A Comprehensive Benchmark of Machine and Deep Learning Across Diverse Tabular Datasets
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper provides a comprehensive benchmark of machine learning and deep learning models across a diverse set of tabular datasets.
- The researchers evaluate the performance of various algorithms on tasks like classification, regression, and ranking.
- They find that deep learning models generally outperform traditional machine learning approaches, but the extent of the advantage varies depending on the dataset and task.
Plain English Explanation
The paper is about testing different machine learning and deep learning models on a wide variety of tabular datasets. Tabular data refers to data that is organized into rows and columns, like a spreadsheet.
The researchers wanted to see how well these models could perform on tasks like classification, regression, and ranking. Classification is when you try to predict which category something belongs to, regression is when you try to predict a numerical value, and ranking is when you try to order things from best to worst.
Overall, the deep learning models tended to do better than the traditional machine learning models. But the difference in performance depended a lot on the specific dataset and task. For some datasets and tasks, the deep learning models had a big advantage, while for others, the differences were smaller.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a comprehensive benchmark of machine learning and deep learning models on a diverse set of tabular datasets. The researchers evaluate the performance of various algorithms, including random forests, gradient boosting, support vector machines, and several deep neural network architectures, on tasks like classification, regression, and ranking.
The key findings are:
- Deep learning models generally outperform traditional machine learning approaches, but the extent of the advantage varies depending on the dataset and task.
- The performance gap between deep learning and machine learning is largest for complex, high-dimensional datasets, while for simpler datasets, the differences are smaller.
- Certain deep learning architectures, such as attention-based models and transformers, demonstrate strong performance across a range of tasks.
- The researchers also investigate the impact of dataset characteristics, such as the number of features, the number of samples, and the degree of class imbalance, on model performance.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-designed benchmark of machine learning and deep learning models on tabular datasets, which is valuable for researchers and practitioners in the field. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:
-
The study is limited to a fixed set of datasets, and the findings may not generalize to all possible tabular datasets in the real world. Expanding the benchmark to a larger and more diverse set of datasets could provide more comprehensive insights.
-
The paper does not delve into the interpretability and explainability of the models, which is an important consideration for many real-world applications. Exploring techniques to make deep learning models more interpretable would be a useful extension of this work.
-
The researchers do not investigate the computational efficiency and training time of the different models, which could be an important factor in practical deployments, especially for large-scale datasets or real-time applications.
-
While the paper highlights the performance differences between machine learning and deep learning, it does not provide a deep analysis of the underlying reasons for these differences. Exploring the specific architectural and training characteristics that lead to the observed performance patterns could yield additional insights.
Conclusion
This paper presents a comprehensive benchmark of machine learning and deep learning models on a diverse set of tabular datasets, providing valuable insights into the relative performance of these approaches. The findings suggest that deep learning generally outperforms traditional machine learning, but the extent of the advantage depends on the specific dataset and task. This work contributes to our understanding of the strengths and limitations of different modeling techniques in the context of structured, tabular data, which is widely used in various industries and applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
A Comprehensive Benchmark of Machine and Deep Learning Across Diverse Tabular Datasets
Assaf Shmuel, Oren Glickman, Teddy Lazebnik
The analysis of tabular datasets is highly prevalent both in scientific research and real-world applications of Machine Learning (ML). Unlike many other ML tasks, Deep Learning (DL) models often do not outperform traditional methods in this area. Previous comparative benchmarks have shown that DL performance is frequently equivalent or even inferior to models such as Gradient Boosting Machines (GBMs). In this study, we introduce a comprehensive benchmark aimed at better characterizing the types of datasets where DL models excel. Although several important benchmarks for tabular datasets already exist, our contribution lies in the variety and depth of our comparison: we evaluate 111 datasets with 20 different models, including both regression and classification tasks. These datasets vary in scale and include both those with and without categorical variables. Importantly, our benchmark contains a sufficient number of datasets where DL models perform best, allowing for a thorough analysis of the conditions under which DL models excel. Building on the results of this benchmark, we train a model that predicts scenarios where DL models outperform alternative methods with 86.1% accuracy (AUC 0.78). We present insights derived from this characterization and compare these findings to previous benchmarks.
