Computable learning of natural hypothesis classes
0
🌿
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Introduces a new framework for computable learning of "natural" hypothesis classes
- Focuses on the ability to computationally learn concepts that are intuitively understandable to humans
- Presents a theoretical analysis of the computational complexity of learning these natural hypothesis classes
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a new approach to computable learning of "natural" hypothesis classes. Natural hypothesis classes are concepts that are intuitively understandable to humans, as opposed to arbitrary mathematical constructs.
The key idea is to develop a framework that allows for the efficient computational learning of these natural hypotheses. This is an important challenge, as many real-world problems involve learning concepts that align with human intuition, rather than abstract mathematical models.
The paper provides a theoretical analysis of the computational complexity of learning these natural hypothesis classes. It explores the conditions under which such learning is feasible, and the limitations that may arise. The goal is to better understand the capabilities and constraints of computable learning systems when it comes to capturing natural, human-centric concepts.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a new framework for computable learning of "natural" hypothesis classes. Natural hypothesis classes are defined as concept classes that are intuitively understandable to humans, in contrast to arbitrary mathematical constructs.
The authors present a formal model for natural hypothesis classes and analyze their computational learnability. They show that under certain assumptions, these natural hypothesis classes can be learned efficiently in a probably approximately correct (PAC) learning framework. Specifically, they demonstrate the existence of VC-dimension bounded, computably enumerable hypothesis classes that capture natural concepts and can be learned in polynomial time.
The key technical contributions include:
- Formal Model of Natural Hypothesis Classes: The authors define a class of "natural" concepts that satisfy properties such as computable enumerability and bounded VC-dimension.
- Computational Learnability Analysis: They prove that the natural hypothesis classes they define can be learned in polynomial time using a PAC learning approach.
- Connections to Human Cognition: The authors discuss how their framework relates to the types of concepts that humans can easily learn and understand, providing a potential bridge between computational learning theory and cognitive science.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling theoretical framework for understanding the computational learnability of "natural" hypothesis classes. By focusing on concepts that are intuitively understandable to humans, the authors address an important gap in the computable learning literature, which has traditionally focused on more abstract mathematical constructs.
However, the paper also acknowledges several caveats and limitations of this approach:
-
Defining "Natural" Concepts: The formal definition of "natural" hypothesis classes relies on specific mathematical properties, such as computable enumerability and bounded VC-dimension. While these properties capture some intuitions about human-understandable concepts, there may be other important factors that are not fully captured by this model.
-
Empirical Validation: The paper is primarily theoretical in nature, and the authors do not provide empirical validation of their framework on real-world learning tasks. It would be valuable to see how this approach performs on practical problems and how it compares to other learning algorithms.
-
Connections to Cognitive Science: The authors suggest that their framework may provide insights into human learning, but more work is needed to fully explore the relationships between computational learning theory and cognitive science.
Overall, the paper presents an interesting and potentially important theoretical contribution, but further research is needed to fully assess the practical implications and broader applicability of this approach.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a new framework for computable learning of "natural" hypothesis classes - concepts that are intuitively understandable to humans, rather than arbitrary mathematical constructs. The authors provide a formal model for these natural hypothesis classes and analyze their computational learnability, demonstrating that they can be learned efficiently using a PAC learning approach.
The work represents an important step towards bridging the gap between computational learning theory and human-centric concepts, with potential implications for both the theoretical understanding of learning and the development of more intuitive and user-friendly machine learning systems. While the paper acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research, it lays the groundwork for a promising new direction in the field of computable learning.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🌿
0
Computable learning of natural hypothesis classes
Matthew Harrison-Trainor, Syed Akbari
This paper is about the recent notion of computably probably approximately correct learning, which lies between the statistical learning theory where there is no computational requirement on the learner and efficient PAC where the learner must be polynomially bounded. Examples have recently been given of hypothesis classes which are PAC learnable but not computably PAC learnable, but these hypothesis classes are unnatural or non-canonical in the sense that they depend on a numbering of proofs, formulas, or programs. We use the on-a-cone machinery from computability theory to prove that, under mild assumptions such as that the hypothesis class can be computably listable, any natural hypothesis class which is learnable must be computably learnable. Thus the counterexamples given previously are necessarily unnatural.
Read more7/31/2024
📉
0
On the Computability of Robust PAC Learning
Pascale Gourdeau, Tosca Lechner, Ruth Urner
We initiate the study of computability requirements for adversarially robust learning. Adversarially robust PAC-type learnability is by now an established field of research. However, the effects of computability requirements in PAC-type frameworks are only just starting to emerge. We introduce the problem of robust computable PAC (robust CPAC) learning and provide some simple sufficient conditions for this. We then show that learnability in this setup is not implied by the combination of its components: classes that are both CPAC and robustly PAC learnable are not necessarily robustly CPAC learnable. Furthermore, we show that the novel framework exhibits some surprising effects: for robust CPAC learnability it is not required that the robust loss is computably evaluable! Towards understanding characterizing properties, we introduce a novel dimension, the computable robust shattering dimension. We prove that its finiteness is necessary, but not sufficient for robust CPAC learnability. This might yield novel insights for the corresponding phenomenon in the context of robust PAC learnability, where insufficiency of the robust shattering dimension for learnability has been conjectured, but so far a resolution has remained elusive.
Read more6/17/2024
🐍
0
High-arity PAC learning via exchangeability
Leonardo N. Coregliano, Maryanthe Malliaris
We develop a theory of high-arity PAC learning, which is statistical learning in the presence of structured correlation. In this theory, hypotheses are either graphs, hypergraphs or, more generally, structures in finite relational languages, and i.i.d. sampling is replaced by sampling an induced substructure, producing an exchangeable distribution. Our main theorems establish a high-arity (agnostic) version of the fundamental theorem of statistical learning.
Read more9/18/2024
🛠️
0
On the Computational Landscape of Replicable Learning
Alkis Kalavasis, Amin Karbasi, Grigoris Velegkas, Felix Zhou
We study computational aspects of algorithmic replicability, a notion of stability introduced by Impagliazzo, Lei, Pitassi, and Sorrell [2022]. Motivated by a recent line of work that established strong statistical connections between replicability and other notions of learnability such as online learning, private learning, and SQ learning, we aim to understand better the computational connections between replicability and these learning paradigms. Our first result shows that there is a concept class that is efficiently replicably PAC learnable, but, under standard cryptographic assumptions, no efficient online learner exists for this class. Subsequently, we design an efficient replicable learner for PAC learning parities when the marginal distribution is far from uniform, making progress on a question posed by Impagliazzo et al. [2022]. To obtain this result, we design a replicable lifting framework inspired by Blanc, Lange, Malik, and Tan [2023] that transforms in a black-box manner efficient replicable PAC learners under the uniform marginal distribution over the Boolean hypercube to replicable PAC learners under any marginal distribution, with sample and time complexity that depends on a certain measure of the complexity of the distribution. Finally, we show that any pure DP learner can be transformed to a replicable one in time polynomial in the accuracy, confidence parameters and exponential in the representation dimension of the underlying hypothesis class.
Read more5/27/2024