Centralized vs. Decentralized Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Enhanced Control of Electric Vehicle Charging Networks
2404.12520
0
0
Abstract
The widespread adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) poses several challenges to power distribution networks and smart grid infrastructure due to the possibility of significantly increasing electricity demands, especially during peak hours. Furthermore, when EVs participate in demand-side management programs, charging expenses can be reduced by using optimal charging control policies that fully utilize real-time pricing schemes. However, devising optimal charging methods and control strategies for EVs is challenging due to various stochastic and uncertain environmental factors. Currently, most EV charging controllers operate based on a centralized model. In this paper, we introduce a novel approach for distributed and cooperative charging strategy using a Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) framework. Our method is built upon the Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG) algorithm for a group of EVs in a residential community, where all EVs are connected to a shared transformer. This method, referred to as CTDE-DDPG, adopts a Centralized Training Decentralized Execution (CTDE) approach to establish cooperation between agents during the training phase, while ensuring a distributed and privacy-preserving operation during execution. We theoretically examine the performance of centralized and decentralized critics for the DDPG-based MARL implementation and demonstrate their trade-offs. Furthermore, we numerically explore the efficiency, scalability, and performance of centralized and decentralized critics. Our theoretical and numerical results indicate that, despite higher policy gradient variances and training complexity, the CTDE-DDPG framework significantly improves charging efficiency by reducing total variation by approximately %36 and charging cost by around %9.1 on average...
Create account to get full access
Related Work
The paper discusses several related research efforts in the area of multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) for controlling electric vehicle (EV) charging networks. Specifically, it mentions Energaize: Multi-Agent Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient for Scalable and Robust EV Charging Optimization, which used a centralized MARL approach, and Real-Time Control of Electric Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand Systems, which employed a decentralized MARL framework. The paper also cites Understanding the Impact of Coalitions Between EV Charging Stations, Distributed Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning-based Graph, and Multi-Agent Soft Actor-Critic with Global Loss as related work in the field of MARL for EV charging control.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores the use of centralized and decentralized approaches to multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) for controlling and optimizing electric vehicle (EV) charging networks. In a centralized MARL system, a single, overarching controller coordinates the actions of all the charging stations, while in a decentralized approach, each charging station independently makes decisions based on its own observations and interactions with the network.
The key idea is to leverage MARL techniques to enable charging stations to learn and adapt their charging strategies over time, with the goal of improving overall network efficiency, minimizing costs, and ensuring reliable and equitable service for EV drivers. By comparing centralized and decentralized approaches, the researchers aim to understand the tradeoffs between these two paradigms and identify the most effective way to deploy MARL for EV charging control.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a comparative analysis of centralized and decentralized MARL approaches for EV charging control. In the centralized approach, a single agent (the "Centralized Controller") observes the state of the entire network and coordinates the actions of all the charging stations. This allows the controller to make globally optimal decisions, but it also introduces complexity and potential vulnerabilities.
In contrast, the decentralized approach relies on each charging station acting as an independent agent, making decisions based on its own local observations and interactions. This distributes the decision-making process and can make the system more scalable and resilient, but it may result in suboptimal global performance.
The researchers use a simulation-based evaluation to compare the performance of the centralized and decentralized MARL approaches across various metrics, including charging efficiency, cost, and fairness. They also analyze the computational complexity and communication requirements of the two approaches.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-designed comparison of centralized and decentralized MARL approaches for EV charging control. The authors acknowledge several limitations and areas for further research, such as the need to consider more realistic scenarios, incorporate uncertainty and dynamic pricing, and explore hybrid approaches that combine the strengths of both centralized and decentralized frameworks.
One potential concern is the reliance on simulation-based evaluation, which may not fully capture the complexities and real-world challenges of deploying MARL systems in actual EV charging networks. Additional field trials and experiments would be valuable to validate the findings and assess the practical feasibility of the proposed approaches.
Furthermore, the paper does not delve deeply into the specific MARL algorithms and techniques employed, which may limit the ability to generalize the insights to other MARL-based EV charging control systems. A more detailed discussion of the algorithmic choices and their implications would strengthen the technical contribution of the work.
