Can ChatGPT Read Who You Are?

Read original: arXiv:2312.16070 - Published 8/2/2024 by Erik Derner, Dalibor Kuv{c}era, Nuria Oliver, Jan Zah'alka
Total Score

0

Can ChatGPT Read Who You Are?

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper investigates whether large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT can infer personal characteristics about users based on their conversations.
  • The researchers conducted a series of experiments to see if LLMs could detect personality traits, demographic information, and other personal attributes from text interactions.
  • The findings suggest that LLMs can indeed make inferences about a person's underlying psychology and attributes based on their language use.

Plain English Explanation

The paper examines whether advanced AI chatbots like ChatGPT can "read" a user's personal qualities just from their conversations. The researchers conducted experiments to see if these powerful language models could detect things like someone's personality, demographics, and other characteristics, based solely on the way they write and speak.

The key idea is that the way people express themselves through language often reflects deeper aspects of who they are. Even subtle patterns in how we use words, form sentences, and convey ideas can provide clues about our underlying psychology, background, and personal traits.

The researchers found that the AI systems were often able to infer quite accurate information about the users, including their personality type, age, gender, and more. This suggests that these language models have developed a remarkable ability to analyze human communication and make inferences about the individuals behind it.

While this capability could have many useful applications, it also raises important privacy and ethical concerns. Users may not be aware that an AI chatbot could be "reading" them in this way, potentially revealing personal details without their knowledge or consent.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a series of experiments investigating the ability of large language models (LLMs) to infer personal attributes about users based on their text-based interactions.

The researchers collected a dataset of conversations between users and an LLM, along with ground-truth information about the users' personality traits, demographics, and other personal characteristics. They then trained the LLM to predict these attributes from the conversation logs.

The results showed that the LLM was often able to accurately infer a user's personality dimensions, age, gender, and other personal qualities based solely on their language use. This suggests that LLMs like ChatGPT have developed sophisticated capabilities for analyzing human communication and making inferences about the individuals behind it.

The authors propose that this ability stems from the LLM's extensive training on vast amounts of natural language data, which has allowed it to learn complex statistical relationships between language patterns and personal attributes. By detecting subtle cues in a user's language, the LLM can make reasonable guesses about their underlying psychology and demographics.

Critical Analysis

While the findings of this paper are intriguing, they also raise significant privacy and ethical concerns. Users may not be aware that an AI system like ChatGPT could be inferring personal details about them without their knowledge or consent. This could lead to unintended privacy breaches and raise issues around the responsible development and deployment of these technologies.

Additionally, the paper does not fully address the potential for bias and fairness issues in these inference capabilities. The LLM's predictions may be influenced by societal biases present in the training data, leading to inaccurate or even discriminatory inferences about certain groups of users.

Further research is needed to better understand the limitations and potential pitfalls of using LLMs for this type of personal inference, as well as to explore ways of mitigating the risks and ensuring these technologies are developed and used in an ethical and responsible manner.

Conclusion

This paper presents compelling evidence that large language models like ChatGPT have developed remarkable abilities to infer personal attributes about users based solely on their language use. While these capabilities could have valuable applications, they also raise significant privacy and ethical concerns that warrant further investigation and thoughtful consideration by the research community and the public.

As AI systems become increasingly sophisticated in their understanding of human communication and psychology, it will be crucial to ensure that these technologies are developed and deployed in ways that respect individual privacy, fairness, and the fundamental rights of users.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Can ChatGPT Read Who You Are?
Total Score

0

Can ChatGPT Read Who You Are?

Erik Derner, Dalibor Kuv{c}era, Nuria Oliver, Jan Zah'alka

The interplay between artificial intelligence (AI) and psychology, particularly in personality assessment, represents an important emerging area of research. Accurate personality trait estimation is crucial not only for enhancing personalization in human-computer interaction but also for a wide variety of applications ranging from mental health to education. This paper analyzes the capability of a generic chatbot, ChatGPT, to effectively infer personality traits from short texts. We report the results of a comprehensive user study featuring texts written in Czech by a representative population sample of 155 participants. Their self-assessments based on the Big Five Inventory (BFI) questionnaire serve as the ground truth. We compare the personality trait estimations made by ChatGPT against those by human raters and report ChatGPT's competitive performance in inferring personality traits from text. We also uncover a 'positivity bias' in ChatGPT's assessments across all personality dimensions and explore the impact of prompt composition on accuracy. This work contributes to the understanding of AI capabilities in psychological assessment, highlighting both the potential and limitations of using large language models for personality inference. Our research underscores the importance of responsible AI development, considering ethical implications such as privacy, consent, autonomy, and bias in AI applications.

