Can we say a cat is a cat? Understanding the challenges in annotating physiological signal-based emotion data
2406.14908
0
0
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms, trained on emotion data extracted from physiological signals, provide a promising approach to monitoring emotions, affect, and mental well-being. However, the field encounters challenges because there is a lack of effective methods for collecting high-quality data in everyday settings that genuinely reflect changes in emotion or affect. This paper presents a position discussion on the current technique of annotating physiological signal-based emotion data. Our discourse underscores the importance of adopting a nuanced understanding of annotation processes, paving the way for a more insightful exploration of the intricate relationship between physiological signals and human emotions.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines the challenges in annotating physiological signal-based emotion data, which is crucial for developing effective emotion recognition systems.
- The authors highlight the difficulty of reaching consensus on emotion labels, even for seemingly simple situations, due to the complex and subjective nature of emotions.
- The paper presents a case study where trained annotators struggled to consistently label emotions based on physiological signals, underscoring the need for more robust and reliable annotation methods.
Plain English Explanation
Emotions are complicated and can be difficult to describe, even for experts. This paper looks at the challenge of getting people to agree on how to label emotions based on physiological signals, like heart rate or skin conductance. The authors did a study where they had trained annotators try to label emotions from these signals, but the annotators often disagreed on what emotion was being expressed. This shows that it's not easy to say "this signal means this emotion" - emotions are just too complex and subjective for simple one-to-one mappings. The paper highlights the need for better ways to annotate emotion data, which is crucial for building accurate emotion recognition systems, like those used in AI models for emotion analysis, emotion analysis systems based on EEG, and improving language models for emotion analysis.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a case study that explores the challenges in annotating physiological signal-based emotion data. The authors recruited trained annotators to label emotion categories (e.g., happy, sad, angry) based on physiological signals, such as heart rate and skin conductance, collected from participants. However, the annotators often struggled to reach consensus on the emotion labels, even for seemingly simple situations.
The authors analyzed the annotation data and found significant variability in the labeling, with low inter-rater reliability. They attribute this to the inherent complexity and subjectivity of emotions, which can be influenced by individual differences, context, and the ambiguity of physiological signals. The paper highlights the need for more robust and reliable annotation methods, such as those explored in related work on good and bad emotions in generative AI and uncovering influential factors in emotion classification.
Critical Analysis
The paper raises important concerns about the challenges in annotating physiological signal-based emotion data, which are critical for developing effective emotion recognition systems. The authors' findings suggest that the mapping between physiological signals and emotional states is not as straightforward as often assumed, and that more nuanced and context-aware approaches may be needed.
One potential limitation of the study is the relatively small sample size and the use of a limited set of physiological signals. It would be valuable to replicate the study with a larger and more diverse dataset, as well as explore the use of additional physiological and behavioral measures to capture the multifaceted nature of emotions.
Furthermore, the paper does not delve deeply into the potential sources of the annotation disagreements, such as individual differences in emotional expression and perception, or the influence of cultural and contextual factors. Exploring these aspects in more detail could provide valuable insights for improving annotation methods and designing more robust emotion recognition systems.
Conclusion
This paper highlights the significant challenges in annotating physiological signal-based emotion data, which is a crucial step in developing effective emotion recognition systems. The authors' case study demonstrates the difficulty of reaching consensus on emotion labels, even for seemingly simple situations, due to the inherent complexity and subjectivity of emotions.
The findings underscore the need for more robust and reliable annotation methods, as well as a deeper understanding of the factors that influence emotional expression and perception. Addressing these challenges is essential for advancing the field of emotion recognition and enabling the development of more accurate and socially-aware AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔎
Empathy Detection from Text, Audiovisual, Audio or Physiological Signals: Task Formulations and Machine Learning Methods
Md Rakibul Hasan, Md Zakir Hossain, Shreya Ghosh, Aneesh Krishna, Tom Gedeon
0
0
Empathy indicates an individual's ability to understand others. Over the past few years, empathy has drawn attention from various disciplines, including but not limited to Affective Computing, Cognitive Science and Psychology. Detecting empathy has potential applications in society, healthcare and education. Despite being a broad and overlapping topic, the avenue of empathy detection leveraging Machine Learning remains underexplored from a systematic literature review perspective. We collected 828 papers from 10 well-known databases, systematically screened them and analysed the final 61 papers. Our analyses reveal several prominent task formulations $-$ including empathy on localised utterances or overall expressions, unidirectional or parallel empathy, and emotional contagion $-$ in monadic, dyadic and group interactions. Empathy detection methods are summarised based on four input modalities $-$ text, audiovisual, audio and physiological signals $-$ thereby presenting modality-specific network architecture design protocols. We discuss challenges, research gaps and potential applications in the Affective Computing-based empathy domain, which can facilitate new avenues of exploration. We further enlist the public availability of datasets and codes. We believe that our work is a stepping stone to developing a robust empathy detection system that can be deployed in practice to enhance the overall well-being of human life.
