Comparing Task Graph Scheduling Algorithms: An Adversarial Approach
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents an adversarial approach to comparing task graph scheduling algorithms, which are used to optimize the execution of complex computational workflows on distributed systems.
- The authors introduce a novel benchmark suite that generates challenging task graphs designed to expose the weaknesses of different scheduling algorithms.
- They evaluate several popular scheduling algorithms, including simple heuristics and more advanced techniques like simulated annealing, using the proposed benchmark.
Plain English Explanation
When you have a complex computational task that needs to be run on multiple computers, you need a way to efficiently schedule and distribute the different parts of the task. This is known as task graph scheduling. The authors of this paper wanted to find a way to rigorously compare different scheduling algorithms to see which ones performed best.
They created a set of test cases, or "benchmarks", that were designed to be difficult for the scheduling algorithms to handle. These benchmarks included task graphs with tricky dependencies and other challenging features. By running the scheduling algorithms on these tough test cases, the authors could identify the strengths and weaknesses of each approach.
The paper evaluates several scheduling algorithms, from simple rules of thumb to more advanced techniques like simulated annealing. The authors found that the more sophisticated algorithms generally outperformed the simpler heuristics, but there were still cases where the heuristics did surprisingly well.
Overall, this research provides a systematic way to compare scheduling algorithms and identify the best approaches for efficiently running complex computational workflows on distributed systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a novel benchmark suite for evaluating task graph scheduling algorithms. The authors design a set of adversarial task graphs that are intended to expose the weaknesses of different scheduling approaches. These task graphs include features like:
- Highly heterogeneous task execution times
- Numerous task dependencies and communication costs
- Irregular task graph structures
By running popular scheduling algorithms, such as list scheduling heuristics and simulated annealing-based approaches, on these challenging benchmarks, the authors are able to perform a comprehensive comparison of the algorithms' strengths and limitations.
The experimental results show that the more advanced scheduling techniques, like simulated annealing, generally outperform simpler heuristics in terms of minimizing the overall makespan (i.e., the total execution time of the task graph). However, the authors also identify cases where the heuristic approaches perform surprisingly well, highlighting the importance of thorough benchmarking and evaluation.
Critical Analysis
The authors' use of adversarial benchmarks is a valuable contribution, as it provides a rigorous way to stress-test scheduling algorithms and uncover their weaknesses. However, the paper does not address the potential limitations of this approach. For example, the benchmarks may not fully capture the complexity of real-world task graphs, which could have different characteristics or requirements.
Additionally, the paper focuses solely on minimizing makespan as the optimization objective. In practice, there may be other important considerations, such as fairness, energy efficiency, or resource utilization, that scheduling algorithms should also account for. Further research could explore how to design benchmarks and evaluation criteria that better reflect the diverse goals and constraints of real-world distributed computing systems.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel adversarial approach to benchmarking task graph scheduling algorithms. By creating challenging test cases that expose the weaknesses of different scheduling techniques, the authors are able to provide a comprehensive comparison of popular algorithms, including simple heuristics and more advanced simulated annealing methods.
The findings highlight the importance of thorough algorithm evaluation and the need for systematic benchmarking frameworks. As distributed computing systems continue to grow in complexity, this research contributes a valuable tool for identifying the most effective scheduling strategies and informing the development of more efficient multi-processor scheduling algorithms for real-world applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Comparing Task Graph Scheduling Algorithms: An Adversarial Approach
Jared Coleman, Bhaskar Krishnamachari
Scheduling a task graph representing an application over a heterogeneous network of computers is a fundamental problem in distributed computing. It is known to be not only NP-hard but also not polynomial-time approximable within a constant factor. As a result, many heuristic algorithms have been proposed over the past few decades. Yet it remains largely unclear how these algorithms compare to each other in terms of the quality of schedules they produce. We identify gaps in the traditional benchmarking approach to comparing task scheduling algorithms and propose a simulated annealing-based adversarial analysis approach called PISA to help address them. We also introduce SAGA, a new open-source library for comparing task scheduling algorithms. We use SAGA to benchmark 15 algorithms on 16 datasets and PISA to compare the algorithms in a pairwise manner. Algorithms that appear to perform similarly on benchmarking datasets are shown to perform very differently on adversarially chosen problem instances. Interestingly, the results indicate that this is true even when the adversarial search is constrained to selecting among well-structured, application-specific problem instances. This work represents an important step towards a more general understanding of the performance boundaries between task scheduling algorithms on different families of problem instances.
