Comparing remote sensing-based forest biomass mapping approaches using new forest inventory plots in contrasting forests in northeastern and southwestern China
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper compares different approaches for mapping forest biomass using remote sensing data, tested in two contrasting forest regions in China.
- The researchers used new ground-based forest inventory data to evaluate the accuracy of their biomass mapping methods.
- The findings provide insights into the strengths and limitations of various remote sensing-based biomass estimation techniques in diverse forest environments.
Plain English Explanation
The paper investigates different ways to map the amount of biomass (the total mass of living plants and trees) in forests using remote sensing technology. The researchers tested these methods in two very different forest areas in China - one in the northeastern part of the country and one in the southwestern region.
To evaluate the accuracy of their biomass mapping approaches, the researchers collected new ground-based forest inventory data. This on-the-ground data was used as a reference to assess how well the remote sensing-based methods were able to estimate the actual biomass levels in the forests.
The results provide valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the various remote sensing techniques for measuring forest biomass in contrasting forest environments. This information can help scientists and forest managers choose the most appropriate methods for monitoring and managing forest resources in different regions.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a comparative study of remote sensing-based approaches for mapping forest biomass in two distinct forest regions in China. The researchers used newly collected ground-based forest inventory data to assess the accuracy of their biomass estimation methods in the northeastern and southwestern forests.
The study tested a range of remote sensing data sources, including optical satellite imagery, synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data, and a combination of the two. The team evaluated the performance of different biomass modeling techniques, such as statistical regression models and machine learning algorithms, in estimating aboveground forest biomass.
The findings indicate that the accuracy of the remote sensing-based biomass mapping varied significantly between the two forest study sites. The researchers attribute this to differences in forest structure, species composition, and environmental conditions in the northeastern and southwestern forests. The paper provides detailed insights into the capabilities and limitations of the tested remote sensing approaches for biomass estimation in these contrasting forest ecosystems.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive evaluation of remote sensing-based forest biomass mapping approaches using new, high-quality ground-based inventory data. This is a strength of the study, as the availability of reliable field data is often a limiting factor in validating remote sensing-derived biomass estimates.
However, the paper does not delve into the specific reasons why the remote sensing methods performed differently in the two study regions. A deeper analysis of the underlying forest characteristics and environmental factors that contributed to the observed variations in biomass mapping accuracy would have provided more insight.
Additionally, the paper could have explored the potential implications of these findings for large-scale forest monitoring and management. Further research may be needed to understand how the performance of these remote sensing techniques scales up to regional or national forest assessments.
Conclusion
This study offers a valuable comparison of remote sensing-based approaches for mapping forest biomass in contrasting forest environments in China. The use of new ground-based inventory data to validate the remote sensing methods is a key strength of the research.
The findings highlight the importance of considering regional forest characteristics when selecting appropriate remote sensing techniques for biomass estimation. The insights gained from this work can inform the development of more accurate and reliable forest monitoring systems, which are essential for sustainable forest management and climate change mitigation efforts.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Comparing remote sensing-based forest biomass mapping approaches using new forest inventory plots in contrasting forests in northeastern and southwestern China
Wenquan Dong, Edward T. A. Mitchard, Yuwei Chen, Man Chen, Congfeng Cao, Peilun Hu, Cong Xu, Steven Hancock
Large-scale high spatial resolution aboveground biomass (AGB) maps play a crucial role in determining forest carbon stocks and how they are changing, which is instrumental in understanding the global carbon cycle, and implementing policy to mitigate climate change. The advent of the new space-borne LiDAR sensor, NASA's GEDI instrument, provides unparalleled possibilities for the accurate and unbiased estimation of forest AGB at high resolution, particularly in dense and tall forests, where Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) and passive optical data exhibit saturation. However, GEDI is a sampling instrument, collecting dispersed footprints, and its data must be combined with that from other continuous cover satellites to create high-resolution maps, using local machine learning methods. In this study, we developed local models to estimate forest AGB from GEDI L2A data, as the models used to create GEDI L4 AGB data incorporated minimal field data from China. We then applied LightGBM and random forest regression to generate wall-to-wall AGB maps at 25 m resolution, using extensive GEDI footprints as well as Sentinel-1 data, ALOS-2 PALSAR-2 and Sentinel-2 optical data. Through a 5-fold cross-validation, LightGBM demonstrated a slightly better performance than Random Forest across two contrasting regions. However, in both regions, the computation speed of LightGBM is substantially faster than that of the random forest model, requiring roughly one-third of the time to compute on the same hardware. Through the validation against field data, the 25 m resolution AGB maps generated using the local models developed in this study exhibited higher accuracy compared to the GEDI L4B AGB data. We found in both regions an increase in error as slope increased. The trained models were tested on nearby but different regions and exhibited good performance.
