Chitchat as Interference: Adding User Backstories to Task-Oriented Dialogues
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper explores adding user backstories to task-oriented dialogues, which can introduce "chitchat" that may interfere with the main task.
- The researchers propose an augmentation pipeline to generate diverse and realistic user backstories that can be incorporated into task-oriented dialogues.
- The goal is to create more natural and engaging dialogues that better reflect real-world conversations while still accomplishing the desired task.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at a problem that can come up when designing conversation systems for specific tasks, like booking a hotel room or ordering food. Sometimes, in real-life conversations, people will start chatting about unrelated topics or sharing personal details - this "chitchat" can get in the way of the main task.
The researchers wanted to find a way to add this kind of natural, conversational element to task-oriented dialogues, while still making sure the main task gets done. They developed a method to generate diverse backstories for the "users" in the conversation, which gives them a more realistic personal context. This can make the overall dialogue feel more natural and human-like, even if some of the chitchat doesn't directly relate to the task at hand.
The key idea is to strike a balance between task-focused efficiency and more open-ended, conversational interactions. By incorporating user backstories, the researchers hope to create dialogue systems that are more engaging and reflective of real-world interactions, without sacrificing the ability to reliably complete the target task.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes an augmentation pipeline to generate diverse user backstories that can be incorporated into task-oriented dialogues. The pipeline consists of several steps:
- Seed Situation: A base task-oriented dialogue is defined, including the overall goal, task steps, and initial user intent.
- Backstory Generation: A large language model is used to generate plausible backstories for the users involved, drawing on contextual information about the task and personas.
- Dialogue Augmentation: The generated backstories are then woven into the original dialogue, introducing relevant personal details and open-ended conversations that may temporarily divert from the main task.
- Evaluation: The augmented dialogues are assessed for task completion, conversational quality, and overall realism.
Through this process, the researchers aimed to create more interactive and dynamic task-oriented dialogues that better reflect the natural flow of human conversations, while still ensuring the target task is ultimately achieved.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges that introducing user backstories and open-ended chitchat can potentially interfere with task completion and efficiency. The researchers note that careful balancing is required to maintain a productive dialogue flow while still adding the desired level of conversational realism.
Additionally, the paper does not fully address how the generated backstories might impact the user's perception of the system's overall competence or trustworthiness. Injecting sales strategies into the dialogue could potentially be seen as manipulative, and the researchers do not explore this potential negative effect.
Further research may be needed to [better understand how contextual cues and user backstories can be leveraged to create more natural and engaging task-oriented dialogues without compromising the core functionality.
Conclusion
This paper presents an innovative approach to enhancing task-oriented dialogues by incorporating user backstories and open-ended conversational elements. The goal is to create more natural and human-like interactions while still accomplishing the target task.
The proposed augmentation pipeline offers a promising framework for modeling real-time interactive conversations and simulating task-oriented dialogues with diverse responses. However, further research is needed to fully understand the implications and potential trade-offs of this approach.
Overall, this work highlights the importance of synergizing context learning and injecting sales strategies to create more engaging and realistic task-oriented dialogues that better reflect the nuances of human conversation.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Chitchat as Interference: Adding User Backstories to Task-Oriented Dialogues
Armand Stricker, Patrick Paroubek
During task-oriented dialogues (TODs), human users naturally introduce chitchat that is beyond the immediate scope of the task, interfering with the flow of the conversation. To address this issue without the need for expensive manual data creation, we use few-shot prompting with Llama-2-70B to enhance the MultiWOZ dataset with user backstories, a typical example of chitchat interference in TODs. We assess the impact of this addition by testing two models: one trained solely on TODs and another trained on TODs with a preliminary chitchat interaction. Our analysis demonstrates that our enhanced dataset poses a challenge for these systems. Moreover, we demonstrate that our dataset can be effectively used for training purposes, enabling a system to consistently acknowledge the user's backstory while also successfully moving the task forward in the same turn, as confirmed by human evaluation. These findings highlight the benefits of generating novel chitchat-TOD scenarios to test TOD systems more thoroughly and improve their resilience to natural user interferences
Read more7/1/2024
📶
0
Revealing User Familiarity Bias in Task-Oriented Dialogue via Interactive Evaluation
Takyoung Kim, Jamin Shin, Young-Ho Kim, Sanghwan Bae, Sungdong Kim
Most task-oriented dialogue (TOD) benchmarks assume users that know exactly how to use the system by constraining the user behaviors within the system's capabilities via strict user goals, namely user familiarity bias. This data bias deepens when it combines with data-driven TOD systems, as it is impossible to fathom the effect of it with existing static evaluations. Hence, we conduct an interactive user study to unveil how vulnerable TOD systems are against realistic scenarios. In particular, we compare users with 1) detailed goal instructions that conform to the system boundaries (closed-goal) and 2) vague goal instructions that are often unsupported but realistic (open-goal). Our study reveals that conversations in open-goal settings lead to catastrophic failures of the system, in which 92% of the dialogues had significant issues. Moreover, we conduct a thorough analysis to identify distinctive features between the two settings through error annotation. From this, we discover a novel pretending behavior, in which the system pretends to handle the user requests even though they are beyond the system's capabilities. We discuss its characteristics and toxicity while showing recent large language models can also suffer from this behavior.
Read more7/2/2024
0
Synergizing In-context Learning with Hints for End-to-end Task-oriented Dialog Systems
Vishal Vivek Saley, Rocktim Jyoti Das, Dinesh Raghu, Mausam
End-to-end Task-Oriented Dialog (TOD) systems typically require extensive training datasets to perform well. In contrast, large language model (LLM) based TOD systems can excel even with limited data due to their ability to learn tasks through in-context exemplars. However, these models lack alignment with the style of responses in training data and often generate comprehensive responses, making it difficult for users to grasp the information quickly. In response, we propose SyncTOD that synergizes LLMs with task-specific hints to improve alignment in low-data settings. SyncTOD employs small auxiliary models to provide hints and select exemplars for in-context prompts. With ChatGPT, SyncTOD achieves superior performance compared to LLM-based baselines and SoTA models in low-data settings, while retaining competitive performance in full-data settings.
Read more7/4/2024
0
Natural Language Task-Oriented Dialog System 2.0
Adib Mosharrof, A. B. Siddique
Task-oriented dialog (TOD) systems play a crucial role in facilitating efficient interactions between users and machines by focusing on achieving specific goals through natural language communication. These systems traditionally rely on manually annotated metadata, such as dialog states and policy annotations, which is labor-intensive, expensive, inconsistent, and prone to errors, thereby limiting the potential to leverage the vast amounts of available conversational data. A critical aspect of TOD systems involves accessing and integrating information from external sources to effectively engage users. The process of determining when and how to query external resources represents a fundamental challenge in system design, however existing approaches expect this information to provided in the context. In this paper, we introduce Natural Language Task Oriented Dialog System (NL-ToD), a novel model that removes the dependency on manually annotated turn-wise data by utilizing dialog history and domain schemas to create a Zero Shot Generalizable TOD system. We also incorporate query generation as a core task of the system, where the output of the system could be a response to the user or an API query to communicate with an external resource. To achieve a more granular analysis of the system output, we classify the output into multiple categories: slot filling, retrieval, and query generation. Our analysis reveals that slot filling is the most challenging TOD task for all models. Experimental results on three popular TOD datasets (SGD, KETOD and BiToD) shows the effectiveness of our approach as NL-ToD outperforms state-of-the-art approaches, particularly with a textbf{31.4%} and textbf{82.1%} improvement in the BLEU-4 score on the SGD and KETOD dataset.
Read more7/23/2024