Conditions for Altruistic Perversity in Two-Strategy Population Games
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This research paper investigates the conditions under which altruistic behavior can lead to perverse outcomes in two-strategy population games.
- The study explores how the interaction between natural selection, payoff structures, and behavioral rules can result in scenarios where altruistic individuals end up harming themselves and their group.
- The paper provides a formal mathematical model to analyze these dynamics and identify the key factors that contribute to altruistic perversity.
Plain English Explanation
In many social and biological systems, individuals can choose to cooperate or compete with others. This choice is often influenced by the potential benefits and costs associated with each strategy. In some cases, individuals may even choose to be altruistic and sacrifice their own interests for the greater good of the group.
However, this research shows that altruism can sometimes backfire and lead to perverse outcomes, where altruistic individuals end up harming themselves and their group. The researchers developed a mathematical model to understand the conditions under which this "altruistic perversity" can occur.
The key factors identified in the model include the payoff structure of the game, the behavioral rules that individuals use to make decisions, and the dynamics of natural selection within the population. Depending on how these elements interact, altruistic individuals may end up being exploited by more self-interested players, or their altruistic behavior may actually reduce the overall fitness and success of the group.
This research has important implications for understanding the evolution of cooperation and the emergence of social norms in various contexts, from population games to protocol models and social dilemmas. By identifying the conditions that can lead to altruistic perversity, the findings can help inform the design of systems and environments that promote more beneficial forms of cooperation and collective action.
Technical Explanation
The researchers developed a mathematical model of a two-strategy population game, where individuals can choose to either cooperate or defect. The payoff structure of the game is defined by a payoff matrix that specifies the rewards and penalties for each possible combination of strategies.
The model incorporates the dynamics of natural selection, where individuals with higher payoffs are more likely to reproduce and pass on their strategies to the next generation. The researchers also consider different behavioral rules that individuals can use to decide which strategy to adopt, such as imitating the most successful players or following a fixed probability of cooperating.
By analyzing this model, the researchers identified several conditions that can lead to altruistic perversity. For example, if the payoff for cooperating is highly dependent on the number of other cooperators in the population, then altruistic individuals may end up being exploited by defectors, leading to a decline in the overall fitness of the group.
Additionally, the researchers found that the specific behavioral rules used by individuals can also influence the emergence of altruistic perversity. Strategies that rely on imitating the most successful players or following a fixed probability of cooperating may be more susceptible to altruistic perversity than strategies that adapt their behavior based on the current state of the population.
The researchers validated their theoretical findings through numerical simulations and compared their results to previous work on the evolution of cooperation in population games.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge several limitations and potential areas for further research in their paper. For instance, they note that their model assumes a simplified two-strategy game and does not consider the effects of more complex strategies or the introduction of new strategies over time.
Additionally, the researchers suggest that the specific behavioral rules and payoff structures they examined may not capture the full range of real-world situations where altruistic perversity can occur. More empirical studies and field observations may be needed to validate the model's predictions and identify additional factors that contribute to this phenomenon.
Furthermore, the paper does not explore the potential implications of altruistic perversity for the design of social institutions, policies, or technological systems. Addressing these broader societal and ethical considerations could be an important area for future research.
Overall, the paper provides a valuable theoretical framework for understanding the conditions that can lead to altruistic perversity in population games. However, further research is needed to fully elucidate the practical implications of these findings and explore potential strategies for mitigating the negative consequences of altruistic behavior in complex social and biological systems.
Conclusion
This research paper examines the conditions under which altruistic behavior in two-strategy population games can lead to perverse outcomes, where altruistic individuals end up harming themselves and their group. The researchers developed a formal mathematical model to analyze the interplay between payoff structures, behavioral rules, and natural selection dynamics, and identified key factors that contribute to the emergence of altruistic perversity.
The findings of this study have important implications for understanding the evolution of cooperation and the design of systems and environments that promote beneficial forms of collective action. By shedding light on the potential pitfalls of altruism, the research can inform the development of strategies and policies that harness the power of cooperation while mitigating the risk of unintended negative consequences.
