Certifying Adapters: Enabling and Enhancing the Certification of Classifier Adversarial Robustness

2405.16036

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 5/28/2024 by Jieren Deng, Hanbin Hong, Aaron Palmer, Xin Zhou, Jinbo Bi, Kaleel Mahmood, Yuan Hong, Derek Aguiar
Certifying Adapters: Enabling and Enhancing the Certification of Classifier Adversarial Robustness

Abstract

Randomized smoothing has become a leading method for achieving certified robustness in deep classifiers against l_{p}-norm adversarial perturbations. Current approaches for achieving certified robustness, such as data augmentation with Gaussian noise and adversarial training, require expensive training procedures that tune large models for different Gaussian noise levels and thus cannot leverage high-performance pre-trained neural networks. In this work, we introduce a novel certifying adapters framework (CAF) that enables and enhances the certification of classifier adversarial robustness. Our approach makes few assumptions about the underlying training algorithm or feature extractor and is thus broadly applicable to different feature extractor architectures (e.g., convolutional neural networks or vision transformers) and smoothing algorithms. We show that CAF (a) enables certification in uncertified models pre-trained on clean datasets and (b) substantially improves the performance of certified classifiers via randomized smoothing and SmoothAdv at multiple radii in CIFAR-10 and ImageNet. We demonstrate that CAF achieves improved certified accuracies when compared to methods based on random or denoised smoothing, and that CAF is insensitive to certifying adapter hyperparameters. Finally, we show that an ensemble of adapters enables a single pre-trained feature extractor to defend against a range of noise perturbation scales.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces "Certifying Adapters", a novel approach for enabling and enhancing the certification of adversarial robustness in machine learning classifiers.
  • The key idea is to use a separate "adapter" module that can be certified for robustness, which can then be combined with any base classifier to provide certified robustness.
  • The authors demonstrate that Certifying Adapters can improve the accuracy-robustness tradeoff compared to prior methods, and can be used to enhance the certification of existing classifiers.

Plain English Explanation

Certifying Adapters is a new technique that helps make machine learning models more robust to adversarial attacks - attempts by an attacker to deliberately fool the model into making incorrect predictions. The core idea is to have a separate "adapter" module that can be specially trained and certified to be robust. This adapter can then be combined with any base classifier model to provide certified robustness, without having to re-train or modify the base model itself.

This is useful because it can be very challenging to make machine learning models robust, as this often involves a tradeoff with the model's overall accuracy. By separating the robust adapter from the base classifier, the authors show that it's possible to achieve better accuracy-robustness tradeoffs compared to prior methods. The adapter can also be used to enhance the robustness of existing classifiers, without having to start from scratch.

The key advantage of Certifying Adapters is that it provides a modular and flexible approach to building robust machine learning systems. Rather than having to re-engineer an entire classifier to make it robust, developers can simply plug in a pre-trained and certified adapter module. This makes it easier to develop and deploy robust AI models in real-world applications.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces the concept of "Certifying Adapters" - a separate neural network module that can be trained and certified to provide adversarial robustness, which can then be combined with any base classifier model. The authors demonstrate that this approach can outperform prior methods for improving the accuracy-robustness tradeoff, and can also be used to enhance the certification of existing classifiers.

The key technical components are:

  1. Adapter Architecture: The adapter is a small neural network module that is inserted between the input and the base classifier. It is designed to be easy to train and certify for robustness.

  2. Certification Procedure: The authors develop a new certification method that can efficiently compute tight bounds on the adversarial robustness of the adapter module, using tools like Incremental Randomized Smoothing Certification and Certified PeFT-Smoothing.

  3. Training Procedure: The adapter is trained using a combination of adversarial training and certified training to maximize its certified robustness.

  4. Composition with Base Classifiers: The certified adapter can be easily composed with any base classifier model to provide certified robustness, without modifying the base model.

The experimental results show that Certifying Adapters can improve the accuracy-robustness tradeoff compared to prior methods like Improving the Accuracy-Robustness Tradeoff for Classifiers. The authors also demonstrate how Certifying Adapters can be used to enhance the certification of existing classifiers.

Critical Analysis

The Certifying Adapters approach represents an important advance in building robust and certifiable machine learning systems. By separating the robust adapter from the base classifier, the authors have introduced a modular and flexible way to achieve certified robustness without having to re-engineer entire models.

However, the paper does not address the scalability of the certification process, which can be computationally intensive, especially for larger models. Additionally, the performance of the Certifying Adapters approach may be sensitive to the specific base classifier being used, and further research may be needed to understand the interaction between the adapter and different types of classifiers.

Another potential limitation is that the Certifying Adapters approach assumes the availability of a base classifier model that is already reasonably accurate. In scenarios where the base classifier has very poor performance, the benefits of the Certifying Adapters approach may be limited.

Overall, the Certifying Adapters paper represents an important step forward in the field of adversarial robustness, and the ideas presented could have significant implications for the development of reliable and trustworthy AI systems.

Conclusion

The "Certifying Adapters" paper introduces a novel approach for enabling and enhancing the certification of adversarial robustness in machine learning classifiers. By using a separate adapter module that can be certified for robustness, the authors demonstrate that it is possible to achieve better accuracy-robustness tradeoffs compared to prior methods, and to improve the certification of existing classifiers.