Read more6/12/2024
0
Learning Interpretable Scheduling Algorithms for Data Processing Clusters
Zhibo Hu (Hye-Young), Chen Wang (Hye-Young), Helen (Hye-Young), Paik, Yanfeng Shu, Liming Zhu
Workloads in data processing clusters are often represented in the form of DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph) jobs. Scheduling DAG jobs is challenging. Simple heuristic scheduling algorithms are often adopted in practice in production data centres. There is much room for scheduling performance optimisation for cost saving. Recently, reinforcement learning approaches (like decima) have been attempted to optimise DAG job scheduling and demonstrate clear performance gain in comparison to traditional algorithms. However, reinforcement learning (RL) approaches face their own problems in real-world deployment. In particular, their black-box decision making processes and generalizability in unseen workloads may add a non-trivial burden to the cluster administrators. Moreover, adapting RL models on unseen workloads often requires significant amount of training data, which leaves edge cases run in a sub-optimal mode. To fill the gap, we propose a new method to distill a simple scheduling policy based on observations of the behaviours of a complex deep learning model. The simple model not only provides interpretability of scheduling decisions, but also adaptive to edge cases easily through tuning. We show that our method achieves high fidelity to the decisions made by deep learning models and outperforms these models when additional heuristics are taken into account.
Read more5/30/2024
šļø
0
Scheduling of Distributed Applications on the Computing Continuum: A Survey
Narges Mehran, Dragi Kimovski, Hermann Hellwagner, Dumitru Roman, Ahmet Soylu, Radu Prodan
The demand for distributed applications has significantly increased over the past decade, with improvements in machine learning techniques fueling this growth. These applications predominantly utilize Cloud data centers for high-performance computing and Fog and Edge devices for low-latency communication for small-size machine learning model training and inference. The challenge of executing applications with different requirements on heterogeneous devices requires effective methods for solving NP-hard resource allocation and application scheduling problems. The state-of-the-art techniques primarily investigate conflicting objectives, such as the completion time, energy consumption, and economic cost of application execution on the Cloud, Fog, and Edge computing infrastructure. Therefore, in this work, we review these research works considering their objectives, methods, and evaluation tools. Based on the review, we provide a discussion on the scheduling methods in the Computing Continuum.
Read more5/2/2024
š
0
Efficient Multi-Processor Scheduling in Increasingly Realistic Models
P'al Andr'as Papp, Georg Anegg, Aikaterini Karanasiou, A. N. Yzelman
We study the problem of efficiently scheduling a computational DAG on multiple processors. The majority of previous works have developed and compared algorithms for this problem in relatively simple models; in contrast to this, we analyze this problem in a more realistic model that captures many real-world aspects, such as communication costs, synchronization costs, and the hierarchical structure of modern processing architectures. For this we extend the well-established BSP model of parallel computing with non-uniform memory access (NUMA) effects. We then develop a range of new scheduling algorithms to minimize the scheduling cost in this more complex setting: several initialization heuristics, a hill-climbing local search method, and several approaches that formulate (and solve) the scheduling problem as an Integer Linear Program (ILP). We combine these algorithms into a single framework, and conduct experiments on a diverse set of real-world computational DAGs to show that the resulting scheduler significantly outperforms both academic and practical baselines. In particular, even without NUMA effects, our scheduler finds solutions of 24%-44% smaller cost on average than the baselines, and in case of NUMA effects, it achieves up to a factor $2.5times$ improvement compared to the baselines. Finally, we also develop a multilevel scheduling algorithm, which provides up to almost a factor $5times$ improvement in the special case when the problem is dominated by very high communication costs.
Read more4/24/2024