As the world grapples with increasingly complex social, economic, and environmental challenges, the insights from this paper can contribute to the ongoing efforts to foster more sustainable and equitable forms of cooperation and collective decision-making, both in biological and social systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Conditions for Altruistic Perversity in Two-Strategy Population Games
Colton Hill, Philip N. Brown, Keith Paarporn
Self-interested behavior from individuals can collectively lead to poor societal outcomes. These outcomes can seemingly be improved through the actions of altruistic agents, which benefit other agents in the system. However, it is known in specific contexts that altruistic agents can actually induce worse outcomes compared to a fully selfish population -- a phenomenon we term altruistic perversity. This paper provides a holistic investigation into the necessary conditions that give rise to altruistic perversity. In particular, we study the class of two-strategy population games where one sub-population is altruistic and the other is selfish. We find that a population game can admit altruistic perversity only if the associated social welfare function is convex and the altruistic population is sufficiently large. Our results are a first step in establishing a connection between properties of nominal agent interactions and the potential impacts from altruistic behaviors.
Read more7/17/2024
0
Evolutionary mechanisms that promote cooperation may not promote social welfare
The Anh Han, Manh Hong Duong, Matjaz Perc
Understanding the emergence of prosocial behaviours among self-interested individuals is an important problem in many scientific disciplines. Various mechanisms have been proposed to explain the evolution of such behaviours, primarily seeking the conditions under which a given mechanism can induce highest levels of cooperation. As these mechanisms usually involve costs that alter individual payoffs, it is however possible that aiming for highest levels of cooperation might be detrimental for social welfare -- the later broadly defined as the total population payoff, taking into account all costs involved for inducing increased prosocial behaviours. Herein, by comparatively analysing the social welfare and cooperation levels obtained from stochastic evolutionary models of two well-established mechanisms of prosocial behaviour, namely, peer and institutional incentives, we demonstrate exactly that. We show that the objectives of maximising cooperation levels and the objectives of maximising social welfare are often misaligned. We argue for the need of adopting social welfare as the main optimisation objective when designing and implementing evolutionary mechanisms for social and collective goods.
Read more9/14/2024
0
Subsidy design for better social outcomes
Maria-Florina Balcan, Matteo Pozzi, Dravyansh Sharma
Overcoming the impact of selfish behavior of rational players in multiagent systems is a fundamental problem in game theory. Without any intervention from a central agent, strategic users take actions in order to maximize their personal utility, which can lead to extremely inefficient overall system performance, often indicated by a high Price of Anarchy. Recent work (Lin et al. 2021) investigated and formalized yet another undesirable behavior of rational agents, that of avoiding freely available information about the game for selfish reasons, leading to worse social outcomes. A central planner can significantly mitigate these issues by injecting a subsidy to reduce certain costs associated with the system and obtain net gains in the system performance. Crucially, the planner needs to determine how to allocate this subsidy effectively. We formally show that designing subsidies that perfectly optimize the social good, in terms of minimizing the Price of Anarchy or preventing the information avoidance behavior, is computationally hard under standard complexity theoretic assumptions. On the positive side, we show that we can learn provably good values of subsidy in repeated games coming from the same domain. This data-driven subsidy design approach avoids solving computationally hard problems for unseen games by learning over polynomially many games. We also show that optimal subsidy can be learned with no-regret given an online sequence of games, under mild assumptions on the cost matrix. Our study focuses on two distinct games: a Bayesian extension of the well-studied fair cost-sharing game, and a component maintenance game with engineering applications.
Read more9/6/2024
🎯
0
On the Complexity of Learning to Cooperate with Populations of Socially Rational Agents
Robert Loftin, Saptarashmi Bandyopadhyay, Mustafa Mert c{C}elikok
Artificially intelligent agents deployed in the real-world will require the ability to reliably textit{cooperate} with humans (as well as other, heterogeneous AI agents). To provide formal guarantees of successful cooperation, we must make some assumptions about how partner agents could plausibly behave. Any realistic set of assumptions must account for the fact that other agents may be just as adaptable as our agent is. In this work, we consider the problem of cooperating with a textit{population} of agents in a finitely-repeated, two player general-sum matrix game with private utilities. Two natural assumptions in such settings are that: 1) all agents in the population are individually rational learners, and 2) when any two members of the population are paired together, with high-probability they will achieve at least the same utility as they would under some Pareto efficient equilibrium strategy. Our results first show that these assumptions alone are insufficient to ensure textit{zero-shot} cooperation with members of the target population. We therefore consider the problem of textit{learning} a strategy for cooperating with such a population using prior observations its members interacting with one another. We provide upper and lower bounds on the number of samples needed to learn an effective cooperation strategy. Most importantly, we show that these bounds can be much stronger than those arising from a naive'' reduction of the problem to one of imitation learning.
Read more7/2/2024