The Conspiracy Money Machine: Uncovering Telegram's Conspiracy Channels and their Profit Model
0
š
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Major social media platforms have been cracking down on conspiracy theory content, leading conspiracy theorists to seek alternative platforms like Telegram.
- Telegram offers features like channels, where only administrators can post, enabling the spread of conspiracy theories with fewer restrictions.
- This paper investigates this ecosystem of conspiracy channels on Telegram, including how conspiracy theorists leverage e-commerce and crowdfunding to profit from their followers.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines how conspiracy theorists are adapting to stricter content moderation policies on major social media platforms. As these platforms have started banning or restricting conspiracy-related content, conspiracy theorists have turned to alternative platforms like Telegram, which has a more permissive approach to content.
Telegram's features, such as "channels" where only administrators can post, have created a fertile environment for the spread of conspiracy theories. The paper explores this ecosystem of conspiracy channels on Telegram, revealing how conspiracy theorists are not only sharing their beliefs but also finding ways to profit from their followers.
The researchers discover that conspiracy theorists are leveraging e-commerce platforms to sell questionable products or promote them through affiliate links. They also observe conspiracy channels using donation and crowdfunding platforms to raise funds for their campaigns. This "Conspiracy Money Machine" involves hundreds of thousands of donors and generates millions in revenue.
By shedding light on this complex ecosystem, the paper provides valuable insights into how conspiracy theorists are adapting to the changing online landscape and the financial incentives driving their activities.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by proposing an approach to detect conspiracy channels on Telegram, a key step in studying this ecosystem. The researchers then use this method to discover over 17,000 conspiracy channels, which they cluster into four distinct communities.
Next, the paper delves into the "Conspiracy Money Machine," revealing how conspiracy theorists are leveraging e-commerce platforms to sell and promote dubious products to their followers. The researchers also find that conspiracy channels are using donation and crowdfunding platforms to generate significant revenue, with hundreds of thousands of donors contributing nearly $66 million.
Through this analysis, the paper provides a comprehensive understanding of the complex web of conspiracy channels on Telegram, including the strategies conspiracy theorists employ to profit from their beliefs.
Critical Analysis
The paper offers a detailed and well-researched exploration of the conspiracy channel ecosystem on Telegram, but it acknowledges some limitations. The researchers note that their approach to detecting conspiracy channels may be biased towards certain types of content and may miss some less obvious channels.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the specific content or narratives being pushed by the conspiracy channels, which could provide further insights into the motivations and tactics of the conspiracy theorists. Investigating the veracity of the claims made in these channels could also be a valuable area for future research.
Despite these limitations, the paper makes a significant contribution to our understanding of how conspiracy theorists are adapting to the changing online landscape and the financial incentives that may be driving their activities. The findings raise important questions about the role of platform design and content moderation policies in shaping the spread of conspiracy theories.
Conclusion
This paper offers a comprehensive analysis of the conspiracy channel ecosystem on Telegram, revealing how conspiracy theorists are leveraging alternative platforms to spread their beliefs and profit from their followers. By shedding light on the complex strategies employed by these groups, the research provides valuable insights that can inform efforts to address the growing challenge of online conspiracy theories and their real-world impacts.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
š
0
The Conspiracy Money Machine: Uncovering Telegram's Conspiracy Channels and their Profit Model
Vincenzo Imperati, Massimo La Morgia, Alessandro Mei, Alberto Maria Mongardini, Francesco Sassi
In recent years, major social media platforms have implemented increasingly strict moderation policies, resulting in bans and restrictions on conspiracy theory-related content. To circumvent these restrictions, conspiracy theorists are turning to alternatives, such as Telegram, where they can express and spread their views with fewer limitations. Telegram offers channels, virtual rooms where only administrators can broadcast messages, and a more permissive content policy. These features have created the perfect breeding ground for a complex ecosystem of conspiracy channels. In this paper, we illuminate this ecosystem. First, we propose an approach to detect conspiracy channels. Then, we discover that conspiracy channels can be clustered into four distinct communities comprising over 17,000 channels. Finally, we uncover the Conspiracy Money Machine, revealing how most conspiracy channels actively seek to profit from their subscribers. We find conspiracy theorists leverage e-commerce platforms to sell questionable products or lucratively promote them through affiliate links. Moreover, we observe that conspiracy channels use donation and crowdfunding platforms to raise funds for their campaigns. We determine that this business involves hundreds of thousands of donors and generates a turnover of almost $66 million.
