Considering Avatar Crossing as Harm or Help for Adolescents in Social VR

Overview

• Avatars in virtual reality (VR) allow users to communicate non-verbal behaviors like interpersonal distance and virtual touch.
• However, inappropriate physical distancing and unwanted intimate touching in social VR can cause social and psychological harm, especially for older adolescent users.
• Peer acceptance and social rewards can drive adolescent behavior even in virtual spaces, and the end of adolescence is often defined socially.
• Avatar crossing, the ability to walk through other avatars, is a unique capability of virtual embodiment that has both benefits and ethical concerns for older adolescents.

Plain English Explanation

In virtual reality (VR), people use digital characters called avatars to communicate without words, like by standing closer or farther away or even touching each other. This can be helpful, but it also raises concerns, especially for older teenagers. Teens often care a lot about being accepted by their peers and getting social rewards, even in virtual worlds. And while the start of being a teenager is mostly about biology, the end of being a teenager is often more about how society sees you.

One interesting capability of avatars is the ability to cross through - or walk right through - other avatars. This could help students in a virtual classroom focus on learning without worrying about blocking others' views. However, this crossing behavior has also been linked to people feeling less like the avatars are real and feeling more uncomfortable or intimidated, compared to when avatars just bump into each other .

So there are both potential benefits and harms to letting older teenagers use this avatar crossing feature in virtual spaces [](https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/perception-pixels-understanding-avatar-representation-video-mediated, https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/moderating-embodied-cyber-threats-using-generative-ai, https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/risk-harm-vr-dating-from-perspective-women). The research paper explores these tradeoffs.

Technical Explanation

The paper examines the implications of avatar crossing, where avatars can pass through each other in virtual environments, for older adolescent users. Avatar crossing is a unique capability of virtual embodiment that enables behaviors not possible in the physical world, like students in a virtual classroom being able to move freely without blocking each other's views.

However, the researchers note that avatar crossing has been associated with reduced perceived presence and avatar realism, as well as greater discomfort and intimidation compared to typical avatar collisions. This raises ethical concerns, as violations of appropriate physical distancing and unwanted intimate touching in social virtual worlds could cause social and psychological harm to older adolescent users.

The paper argues that the drive for peer acceptance and social rewards, which can strongly influence adolescent behavior even in simulated virtual spaces, must be considered when evaluating the potential benefits and harms of avatar crossing technology for this age group.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thoughtful exploration of the complex interplay between the technical capabilities of avatar crossing and the social-emotional dynamics of older adolescent users in virtual environments. The researchers acknowledge the potential benefits, such as improved focus and access to information in virtual classrooms, while also highlighting the ethical concerns around violations of personal space and unwanted intimacy.

However, the paper does not delve deeply into specific design considerations or interventions that could help mitigate the risks of avatar crossing for this user population. Further research may be needed to understand how to balance the functional advantages of avatar crossing with safeguards to protect users' sense of comfort and agency in virtual spaces.

Additionally, the paper's reliance on prior studies to contextualize the adolescent experience in virtual worlds could be strengthened by incorporating more direct empirical data on the subjective experiences and behaviors of this age group in immersive VR environments. This could help validate the researchers' assumptions and provide a stronger foundation for their analysis.

Conclusion

This paper raises important considerations around the use of avatar crossing technology in virtual environments, particularly for older adolescent users. While avatar crossing offers unique capabilities, such as improved navigation and access to information, it also presents the potential for social and psychological harm due to violations of personal space and unwanted intimacy.

The researchers make a compelling case for the need to carefully balance the functional benefits of avatar crossing with the social-emotional needs and vulnerabilities of adolescent users, who may be strongly motivated by peer acceptance and social rewards. Addressing these complex tradeoffs will be crucial as virtual worlds become increasingly prevalent in education, social interaction, and other domains.

Overall, this paper highlights the importance of considering the human factors and ethical implications of emerging virtual embodiment technologies, especially when targeting vulnerable user populations. Further research and thoughtful design approaches will be essential to unlock the full potential of virtual reality while prioritizing the well-being and safety of all users.