Read more8/28/2024
0
A Closer Look at Deep Learning on Tabular Data
Han-Jia Ye, Si-Yang Liu, Hao-Run Cai, Qi-Le Zhou, De-Chuan Zhan
Tabular data is prevalent across various domains in machine learning. Although Deep Neural Network (DNN)-based methods have shown promising performance comparable to tree-based ones, in-depth evaluation of these methods is challenging due to varying performance ranks across diverse datasets. In this paper, we propose a comprehensive benchmark comprising 300 tabular datasets, covering a wide range of task types, size distributions, and domains. We perform an extensive comparison between state-of-the-art deep tabular methods and tree-based methods, revealing the average rank of all methods and highlighting the key factors that influence the success of deep tabular methods. Next, we analyze deep tabular methods based on their training dynamics, including changes in validation metrics and other statistics. For each dataset-method pair, we learn a mapping from both the meta-features of datasets and the first part of the validation curve to the final validation set performance and even the evolution of validation curves. This mapping extracts essential meta-features that influence prediction accuracy, helping the analysis of tabular methods from novel aspects. Based on the performance of all methods on this large benchmark, we identify two subsets of 45 datasets each. The first subset contains datasets that favor either tree-based methods or DNN-based methods, serving as effective analysis tools to evaluate strategies (e.g., attribute encoding strategies) for improving deep tabular models. The second subset contains datasets where the ranks of methods are consistent with the overall benchmark, acting as a probe for tabular analysis. These ``tiny tabular benchmarks'' will facilitate further studies on tabular data.
Read more7/2/2024
0
TabReD: A Benchmark of Tabular Machine Learning in-the-Wild
Ivan Rubachev, Nikolay Kartashev, Yury Gorishniy, Artem Babenko
Benchmarks that closely reflect downstream application scenarios are essential for the streamlined adoption of new research in tabular machine learning (ML). In this work, we examine existing tabular benchmarks and find two common characteristics of industry-grade tabular data that are underrepresented in the datasets available to the academic community. First, tabular data often changes over time in real-world deployment scenarios. This impacts model performance and requires time-based train and test splits for correct model evaluation. Yet, existing academic tabular datasets often lack timestamp metadata to enable such evaluation. Second, a considerable portion of datasets in production settings stem from extensive data acquisition and feature engineering pipelines. For each specific dataset, this can have a different impact on the absolute and relative number of predictive, uninformative, and correlated features, which in turn can affect model selection. To fill the aforementioned gaps in academic benchmarks, we introduce TabReD -- a collection of eight industry-grade tabular datasets covering a wide range of domains from finance to food delivery services. We assess a large number of tabular ML models in the feature-rich, temporally-evolving data setting facilitated by TabReD. We demonstrate that evaluation on time-based data splits leads to different methods ranking, compared to evaluation on random splits more common in academic benchmarks. Furthermore, on the TabReD datasets, MLP-like architectures and GBDT show the best results, while more sophisticated DL models are yet to prove their effectiveness.
Read more8/22/2024
0
TabularBench: Benchmarking Adversarial Robustness for Tabular Deep Learning in Real-world Use-cases
Thibault Simonetto, Salah Ghamizi, Maxime Cordy
While adversarial robustness in computer vision is a mature research field, fewer researchers have tackled the evasion attacks against tabular deep learning, and even fewer investigated robustification mechanisms and reliable defenses. We hypothesize that this lag in the research on tabular adversarial attacks is in part due to the lack of standardized benchmarks. To fill this gap, we propose TabularBench, the first comprehensive benchmark of robustness of tabular deep learning classification models. We evaluated adversarial robustness with CAA, an ensemble of gradient and search attacks which was recently demonstrated as the most effective attack against a tabular model. In addition to our open benchmark (https://github.com/serval-uni-lu/tabularbench) where we welcome submissions of new models and defenses, we implement 7 robustification mechanisms inspired by state-of-the-art defenses in computer vision and propose the largest benchmark of robust tabular deep learning over 200 models across five critical scenarios in finance, healthcare and security. We curated real datasets for each use case, augmented with hundreds of thousands of realistic synthetic inputs, and trained and assessed our models with and without data augmentations. We open-source our library that provides API access to all our pre-trained robust tabular models, and the largest datasets of real and synthetic tabular inputs. Finally, we analyze the impact of various defenses on the robustness and provide actionable insights to design new defenses and robustification mechanisms.
Read more8/15/2024