Connecting the Dots: Is Mode-Connectedness the Key to Feasible Sample-Based Inference in Bayesian Neural Networks?

Read original: arXiv:2402.01484 - Published 5/29/2024 by Emanuel Sommer, Lisa Wimmer, Theodore Papamarkou, Ludwig Bothmann, Bernd Bischl, David Rugamer
Total Score

0

Connecting the Dots: Is Mode-Connectedness the Key to Feasible Sample-Based Inference in Bayesian Neural Networks?

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper examines the feasibility of sample-based inference in Bayesian neural networks (BNNs), focusing on the concept of mode-connectedness.
  • The authors investigate whether mode-connectedness, which captures the relationship between modes in the posterior distribution, is the key to enabling practical sample-based inference in BNNs.
  • They conduct experiments to understand the mode-connectedness properties of BNN posteriors and their implications for sample-based inference.

Plain English Explanation

Bayesian neural networks (BNNs) are a type of machine learning model that can capture uncertainty in their predictions. However, performing inference, or reasoning about the model's parameters and outputs, in BNNs can be challenging. This paper explores whether a concept called "mode-connectedness" could be the key to making sample-based inference, where the model is repeatedly sampled to estimate its behavior, more feasible in BNNs.

The authors investigate the properties of the posterior distribution, which represents the model's beliefs about its parameters after seeing the data. They examine how the different "modes," or peaks, in this distribution are connected, and whether this mode-connectedness is important for enabling practical sample-based inference.

Through a series of experiments, the researchers aim to understand the mode-connectedness characteristics of BNN posteriors and how they impact the ability to perform efficient sample-based inference. The findings from this work could help advance the practical use of BNNs in real-world applications by shedding light on the challenges and potential solutions for performing inference in these models.

Technical Explanation

The paper explores the feasibility of sample-based inference in Bayesian neural networks (BNNs), focusing on the concept of mode-connectedness. Mode-connectedness captures the relationship between modes, or peaks, in the posterior distribution of a BNN.

The authors hypothesize that mode-connectedness may be the key to enabling practical sample-based inference in BNNs. They conduct a series of experiments to investigate the mode-connectedness properties of BNN posteriors and their implications for sample-based inference.

The experiments involve training BNNs on various datasets and analyzing the properties of the resulting posterior distributions. The researchers examine factors such as the number of modes, the connectivity between modes, and how these properties change as the dataset size or model complexity is varied.

The findings suggest that the mode-connectedness of BNN posteriors can have a significant impact on the feasibility of sample-based inference. In cases where the posterior is highly mode-connected, the authors find that sample-based inference becomes more practical and efficient. Conversely, when the posterior exhibits poor mode-connectedness, sample-based inference can become challenging and computationally expensive.

The paper also discusses potential reasons for the observed mode-connectedness properties, such as the interplay between model capacity, data, and the Bayesian prior. The authors suggest that understanding and addressing the mode-connectedness challenges in BNNs could be crucial for advancing the practical use of these models in real-world applications.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a thorough investigation of the mode-connectedness properties of Bayesian neural network (BNN) posteriors and their implications for sample-based inference. The authors' focus on this aspect of BNN inference is well-justified, as it can have significant implications for the practical feasibility of these models.

One potential limitation of the research is the specific datasets and model architectures used in the experiments. While the authors have made efforts to explore a range of scenarios, the findings may not fully generalize to all possible BNN applications. Further research could investigate the mode-connectedness properties of BNN posteriors in a broader set of problem domains and model configurations.

Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the underlying reasons for the observed mode-connectedness characteristics. While the authors provide some hypotheses, a more detailed analysis of the factors influencing mode-connectedness, such as the interplay between model capacity, data, and prior, could be valuable for developing a more comprehensive understanding of this phenomenon.

Moreover, the paper does not explore potential solutions or strategies for addressing mode-connectedness challenges in BNNs. Investigating methods to improve mode-connectedness or alternative inference approaches that are less sensitive to mode-connectedness could be a fruitful direction for future research.

Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution by highlighting the importance of mode-connectedness in the context of sample-based inference for BNNs. The findings provide a foundation for further research into this critical aspect of Bayesian neural network modeling and inference.

Conclusion

This paper investigates the role of mode-connectedness in the feasibility of sample-based inference for Bayesian neural networks (BNNs). The authors conduct a series of experiments to explore the mode-connectedness properties of BNN posteriors and their implications for practical inference.

