Classifier Guidance Enhances Diffusion-based Adversarial Purification by Preserving Predictive Information

Read original: arXiv:2408.05900 - Published 8/13/2024 by Mingkun Zhang, Jianing Li, Wei Chen, Jiafeng Guo, Xueqi Cheng
Total Score

0

Classifier Guidance Enhances Diffusion-based Adversarial Purification by Preserving Predictive Information

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper introduces a new method called "Classifier Guidance" that enhances diffusion-based adversarial purification.
  • The key idea is to preserve predictive information during the purification process to maintain model performance.
  • Experiments show the proposed method outperforms existing adversarial purification techniques.

Plain English Explanation

Diffusion models are a type of machine learning algorithm that can be used to remove unwanted "noise" from images. This can be helpful for making machine learning models more robust to adversarial attacks - deliberate attempts to confuse the model.

However, a common issue with existing diffusion-based purification methods is that they can inadvertently remove useful information that the model relies on to make accurate predictions. The paper introduces a new technique called "Classifier Guidance" that aims to preserve this predictive information during the purification process.

The key idea is to incorporate guidance from the original classification model into the diffusion process. This helps ensure that the purified image retains the features that the model uses to make its predictions, rather than removing them.

Experiments show this approach outperforms existing adversarial purification techniques, demonstrating the importance of preserving predictive information when cleaning up adversarial examples.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a new method called "Classifier Guidance" that enhances diffusion-based adversarial purification. The core idea is to incorporate guidance from the original classification model into the diffusion process to preserve predictive information.

Specifically, the authors introduce a modified diffusion objective that maximizes the agreement between the purified image and the original model's predictions. This is achieved by adding a "classifier guidance" term to the standard diffusion loss function.

The authors evaluate their approach on several image classification benchmarks, including CIFAR-10 and ImageNet. Experiments show the proposed Classifier Guidance method outperforms existing diffusion-based adversarial purification techniques, achieving higher classification accuracy on the purified images.

The key insight is that preserving predictive information is crucial for maintaining model performance after the purification process. By incorporating guidance from the original classifier, the Classifier Guidance method is able to remove adversarial perturbations while retaining the features the model relies on to make accurate predictions.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling approach to enhancing diffusion-based adversarial purification. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further exploration:

  1. The experiments are focused on image classification tasks, so it's unclear how well the Classifier Guidance method would generalize to other domains, such as natural language processing or speaker verification.

  2. The paper does not address the computational overhead of the Classifier Guidance method compared to simpler diffusion-based purification approaches. This could be an important consideration for real-world deployment.

  3. While the authors demonstrate the benefits of preserving predictive information, it may also be valuable to explore techniques that can adaptively balance the trade-off between purification and maintaining model performance.

Overall, the Classifier Guidance method represents an interesting and promising approach to improving the robustness of machine learning models to adversarial attacks. Further research exploring its generalization, efficiency, and trade-offs could lead to valuable advancements in the field of adversarial purification.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a new technique called Classifier Guidance that enhances diffusion-based adversarial purification by preserving predictive information. Experiments show the proposed method outperforms existing approaches, highlighting the importance of maintaining the features that models rely on to make accurate predictions.

While the current focus is on image classification, the Classifier Guidance approach could potentially be extended to other domains and further optimized for real-world deployment. Continued research in this area could lead to more robust and reliable machine learning systems that are better equipped to withstand adversarial attacks.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Classifier Guidance Enhances Diffusion-based Adversarial Purification by Preserving Predictive Information
Total Score

0

Classifier Guidance Enhances Diffusion-based Adversarial Purification by Preserving Predictive Information

Mingkun Zhang, Jianing Li, Wei Chen, Jiafeng Guo, Xueqi Cheng

Adversarial purification is one of the promising approaches to defend neural networks against adversarial attacks. Recently, methods utilizing diffusion probabilistic models have achieved great success for adversarial purification in image classification tasks. However, such methods fall into the dilemma of balancing the needs for noise removal and information preservation. This paper points out that existing adversarial purification methods based on diffusion models gradually lose sample information during the core denoising process, causing occasional label shift in subsequent classification tasks. As a remedy, we suggest to suppress such information loss by introducing guidance from the classifier confidence. Specifically, we propose Classifier-cOnfidence gUided Purification (COUP) algorithm, which purifies adversarial examples while keeping away from the classifier decision boundary. Experimental results show that COUP can achieve better adversarial robustness under strong attack methods.

