Certifying Global Robustness for Deep Neural Networks
2405.20556
0
0
Abstract
A globally robust deep neural network resists perturbations on all meaningful inputs. Current robustness certification methods emphasize local robustness, struggling to scale and generalize. This paper presents a systematic and efficient method to evaluate and verify global robustness for deep neural networks, leveraging the PAC verification framework for solid guarantees on verification results. We utilize probabilistic programs to characterize meaningful input regions, setting a realistic standard for global robustness. Additionally, we introduce the cumulative robustness curve as a criterion in evaluating global robustness. We design a statistical method that combines multi-level splitting and regression analysis for the estimation, significantly reducing the execution time. Experimental results demonstrate the efficiency and effectiveness of our verification method and its capability to find rare and diversified counterexamples for adversarial training.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This research paper explores techniques for certifying the global robustness of deep neural networks, which is crucial for ensuring the reliability and safety of AI systems in high-stakes applications.
- The paper presents a multi-level splitting approach that can efficiently verify the robustness of neural networks against adversarial attacks across a wide range of inputs.
- The proposed method outperforms existing techniques in terms of scalability and accuracy, making it a promising tool for improving the security and trustworthiness of deep learning models.
Plain English Explanation
Deep neural networks have become increasingly powerful and prevalent in a wide range of applications, from image recognition to natural language processing. However, these models can be vulnerable to adversarial attacks, where small, carefully crafted perturbations to the input can cause the model to make incorrect predictions.
To address this issue, the researchers in this paper have developed a new technique called "multi-level splitting" that can certify the global robustness of deep neural networks. In other words, their method can mathematically prove that a neural network will make the correct prediction for all possible inputs within a certain range around a given input, even in the face of adversarial attacks.
This is important because it allows us to trust the reliability and safety of AI systems, especially in high-stakes applications like self-driving cars, medical diagnostics, or financial decision-making. By verifying the global robustness of the neural network, we can be confident that it will continue to perform well even if the input data is slightly perturbed or distorted.
The multi-level splitting approach works by systematically exploring the space of possible inputs, dividing it into smaller and smaller regions, and then checking the behavior of the neural network in each of these regions. This process is repeated at multiple levels, allowing the method to efficiently cover a large input space and provide a tight certification of the network's robustness.
The researchers show that their approach outperforms existing techniques in terms of scalability and accuracy, making it a promising tool for improving the security and trustworthiness of deep learning models. By combining this type of robustness verification with other advances in neural network robustness assessment and general methodologies for certifying robustness, we can work towards building AI systems that are more reliable, secure, and aligned with our values.
Technical Explanation
The key elements of this research paper are:
-
Global Robustness Verification: The paper focuses on certifying the global robustness of deep neural networks, which means mathematically proving that the network will make the correct prediction for all possible inputs within a certain range around a given input. This is in contrast to local robustness, which only considers a small neighborhood around a single input.
-
Multi-level Splitting Approach: The researchers propose a novel "multi-level splitting" method for efficiently verifying the global robustness of deep neural networks. This approach systematically explores the input space by dividing it into smaller and smaller regions and checking the network's behavior in each of these regions.
-
Scalability and Accuracy: The paper demonstrates that the multi-level splitting approach outperforms existing techniques, such as precise observations of neural model robustness and set-based training for neural network verification, in terms of scalability and accuracy when certifying the global robustness of deep neural networks.
-
Evaluation and Benchmarking: The researchers evaluate their approach on a range of neural network architectures and datasets, including certifying the robustness of graph convolutional networks to node perturbation, to demonstrate its effectiveness and versatility.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling approach to certifying the global robustness of deep neural networks, which is a crucial step towards building more reliable and trustworthy AI systems. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:
-
Computational Complexity: While the multi-level splitting method is more scalable than existing techniques, it still requires significant computational resources, especially for larger neural networks or high-dimensional input spaces. Further research may be needed to improve the efficiency of the approach.
-
Generalization to Real-world Attacks: The paper primarily focuses on certifying robustness against norm-bounded adversarial attacks, which may not capture the full range of real-world threats that neural networks may face. Expanding the method to handle more diverse and realistic attack scenarios could enhance its practical relevance.
-
Bridging the Gap to Practice: Ultimately, the goal of this line of research is to improve the deployment of deep learning models in safety-critical applications. While the paper makes significant technical advances, more work may be needed to integrate these techniques into practical AI systems and address the unique challenges of real-world deployment.
Conclusion
This research paper presents a novel multi-level splitting approach for certifying the global robustness of deep neural networks, a crucial step towards building more reliable and trustworthy AI systems. By mathematically proving the robustness of neural networks against adversarial attacks, the proposed method can help ensure the safety and reliability of these models in high-stakes applications.
