Comparative Study of Neighbor-based Methods for Local Outlier Detection
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a comparative study of neighbor-based methods for local outlier detection.
- The authors evaluate and compare the performance of several popular neighbor-based outlier detection algorithms on a variety of datasets.
- The goal is to provide insights into the strengths and weaknesses of these methods, which can guide researchers and practitioners in selecting the most appropriate approach for their specific needs.
Plain English Explanation
Neighbor-based outlier detection is a technique used to identify data points that are significantly different from their surrounding data points. This is useful for detecting anomalies or unusual patterns in data, which can have important applications in fields like fraud detection, network intrusion detection, and medical diagnostics.
The paper examines several popular neighbor-based outlier detection methods, such as Local Outlier Factor (LOF), Connectivity-based Outlier Factor (COF), and Influenced Outlierness (INFLO). The authors compare the performance of these algorithms on different types of data, looking at factors like accuracy, sensitivity to parameter settings, and computational efficiency.
The findings provide guidance on when to use each method based on the characteristics of the data and the specific goals of the outlier detection task. For example, the paper suggests that LOF may be a good choice for datasets with varying densities, while INFLO may be more suitable for datasets with significant noise or outlier clusters.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by providing an overview of the problem of local outlier detection and the key concepts underlying neighbor-based approaches. It then describes the specific algorithms evaluated in the study, including LOF, COF, INFLO, and Information-modified k-Nearest Neighbor (IMkNN).
The authors conducted extensive experiments on a range of synthetic and real-world datasets, evaluating the algorithms' performance on measures such as area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, precision-recall, and computational time. They also investigated the sensitivity of the methods to the choice of input parameters, such as the number of nearest neighbors.
The results of the experiments show that the performance of the algorithms can vary significantly depending on the characteristics of the dataset. For example, LOF and INFLO generally outperform the other methods in terms of accuracy, but IMkNN is more computationally efficient. The authors also found that the choice of the number of nearest neighbors can have a significant impact on the performance of the algorithms.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and well-designed comparative study of neighbor-based outlier detection methods. The authors have carefully selected a diverse set of algorithms and datasets, and their experimental design and analysis are thorough and rigorous.
One potential limitation of the study is that it focuses solely on neighbor-based methods, which may not capture all the relevant factors for outlier detection, such as global data distributions or feature interactions. The authors acknowledge this and suggest that future work could explore the integration of neighbor-based approaches with other outlier detection techniques.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the implications of the findings for real-world applications or provide guidance on how to choose the most appropriate algorithm based on the specific requirements of a given problem. This could be an area for further research and discussion.
Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the field of outlier detection by providing a detailed comparative analysis of several neighbor-based methods. The insights gained can help researchers and practitioners make more informed decisions when selecting outlier detection algorithms for their specific use cases.
Conclusion
This paper presents a comprehensive comparative study of neighbor-based outlier detection methods, evaluating the performance of several popular algorithms on a variety of datasets. The findings provide valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of these approaches, guiding researchers and practitioners in selecting the most appropriate method for their specific needs.
The study demonstrates that the performance of neighbor-based outlier detection algorithms can vary significantly depending on the characteristics of the data, underscoring the importance of understanding the underlying assumptions and limitations of each method. The authors' recommendations on algorithm selection and parameter tuning can help users make more informed decisions and improve the effectiveness of outlier detection in diverse applications.