Read more

8/13/2024

ZeroPur: Succinct Training-Free Adversarial Purification
Total Score

0

ZeroPur: Succinct Training-Free Adversarial Purification

Xiuli Bi, Zonglin Yang, Bo Liu, Xiaodong Cun, Chi-Man Pun, Pietro Lio, Bin Xiao

Adversarial purification is a kind of defense technique that can defend various unseen adversarial attacks without modifying the victim classifier. Existing methods often depend on external generative models or cooperation between auxiliary functions and victim classifiers. However, retraining generative models, auxiliary functions, or victim classifiers relies on the domain of the fine-tuned dataset and is computation-consuming. In this work, we suppose that adversarial images are outliers of the natural image manifold and the purification process can be considered as returning them to this manifold. Following this assumption, we present a simple adversarial purification method without further training to purify adversarial images, called ZeroPur. ZeroPur contains two steps: given an adversarial example, Guided Shift obtains the shifted embedding of the adversarial example by the guidance of its blurred counterparts; after that, Adaptive Projection constructs a directional vector by this shifted embedding to provide momentum, projecting adversarial images onto the manifold adaptively. ZeroPur is independent of external models and requires no retraining of victim classifiers or auxiliary functions, relying solely on victim classifiers themselves to achieve purification. Extensive experiments on three datasets (CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and ImageNet-1K) using various classifier architectures (ResNet, WideResNet) demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art robust performance. The code will be publicly available.

Read more

6/6/2024

Robust Diffusion Models for Adversarial Purification
Total Score

0

Robust Diffusion Models for Adversarial Purification

Guang Lin, Zerui Tao, Jianhai Zhang, Toshihisa Tanaka, Qibin Zhao

Diffusion models (DMs) based adversarial purification (AP) has shown to be the most powerful alternative to adversarial training (AT). However, these methods neglect the fact that pre-trained diffusion models themselves are not robust to adversarial attacks as well. Additionally, the diffusion process can easily destroy semantic information and generate a high quality image but totally different from the original input image after the reverse process, leading to degraded standard accuracy. To overcome these issues, a natural idea is to harness adversarial training strategy to retrain or fine-tune the pre-trained diffusion model, which is computationally prohibitive. We propose a novel robust reverse process with adversarial guidance, which is independent of given pre-trained DMs and avoids retraining or fine-tuning the DMs. This robust guidance can not only ensure to generate purified examples retaining more semantic content but also mitigate the accuracy-robustness trade-off of DMs for the first time, which also provides DM-based AP an efficient adaptive ability to new attacks. Extensive experiments are conducted on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100 and ImageNet to demonstrate that our method achieves the state-of-the-art results and exhibits generalization against different attacks.

Read more

8/26/2024

🏋️

Total Score

0

Towards Better Adversarial Purification via Adversarial Denoising Diffusion Training

Yiming Liu, Kezhao Liu, Yao Xiao, Ziyi Dong, Xiaogang Xu, Pengxu Wei, Liang Lin

Recently, diffusion-based purification (DBP) has emerged as a promising approach for defending against adversarial attacks. However, previous studies have used questionable methods to evaluate the robustness of DBP models, their explanations of DBP robustness also lack experimental support. We re-examine DBP robustness using precise gradient, and discuss the impact of stochasticity on DBP robustness. To better explain DBP robustness, we assess DBP robustness under a novel attack setting, Deterministic White-box, and pinpoint stochasticity as the main factor in DBP robustness. Our results suggest that DBP models rely on stochasticity to evade the most effective attack direction, rather than directly countering adversarial perturbations. To improve the robustness of DBP models, we propose Adversarial Denoising Diffusion Training (ADDT). This technique uses Classifier-Guided Perturbation Optimization (CGPO) to generate adversarial perturbation through guidance from a pre-trained classifier, and uses Rank-Based Gaussian Mapping (RBGM) to convert adversarial pertubation into a normal Gaussian distribution. Empirical results show that ADDT improves the robustness of DBP models. Further experiments confirm that ADDT equips DBP models with the ability to directly counter adversarial perturbations.

Read more

4/23/2024