Causality for Earth Science -- A Review on Time-series and Spatiotemporal Causality Methods

Read original: arXiv:2404.05746 - Published 9/4/2024 by Sahara Ali, Uzma Hasan, Xingyan Li, Omar Faruque, Akila Sampath, Yiyi Huang, Md Osman Gani, Jianwu Wang
Total Score

0

Causality for Earth Science -- A Review on Time-series and Spatiotemporal Causality Methods

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper provides a comprehensive review of time-series and spatiotemporal causality methods for Earth science applications.
  • It highlights open challenges in causality-based Earth science studies and discusses the latest advancements in causal discovery, time-series causal modeling, and spatiotemporal causal inference.
  • The paper covers key methodologies and their applications in areas like climate, hydrology, and ecology, and identifies future research directions.

Plain English Explanation

This research paper examines different ways of understanding cause-and-effect relationships in Earth science data, such as weather patterns, water resources, and ecological systems. Establishing causal links is important for making accurate predictions and understanding complex environmental processes.

The paper first discusses the unique challenges involved in studying causality in Earth science data, which can be highly complex, interdependent, and span both time and space. It then reviews several advanced statistical and machine learning techniques that have been developed to uncover causal relationships from time-series data (e.g., time-series causal modeling) and spatiotemporal data (e.g., spatiotemporal causal inference).

These causal discovery methods can be applied to a wide range of Earth science problems, such as understanding the drivers of climate change, predicting extreme weather events, managing water resources, and modeling ecosystem dynamics. By identifying the underlying causal mechanisms, researchers can develop more reliable predictive models and gain deeper insights into the workings of the Earth system.

The paper also highlights emerging areas of research, such as using causal reasoning for computational storytelling of events and incorporating causal knowledge into deep learning models for spatiotemporal prediction. Overall, the review provides a valuable resource for Earth scientists seeking to leverage causal analysis to better understand and manage our complex planet.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by discussing the importance of causality in Earth science research, where untangling the complex relationships between various environmental factors is crucial for making accurate predictions and gaining deeper insights. However, the authors note that establishing causal links in Earth science data is particularly challenging due to the inherent complexity, interdependence, and spatiotemporal nature of the data.

To address these challenges, the paper reviews the latest advancements in causal discovery methods, time-series causal modeling, and spatiotemporal causal inference. For causal discovery, the authors discuss techniques like Granger causality, directed acyclic graphs, and reinforcement learning-based approaches, highlighting their strengths and limitations in capturing both linear and nonlinear causal relationships.

In the time-series causal modeling section, the paper examines methods such as vector autoregressive models, structural equation models, and time-series causal neural networks, which can uncover temporal causal dependencies in Earth science data. The authors also discuss the use of deep learning for analyzing satellite image time series and extracting spatiotemporal causal insights.

Additionally, the paper reviews emerging research areas, such as using causal reasoning for computational storytelling of environmental events and incorporating causal knowledge into deep learning models for spatiotemporal prediction, demonstrating the diverse applications of causal analysis in Earth science.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive and up-to-date review of causal discovery and modeling methods in the context of Earth science research. The authors acknowledge the unique challenges posed by the complexity and spatiotemporal nature of Earth science data, and they effectively highlight the importance of developing robust causal analysis techniques to address these challenges.

One potential limitation of the review is that it does not delve deeply into the specific assumptions, strengths, and weaknesses of each causal analysis method. While the authors provide a good overview, readers may benefit from a more detailed discussion of the trade-offs and appropriate applications of the various approaches.

Additionally, the paper could have explored the integration of causal analysis with other data science techniques, such as GIS-based modeling, to further enhance the understanding and prediction of Earth system processes. Integrating causal reasoning with spatial analysis and visualization could lead to more powerful and interpretable models.

Overall, this paper serves as a valuable resource for Earth scientists interested in leveraging causal analysis to advance their research. The authors have done an excellent job in highlighting the current state of the art and identifying promising future research directions in this important field.

Conclusion

This review paper provides a comprehensive overview of the latest advancements in time-series and spatiotemporal causality methods for Earth science applications. The authors highlight the unique challenges involved in studying causality in complex, interdependent, and spatiotemporal Earth science data, and they discuss a range of causal discovery, time-series causal modeling, and spatiotemporal causal inference techniques that have been developed to address these challenges.

The paper covers the key methodologies and their applications in areas like climate, hydrology, and ecology, demonstrating the value of causal analysis for improving our understanding and management of the Earth system. The authors also identify emerging research directions, such as using causal reasoning for computational storytelling and incorporating causal knowledge into deep learning models for spatiotemporal prediction.

Overall, this review serves as a valuable resource for Earth scientists and data analysts seeking to leverage causal analysis to gain deeper insights and make more accurate predictions about the processes shaping our planet. By understanding the underlying causal mechanisms, researchers can develop more reliable models and make more informed decisions to address critical environmental challenges.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Causality for Earth Science -- A Review on Time-series and Spatiotemporal Causality Methods
Total Score

0

Causality for Earth Science -- A Review on Time-series and Spatiotemporal Causality Methods

Sahara Ali, Uzma Hasan, Xingyan Li, Omar Faruque, Akila Sampath, Yiyi Huang, Md Osman Gani, Jianwu Wang

This survey paper covers the breadth and depth of time-series and spatiotemporal causality methods, and their applications in Earth Science. More specifically, the paper presents an overview of causal discovery and causal inference, explains the underlying causal assumptions, and enlists evaluation techniques and key terminologies of the domain area. The paper elicits the various state-of-the-art methods introduced for time-series and spatiotemporal causal analysis along with their strengths and limitations. The paper further describes the existing applications of several methods for answering specific Earth Science questions such as extreme weather events, sea level rise, teleconnections etc. This survey paper can serve as a primer for Data Science researchers interested in data-driven causal study as we share a list of resources, such as Earth Science datasets (synthetic, simulated and observational data) and open source tools for causal analysis. It will equally benefit the Earth Science community interested in taking an AI-driven approach to study the causality of different dynamic and thermodynamic processes as we present the open challenges and opportunities in performing causality-based Earth Science study.