Conclusion
This paper offers a comprehensive comparison of centralized and decentralized MARL approaches for controlling and optimizing EV charging networks. The findings highlight the tradeoffs between these two paradigms, providing valuable insights for researchers and practitioners working on developing intelligent and efficient EV charging systems. The research contributes to the growing body of knowledge in the field of MARL and its application to the complex problem of EV charging control, with potential implications for improving the sustainability and reliability of electric transportation infrastructure.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Decentralized Collaborative Pricing and Shunting for Multiple EV Charging Stations Based on Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Tianhao Bu, Hang Li, Guojie Li
0
0
The extraordinary electric vehicle (EV) popularization in the recent years has facilitated research studies in alleviating EV energy charging demand. Previous studies primarily focused on the optimizations over charging stations (CS) profit and EV users cost savings through charge/discharge scheduling events. In this work, the random behaviors of EVs are considered, with EV users preferences over multi-CS characteristics modelled to imitate the potential CS selection disequilibrium. A price scheduling strategy under decentralized collaborative framework is proposed to achieve EV shunting in a multi-CS environment, while minimizing the charging cost through multi agent reinforcement learning. The proposed problem is formulated as a Markov Decision Process (MDP) with uncertain transition probability.
6/18/2024
Decentralized Coordination of Distributed Energy Resources through Local Energy Markets and Deep Reinforcement Learning
Daniel May, Matthew Taylor, Petr Musilek
0
0
As the energy landscape evolves toward sustainability, the accelerating integration of distributed energy resources poses challenges to the operability and reliability of the electricity grid. One significant aspect of this issue is the notable increase in net load variability at the grid edge. Transactive energy, implemented through local energy markets, has recently garnered attention as a promising solution to address the grid challenges in the form of decentralized, indirect demand response on a community level. Given the nature of these challenges, model-free control approaches, such as deep reinforcement learning, show promise for the decentralized automation of participation within this context. Existing studies at the intersection of transactive energy and model-free control primarily focus on socioeconomic and self-consumption metrics, overlooking the crucial goal of reducing community-level net load variability. This study addresses this gap by training a set of deep reinforcement learning agents to automate end-user participation in ALEX, an economy-driven local energy market. In this setting, agents do not share information and only prioritize individual bill optimization. The study unveils a clear correlation between bill reduction and reduced net load variability in this setup. The impact on net load variability is assessed over various time horizons using metrics such as ramping rate, daily and monthly load factor, as well as daily average and total peak export and import on an open-source dataset. Agents are then benchmarked against several baselines, with their performance levels showing promising results, approaching those of a near-optimal dynamic programming benchmark.
4/23/2024
Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Energy Networks: Computational Challenges, Progress and Open Problems
Sarah Keren, Chaimaa Essayeh, Stefano V. Albrecht, Thomas Morstyn
0
0
The rapidly changing architecture and functionality of electrical networks and the increasing penetration of renewable and distributed energy resources have resulted in various technological and managerial challenges. These have rendered traditional centralized energy-market paradigms insufficient due to their inability to support the dynamic and evolving nature of the network. This survey explores how multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) can support the decentralization and decarbonization of energy networks and mitigate the associated challenges. This is achieved by specifying key computational challenges in managing energy networks, reviewing recent research progress on addressing them, and highlighting open challenges that may be addressed using MARL.
5/28/2024
🏅
(A Partial Survey of) Decentralized, Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Christopher Amato
0
0
Multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) has exploded in popularity in recent years. Many approaches have been developed but they can be divided into three main types: centralized training and execution (CTE), centralized training for decentralized execution (CTDE), and Decentralized training and execution (DTE).Decentralized training and execution methods make the fewest assumptions and are often simple to implement. In fact, as I'll discuss, any single-agent RL method can be used for DTE by just letting each agent learn separately. Of course, there are pros and cons to such approaches as I discuss below. It is worth noting that DTE is required if no offline coordination is available. That is, if all agents must learn during online interactions without prior coordination, learning and execution must both be decentralized. DTE methods can be applied in cooperative, competitive, or mixed cases but this text will focus on the cooperative MARL case. In this text, I will first give a brief description of the cooperative MARL problem in the form of the Dec-POMDP. Then, I will discuss value-based DTE methods starting with independent Q-learning and its extensions and then discuss the extension to the deep case with DQN, the additional complications this causes, and methods that have been developed to (attempt to) address these issues. Next, I will discuss policy gradient DTE methods starting with independent REINFORCE (i.e., vanilla policy gradient), and then extending to the actor-critic case and deep variants (such as independent PPO). Finally, I will discuss some general topics related to DTE and future directions.
5/24/2024