Read more9/4/2024
0
Conspiracy theories and where to find them on TikTok
Francesco Corso, Francesco Pierri, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales
TikTok has skyrocketed in popularity over recent years, especially among younger audiences, thanks to its viral trends and social challenges. However, concerns have been raised about the potential of this platform to promote and amplify online harmful and dangerous content. Leveraging the official TikTok Research API and collecting a longitudinal dataset of 1.5M videos shared in the US over a period of 3 years, our study analyzes the presence of videos promoting conspiracy theories, providing a lower-bound estimate of their prevalence (approximately 0.1% of all videos) and assessing the effects of the new Creator Program, which provides new ways for creators to monetize, on the supply of conspiratorial content. We evaluate the capabilities of state-of-the-art open Large Language Models to identify conspiracy theories after extracting audio transcriptions of videos, finding that they can detect harmful content with high precision but with overall performance comparable to fine-tuned traditional language models such as RoBERTa. Our findings are instrumental for content moderation strategies that aim to understand and mitigate the spread of harmful content on rapidly evolving social media platforms like TikTok.
Read more7/18/2024
0
Recontextualized Knowledge and Narrative Coalitions on Telegram
Tom Willaert
A defining characteristic of conspiracy texts is that they negotiate power and identity by recontextualizing prior knowledge. This dynamic has been shown to intensify on social media, where knowledge sources can readily be integrated into antagonistic narratives through hyperlinks. The objective of the present chapter is to further our understanding of this dynamic by surfacing and examining 1) how online conspiracy narratives recontextualize prior knowledge by coupling it with heterogeneous antagonistic elements, and 2) how such recontextualizing narratives operate as connectors around which diverse actors might form narrative coalitions. To this end, the chapter offers an empirical analysis of links to prior knowledge in public messaging channels from the Pushshift Telegram dataset. Using transferable methods from the field of bibliometrics, we find that politically extreme Telegram channels engage with a variety of established knowledge sources, including scientific journals, scientific repositories and other sources associated with the system of scholarly communication. Channels engaging with shared knowledge sources thereby form narrative coalitions ranging from scientific and technological imaginaries to far-right extremist and antisemitic conspiracy theories. Our analysis of these coalitions reveals (i) linguistic, political, and thematic forces that shape conspiracy narratives, (ii) emerging ideological, epistemological and ontological positions associated with online conspiracism, and (iii) how references to shared knowledge contribute to the communicability of conspiracy narratives.
Read more4/30/2024
ā
0
Partial Mobilization: Tracking Multilingual Information Flows Amongst Russian Media Outlets and Telegram
Hans W. A. Hanley, Zakir Durumeric
In response to disinformation and propaganda from Russian online media following the invasion of Ukraine, Russian media outlets such as Russia Today and Sputnik News were banned throughout Europe. To maintain viewership, many of these Russian outlets began to heavily promote their content on messaging services like Telegram. In this work, we study how 16 Russian media outlets interacted with and utilized 732 Telegram channels throughout 2022. Leveraging the foundational model MPNet, DP-means clustering, and Hawkes processes, we trace how narratives spread between news sites and Telegram channels. We show that news outlets not only propagate existing narratives through Telegram but that they source material from the messaging platform. For example, across the websites in our study, between 2.3% (ura.news) and 26.7% (ukraina.ru) of articles discussed content that originated/resulted from activity on Telegram. Finally, tracking the spread of individual topics, we measure the rate at which news outlets and Telegram channels disseminate content within the Russian media ecosystem, finding that websites like ura.news and Telegram channels such as @genshab are the most effective at disseminating their content.
Read more5/29/2024