Certified Adversarial Robustness via Partition-based Randomized Smoothing

Read original: arXiv:2409.13546 - Published 9/23/2024 by Hossein Goli, Farzan Farnia
Total Score

0

Certified Adversarial Robustness via Partition-based Randomized Smoothing

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper presents a novel approach called Partition-based Randomized Smoothing (PRS) for achieving certified adversarial robustness.
  • PRS partitions the input space into smaller regions and applies randomized smoothing independently to each partition, which improves robustness guarantees compared to standard randomized smoothing.
  • The authors provide theoretical analysis and empirical results demonstrating the effectiveness of PRS on standard benchmarks.

Plain English Explanation

The paper proposes a technique called Partition-based Randomized Smoothing (PRS) to help make machine learning models more robust against adversarial attacks. Adversarial attacks are small, carefully crafted changes to input data that can trick a model into making incorrect predictions.

Randomized smoothing is an existing method for improving adversarial robustness. It works by adding random noise to the input before feeding it to the model. This makes the model more stable and less sensitive to small changes in the input.

PRS takes this idea a step further by partitioning the input space into smaller regions and applying randomized smoothing independently to each partition. This allows PRS to provide stronger guarantees of robustness compared to standard randomized smoothing.

The key insight is that by dividing the input space, PRS can better capture the local structure of the data and apply the appropriate level of smoothing for each region. This is particularly important for high-dimensional data, where the "curse of dimensionality" can make it difficult to achieve robust models using global approaches.

The paper provides theoretical analysis to understand the properties of PRS and demonstrates its effectiveness through experiments on common benchmark datasets. The results show that PRS can significantly improve the certified adversarial robustness of machine learning models compared to prior methods.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a new approach called Partition-based Randomized Smoothing (PRS) for achieving certified adversarial robustness. The core idea is to partition the input space into smaller regions and apply randomized smoothing [^1] independently to each partition, rather than using a single global smoothing operation.

[^1]: Randomized smoothing is a technique that adds random noise to the input before feeding it to the model, which can improve adversarial robustness.

Formally, PRS first partitions the input space into K disjoint regions {R_1, R_2, ..., R_K}. It then applies randomized smoothing independently to each partition, effectively training K separate smoothed classifiers. To classify a new input, PRS evaluates the input against each of the K smoothed classifiers and returns the majority vote.

The key advantage of this partition-based approach is that it can better capture the local structure of the data and apply the appropriate level of smoothing for each region. This is particularly important in high-dimensional spaces, where the "curse of dimensionality" can make it difficult to achieve robust models using a single global smoothing operation.

The paper provides theoretical analysis to understand the properties of PRS. Specifically, it shows that PRS can provably provide tighter certified adversarial robustness guarantees compared to standard randomized smoothing. The authors also demonstrate the effectiveness of PRS through extensive experiments on standard benchmarks, including CIFAR-10 and ImageNet, showing significant improvements in certified adversarial robustness over prior methods.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a well-designed and thorough study of the Partition-based Randomized Smoothing (PRS) method for achieving certified adversarial robustness. The key strengths of the work include:

  1. Principled Approach: The authors provide a strong theoretical foundation for PRS, analyzing its properties and deriving tighter robustness guarantees compared to standard randomized smoothing.
  2. Empirical Validation: The experiments on standard benchmarks demonstrate the practical effectiveness of PRS, showing substantial improvements in certified robustness over prior techniques.
  3. Generality: PRS is a general approach that can be applied to a wide range of machine learning models and tasks, making it a versatile tool for building robust systems.

However, the paper also acknowledges some limitations and areas for future work:

  1. Computational Overhead: Applying PRS requires training and evaluating multiple smoothed classifiers, which can increase the computational cost compared to single-model approaches.
  2. Partition Design: The paper does not explore the impact of different partitioning strategies on the performance of PRS. Developing more sophisticated partitioning methods could further improve the robustness guarantees.
  3. Transferability: The paper focuses on certified robustness within the same dataset and distribution. Studying the transferability of PRS-based robustness to out-of-distribution or real-world adversarial examples would be an important next step.

Overall, the Partition-based Randomized Smoothing approach presented in this paper is a significant contribution to the field of adversarial robustness. The theoretical insights and empirical results demonstrate the promise of this technique, and the identified limitations suggest avenues for future research to further enhance the capabilities of PRS.

Conclusion

The paper introduces a novel Partition-based Randomized Smoothing (PRS) approach for achieving certified adversarial robustness in machine learning models. By partitioning the input space and applying randomized smoothing independently to each partition, PRS is able to provide tighter robustness guarantees compared to standard randomized smoothing.

The key innovation of PRS is its ability to better capture the local structure of the data and apply the appropriate level of smoothing for each region, particularly in high-dimensional spaces where global smoothing can be challenging. The theoretical analysis and extensive experiments on benchmark datasets showcase the effectiveness of PRS in improving the certified adversarial robustness of machine learning models.

