Comparing and Contrasting Deep Learning Weather Prediction Backbones on Navier-Stokes and Atmospheric Dynamics

Read original: arXiv:2407.14129 - Published 7/22/2024 by Matthias Karlbauer, Danielle C. Maddix, Abdul Fatir Ansari, Boran Han, Gaurav Gupta, Yuyang Wang, Andrew Stuart, Michael W. Mahoney
Total Score

0

Comparing and Contrasting Deep Learning Weather Prediction Backbones on Navier-Stokes and Atmospheric Dynamics

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper compares and contrasts different deep learning architectures for weather prediction using Navier-Stokes equations and atmospheric dynamics.
  • The researchers evaluated the performance of various deep learning backbones on weather forecasting tasks.
  • The goal was to understand how different neural network architectures handle the complex physics and fluid dynamics involved in weather prediction.

Plain English Explanation

Weather forecasting is a challenging task that requires understanding complex physical processes like fluid dynamics, atmospheric conditions, and energy transfers. Deep learning models have shown promise in tackling weather prediction by learning these intricate patterns from data.

This paper explores how different deep learning "backbones" - the core neural network architectures - perform on weather forecasting. The researchers tested several popular backbones, like convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and transformers, to see how well they can model the Navier-Stokes equations and atmospheric dynamics that govern weather.

By comparing the strengths and weaknesses of these models, the study aims to provide insights into the best deep learning approaches for improving weather forecasting systems. This could lead to more accurate and reliable weather predictions, which have important implications for fields like agriculture, transportation, and disaster response.

Technical Explanation

The paper evaluates the performance of several popular deep learning backbones on weather forecasting tasks based on Navier-Stokes equations and atmospheric dynamics:

  • Convolutional neural networks (CNNs): These models excel at capturing local spatial relationships, which could be useful for modeling fluid flows and atmospheric patterns.
  • Transformers: These attention-based models have shown strong performance on sequence-to-sequence tasks and may be able to capture long-range dependencies in weather data.
  • Hybrid models: Combining CNN and transformer layers could leverage the strengths of both architectures for weather prediction.

The researchers designed experiments to test these models on benchmark weather forecasting datasets. They assessed metrics like prediction accuracy, computational efficiency, and ability to generalize to unseen weather patterns.

The results provide insights into the inductive biases and modeling capabilities of these deep learning backbones for weather forecasting. The findings can inform the development of more effective weather prediction systems by guiding the selection and adaptation of deep learning architectures.

Critical Analysis

The paper offers a thorough comparison of deep learning backbones for weather forecasting, but there are a few potential limitations:

  • The study focused on a limited set of architectures and did not explore more specialized weather modeling techniques, such as physics-informed neural networks.
  • The datasets used may not capture the full complexity of real-world weather systems, so the model performance may not directly translate to operational weather forecasting.
  • The paper does not delve into the interpretability of the deep learning models or how to extract meaningful insights about the underlying physical processes.

Further research could investigate a broader range of deep learning architectures, incorporate more realistic weather simulation data, and explore techniques for better understanding the models' internal representations and decision-making.

Conclusion

This paper provides a valuable comparison of deep learning backbones for weather prediction, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of different neural network architectures. The findings can guide the development of more effective weather forecasting systems that leverage the power of deep learning to model complex atmospheric dynamics. As deep learning continues to advance, this research contributes to a better understanding of how to harness these techniques for improving weather prediction, with far-reaching implications for various industries and sectors.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Comparing and Contrasting Deep Learning Weather Prediction Backbones on Navier-Stokes and Atmospheric Dynamics
Total Score

0

Comparing and Contrasting Deep Learning Weather Prediction Backbones on Navier-Stokes and Atmospheric Dynamics

Matthias Karlbauer, Danielle C. Maddix, Abdul Fatir Ansari, Boran Han, Gaurav Gupta, Yuyang Wang, Andrew Stuart, Michael W. Mahoney

Remarkable progress in the development of Deep Learning Weather Prediction (DLWP) models positions them to become competitive with traditional numerical weather prediction (NWP) models. Indeed, a wide number of DLWP architectures -- based on various backbones, including U-Net, Transformer, Graph Neural Network (GNN), and Fourier Neural Operator (FNO) -- have demonstrated their potential at forecasting atmospheric states. However, due to differences in training protocols, forecast horizons, and data choices, it remains unclear which (if any) of these methods and architectures are most suitable for weather forecasting and for future model development. Here, we step back and provide a detailed empirical analysis, under controlled conditions, comparing and contrasting the most prominent DLWP models, along with their backbones. We accomplish this by predicting synthetic two-dimensional incompressible Navier-Stokes and real-world global weather dynamics. In terms of accuracy, memory consumption, and runtime, our results illustrate various tradeoffs. For example, on synthetic data, we observe favorable performance of FNO; and on the real-world WeatherBench dataset, our results demonstrate the suitability of ConvLSTM and SwinTransformer for short-to-mid-ranged forecasts. For long-ranged weather rollouts of up to 365 days, we observe superior stability and physical soundness in architectures that formulate a spherical data representation, i.e., GraphCast and Spherical FNO. In addition, we observe that all of these model backbones ``saturate,'' i.e., none of them exhibit so-called neural scaling, which highlights an important direction for future work on these and related models.

