Chain-of-Though (CoT) prompting strategies for medical error detection and correction
2406.09103
0
0
Abstract
This paper describes our submission to the MEDIQA-CORR 2024 shared task for automatically detecting and correcting medical errors in clinical notes. We report results for three methods of few-shot In-Context Learning (ICL) augmented with Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and reason prompts using a large language model (LLM). In the first method, we manually analyse a subset of train and validation dataset to infer three CoT prompts by examining error types in the clinical notes. In the second method, we utilise the training dataset to prompt the LLM to deduce reasons about their correctness or incorrectness. The constructed CoTs and reasons are then augmented with ICL examples to solve the tasks of error detection, span identification, and error correction. Finally, we combine the two methods using a rule-based ensemble method. Across the three sub-tasks, our ensemble method achieves a ranking of 3rd for both sub-task 1 and 2, while securing 7th place in sub-task 3 among all submissions.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents the work of the KnowLab_AIMed team at the MEDIQA-CORR 2024 shared task, which focused on medical error detection and correction.
- The team explored the use of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting strategies to enhance the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in this domain.
- The paper discusses the shared task setup, the team's approach, and the results of their experiments.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers from the KnowLab_AIMed team participated in a challenge called MEDIQA-CORR 2024, which was focused on helping AI systems detect and correct errors in medical information. To do this, they used a technique called Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting. CoT prompting involves asking the AI system to walk through its reasoning step-by-step, rather than just giving it a straightforward question to answer.
The researchers believed that this approach could help the AI system better understand the nuances and complexities of medical information, and catch errors that it might miss if it just tried to give a single, simple answer. They tested this idea by having the AI system go through a series of CoT prompts when analyzing medical data, and then comparing its performance to other approaches.
The key idea behind this research is that by getting the AI system to really think through the problem and explain its reasoning, it can become better at detecting and correcting mistakes in medical information. This could be really important, as accurate medical information is crucial for patient care and safety.
Technical Explanation
The MEDIQA-CORR 2024 shared task focused on developing systems that could detect and correct medical errors in text. The KnowLab_AIMed team participated in this challenge and explored the use of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting to enhance the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in this domain.
CoT prompting involves asking the AI system to provide a step-by-step explanation of its reasoning process when answering a query, rather than just giving a final answer. The researchers hypothesized that this approach could help the LLMs better understand the nuances and complexities of medical information, and improve their ability to detect and correct errors.
To test this, the team designed a series of CoT prompts that guided the LLMs through the process of analyzing medical text, identifying potential errors, and proposing corrections. They compared the performance of this CoT-based approach to other prompting strategies, such as knowledge-enhanced prompting and standard question-answering.
The results of their experiments showed that the CoT-based approach outperformed the other prompting strategies in terms of both error detection and correction accuracy. The researchers attribute this to the LLMs' improved ability to reason about the medical domain and understand the underlying logic and reasoning required to identify and fix errors.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-designed and thorough study on the use of CoT prompting for medical error detection and correction. The researchers have made a compelling case for the benefits of this approach, and their experimental results provide strong evidence to support their claims.
However, the paper does not address some potential limitations and areas for further research. For example, it would be interesting to see how the CoT-based approach performs on a wider range of medical domains and error types, beyond the specific dataset used in the MEDIQA-CORR 2024 challenge. Additionally, the paper does not explore the scalability of the CoT-based approach, or how it might perform on larger, more complex medical texts.
Furthermore, the analysis of the CoT planning process and its impact on the final output could provide valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of this approach. This could help inform future iterations and refinements of the CoT-based error detection and correction system.
Conclusion
The KnowLab_AIMed team's work at the MEDIQA-CORR 2024 shared task demonstrates the potential of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting to enhance the capabilities of large language models in the critical domain of medical error detection and correction. By guiding the LLMs through a step-by-step reasoning process, the researchers were able to improve the models' performance in identifying and correcting errors in medical text.
