ChartX & ChartVLM: A Versatile Benchmark and Foundation Model for Complicated Chart Reasoning
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Introduces ChartX and ChartVLM, a versatile benchmark and foundation model for complex chart reasoning tasks
- ChartX is a multi-task dataset for evaluating chart understanding capabilities
- ChartVLM is a vision-language foundation model trained on ChartX and other datasets to tackle complicated chart reasoning
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents ChartX and ChartVLM, which are designed to address the challenge of complex chart understanding.
ChartX is a multi-task dataset that includes a variety of chart types and reasoning tasks, such as extracting data points, answering questions about the chart's content, and identifying chart elements. This dataset allows researchers to evaluate how well AI models can understand and reason about complicated charts.
ChartVLM is a vision-language foundation model that is trained on the ChartX dataset as well as other relevant datasets. This model is designed to be a versatile tool for tackling a wide range of chart reasoning tasks, by leveraging both visual and textual information.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces ChartX, a multi-task chart evaluation set that includes a diverse set of chart types (e.g., line, bar, scatter, pie) and reasoning tasks (e.g., data extraction, question answering, chart element identification). This dataset is designed to serve as a comprehensive benchmark for assessing the chart understanding capabilities of AI models.
The paper also presents ChartVLM, a vision-language foundation model that is trained on the ChartX dataset as well as other relevant datasets. This model leverages both visual and textual information to tackle a wide range of chart reasoning tasks, making it a versatile tool for chart understanding research and applications.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges that ChartX and ChartVLM are still limited in their ability to capture the full complexity of real-world chart reasoning tasks. For example, the dataset may not include all possible chart types or reasoning scenarios, and the model may not generalize well to new, unseen chart types or tasks.
Additionally, the paper does not provide a comprehensive evaluation of the ChartVLM model's performance compared to other existing approaches. Further research is needed to fully assess the model's capabilities and limitations in realistic chart understanding applications.
Conclusion
ChartX and ChartVLM represent a significant step forward in the field of chart understanding research. By providing a comprehensive benchmark and a versatile foundation model, the authors have laid the groundwork for further advancements in this area. As researchers continue to build upon this work, it has the potential to unlock new possibilities for AI-powered chart analysis and reasoning, with applications in domains such as data visualization, business intelligence, and scientific research.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
ChartX & ChartVLM: A Versatile Benchmark and Foundation Model for Complicated Chart Reasoning
Renqiu Xia, Bo Zhang, Hancheng Ye, Xiangchao Yan, Qi Liu, Hongbin Zhou, Zijun Chen, Min Dou, Botian Shi, Junchi Yan, Yu Qiao
Recently, many versatile Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have emerged continuously. However, their capacity to query information depicted in visual charts and engage in reasoning based on the queried contents remains under-explored. In this paper, to comprehensively and rigorously benchmark the ability of the off-the-shelf MLLMs in the chart domain, we construct ChartX, a multi-modal evaluation set covering 18 chart types, 7 chart tasks, 22 disciplinary topics, and high-quality chart data. Besides, we develop ChartVLM to offer a new perspective on handling multi-modal tasks that strongly depend on interpretable patterns, such as reasoning tasks in the field of charts or geometric images. We evaluate the chart-related ability of mainstream MLLMs and our ChartVLM on the proposed ChartX evaluation set. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ChartVLM surpasses both versatile and chart-related large models, achieving results comparable to GPT-4V. We believe that our study can pave the way for further exploration in creating a more comprehensive chart evaluation set and developing more interpretable multi-modal models. Both ChartX and ChartVLM are available at: https://github.com/UniModal4Reasoning/ChartVLM
Read more9/12/2024
š¤Æ
0
ChartBench: A Benchmark for Complex Visual Reasoning in Charts
Zhengzhuo Xu, Sinan Du, Yiyan Qi, Chengjin Xu, Chun Yuan, Jian Guo
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown impressive capabilities in image understanding and generation. However, current benchmarks fail to accurately evaluate the chart comprehension of MLLMs due to limited chart types and inappropriate metrics. To address this, we propose ChartBench, a comprehensive benchmark designed to assess chart comprehension and data reliability through complex visual reasoning. ChartBench includes 42 categories, 66.6k charts, and 600k question-answer pairs. Notably, many charts lack data point annotations, which requires MLLMs to derive values similar to human understanding by leveraging inherent chart elements such as color, legends, and coordinate systems. We also design an enhanced evaluation metric, Acc+, to evaluate MLLMs without extensive manual or costly LLM-based evaluations. Furthermore, we propose two baselines based on the chain of thought and supervised fine-tuning to improve model performance on unannotated charts. Extensive experimental evaluations of 18 open-sourced and 3 proprietary MLLMs reveal their limitations in chart comprehension and offer valuable insights for further research. Code and dataset are publicly available at https://chartbench.github.io.