Read more

9/4/2024

Total Score

0

A case study of spatiotemporal forecasting techniques for weather forecasting

Shakir Showkat Sofi, Ivan Oseledets

The majority of real-world processes are spatiotemporal, and the data generated by them exhibits both spatial and temporal evolution. Weather is one of the most essential processes in this domain, and weather forecasting has become a crucial part of our daily routine. Weather data analysis is considered the most complex and challenging task. Although numerical weather prediction models are currently state-of-the-art, they are resource-intensive and time-consuming. Numerous studies have proposed time series-based models as a viable alternative to numerical forecasts. Recent research in the area of time series analysis indicates significant advancements, particularly regarding the use of state-space-based models (white box) and, more recently, the integration of machine learning and deep neural network-based models (black box). The most famous examples of such models are RNNs and transformers. These models have demonstrated remarkable results in the field of time-series analysis and have demonstrated effectiveness in modelling temporal correlations. It is crucial to capture both temporal and spatial correlations for a spatiotemporal process, as the values at nearby locations and time affect the values of a spatiotemporal process at a specific point. This self-contained paper explores various regional data-driven weather forecasting methods, i.e., forecasting over multiple latitude-longitude points (matrix-shaped spatial grid) to capture spatiotemporal correlations. The results showed that spatiotemporal prediction models reduced computational costs while improving accuracy. In particular, the proposed tensor train dynamic mode decomposition-based forecasting model has comparable accuracy to the state-of-the-art models without the need for training. We provide convincing numerical experiments to show that the proposed approach is practical.

Read more

6/11/2024

Total Score

0

A Survey on Exploratory Spatiotemporal Visual Analytics Approaches for Climate Science

Abdullah-Al-Raihan Nayeem, Dongyun Han, Huikyo Lee, Donghoon Kim, Daniel Feldman, William J. Tolone, Daniel Crichton, Isaac Cho

Climate science produces a wealth of complex, high-dimensional, multivariate data from observations and numerical models. These data are critical for understanding climate changes and their socioeconomic impacts. Climate scientists are continuously evaluating output from numerical models against observations. This model evaluation process provides useful guidance to improve the numerical models and subsequent climate projections. Exploratory visual analytics systems possess the potential to significantly reduce the burden on scientists for traditional spatiotemporal analyses. In addition, technology and infrastructure advancements are further facilitating broader access to climate data. Climate scientists today can access climate data in distributed analytic environments and render exploratory visualizations for analyses. Efforts are ongoing to optimize the computational efficiency of spatiotemporal analyses to enable efficient exploration of massive data. These advances present further opportunities for the visualization community to innovate over the full landscape of challenges and requirements raised by scientists. In this report, we provide a comprehensive review of the challenges, requirements, and current approaches for exploratory spatiotemporal visual analytics solutions for climate data. We categorize the visual analytic techniques, systems, and tools presented in the relevant literature based on task requirements, data sources, statistical techniques, interaction methods, visualization techniques, performance evaluation methods, and application domains. Moreover, our analytic review identifies trends, limitations, and key challenges in visual analysis. This report will advance future research activities in climate visualizations and enables the end-users of climate data to identify effective climate change mitigation strategies.

Read more

8/1/2024

Causality-Aware Spatiotemporal Graph Neural Networks for Spatiotemporal Time Series Imputation
Total Score

0

Causality-Aware Spatiotemporal Graph Neural Networks for Spatiotemporal Time Series Imputation

Baoyu Jing, Dawei Zhou, Kan Ren, Carl Yang

Spatiotemporal time series are usually collected via monitoring sensors placed at different locations, which usually contain missing values due to various failures, such as mechanical damages and Internet outages. Imputing the missing values is crucial for analyzing time series. When recovering a specific data point, most existing methods consider all the information relevant to that point regardless of the cause-and-effect relationship. During data collection, it is inevitable that some unknown confounders are included, e.g., background noise in time series and non-causal shortcut edges in the constructed sensor network. These confounders could open backdoor paths and establish non-causal correlations between the input and output. Over-exploiting these non-causal correlations could cause overfitting. In this paper, we first revisit spatiotemporal time series imputation from a causal perspective and show how to block the confounders via the frontdoor adjustment. Based on the results of frontdoor adjustment, we introduce a novel Causality-Aware Spatiotemporal Graph Neural Network (Casper), which contains a novel Prompt Based Decoder (PBD) and a Spatiotemporal Causal Attention (SCA). PBD could reduce the impact of confounders and SCA could discover the sparse causal relationships among embeddings. Theoretical analysis reveals that SCA discovers causal relationships based on the values of gradients. We evaluate Casper on three real-world datasets, and the experimental results show that Casper could outperform the baselines and could effectively discover causal relationships.

Read more

8/29/2024