Read more5/27/2024
0
Unified Deep Learning Model for Global Prediction of Aboveground Biomass, Canopy Height and Cover from High-Resolution, Multi-Sensor Satellite Imagery
Manuel Weber, Carly Beneke, Clyde Wheeler
Regular measurement of carbon stock in the world's forests is critical for carbon accounting and reporting under national and international climate initiatives, and for scientific research, but has been largely limited in scalability and temporal resolution due to a lack of ground based assessments. Increasing efforts have been made to address these challenges by incorporating remotely sensed data. We present a new methodology which uses multi-sensor, multi-spectral imagery at a resolution of 10 meters and a deep learning based model which unifies the prediction of above ground biomass density (AGBD), canopy height (CH), canopy cover (CC) as well as uncertainty estimations for all three quantities. The model is trained on millions of globally sampled GEDI-L2/L4 measurements. We validate the capability of our model by deploying it over the entire globe for the year 2023 as well as annually from 2016 to 2023 over selected areas. The model achieves a mean absolute error for AGBD (CH, CC) of 26.1 Mg/ha (3.7 m, 9.9 %) and a root mean squared error of 50.6 Mg/ha (5.4 m, 15.8 %) on a globally sampled test dataset, demonstrating a significant improvement over previously published results. We also report the model performance against independently collected ground measurements published in the literature, which show a high degree of correlation across varying conditions. We further show that our pre-trained model facilitates seamless transferability to other GEDI variables due to its multi-head architecture.
Read more8/22/2024
0
AGBD: A Global-scale Biomass Dataset
Ghjulia Sialelli, Torben Peters, Jan D. Wegner, Konrad Schindler
Accurate estimates of Above Ground Biomass (AGB) are essential in addressing two of humanity's biggest challenges, climate change and biodiversity loss. Existing datasets for AGB estimation from satellite imagery are limited. Either they focus on specific, local regions at high resolution, or they offer global coverage at low resolution. There is a need for a machine learning-ready, globally representative, high-resolution benchmark. Our findings indicate significant variability in biomass estimates across different vegetation types, emphasizing the necessity for a dataset that accurately captures global diversity. To address these gaps, we introduce a comprehensive new dataset that is globally distributed, covers a range of vegetation types, and spans several years. This dataset combines AGB reference data from the GEDI mission with data from Sentinel-2 and PALSAR-2 imagery. Additionally, it includes pre-processed high-level features such as a dense canopy height map, an elevation map, and a land-cover classification map. We also produce a dense, high-resolution (10m) map of AGB predictions for the entire area covered by the dataset. Rigorously tested, our dataset is accompanied by several benchmark models and is publicly available. It can be easily accessed using a single line of code, offering a solid basis for efforts towards global AGB estimation. The GitHub repository github.com/ghjuliasialelli/AGBD serves as a one-stop shop for all code and data.
Read more6/10/2024
0
Fine-tuning of Geospatial Foundation Models for Aboveground Biomass Estimation
Michal Muszynski, Levente Klein, Ademir Ferreira da Silva, Anjani Prasad Atluri, Carlos Gomes, Daniela Szwarcman, Gurkanwar Singh, Kewen Gu, Maciel Zortea, Naomi Simumba, Paolo Fraccaro, Shraddha Singh, Steve Meliksetian, Campbell Watson, Daiki Kimura, Harini Srinivasan
Global vegetation structure mapping is critical for understanding the global carbon cycle and maximizing the efficacy of nature-based carbon sequestration initiatives. Moreover, vegetation structure mapping can help reduce the impacts of climate change by, for example, guiding actions to improve water security, increase biodiversity and reduce flood risk. Global satellite measurements provide an important set of observations for monitoring and managing deforestation and degradation of existing forests, natural forest regeneration, reforestation, biodiversity restoration, and the implementation of sustainable agricultural practices. In this paper, we explore the effectiveness of fine-tuning of a geospatial foundation model to estimate above-ground biomass (AGB) using space-borne data collected across different eco-regions in Brazil. The fine-tuned model architecture consisted of a Swin-B transformer as the encoder (i.e., backbone) and a single convolutional layer for the decoder head. All results were compared to a U-Net which was trained as the baseline model Experimental results of this sparse-label prediction task demonstrate that the fine-tuned geospatial foundation model with a frozen encoder has comparable performance to a U-Net trained from scratch. This is despite the fine-tuned model having 13 times less parameters requiring optimization, which saves both time and compute resources. Further, we explore the transfer-learning capabilities of the geospatial foundation models by fine-tuning on satellite imagery with sparse labels from different eco-regions in Brazil.
Read more7/1/2024