Comparing Visual Metaphors with Textual Code For Learning Basic Computer Science Concepts in Virtual Reality

Overview

• This paper describes a pilot study that examines how virtual reality (VR) applications can be used to teach computer science (CS) concepts to learners new to the field.
• Two experimental groups were taught using different VR applications - one with textual code and the other with everyday objects as visual metaphors for the CS concepts.
• The study compared self-efficacy, CS knowledge, productivity, and engagement between the two groups before and after the VR activity intervention.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers developed two different virtual reality (VR) applications to teach basic programming concepts to people new to computer science. In one version of the app, the programming concepts were represented by actual code, while in the other version, the concepts were represented by everyday objects as visual metaphors.

The study looked at how effective these two approaches were at improving the learners' confidence in their ability to do computer science (self-efficacy) and their actual knowledge of computer science concepts. It also examined how engaged and productive the learners felt during the VR activity.

The researchers found that both versions of the VR app led to increased self-efficacy and knowledge in the learners. This suggests that using VR to teach programming can be an effective approach, whether the concepts are represented textually or through visual metaphors.

However, this was a small pilot study, so more research with a larger number of participants would be needed to confirm these preliminary findings. The researchers plan to conduct additional studies to build on these initial results.

Technical Explanation

The study used a between-subjects experimental design with two treatment groups. One group used a VR application that represented programming concepts through textual code, while the other group used a VR application that represented the concepts through everyday objects as visual metaphors.

Before and after the VR activity intervention, the participants completed self-efficacy surveys and knowledge tests related to computer science. After the intervention, they also filled out an attitudinal survey to assess their sense of productivity and engagement with the VR activity.

The results showed that both groups experienced increases in self-efficacy and knowledge related to computer science after the VR activity. This suggests that VR can be an effective tool for teaching basic programming concepts, regardless of whether the representation is textual or uses visual metaphors.

The researchers note that this was a small-scale pilot study, and further research with a larger sample size would be needed to confirm and expand upon these preliminary findings. Conducting follow-up studies with more participants is a key next step to validate the results and gain a deeper understanding of the relative merits of the two VR application approaches.

Critical Analysis

The pilot nature of this study means the sample size was quite small, which limits the ability to draw firm conclusions from the results. Larger-scale follow-up studies will be important to verify the findings and explore the impacts of the different VR application designs in more depth.

Additionally, the study did not include a control group that did not receive the VR intervention. This makes it difficult to attribute the observed increases in self-efficacy and knowledge solely to the VR activities, as other factors could have contributed.

Future research could also investigate the long-term retention of the computer science concepts learned through the VR activities, as well as explore how the VR applications might impact learners' attitudes and interest in pursuing further computer science education and careers.

Overall, this pilot study provides an encouraging initial look at how virtual reality could be leveraged to improve computer science education for those new to the field. With additional rigorous research, the findings could inform the development of more effective VR-based learning tools and experiences.

Conclusion

This pilot study suggests that virtual reality (VR) applications can be an effective way to teach basic computer science (CS) concepts to learners who are new to the field. Both textual and visual metaphor-based VR approaches led to increases in the participants' CS self-efficacy and knowledge.

While further research with larger sample sizes is needed to confirm and expand upon these preliminary findings, this study represents a promising step toward exploring how immersive technologies like VR could be leveraged to make computer science more accessible and engaging for a wider range of learners. Developing effective VR-based educational tools has the potential to broaden participation in CS and prepare more people for the growing number of tech-driven jobs and opportunities.