While the paper focuses on neighbor-based techniques, future research could explore the integration of these methods with other outlier detection approaches to further enhance the robustness and accuracy of anomaly detection systems. Overall, this work provides a valuable reference for the outlier detection community and lays the groundwork for further advancements in this important field.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Comparative Study of Neighbor-based Methods for Local Outlier Detection
Zhuang Qi, Junlin Zhang, Xiaming Chen, Xin Qi
The neighbor-based method has become a powerful tool to handle the outlier detection problem, which aims to infer the abnormal degree of the sample based on the compactness of the sample and its neighbors. However, the existing methods commonly focus on designing different processes to locate outliers in the dataset, while the contributions of different types neighbors to outlier detection has not been well discussed. To this end, this paper studies the neighbor in the existing outlier detection algorithms and a taxonomy is introduced, which uses the three-level components of information, neighbor and methodology to define hybrid methods. This taxonomy can serve as a paradigm where a novel neighbor-based outlier detection method can be proposed by combining different components in this taxonomy. A large number of comparative experiments were conducted on synthetic and real-world datasets in terms of performance comparison and case study, and the results show that reverse K-nearest neighbor based methods achieve promising performance and dynamic selection method is suitable for working in high-dimensional space. Notably, it is verified that rationally selecting components from this taxonomy may create an algorithms superior to existing methods.
Read more5/30/2024
0
On high-dimensional modifications of the nearest neighbor classifier
Annesha Ghosh, Bilol Banerjee, Anil K. Ghosh
Nearest neighbor classifier is arguably the most simple and popular nonparametric classifier available in the literature. However, due to the concentration of pairwise distances and the violation of the neighborhood structure, this classifier often suffers in high-dimension, low-sample size (HDLSS) situations, especially when the scale difference between the competing classes dominates their location difference. Several attempts have been made in the literature to take care of this problem. In this article, we discuss some of these existing methods and propose some new ones. We carry out some theoretical investigations in this regard and analyze several simulated and benchmark datasets to compare the empirical performances of proposed methods with some of the existing ones.
Read more7/9/2024
0
Enhancing Community Detection in Networks: A Comparative Analysis of Local Metrics and Hierarchical Algorithms
Julio-Omar Palacio-Ni~no, Fernando Berzal
The analysis and detection of communities in network structures are becoming increasingly relevant for understanding social behavior. One of the principal challenges in this field is the complexity of existing algorithms. The Girvan-Newman algorithm, which uses the betweenness metric as a measure of node similarity, is one of the most representative algorithms in this area. This study employs the same method to evaluate the relevance of using local similarity metrics for community detection. A series of local metrics were tested on a set of networks constructed using the Girvan-Newman basic algorithm. The efficacy of these metrics was evaluated by applying the base algorithm to several real networks with varying community sizes, using modularity and NMI. The results indicate that approaches based on local similarity metrics have significant potential for community detection.
Read more8/26/2024
0
Information Modified K-Nearest Neighbor
Mohammad Ali Vahedifar, Azim Akhtarshenas, Maryam Sabbaghian, Mohammad Mohammadi Rafatpanah, Ramin Toosi
The fundamental concept underlying K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) is the classification of samples based on the majority through their nearest neighbors. Although distance and neighbors' labels are critical in KNN, traditional KNN treats all samples equally. However, some KNN variants weigh neighbors differently based on a specific rule, considering each neighbor's distance and label. Many KNN methodologies introduce complex algorithms that do not significantly outperform the traditional KNN, often leading to less satisfactory outcomes. The gap in reliably extracting information for accurately predicting true weights remains an open research challenge. In our proposed method, information-modified KNN (IMKNN), we bridge the gap by presenting a straightforward algorithm that achieves effective results. To this end, we introduce a classification method to improve the performance of the KNN algorithm. By exploiting mutual information (MI) and incorporating ideas from Shapley's values, we improve the traditional KNN performance in accuracy, precision, and recall, offering a more refined and effective solution. To evaluate the effectiveness of our method, it is compared with eight variants of KNN. We conduct experiments on 12 widely-used datasets, achieving 11.05%, 12.42%, and 12.07% in accuracy, precision, and recall performance, respectively, compared to traditional KNN. Additionally, we compared IMKNN with traditional KNN across four large-scale datasets to highlight the distinct advantages of IMKNN in the impact of monotonicity, noise, density, subclusters, and skewed distributions. Our research indicates that IMKNN consistently surpasses other methods in diverse datasets.
Read more5/15/2024