From Frege to chatGPT: Compositionality in language, cognition, and deep neural networks
2405.15164
0
0
Abstract
Compositionality has long been considered a key explanatory property underlying human intelligence: arbitrary concepts can be composed into novel complex combinations, permitting the acquisition of an open ended, potentially infinite expressive capacity from finite learning experiences. Influential arguments have held that neural networks fail to explain this aspect of behavior, leading many to dismiss them as viable models of human cognition. Over the last decade, however, modern deep neural networks (DNNs), which share the same fundamental design principles as their predecessors, have come to dominate artificial intelligence, exhibiting the most advanced cognitive behaviors ever demonstrated in machines. In particular, large language models (LLMs), DNNs trained to predict the next word on a large corpus of text, have proven capable of sophisticated behaviors such as writing syntactically complex sentences without grammatical errors, producing cogent chains of reasoning, and even writing original computer programs -- all behaviors thought to require compositional processing. In this chapter, we survey recent empirical work from machine learning for a broad audience in philosophy, cognitive science, and neuroscience, situating recent breakthroughs within the broader context of philosophical arguments about compositionality. In particular, our review emphasizes two approaches to endowing neural networks with compositional generalization capabilities: (1) architectural inductive biases, and (2) metalearning, or learning to learn. We also present findings suggesting that LLM pretraining can be understood as a kind of metalearning, and can thereby equip DNNs with compositional generalization abilities in a similar way. We conclude by discussing the implications that these findings may have for the study of compositionality in human cognition and by suggesting avenues for future research.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the topic of compositionality in language, cognition, and deep neural networks.
- It provides a historical perspective on the concept of compositionality, tracing its development from the work of philosopher Gottlob Frege to its relevance in modern language models like ChatGPT.
- The paper investigates how the principle of compositionality, which states that the meaning of a complex expression is determined by the meanings of its parts and the way they are combined, applies to various domains.
Plain English Explanation
Compositionality is the idea that the meaning of a complex expression, like a sentence, can be determined by the meanings of its individual parts, like words, and how they are put together. This concept has been important in understanding how language, thought, and artificial intelligence work.
The paper starts by looking at the historical roots of compositionality, going back to the work of the German philosopher Gottlob Frege in the late 1800s. Frege proposed that the meaning of a sentence is built up from the meanings of its individual words and the rules for combining them.
The paper then explores how the principle of compositionality applies in different contexts. For example, it examines how compositionality relates to how humans understand and use language, and how it is relevant to the development of deep neural networks that can process and generate language, like the ChatGPT model.
The key idea is that compositionality allows us to understand and generate an infinite number of meaningful expressions by combining a finite set of building blocks (words, concepts, etc.) in systematic ways. This is a powerful property that enables humans to be creative with language and that researchers are trying to capture in artificial intelligence systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper provides a historical overview of the concept of compositionality, tracing its origins to the work of Gottlob Frege in the late 19th century. Frege argued that the meaning of a complex expression, like a sentence, is determined by the meanings of its parts (e.g., words) and the way they are combined.
The paper then examines how the principle of compositionality has been applied in various domains, including language and cognition as well as in the design and analysis of deep neural networks. It explores how compositionality enables the systematic reuse of linguistic and conceptual building blocks to generate an infinite number of meaningful expressions.
The paper also discusses the challenges in achieving compositionality in large language models, such as the potential for these models to exhibit "compositional deficiencies" where their behavior deviates from the expected compositional patterns.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and thought-provoking examination of the concept of compositionality and its relevance across various domains. However, it acknowledges that achieving true compositionality in complex systems like deep neural networks remains an ongoing challenge.
One potential limitation of the research is that it focuses primarily on language and cognition, without delving deeply into the implications of compositionality for other areas of artificial intelligence, such as reasoning, decision-making, or robotic control. Exploring the broader applicability of compositionality principles could yield additional insights.
Additionally, the paper touches on the issue of "compositional deficiencies" in large language models but does not provide a detailed analysis of the underlying causes or potential solutions. Further research in this area could help inform the development of more compositional and generative language models.
Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution to the understanding of compositionality and its significance in the fields of language, cognition, and artificial intelligence. Encouraging readers to think critically about the research and its implications is an important aspect of the work.
Conclusion
This paper offers a comprehensive exploration of the concept of compositionality, tracing its historical origins and examining its relevance in language, cognition, and deep neural networks. The principle of compositionality, which states that the meaning of a complex expression can be determined by the meanings of its parts and the way they are combined, is a powerful idea that has shaped our understanding of how humans and machines process and generate language.
