NLP Verification: Towards a General Methodology for Certifying Robustness
2403.10144
0
0
Abstract
Deep neural networks have exhibited substantial success in the field of Natural Language Processing and ensuring their safety and reliability is crucial: there are safety critical contexts where such models must be robust to variability or attack, and give guarantees over their output. Unlike Computer Vision, NLP lacks a unified verification methodology and, despite recent advancements in literature, they are often light on the pragmatical issues of NLP verification. In this paper, we attempt to distil and evaluate general components of an NLP verification pipeline, that emerges from the progress in the field to date. Our contributions are two-fold. Firstly, we give a general (i.e. algorithm-independent) characterisation of verifiable subspaces that result from embedding sentences into continuous spaces. We identify, and give an effective method to deal with, the technical challenge of semantic generalisability of verified subspaces; and propose it as a standard metric in the NLP verification pipelines (alongside with the standard metrics of model accuracy and model verifiability). Secondly, we propose a general methodology to analyse the effect of the embedding gap -- a problem that refers to the discrepancy between verification of geometric subspaces, and the semantic meaning of sentences which the geometric subspaces are supposed to represent. In extreme cases, poor choices in embedding of sentences may invalidate verification results. We propose a number of practical NLP methods that can help to quantify the effects of the embedding gap; and in particular we propose the metric of falsifiability of semantic subspaces as another fundamental metric to be reported as part of the NLP verification pipeline. We believe that together these general principles pave the way towards a more consolidated and effective development of this new domain.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a general methodology for certifying the robustness of natural language processing (NLP) models, ensuring their outputs are reliable and trustworthy even in the face of adversarial attacks.
- The researchers explore the need for guaranteed outputs in critical contexts like medical diagnosis and legal decision-making, where the consequences of model errors can be severe.
- They delve into the challenge of formally verifying the behavior of complex neural networks and the potential for leveraging recent advancements in set-based training and proof-based verification techniques.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on a critical challenge in the field of natural language processing (NLP): ensuring the reliability and trustworthiness of AI models, even when faced with attempts to trick or manipulate them. In many important contexts, such as medical diagnosis or legal decision-making, it is essential that the AI system's outputs can be guaranteed to be correct. Here is an example of research exploring this issue.
However, verifying the behavior of complex neural networks, which are the foundation of most NLP models, can be extremely challenging. These models can be vulnerable to adversarial attacks, where small changes to the input can cause the model to produce unexpected or incorrect outputs. This paper discusses some of the challenges in ensuring NLP model robustness.
The researchers in this paper propose a general methodology for certifying the robustness of NLP models, drawing on recent advancements in set-based training and proof-based verification techniques. By developing a systematic approach to verifying the model's behavior, they aim to provide a pathway for creating NLP systems that can reliably deliver guaranteed outputs, even in the face of potential adversarial attacks or other challenges.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a general methodology for certifying the robustness of natural language processing (NLP) models, ensuring their outputs are reliable and trustworthy even in the face of adversarial attacks. The researchers explore the need for guaranteed outputs in critical contexts like medical diagnosis and legal decision-making, where the consequences of model errors can be severe.
The paper delves into the challenge of formally verifying the behavior of complex neural networks, which form the foundation of most NLP models. These models can be vulnerable to adversarial attacks, where small changes to the input can cause the model to produce unexpected or incorrect outputs. The researchers discuss how recent advancements in set-based training and proof-based verification techniques can be leveraged to address this challenge.
The proposed methodology involves developing a systematic approach to verifying the model's behavior, with the goal of creating NLP systems that can reliably deliver guaranteed outputs, even in the face of potential adversarial attacks or other challenges. The paper explores the various components of this methodology, including techniques for formally modeling the input-output behavior of NLP models, methods for efficiently searching the space of possible inputs, and strategies for constructing formal proofs of model robustness.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling approach to addressing the critical issue of ensuring the reliability and trustworthiness of NLP models, particularly in high-stakes contexts. By proposing a general methodology for certifying model robustness, the researchers are taking an important step towards developing NLP systems that can be trusted to deliver accurate and reliable outputs, even when faced with adversarial attacks or other challenges.
However, the paper also acknowledges the significant technical challenges involved in formally verifying the behavior of complex neural networks. This paper highlights some of the limitations and potential pitfalls of current verification techniques. Additionally, the proposed methodology may require significant computational resources and expertise, which could limit its practical applicability in some real-world scenarios.
Further research is needed to refine and scale the proposed methodology, as well as to explore alternative approaches to ensuring NLP model robustness. It will be crucial to continue pushing the boundaries of formal verification techniques and to explore ways of making them more accessible and efficient for practical deployments.