This modular and flexible approach to building robust AI systems has the potential to greatly simplify the development and deployment of reliable machine learning models in real-world applications. While the paper identifies some limitations and areas for further research, the Certifying Adapters concept represents an important advancement in the field of adversarial robustness, and could have significant implications for the future of trustworthy AI.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

🖼️

Improving the Accuracy-Robustness Trade-Off of Classifiers via Adaptive Smoothing

Yatong Bai, Brendon G. Anderson, Aerin Kim, Somayeh Sojoudi

YC

0

Reddit

0

While prior research has proposed a plethora of methods that build neural classifiers robust against adversarial robustness, practitioners are still reluctant to adopt them due to their unacceptably severe clean accuracy penalties. This paper significantly alleviates this accuracy-robustness trade-off by mixing the output probabilities of a standard classifier and a robust classifier, where the standard network is optimized for clean accuracy and is not robust in general. We show that the robust base classifier's confidence difference for correct and incorrect examples is the key to this improvement. In addition to providing intuitions and empirical evidence, we theoretically certify the robustness of the mixed classifier under realistic assumptions. Furthermore, we adapt an adversarial input detector into a mixing network that adaptively adjusts the mixture of the two base models, further reducing the accuracy penalty of achieving robustness. The proposed flexible method, termed adaptive smoothing, can work in conjunction with existing or even future methods that improve clean accuracy, robustness, or adversary detection. Our empirical evaluation considers strong attack methods, including AutoAttack and adaptive attack. On the CIFAR-100 dataset, our method achieves an 85.21% clean accuracy while maintaining a 38.72% $ell_infty$-AutoAttacked ($epsilon = 8/255$) accuracy, becoming the second most robust method on the RobustBench CIFAR-100 benchmark as of submission, while improving the clean accuracy by ten percentage points compared with all listed models. The code that implements our method is available at https://github.com/Bai-YT/AdaptiveSmoothing.

Read more

4/10/2024

Certified Adversarial Robustness of Machine Learning-based Malware Detectors via (De)Randomized Smoothing

Certified Adversarial Robustness of Machine Learning-based Malware Detectors via (De)Randomized Smoothing

Daniel Gibert, Luca Demetrio, Giulio Zizzo, Quan Le, Jordi Planes, Battista Biggio

YC

0

Reddit

0

Deep learning-based malware detection systems are vulnerable to adversarial EXEmples - carefully-crafted malicious programs that evade detection with minimal perturbation. As such, the community is dedicating effort to develop mechanisms to defend against adversarial EXEmples. However, current randomized smoothing-based defenses are still vulnerable to attacks that inject blocks of adversarial content. In this paper, we introduce a certifiable defense against patch attacks that guarantees, for a given executable and an adversarial patch size, no adversarial EXEmple exist. Our method is inspired by (de)randomized smoothing which provides deterministic robustness certificates. During training, a base classifier is trained using subsets of continguous bytes. At inference time, our defense splits the executable into non-overlapping chunks, classifies each chunk independently, and computes the final prediction through majority voting to minimize the influence of injected content. Furthermore, we introduce a preprocessing step that fixes the size of the sections and headers to a multiple of the chunk size. As a consequence, the injected content is confined to an integer number of chunks without tampering the other chunks containing the real bytes of the input examples, allowing us to extend our certified robustness guarantees to content insertion attacks. We perform an extensive ablation study, by comparing our defense with randomized smoothing-based defenses against a plethora of content manipulation attacks and neural network architectures. Results show that our method exhibits unmatched robustness against strong content-insertion attacks, outperforming randomized smoothing-based defenses in the literature.

Read more

5/2/2024

Adaptive Randomized Smoothing: Certifying Multi-Step Defences against Adversarial Examples

Adaptive Randomized Smoothing: Certifying Multi-Step Defences against Adversarial Examples

Saiyue Lyu, Shadab Shaikh, Frederick Shpilevskiy, Evan Shelhamer, Mathias L'ecuyer

YC

0

Reddit

0

We propose Adaptive Randomized Smoothing (ARS) to certify the predictions of our test-time adaptive models against adversarial examples. ARS extends the analysis of randomized smoothing using f-Differential Privacy to certify the adaptive composition of multiple steps. For the first time, our theory covers the sound adaptive composition of general and high-dimensional functions of noisy input. We instantiate ARS on deep image classification to certify predictions against adversarial examples of bounded $L_{infty}$ norm. In the $L_{infty}$ threat model, our flexibility enables adaptation through high-dimensional input-dependent masking. We design adaptivity benchmarks, based on CIFAR-10 and CelebA, and show that ARS improves accuracy by $2$ to $5%$ points. On ImageNet, ARS improves accuracy by $1$ to $3%$ points over standard RS without adaptivity.

Read more

6/18/2024

Incremental Randomized Smoothing Certification

Shubham Ugare, Tarun Suresh, Debangshu Banerjee, Gagandeep Singh, Sasa Misailovic

YC

0

Reddit

0

Randomized smoothing-based certification is an effective approach for obtaining robustness certificates of deep neural networks (DNNs) against adversarial attacks. This method constructs a smoothed DNN model and certifies its robustness through statistical sampling, but it is computationally expensive, especially when certifying with a large number of samples. Furthermore, when the smoothed model is modified (e.g., quantized or pruned), certification guarantees may not hold for the modified DNN, and recertifying from scratch can be prohibitively expensive. We present the first approach for incremental robustness certification for randomized smoothing, IRS. We show how to reuse the certification guarantees for the original smoothed model to certify an approximated model with very few samples. IRS significantly reduces the computational cost of certifying modified DNNs while maintaining strong robustness guarantees. We experimentally demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, showing up to 3x certification speedup over the certification that applies randomized smoothing of the approximate model from scratch.

Read more

4/12/2024