Comparing statistical and machine learning methods for time series forecasting in data-driven logistics -- A simulation study
2303.07139
0
0
🛸
Abstract
Many planning and decision activities in logistics and supply chain management are based on forecasts of multiple time dependent factors. Therefore, the quality of planning depends on the quality of the forecasts. We compare various forecasting methods in terms of out of the box forecasting performance on a broad set of simulated time series. We simulate various linear and non-linear time series and look at the one step forecast performance of statistical learning methods.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper compares the forecasting performance of various statistical learning methods on simulated time series data.
- The researchers generated both linear and non-linear time series data and evaluated the one-step-ahead forecasting accuracy of different models.
- The goal was to assess the "out-of-the-box" forecasting capabilities of these methods without any specialized tuning or domain expertise.
Plain English Explanation
Forecasting future events is crucial in logistics and supply chain management, as it helps organizations make better decisions about things like inventory, transportation, and resource allocation. However, the quality of these forecasts depends on the methods used to generate them.
In this study, the researchers took a broad look at how well different statistical forecasting techniques perform "out of the box" - without any special customization or expert knowledge applied. They created a diverse set of simulated time series data, including both linear and non-linear patterns, and then tested various models' ability to accurately predict the next value in the sequence.
The goal was to get a sense of the inherent forecasting capabilities of these methods, rather than seeing how they might perform after significant tuning or expert intervention. This can help logistics and supply chain professionals understand the strengths and limitations of different forecasting approaches and make more informed choices about which ones to use in their operations.
Some of the forecasting techniques evaluated in the paper include methods like those discussed in this paper on lag selection for time series forecasting and approaches that involve sequential learning, as explored in this work. The researchers looked at both statistical and machine learning-based models to get a comprehensive understanding of the landscape.
Technical Explanation
The researchers generated a diverse set of simulated time series data, including both linear and non-linear patterns, to assess the one-step-ahead forecasting performance of various statistical learning methods. This allowed them to evaluate the "out-of-the-box" capabilities of these techniques without any specialized tuning or domain expertise.
The linear time series were generated using standard ARIMA processes, while the non-linear series incorporated elements like autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (ARCH), as discussed in this paper. This provided a broad range of time series characteristics to test the forecasting models against.
The researchers then compared the performance of several statistical and machine learning-based forecasting approaches, including methods that involve sequential learning and techniques like quantum long short-term memory (QLSTM), as explored in this work. They also looked at the impact of different preprocessing steps, such as detrending and differencing, on the models' forecasting accuracy.
The results provide insights into the inherent strengths and weaknesses of these forecasting techniques when applied to a broad range of time series data, without the benefit of specialized tuning or domain expertise. This can inform the choices that logistics and supply chain professionals make when selecting forecasting methods for their operations.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge that their study focused solely on one-step-ahead forecasting, and that the models' performance may differ for longer-term forecasting horizons. They also note that the simulated data, while diverse, may not capture all the complexities of real-world time series encountered in logistics and supply chain management.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the computational efficiency or training time requirements of the different forecasting methods, which could be important considerations for practitioners. Automated time series forecasting approaches, as discussed in this work, could be a promising avenue for further exploration.
It would also be valuable to see how the models' performance compares on real-world data from logistics and supply chain applications, rather than just simulated data. This could uncover practical challenges or domain-specific considerations that were not captured in the controlled experiments.
Overall, the paper provides a solid foundation for understanding the inherent forecasting capabilities of various statistical learning methods, but further research is needed to fully address the needs of logistics and supply chain practitioners.
Conclusion
This study compared the one-step-ahead forecasting performance of a range of statistical learning methods on both linear and non-linear simulated time series data. The goal was to assess the "out-of-the-box" capabilities of these techniques without any specialized tuning or domain expertise.
The results offer insights into the strengths and limitations of different forecasting approaches, which can inform the choices that logistics and supply chain professionals make when selecting methods for their operations. While the study has some limitations, it provides a valuable benchmark for understanding the inherent forecasting capabilities of these models.