Read more

7/22/2024

Analyzing and Exploring Training Recipes for Large-Scale Transformer-Based Weather Prediction
Total Score

0

Analyzing and Exploring Training Recipes for Large-Scale Transformer-Based Weather Prediction

Jared D. Willard, Peter Harrington, Shashank Subramanian, Ankur Mahesh, Travis A. O'Brien, William D. Collins

The rapid rise of deep learning (DL) in numerical weather prediction (NWP) has led to a proliferation of models which forecast atmospheric variables with comparable or superior skill than traditional physics-based NWP. However, among these leading DL models, there is a wide variance in both the training settings and architecture used. Further, the lack of thorough ablation studies makes it hard to discern which components are most critical to success. In this work, we show that it is possible to attain high forecast skill even with relatively off-the-shelf architectures, simple training procedures, and moderate compute budgets. Specifically, we train a minimally modified SwinV2 transformer on ERA5 data, and find that it attains superior forecast skill when compared against IFS. We present some ablations on key aspects of the training pipeline, exploring different loss functions, model sizes and depths, and multi-step fine-tuning to investigate their effect. We also examine the model performance with metrics beyond the typical ACC and RMSE, and investigate how the performance scales with model size.

Read more

5/1/2024

Leveraging data-driven weather models for improving numerical weather prediction skill through large-scale spectral nudging
Total Score

0

Leveraging data-driven weather models for improving numerical weather prediction skill through large-scale spectral nudging

Syed Zahid Husain, Leo Separovic, Jean-Franc{c}ois Caron, Rabah Aider, Mark Buehner, St'ephane Chamberland, Ervig Lapalme, Ron McTaggart-Cowan, Christopher Subich, Paul A. Vaillancourt, Jing Yang, Ayrton Zadra

Operational meteorological forecasting has long relied on physics-based numerical weather prediction (NWP) models. Recently, this landscape is facing disruption by the advent of data-driven artificial intelligence (AI)-based weather models, which offer tremendous computational performance and competitive forecasting skill. However, data-driven models for medium-range forecasting generally suffer from major limitations, including low effective resolution and a narrow range of predicted variables. This study illustrates the relative strengths and weaknesses of these competing paradigms using the GEM (Global Environmental Multiscale) and GraphCast models to represent physics-based and AI-based approaches, respectively. By analyzing global predictions from these two models against observations and analyses in both physical and spectral spaces, this study demonstrates that GraphCast-predicted large scales outperform GEM, particularly for longer lead times. Building on this insight, a hybrid NWP-AI system is proposed, wherein GEM-predicted large-scale state variables are spectrally nudged toward GraphCast predictions, while allowing GEM to freely generate fine-scale details critical for weather extremes. Results indicate that this hybrid approach is capable of leveraging the strengths of GraphCast to enhance the prediction skill of the GEM model. Importantly, trajectories of tropical cyclones are predicted with enhanced accuracy without significant changes in intensity. Furthermore, this new hybrid system ensures that meteorologists have access to a complete set of forecast variables, including those relevant for high-impact weather events.

Read more

7/26/2024

Advances in Land Surface Model-based Forecasting: A comparative study of LSTM, Gradient Boosting, and Feedforward Neural Network Models as prognostic state emulators
Total Score

0

Advances in Land Surface Model-based Forecasting: A comparative study of LSTM, Gradient Boosting, and Feedforward Neural Network Models as prognostic state emulators

Marieke Wesselkamp, Matthew Chantry, Ewan Pinnington, Margarita Choulga, Souhail Boussetta, Maria Kalweit, Joschka Boedecker, Carsten F. Dormann, Florian Pappenberger, Gianpaolo Balsamo

Most useful weather prediction for the public is near the surface. The processes that are most relevant for near-surface weather prediction are also those that are most interactive and exhibit positive feedback or have key role in energy partitioning. Land surface models (LSMs) consider these processes together with surface heterogeneity and forecast water, carbon and energy fluxes, and coupled with an atmospheric model provide boundary and initial conditions. This numerical parametrization of atmospheric boundaries being computationally expensive, statistical surrogate models are increasingly used to accelerated progress in experimental research. We evaluated the efficiency of three surrogate models in speeding up experimental research by simulating land surface processes, which are integral to forecasting water, carbon, and energy fluxes in coupled atmospheric models. Specifically, we compared the performance of a Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) encoder-decoder network, extreme gradient boosting, and a feed-forward neural network within a physics-informed multi-objective framework. This framework emulates key states of the ECMWF's Integrated Forecasting System (IFS) land surface scheme, ECLand, across continental and global scales. Our findings indicate that while all models on average demonstrate high accuracy over the forecast period, the LSTM network excels in continental long-range predictions when carefully tuned, the XGB scores consistently high across tasks and the MLP provides an excellent implementation-time-accuracy trade-off. The runtime reduction achieved by the emulators in comparison to the full numerical models are significant, offering a faster, yet reliable alternative for conducting numerical experiments on land surfaces.

Read more

7/24/2024