Conclusion
This paper presents a valuable contribution to the field of NLP by proposing a general methodology for certifying the robustness of NLP models. The researchers recognize the critical need for guaranteed outputs in high-stakes contexts and have developed a systematic approach to formally verifying the behavior of complex neural networks.
While the technical challenges involved are significant, the potential benefits of this research are substantial. By creating NLP systems that can reliably deliver trustworthy outputs, even in the face of adversarial attacks or other challenges, the researchers are laying the groundwork for a future where AI systems can be safely and confidently deployed in mission-critical applications. As the field of AI continues to rapidly evolve, this type of rigorous, principled approach to ensuring model reliability and robustness will become increasingly important.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤿
Verifying the Generalization of Deep Learning to Out-of-Distribution Domains
Guy Amir, Osher Maayan, Tom Zelazny, Guy Katz, Michael Schapira
0
0
Deep neural networks (DNNs) play a crucial role in the field of machine learning, demonstrating state-of-the-art performance across various application domains. However, despite their success, DNN-based models may occasionally exhibit challenges with generalization, i.e., may fail to handle inputs that were not encountered during training. This limitation is a significant challenge when it comes to deploying deep learning for safety-critical tasks, as well as in real-world settings characterized by substantial variability. We introduce a novel approach for harnessing DNN verification technology to identify DNN-driven decision rules that exhibit robust generalization to previously unencountered input domains. Our method assesses generalization within an input domain by measuring the level of agreement between independently trained deep neural networks for inputs in this domain. We also efficiently realize our approach by using off-the-shelf DNN verification engines, and extensively evaluate it on both supervised and unsupervised DNN benchmarks, including a deep reinforcement learning (DRL) system for Internet congestion control -- demonstrating the applicability of our approach for real-world settings. Moreover, our research introduces a fresh objective for formal verification, offering the prospect of mitigating the challenges linked to deploying DNN-driven systems in real-world scenarios.
6/10/2024
Certifying Global Robustness for Deep Neural Networks
You Li, Guannan Zhao, Shuyu Kong, Yunqi He, Hai Zhou
0
0
A globally robust deep neural network resists perturbations on all meaningful inputs. Current robustness certification methods emphasize local robustness, struggling to scale and generalize. This paper presents a systematic and efficient method to evaluate and verify global robustness for deep neural networks, leveraging the PAC verification framework for solid guarantees on verification results. We utilize probabilistic programs to characterize meaningful input regions, setting a realistic standard for global robustness. Additionally, we introduce the cumulative robustness curve as a criterion in evaluating global robustness. We design a statistical method that combines multi-level splitting and regression analysis for the estimation, significantly reducing the execution time. Experimental results demonstrate the efficiency and effectiveness of our verification method and its capability to find rare and diversified counterexamples for adversarial training.
6/3/2024
📉
Whispers of Doubt Amidst Echoes of Triumph in NLP Robustness
Ashim Gupta, Rishanth Rajendhran, Nathan Stringham, Vivek Srikumar, Ana Marasovi'c
0
0
Do larger and more performant models resolve NLP's longstanding robustness issues? We investigate this question using over 20 models of different sizes spanning different architectural choices and pretraining objectives. We conduct evaluations using (a) out-of-domain and challenge test sets, (b) behavioral testing with CheckLists, (c) contrast sets, and (d) adversarial inputs. Our analysis reveals that not all out-of-domain tests provide insight into robustness. Evaluating with CheckLists and contrast sets shows significant gaps in model performance; merely scaling models does not make them adequately robust. Finally, we point out that current approaches for adversarial evaluations of models are themselves problematic: they can be easily thwarted, and in their current forms, do not represent a sufficiently deep probe of model robustness. We conclude that not only is the question of robustness in NLP as yet unresolved, but even some of the approaches to measure robustness need to be reassessed.
4/4/2024
🏋️
Set-Based Training for Neural Network Verification
Lukas Koller, Tobias Ladner, Matthias Althoff
0
0
Neural networks are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, i.e., small input perturbations can significantly affect the outputs of a neural network. In safety-critical environments, the inputs often contain noisy sensor data; hence, in this case, neural networks that are robust against input perturbations are required. To ensure safety, the robustness of a neural network must be formally verified. However, training and formally verifying robust neural networks is challenging. We address both of these challenges by employing, for the first time, an end-to-end set-based training procedure that trains robust neural networks for formal verification. Our training procedure trains neural networks, which can be easily verified using simple polynomial-time verification algorithms. Moreover, our extensive evaluation demonstrates that our set-based training procedure effectively trains robust neural networks, which are easier to verify. Set-based trained neural networks consistently match or outperform those trained with state-of-the-art robust training approaches.
4/22/2024