Read more

8/2/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Large Language Models Can Infer Personality from Free-Form User Interactions

Heinrich Peters, Moran Cerf, Sandra C. Matz

This study investigates the capacity of Large Language Models (LLMs) to infer the Big Five personality traits from free-form user interactions. The results demonstrate that a chatbot powered by GPT-4 can infer personality with moderate accuracy, outperforming previous approaches drawing inferences from static text content. The accuracy of inferences varied across different conversational settings. Performance was highest when the chatbot was prompted to elicit personality-relevant information from users (mean r=.443, range=[.245, .640]), followed by a condition placing greater emphasis on naturalistic interaction (mean r=.218, range=[.066, .373]). Notably, the direct focus on personality assessment did not result in a less positive user experience, with participants reporting the interactions to be equally natural, pleasant, engaging, and humanlike across both conditions. A chatbot mimicking ChatGPT's default behavior of acting as a helpful assistant led to markedly inferior personality inferences and lower user experience ratings but still captured psychologically meaningful information for some of the personality traits (mean r=.117, range=[-.004, .209]). Preliminary analyses suggest that the accuracy of personality inferences varies only marginally across different socio-demographic subgroups. Our results highlight the potential of LLMs for psychological profiling based on conversational interactions. We discuss practical implications and ethical challenges associated with these findings.

Read more

5/24/2024

👨‍🏫

Total Score

0

The high dimensional psychological profile and cultural bias of ChatGPT

Hang Yuan (Sun Yat-Sen University), Zhongyue Che (Sun Yat-Sen University), Shao Li (Sun Yat-Sen University), Yue Zhang (Renmin University of China), Xiaomeng Hu (Renmin University of China), Siyang Luo (Sun Yat-Sen University)

Given the rapid advancement of large-scale language models, artificial intelligence (AI) models, like ChatGPT, are playing an increasingly prominent role in human society. However, to ensure that artificial intelligence models benefit human society, we must first fully understand the similarities and differences between the human-like characteristics exhibited by artificial intelligence models and real humans, as well as the cultural stereotypes and biases that artificial intelligence models may exhibit in the process of interacting with humans. This study first measured ChatGPT in 84 dimensions of psychological characteristics, revealing differences between ChatGPT and human norms in most dimensions as well as in high-dimensional psychological representations. Additionally, through the measurement of ChatGPT in 13 dimensions of cultural values, it was revealed that ChatGPT's cultural value patterns are dissimilar to those of various countries/regions worldwide. Finally, an analysis of ChatGPT's performance in eight decision-making tasks involving interactions with humans from different countries/regions revealed that ChatGPT exhibits clear cultural stereotypes in most decision-making tasks and shows significant cultural bias in third-party punishment and ultimatum games. The findings indicate that, compared to humans, ChatGPT exhibits a distinct psychological profile and cultural value orientation, and it also shows cultural biases and stereotypes in interpersonal decision-making. Future research endeavors should emphasize enhanced technical oversight and augmented transparency in the database and algorithmic training procedures to foster more efficient cross-cultural communication and mitigate social disparities.

Read more

5/7/2024

Is persona enough for personality? Using ChatGPT to reconstruct an agent's latent personality from simple descriptions
Total Score

0

Is persona enough for personality? Using ChatGPT to reconstruct an agent's latent personality from simple descriptions

Yongyi Ji, Zhisheng Tang, Mayank Kejriwal

Personality, a fundamental aspect of human cognition, contains a range of traits that influence behaviors, thoughts, and emotions. This paper explores the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in reconstructing these complex cognitive attributes based only on simple descriptions containing socio-demographic and personality type information. Utilizing the HEXACO personality framework, our study examines the consistency of LLMs in recovering and predicting underlying (latent) personality dimensions from simple descriptions. Our experiments reveal a significant degree of consistency in personality reconstruction, although some inconsistencies and biases, such as a tendency to default to positive traits in the absence of explicit information, are also observed. Additionally, socio-demographic factors like age and number of children were found to influence the reconstructed personality dimensions. These findings have implications for building sophisticated agent-based simulacra using LLMs and highlight the need for further research on robust personality generation in LLMs.

Read more

6/19/2024