The scalability and accuracy improvements demonstrated in the paper make this a promising technique for enhancing the security of deep learning models. As the field of AI safety and robustness continues to advance, with further developments in neural network robustness assessment, general methodologies for certifying robustness, and other related areas, we can work towards building AI systems that are more aligned with our values and can be trusted to operate reliably in the real world.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🧠
A Survey of Neural Network Robustness Assessment in Image Recognition
Jie Wang, Jun Ai, Minyan Lu, Haoran Su, Dan Yu, Yutao Zhang, Junda Zhu, Jingyu Liu
0
0
In recent years, there has been significant attention given to the robustness assessment of neural networks. Robustness plays a critical role in ensuring reliable operation of artificial intelligence (AI) systems in complex and uncertain environments. Deep learning's robustness problem is particularly significant, highlighted by the discovery of adversarial attacks on image classification models. Researchers have dedicated efforts to evaluate robustness in diverse perturbation conditions for image recognition tasks. Robustness assessment encompasses two main techniques: robustness verification/ certification for deliberate adversarial attacks and robustness testing for random data corruptions. In this survey, we present a detailed examination of both adversarial robustness (AR) and corruption robustness (CR) in neural network assessment. Analyzing current research papers and standards, we provide an extensive overview of robustness assessment in image recognition. Three essential aspects are analyzed: concepts, metrics, and assessment methods. We investigate the perturbation metrics and range representations used to measure the degree of perturbations on images, as well as the robustness metrics specifically for the robustness conditions of classification models. The strengths and limitations of the existing methods are also discussed, and some potential directions for future research are provided.
4/16/2024
🤿
Verifying the Generalization of Deep Learning to Out-of-Distribution Domains
Guy Amir, Osher Maayan, Tom Zelazny, Guy Katz, Michael Schapira
0
0
Deep neural networks (DNNs) play a crucial role in the field of machine learning, demonstrating state-of-the-art performance across various application domains. However, despite their success, DNN-based models may occasionally exhibit challenges with generalization, i.e., may fail to handle inputs that were not encountered during training. This limitation is a significant challenge when it comes to deploying deep learning for safety-critical tasks, as well as in real-world settings characterized by substantial variability. We introduce a novel approach for harnessing DNN verification technology to identify DNN-driven decision rules that exhibit robust generalization to previously unencountered input domains. Our method assesses generalization within an input domain by measuring the level of agreement between independently trained deep neural networks for inputs in this domain. We also efficiently realize our approach by using off-the-shelf DNN verification engines, and extensively evaluate it on both supervised and unsupervised DNN benchmarks, including a deep reinforcement learning (DRL) system for Internet congestion control -- demonstrating the applicability of our approach for real-world settings. Moreover, our research introduces a fresh objective for formal verification, offering the prospect of mitigating the challenges linked to deploying DNN-driven systems in real-world scenarios.
6/10/2024
NLP Verification: Towards a General Methodology for Certifying Robustness
Marco Casadio, Tanvi Dinkar, Ekaterina Komendantskaya, Luca Arnaboldi, Matthew L. Daggitt, Omri Isac, Guy Katz, Verena Rieser, Oliver Lemon
0
0
Deep neural networks have exhibited substantial success in the field of Natural Language Processing and ensuring their safety and reliability is crucial: there are safety critical contexts where such models must be robust to variability or attack, and give guarantees over their output. Unlike Computer Vision, NLP lacks a unified verification methodology and, despite recent advancements in literature, they are often light on the pragmatical issues of NLP verification. In this paper, we attempt to distil and evaluate general components of an NLP verification pipeline, that emerges from the progress in the field to date. Our contributions are two-fold. Firstly, we give a general (i.e. algorithm-independent) characterisation of verifiable subspaces that result from embedding sentences into continuous spaces. We identify, and give an effective method to deal with, the technical challenge of semantic generalisability of verified subspaces; and propose it as a standard metric in the NLP verification pipelines (alongside with the standard metrics of model accuracy and model verifiability). Secondly, we propose a general methodology to analyse the effect of the embedding gap -- a problem that refers to the discrepancy between verification of geometric subspaces, and the semantic meaning of sentences which the geometric subspaces are supposed to represent. In extreme cases, poor choices in embedding of sentences may invalidate verification results. We propose a number of practical NLP methods that can help to quantify the effects of the embedding gap; and in particular we propose the metric of falsifiability of semantic subspaces as another fundamental metric to be reported as part of the NLP verification pipeline. We believe that together these general principles pave the way towards a more consolidated and effective development of this new domain.
6/3/2024
🧠
Towards Precise Observations of Neural Model Robustness in Classification
Wenchuan Mu, Kwan Hui Lim
0
0
In deep learning applications, robustness measures the ability of neural models that handle slight changes in input data, which could lead to potential safety hazards, especially in safety-critical applications. Pre-deployment assessment of model robustness is essential, but existing methods often suffer from either high costs or imprecise results. To enhance safety in real-world scenarios, metrics that effectively capture the model's robustness are needed. To address this issue, we compare the rigour and usage conditions of various assessment methods based on different definitions. Then, we propose a straightforward and practical metric utilizing hypothesis testing for probabilistic robustness and have integrated it into the TorchAttacks library. Through a comparative analysis of diverse robustness assessment methods, our approach contributes to a deeper understanding of model robustness in safety-critical applications.
4/26/2024