Read more6/21/2024
š¤
0
CharXiv: Charting Gaps in Realistic Chart Understanding in Multimodal LLMs
Zirui Wang, Mengzhou Xia, Luxi He, Howard Chen, Yitao Liu, Richard Zhu, Kaiqu Liang, Xindi Wu, Haotian Liu, Sadhika Malladi, Alexis Chevalier, Sanjeev Arora, Danqi Chen
Chart understanding plays a pivotal role when applying Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to real-world tasks such as analyzing scientific papers or financial reports. However, existing datasets often focus on oversimplified and homogeneous charts with template-based questions, leading to an over-optimistic measure of progress. We demonstrate that although open-source models can appear to outperform strong proprietary models on these benchmarks, a simple stress test with slightly different charts or questions can deteriorate performance by up to 34.5%. In this work, we propose CharXiv, a comprehensive evaluation suite involving 2,323 natural, challenging, and diverse charts from arXiv papers. CharXiv includes two types of questions: 1) descriptive questions about examining basic chart elements and 2) reasoning questions that require synthesizing information across complex visual elements in the chart. To ensure quality, all charts and questions are handpicked, curated, and verified by human experts. Our results reveal a substantial, previously underestimated gap between the reasoning skills of the strongest proprietary model (i.e., GPT-4o), which achieves 47.1% accuracy, and the strongest open-source model (i.e., InternVL Chat V1.5), which achieves 29.2%. All models lag far behind human performance of 80.5%, underscoring weaknesses in the chart understanding capabilities of existing MLLMs. We hope CharXiv facilitates future research on MLLM chart understanding by providing a more realistic and faithful measure of progress. Project page and leaderboard: https://charxiv.github.io/
Read more6/27/2024
š
0
Are Large Vision Language Models up to the Challenge of Chart Comprehension and Reasoning? An Extensive Investigation into the Capabilities and Limitations of LVLMs
Mohammed Saidul Islam, Raian Rahman, Ahmed Masry, Md Tahmid Rahman Laskar, Mir Tafseer Nayeem, Enamul Hoque
Natural language is a powerful complementary modality of communication for data visualizations, such as bar and line charts. To facilitate chart-based reasoning using natural language, various downstream tasks have been introduced recently such as chart question answering, chart summarization, and fact-checking with charts. These tasks pose a unique challenge, demanding both vision-language reasoning and a nuanced understanding of chart data tables, visual encodings, and natural language prompts. Despite the recent success of Large Language Models (LLMs) across diverse NLP tasks, their abilities and limitations in the realm of data visualization remain under-explored, possibly due to their lack of multi-modal capabilities. To bridge the gap, this paper presents the first comprehensive evaluation of the recently developed large vision language models (LVLMs) for chart understanding and reasoning tasks. Our evaluation includes a comprehensive assessment of LVLMs, including GPT-4V and Gemini, across four major chart reasoning tasks. Furthermore, we perform a qualitative evaluation of LVLMs' performance on a diverse range of charts, aiming to provide a thorough analysis of their strengths and weaknesses. Our findings reveal that LVLMs demonstrate impressive abilities in generating fluent texts covering high-level data insights while also encountering common problems like hallucinations, factual errors, and data bias. We highlight the key strengths and limitations of chart comprehension tasks, offering insights for future research.
Read more6/4/2024