Compositional Generative Modeling: A Single Model is Not All You Need
2402.01103
0
0
Abstract
Large monolithic generative models trained on massive amounts of data have become an increasingly dominant approach in AI research. In this paper, we argue that we should instead construct large generative systems by composing smaller generative models together. We show how such a compositional generative approach enables us to learn distributions in a more data-efficient manner, enabling generalization to parts of the data distribution unseen at training time. We further show how this enables us to program and construct new generative models for tasks completely unseen at training. Finally, we show that in many cases, we can discover separate compositional components from data.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper discusses the limitations of using a single generative model to handle the full range of human cognition and proposes a more modular, compositional approach.
- It argues that a single model is not sufficient to capture the complexity and diversity of real-world data distributions, and that a more flexible, composable system is needed to achieve generalization to new distributions.
- The paper introduces the concept of compositional generative modeling as a potential solution, and discusses its advantages over traditional monolithic models.
Plain English Explanation
The paper suggests that using a single, all-encompassing generative model to capture the full range of human knowledge and abilities may not be the best approach. Instead, it proposes a more modular, compositional system that can be broken down into smaller, specialized components.
The idea is that the complexity and diversity of real-world data is too vast for a single model to handle effectively. By breaking the problem down into smaller, more manageable pieces, the system can become more data-efficient and better able to generalize to new distributions that it hasn't seen before.
This approach, known as compositional generative modeling, is inspired by the way the human brain processes information, with different specialized regions handling different types of inputs and tasks. By emulating this modular, composable structure, the authors believe that AI systems can become more robust, flexible, and ultimately more useful in the real world.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a theoretical framework for compositional generative modeling, which proposes that a single, monolithic generative model is not sufficient to capture the full range of human cognition and the diversity of real-world data distributions.
Instead, the authors argue that a more modular, composable system is needed, where specialized sub-components can be combined in different ways to handle different types of inputs and tasks. This approach is inspired by the way the human brain processes information, with different regions handling different specialized functions.
The paper explores the potential advantages of this compositional approach, including improved data efficiency, enhanced generalization to new distributions, and the ability to more effectively handle the complexity and diversity of real-world data.
The authors also discuss the challenges and potential pitfalls of implementing such a compositional system, including the need for novel architectural designs, training algorithms, and evaluation metrics that can effectively capture the benefits of modularity and compositionality.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling theoretical framework for compositional generative modeling, but it acknowledges that significant technical and practical challenges remain in realizing this vision. For example, the authors note that designing effective modular architectures and training algorithms that can seamlessly compose sub-components is a non-trivial task.
Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed implementation or evaluation of a compositional generative modeling system, leaving some uncertainty around the practical feasibility and performance of this approach compared to traditional monolithic models.
While the authors make a strong case for the potential benefits of compositionality, such as improved data efficiency and generalization, further empirical research and real-world validation would be needed to fully substantiate these claims.
Overall, the paper presents a thought-provoking and well-reasoned argument for the importance of compositional generative modeling in the pursuit of more flexible, generalizable AI systems. While the technical challenges are significant, the potential benefits make this a promising area for future research and development.
Conclusion
The paper argues that a single, monolithic generative model is not sufficient to capture the full complexity and diversity of real-world data and human cognition. Instead, it proposes a more modular, compositional approach to generative modeling, inspired by the way the human brain processes information.
By breaking down the problem into specialized sub-components that can be flexibly combined, the authors believe that AI systems can become more data-efficient, generalizable, and better able to handle the challenges of the real world. While significant technical hurdles remain, the potential benefits of compositional generative modeling make it a promising direction for future research in the pursuit of more flexible and capable AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
š
What makes Models Compositional? A Theoretical View: With Supplement
Parikshit Ram, Tim Klinger, Alexander G. Gray
0
0
Compositionality is thought to be a key component of language, and various compositional benchmarks have been developed to empirically probe the compositional generalization of existing sequence processing models. These benchmarks often highlight failures of existing models, but it is not clear why these models fail in this way. In this paper, we seek to theoretically understand the role the compositional structure of the models plays in these failures and how this structure relates to their expressivity and sample complexity. We propose a general neuro-symbolic definition of compositional functions and their compositional complexity. We then show how various existing general and special purpose sequence processing models (such as recurrent, convolution and attention-based ones) fit this definition and use it to analyze their compositional complexity. Finally, we provide theoretical guarantees for the expressivity and systematic generalization of compositional models that explicitly depend on our proposed definition and highlighting factors which drive poor empirical performance.
5/7/2024
Sequential Compositional Generalization in Multimodal Models
Semih Yagcioglu, Osman Batur .Ince, Aykut Erdem, Erkut Erdem, Desmond Elliott, Deniz Yuret
0
0
The rise of large-scale multimodal models has paved the pathway for groundbreaking advances in generative modeling and reasoning, unlocking transformative applications in a variety of complex tasks. However, a pressing question that remains is their genuine capability for stronger forms of generalization, which has been largely underexplored in the multimodal setting. Our study aims to address this by examining sequential compositional generalization using textsc{CompAct} (underline{Comp}ositional underline{Act}ivities)footnote{Project Page: url{http://cyberiada.github.io/CompAct}}, a carefully constructed, perceptually grounded dataset set within a rich backdrop of egocentric kitchen activity videos. Each instance in our dataset is represented with a combination of raw video footage, naturally occurring sound, and crowd-sourced step-by-step descriptions. More importantly, our setup ensures that the individual concepts are consistently distributed across training and evaluation sets, while their compositions are novel in the evaluation set. We conduct a comprehensive assessment of several unimodal and multimodal models. Our findings reveal that bi-modal and tri-modal models exhibit a clear edge over their text-only counterparts. This highlights the importance of multimodality while charting a trajectory for future research in this domain.
4/19/2024
š¬
Towards Compositionally Generalizable Semantic Parsing in Large Language Models: A Survey
Amogh Mannekote
0
0
Compositional generalization is the ability of a model to generalize to complex, previously unseen types of combinations of entities from just having seen the primitives. This type of generalization is particularly relevant to the semantic parsing community for applications such as task-oriented dialogue, text-to-SQL parsing, and information retrieval, as they can harbor infinite complexity. Despite the success of large language models (LLMs) in a wide range of NLP tasks, unlocking perfect compositional generalization still remains one of the few last unsolved frontiers. The past few years has seen a surge of interest in works that explore the limitations of, methods to improve, and evaluation metrics for compositional generalization capabilities of LLMs for semantic parsing tasks. In this work, we present a literature survey geared at synthesizing recent advances in analysis, methods, and evaluation schemes to offer a starting point for both practitioners and researchers in this area.
4/23/2024
A Survey on Compositional Learning of AI Models: Theoretical and Experimetnal Practices
Sania Sinha, Tanawan Premsri, Parisa Kordjamshidi
0
0
Compositional learning, mastering the ability to combine basic concepts and construct more intricate ones, is crucial for human cognition, especially in human language comprehension and visual perception. This notion is tightly connected to generalization over unobserved situations. Despite its integral role in intelligence, there is a lack of systematic theoretical and experimental research methodologies, making it difficult to analyze the compositional learning abilities of computational models. In this paper, we survey the literature on compositional learning of AI models and the connections made to cognitive studies. We identify abstract concepts of compositionality in cognitive and linguistic studies and connect these to the computational challenges faced by language and vision models in compositional reasoning. We overview the formal definitions, tasks, evaluation benchmarks, variety of computational models, and theoretical findings. We cover modern studies on large language models to provide a deeper understanding of the cutting-edge compositional capabilities exhibited by state-of-the-art AI models and pinpoint important directions for future research.
6/14/2024