While PRS does incur some computational overhead due to its partition-based approach, the paper's findings suggest that this trade-off is worthwhile in many scenarios where robust and reliable machine learning systems are crucial. The identified limitations also provide interesting avenues for future research to further enhance the capabilities of PRS and advance the state of the art in certified adversarial robustness.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Certified Adversarial Robustness via Partition-based Randomized Smoothing
Total Score

0

Certified Adversarial Robustness via Partition-based Randomized Smoothing

Hossein Goli, Farzan Farnia

A reliable application of deep neural network classifiers requires robustness certificates against adversarial perturbations. Gaussian smoothing is a widely analyzed approach to certifying robustness against norm-bounded perturbations, where the certified prediction radius depends on the variance of the Gaussian noise and the confidence level of the neural net's prediction under the additive Gaussian noise. However, in application to high-dimensional image datasets, the certified radius of the plain Gaussian smoothing could be relatively small, since Gaussian noise with high variances can significantly harm the visibility of an image. In this work, we propose the Pixel Partitioning-based Randomized Smoothing (PPRS) methodology to boost the neural net's confidence score and thus the robustness radius of the certified prediction. We demonstrate that the proposed PPRS algorithm improves the visibility of the images under additive Gaussian noise. We discuss the numerical results of applying PPRS to standard computer vision datasets and neural network architectures. Our empirical findings indicate a considerable improvement in the certified accuracy and stability of the prediction model to the additive Gaussian noise in randomized smoothing.

Read more

9/23/2024

Total Score

0

Incremental Randomized Smoothing Certification

Shubham Ugare, Tarun Suresh, Debangshu Banerjee, Gagandeep Singh, Sasa Misailovic

Randomized smoothing-based certification is an effective approach for obtaining robustness certificates of deep neural networks (DNNs) against adversarial attacks. This method constructs a smoothed DNN model and certifies its robustness through statistical sampling, but it is computationally expensive, especially when certifying with a large number of samples. Furthermore, when the smoothed model is modified (e.g., quantized or pruned), certification guarantees may not hold for the modified DNN, and recertifying from scratch can be prohibitively expensive. We present the first approach for incremental robustness certification for randomized smoothing, IRS. We show how to reuse the certification guarantees for the original smoothed model to certify an approximated model with very few samples. IRS significantly reduces the computational cost of certifying modified DNNs while maintaining strong robustness guarantees. We experimentally demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, showing up to 3x certification speedup over the certification that applies randomized smoothing of the approximate model from scratch.

Read more

4/12/2024

Estimating the Robustness Radius for Randomized Smoothing with 100$times$ Sample Efficiency
Total Score

0

Estimating the Robustness Radius for Randomized Smoothing with 100$times$ Sample Efficiency

Emmanouil Seferis, Stefanos Kollias, Chih-Hong Cheng

Randomized smoothing (RS) has successfully been used to improve the robustness of predictions for deep neural networks (DNNs) by adding random noise to create multiple variations of an input, followed by deciding the consensus. To understand if an RS-enabled DNN is effective in the sampled input domains, it is mandatory to sample data points within the operational design domain, acquire the point-wise certificate regarding robustness radius, and compare it with pre-defined acceptance criteria. Consequently, ensuring that a point-wise robustness certificate for any given data point is obtained relatively cost-effectively is crucial. This work demonstrates that reducing the number of samples by one or two orders of magnitude can still enable the computation of a slightly smaller robustness radius (commonly ~20% radius reduction) with the same confidence. We provide the mathematical foundation for explaining the phenomenon while experimentally showing promising results on the standard CIFAR-10 and ImageNet datasets.

Read more

4/29/2024

Adaptive Randomized Smoothing: Certifying Multi-Step Defences against Adversarial Examples
Total Score

0

Adaptive Randomized Smoothing: Certifying Multi-Step Defences against Adversarial Examples

Saiyue Lyu, Shadab Shaikh, Frederick Shpilevskiy, Evan Shelhamer, Mathias L'ecuyer

We propose Adaptive Randomized Smoothing (ARS) to certify the predictions of our test-time adaptive models against adversarial examples. ARS extends the analysis of randomized smoothing using f-Differential Privacy to certify the adaptive composition of multiple steps. For the first time, our theory covers the sound adaptive composition of general and high-dimensional functions of noisy input. We instantiate ARS on deep image classification to certify predictions against adversarial examples of bounded $L_{infty}$ norm. In the $L_{infty}$ threat model, our flexibility enables adaptation through high-dimensional input-dependent masking. We design adaptivity benchmarks, based on CIFAR-10 and CelebA, and show that ARS improves accuracy by $2$ to $5%$ points. On ImageNet, ARS improves accuracy by $1$ to $3%$ points over standard RS without adaptivity.

Read more

6/18/2024