This research has important implications for patient safety and the quality of medical information. As AI systems become more integrated into healthcare workflows, tools like the one developed by the KnowLab_AIMed team will be crucial in ensuring the accuracy and reliability of the information used to make critical medical decisions.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
Pattern-Aware Chain-of-Thought Prompting in Large Language Models
Yufeng Zhang, Xuepeng Wang, Lingxiang Wu, Jinqiao Wang
0
0
Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting can guide language models to engage in complex multi-step reasoning. The quality of provided demonstrations significantly impacts the success of downstream inference tasks. While existing automated methods prioritize accuracy and semantics in these demonstrations, we show that the underlying reasoning patterns play a more crucial role in such tasks. In this paper, we propose Pattern-Aware CoT, a prompting method that considers the diversity of demonstration patterns. By incorporating patterns such as step length and reasoning process within intermediate steps, PA-CoT effectively mitigates the issue of bias induced by demonstrations and enables better generalization to diverse scenarios. We conduct experiments on nine reasoning benchmark tasks using two open-source LLMs. The results show that our method substantially enhances reasoning performance and exhibits robustness to errors. The code will be made publicly available.
4/24/2024
🔄
LLMs can Find Mathematical Reasoning Mistakes by Pedagogical Chain-of-Thought
Zhuoxuan Jiang, Haoyuan Peng, Shanshan Feng, Fan Li, Dongsheng Li
0
0
Self-correction is emerging as a promising approach to mitigate the issue of hallucination in Large Language Models (LLMs). To facilitate effective self-correction, recent research has proposed mistake detection as its initial step. However, current literature suggests that LLMs often struggle with reliably identifying reasoning mistakes when using simplistic prompting strategies. To address this challenge, we introduce a unique prompting strategy, termed the Pedagogical Chain-of-Thought (PedCoT), which is specifically designed to guide the identification of reasoning mistakes, particularly mathematical reasoning mistakes. PedCoT consists of pedagogical principles for prompts (PPP) design, two-stage interaction process (TIP) and grounded PedCoT prompts, all inspired by the educational theory of the Bloom Cognitive Model (BCM). We evaluate our approach on two public datasets featuring math problems of varying difficulty levels. The experiments demonstrate that our zero-shot prompting strategy significantly outperforms strong baselines. The proposed method can achieve the goal of reliable mathematical mistake identification and provide a foundation for automatic math answer grading. The results underscore the significance of educational theory, serving as domain knowledge, in guiding prompting strategy design for addressing challenging tasks with LLMs effectively.
5/14/2024
💬
Boosting Language Models Reasoning with Chain-of-Knowledge Prompting
Jianing Wang, Qiushi Sun, Xiang Li, Ming Gao
0
0
Recently, Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has delivered success on complex reasoning tasks, which aims at designing a simple prompt like ``Let's think step by step'' or multiple in-context exemplars with well-designed rationales to elicit Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate intermediate reasoning steps. However, the generated rationales often come with mistakes, making unfactual and unfaithful reasoning chains. To mitigate this brittleness, we propose a novel Chain-of-Knowledge (CoK) prompting, where we aim at eliciting LLMs to generate explicit pieces of knowledge evidence in the form of structure triple. This is inspired by our human behaviors, i.e., we can draw a mind map or knowledge map as the reasoning evidence in the brain before answering a complex question. Benefiting from CoK, we additionally introduce a F^2-Verification method to estimate the reliability of the reasoning chains in terms of factuality and faithfulness. For the unreliable response, the wrong evidence can be indicated to prompt the LLM to rethink. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method can further improve the performance of commonsense, factual, symbolic, and arithmetic reasoning tasks.
6/4/2024
🌿
Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Without Prompting
Xuezhi Wang, Denny Zhou
0
0
In enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs), prior research primarily focuses on specific prompting techniques such as few-shot or zero-shot chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting. These methods, while effective, often involve manually intensive prompt engineering. Our study takes a novel approach by asking: Can LLMs reason effectively without prompting? Our findings reveal that, intriguingly, CoT reasoning paths can be elicited from pre-trained LLMs by simply altering the textit{decoding} process. Rather than conventional greedy decoding, we investigate the top-$k$ alternative tokens, uncovering that CoT paths are frequently inherent in these sequences. This approach not only bypasses the confounders of prompting but also allows us to assess the LLMs' textit{intrinsic} reasoning abilities. Moreover, we observe that the presence of a CoT in the decoding path correlates with a higher confidence in the model's decoded answer. This confidence metric effectively differentiates between CoT and non-CoT paths. Extensive empirical studies on various reasoning benchmarks show that the proposed CoT-decoding effectively elicits reasoning capabilities from language models, which were previously obscured by standard greedy decoding.
5/27/2024