The paper's insights into the challenges of achieving true compositionality in large language models like ChatGPT highlight the ongoing research needed to develop more compositional and generative AI systems. As the field of artificial intelligence continues to advance, the principles of compositionality will likely play an increasingly important role in shaping the design and capabilities of language models and other intelligent systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Development of Compositionality and Generalization through Interactive Learning of Language and Action of Robots
Prasanna Vijayaraghavan, Jeffrey Frederic Queisser, Sergio Verduzco Flores, Jun Tani
0
0
Humans excel at applying learned behavior to unlearned situations. A crucial component of this generalization behavior is our ability to compose/decompose a whole into reusable parts, an attribute known as compositionality. One of the fundamental questions in robotics concerns this characteristic. How can linguistic compositionality be developed concomitantly with sensorimotor skills through associative learning, particularly when individuals only learn partial linguistic compositions and their corresponding sensorimotor patterns? To address this question, we propose a brain-inspired neural network model that integrates vision, proprioception, and language into a framework of predictive coding and active inference, based on the free-energy principle. The effectiveness and capabilities of this model were assessed through various simulation experiments conducted with a robot arm. Our results show that generalization in learning to unlearned verb-noun compositions, is significantly enhanced when training variations of task composition are increased. We attribute this to self-organized compositional structures in linguistic latent state space being influenced significantly by sensorimotor learning. Ablation studies show that visual attention and working memory are essential to accurately generate visuo-motor sequences to achieve linguistically represented goals. These insights advance our understanding of mechanisms underlying development of compositionality through interactions of linguistic and sensorimotor experience.
4/1/2024
A Survey on Compositional Learning of AI Models: Theoretical and Experimetnal Practices
Sania Sinha, Tanawan Premsri, Parisa Kordjamshidi
0
0
Compositional learning, mastering the ability to combine basic concepts and construct more intricate ones, is crucial for human cognition, especially in human language comprehension and visual perception. This notion is tightly connected to generalization over unobserved situations. Despite its integral role in intelligence, there is a lack of systematic theoretical and experimental research methodologies, making it difficult to analyze the compositional learning abilities of computational models. In this paper, we survey the literature on compositional learning of AI models and the connections made to cognitive studies. We identify abstract concepts of compositionality in cognitive and linguistic studies and connect these to the computational challenges faced by language and vision models in compositional reasoning. We overview the formal definitions, tasks, evaluation benchmarks, variety of computational models, and theoretical findings. We cover modern studies on large language models to provide a deeper understanding of the cutting-edge compositional capabilities exhibited by state-of-the-art AI models and pinpoint important directions for future research.
6/14/2024
💬
What Makes a Language Easy to Deep-Learn?
Lukas Galke, Yoav Ram, Limor Raviv
0
0
Deep neural networks drive the success of natural language processing. A fundamental property of language is its compositional structure, allowing humans to systematically produce forms for new meanings. For humans, languages with more compositional and transparent structures are typically easier to learn than those with opaque and irregular structures. However, this learnability advantage has not yet been shown for deep neural networks, limiting their use as models for human language learning. Here, we directly test how neural networks compare to humans in learning and generalizing different languages that vary in their degree of compositional structure. We evaluate the memorization and generalization capabilities of a large language model and recurrent neural networks, and show that both deep neural networks exhibit a learnability advantage for more structured linguistic input: neural networks exposed to more compositional languages show more systematic generalization, greater agreement between different agents, and greater similarity to human learners.
4/5/2024
🔍
What makes Models Compositional? A Theoretical View: With Supplement
Parikshit Ram, Tim Klinger, Alexander G. Gray
0
0
Compositionality is thought to be a key component of language, and various compositional benchmarks have been developed to empirically probe the compositional generalization of existing sequence processing models. These benchmarks often highlight failures of existing models, but it is not clear why these models fail in this way. In this paper, we seek to theoretically understand the role the compositional structure of the models plays in these failures and how this structure relates to their expressivity and sample complexity. We propose a general neuro-symbolic definition of compositional functions and their compositional complexity. We then show how various existing general and special purpose sequence processing models (such as recurrent, convolution and attention-based ones) fit this definition and use it to analyze their compositional complexity. Finally, we provide theoretical guarantees for the expressivity and systematic generalization of compositional models that explicitly depend on our proposed definition and highlighting factors which drive poor empirical performance.
5/7/2024