6/27/2024
⛏️
Characterizing Information Seeking Processes with Multiple Physiological Signals
Kaixin Ji, Danula Hettiachchi, Flora D. Salim, Falk Scholer, Damiano Spina
0
0
Information access systems are getting complex, and our understanding of user behavior during information seeking processes is mainly drawn from qualitative methods, such as observational studies or surveys. Leveraging the advances in sensing technologies, our study aims to characterize user behaviors with physiological signals, particularly in relation to cognitive load, affective arousal, and valence. We conduct a controlled lab study with 26 participants, and collect data including Electrodermal Activities, Photoplethysmogram, Electroencephalogram, and Pupillary Responses. This study examines informational search with four stages: the realization of Information Need (IN), Query Formulation (QF), Query Submission (QS), and Relevance Judgment (RJ). We also include different interaction modalities to represent modern systems, e.g., QS by text-typing or verbalizing, and RJ with text or audio information. We analyze the physiological signals across these stages and report outcomes of pairwise non-parametric repeated-measure statistical tests. The results show that participants experience significantly higher cognitive loads at IN with a subtle increase in alertness, while QF requires higher attention. QS involves demanding cognitive loads than QF. Affective responses are more pronounced at RJ than QS or IN, suggesting greater interest and engagement as knowledge gaps are resolved. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that explores user behaviors in a search process employing a more nuanced quantitative analysis of physiological signals. Our findings offer valuable insights into user behavior and emotional responses in information seeking processes. We believe our proposed methodology can inform the characterization of more complex processes, such as conversational information seeking.
5/8/2024
💬
Improving Language Models for Emotion Analysis: Insights from Cognitive Science
Constant Bonard (UNIBE), Gustave Cortal (LMF, LISN)
0
0
We propose leveraging cognitive science research on emotions and communication to improve language models for emotion analysis. First, we present the main emotion theories in psychology and cognitive science. Then, we introduce the main methods of emotion annotation in natural language processing and their connections to psychological theories. We also present the two main types of analyses of emotional communication in cognitive pragmatics. Finally, based on the cognitive science research presented, we propose directions for improving language models for emotion analysis. We suggest that these research efforts pave the way for constructing new annotation schemes and a possible benchmark for emotional understanding, considering different facets of human emotion and communication.
6/18/2024
The Good, The Bad, and Why: Unveiling Emotions in Generative AI
Cheng Li, Jindong Wang, Yixuan Zhang, Kaijie Zhu, Xinyi Wang, Wenxin Hou, Jianxun Lian, Fang Luo, Qiang Yang, Xing Xie
0
0
Emotion significantly impacts our daily behaviors and interactions. While recent generative AI models, such as large language models, have shown impressive performance in various tasks, it remains unclear whether they truly comprehend emotions. This paper aims to address this gap by incorporating psychological theories to gain a holistic understanding of emotions in generative AI models. Specifically, we propose three approaches: 1) EmotionPrompt to enhance AI model performance, 2) EmotionAttack to impair AI model performance, and 3) EmotionDecode to explain the effects of emotional stimuli, both benign and malignant. Through extensive experiments involving language and multi-modal models on semantic understanding, logical reasoning, and generation tasks, we demonstrate that both textual and visual EmotionPrompt can boost the performance of AI models while EmotionAttack can hinder it. Additionally, EmotionDecode reveals that AI models can comprehend emotional stimuli akin to the mechanism of dopamine in the human brain. Our work heralds a novel avenue for exploring psychology to enhance our understanding of generative AI models.
6/10/2024