The key finding is that mode-connectedness can have a significant impact on the efficiency and feasibility of sample-based inference in BNNs. When the posterior distribution exhibits high mode-connectedness, sample-based inference becomes more practical, while poor mode-connectedness can lead to computational challenges.

The insights from this research could be instrumental in advancing the practical use of BNNs in real-world applications. By understanding the mode-connectedness characteristics of BNN posteriors, researchers and practitioners can develop more effective inference strategies and design models better suited for efficient sample-based reasoning.

Further exploration of the factors influencing mode-connectedness, as well as the investigation of methods to address mode-connectedness challenges, could be valuable avenues for future research in this area.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Connecting the Dots: Is Mode-Connectedness the Key to Feasible Sample-Based Inference in Bayesian Neural Networks?
Total Score

0

Connecting the Dots: Is Mode-Connectedness the Key to Feasible Sample-Based Inference in Bayesian Neural Networks?

Emanuel Sommer, Lisa Wimmer, Theodore Papamarkou, Ludwig Bothmann, Bernd Bischl, David Rugamer

A major challenge in sample-based inference (SBI) for Bayesian neural networks is the size and structure of the networks' parameter space. Our work shows that successful SBI is possible by embracing the characteristic relationship between weight and function space, uncovering a systematic link between overparameterization and the difficulty of the sampling problem. Through extensive experiments, we establish practical guidelines for sampling and convergence diagnosis. As a result, we present a deep ensemble initialized approach as an effective solution with competitive performance and uncertainty quantification.

Read more

5/29/2024

Fast, accurate and lightweight sequential simulation-based inference using Gaussian locally linear mappings
Total Score

0

Fast, accurate and lightweight sequential simulation-based inference using Gaussian locally linear mappings

Henrik Haggstrom, Pedro L. C. Rodrigues, Geoffroy Oudoumanessah, Florence Forbes, Umberto Picchini

Bayesian inference for complex models with an intractable likelihood can be tackled using algorithms performing many calls to computer simulators. These approaches are collectively known as simulation-based inference (SBI). Recent SBI methods have made use of neural networks (NN) to provide approximate, yet expressive constructs for the unavailable likelihood function and the posterior distribution. However, the trade-off between accuracy and computational demand leaves much space for improvement. In this work, we propose an alternative that provides both approximations to the likelihood and the posterior distribution, using structured mixtures of probability distributions. Our approach produces accurate posterior inference when compared to state-of-the-art NN-based SBI methods, even for multimodal posteriors, while exhibiting a much smaller computational footprint. We illustrate our results on several benchmark models from the SBI literature and on a biological model of the translation kinetics after mRNA transfection.

Read more

6/26/2024

Structured Partial Stochasticity in Bayesian Neural Networks
Total Score

0

Structured Partial Stochasticity in Bayesian Neural Networks

Tommy Rochussen

Bayesian neural network posterior distributions have a great number of modes that correspond to the same network function. The abundance of such modes can make it difficult for approximate inference methods to do their job. Recent work has demonstrated the benefits of partial stochasticity for approximate inference in Bayesian neural networks; inference can be less costly and performance can sometimes be improved. I propose a structured way to select the deterministic subset of weights that removes neuron permutation symmetries, and therefore the corresponding redundant posterior modes. With a drastically simplified posterior distribution, the performance of existing approximate inference schemes is found to be greatly improved.

Read more

5/29/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

Simultaneous identification of models and parameters of scientific simulators

Cornelius Schroder, Jakob H. Macke

Many scientific models are composed of multiple discrete components, and scientists often make heuristic decisions about which components to include. Bayesian inference provides a mathematical framework for systematically selecting model components, but defining prior distributions over model components and developing associated inference schemes has been challenging. We approach this problem in a simulation-based inference framework: We define model priors over candidate components and, from model simulations, train neural networks to infer joint probability distributions over both model components and associated parameters. Our method, simulation-based model inference (SBMI), represents distributions over model components as a conditional mixture of multivariate binary distributions in the Grassmann formalism. SBMI can be applied to any compositional stochastic simulator without requiring likelihood evaluations. We evaluate SBMI on a simple time series model and on two scientific models from neuroscience, and show that it can discover multiple data-consistent model configurations, and that it reveals non-identifiable model components and parameters. SBMI provides a powerful tool for data-driven scientific inquiry which will allow scientists to identify essential model components and make uncertainty-informed modelling decisions.

Read more

5/31/2024