As organizations in logistics and supply chain management continue to rely on accurate forecasts to drive their planning and decision-making, research like this can help ensure they are using the most appropriate and effective forecasting techniques for their needs.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Time Series Analysis: yesterday, today, tomorrow
Igor Mackarov
0
0
Forecasts of various processes have always been a sophisticated problem for statistics and data science. Over the past decades the solution procedures were updated by deep learning and kernel methods. According to many specialists, these approaches are much more precise, stable, and suitable compared to the classical statistical linear time series methods. Here we investigate how true this point of view is.
6/11/2024
🚀
Enhancing supply chain security with automated machine learning
Haibo Wang, Lutfu S. Sua, Bahram Alidaee
0
0
This study tackles the complexities of global supply chains, which are increasingly vulnerable to disruptions caused by port congestion, material shortages, and inflation. To address these challenges, we explore the application of machine learning methods, which excel in predicting and optimizing solutions based on large datasets. Our focus is on enhancing supply chain security through fraud detection, maintenance prediction, and material backorder forecasting. We introduce an automated machine learning framework that streamlines data analysis, model construction, and hyperparameter optimization for these tasks. By automating these processes, our framework improves the efficiency and effectiveness of supply chain security measures. Our research identifies key factors that influence machine learning performance, including sampling methods, categorical encoding, feature selection, and hyperparameter optimization. We demonstrate the importance of considering these factors when applying machine learning to supply chain challenges. Traditional mathematical programming models often struggle to cope with the complexity of large-scale supply chain problems. Our study shows that machine learning methods can provide a viable alternative, particularly when dealing with extensive datasets and complex patterns. The automated machine learning framework presented in this study offers a novel approach to supply chain security, contributing to the existing body of knowledge in the field. Its comprehensive automation of machine learning processes makes it a valuable contribution to the domain of supply chain management.
6/21/2024
➖
A case study of spatiotemporal forecasting techniques for weather forecasting
Shakir Showkat Sofi, Ivan Oseledets
0
0
The majority of real-world processes are spatiotemporal, and the data generated by them exhibits both spatial and temporal evolution. Weather is one of the most essential processes in this domain, and weather forecasting has become a crucial part of our daily routine. Weather data analysis is considered the most complex and challenging task. Although numerical weather prediction models are currently state-of-the-art, they are resource-intensive and time-consuming. Numerous studies have proposed time series-based models as a viable alternative to numerical forecasts. Recent research in the area of time series analysis indicates significant advancements, particularly regarding the use of state-space-based models (white box) and, more recently, the integration of machine learning and deep neural network-based models (black box). The most famous examples of such models are RNNs and transformers. These models have demonstrated remarkable results in the field of time-series analysis and have demonstrated effectiveness in modelling temporal correlations. It is crucial to capture both temporal and spatial correlations for a spatiotemporal process, as the values at nearby locations and time affect the values of a spatiotemporal process at a specific point. This self-contained paper explores various regional data-driven weather forecasting methods, i.e., forecasting over multiple latitude-longitude points (matrix-shaped spatial grid) to capture spatiotemporal correlations. The results showed that spatiotemporal prediction models reduced computational costs while improving accuracy. In particular, the proposed tensor train dynamic mode decomposition-based forecasting model has comparable accuracy to the state-of-the-art models without the need for training. We provide convincing numerical experiments to show that the proposed approach is practical.
6/11/2024
Can Language Models Use Forecasting Strategies?
Sarah Pratt, Seth Blumberg, Pietro Kreitlon Carolino, Meredith Ringel Morris
0
0
Advances in deep learning systems have allowed large models to match or surpass human accuracy on a number of skills such as image classification, basic programming, and standardized test taking. As the performance of the most capable models begin to saturate on tasks where humans already achieve high accuracy, it becomes necessary to benchmark models on increasingly complex abilities. One such task is forecasting the future outcome of events. In this work we describe experiments using a novel dataset of real world events and associated human predictions, an evaluation metric to measure forecasting ability, and the accuracy of a number of different LLM based forecasting designs on the provided dataset. Additionally, we analyze the performance of the LLM forecasters against human predictions and find that models still struggle to make accurate predictions about the future. Our follow-up experiments indicate this is likely due to models' tendency to guess that most events are unlikely to occur (which tends to be true for many prediction datasets, but does not reflect actual forecasting abilities). We reflect on next steps for developing a systematic and reliable approach to studying LLM forecasting.
6/10/2024