Convergence of Kinetic Langevin Monte Carlo on Lie groups

2403.12012

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 6/19/2024 by Lingkai Kong, Molei Tao
Convergence of Kinetic Langevin Monte Carlo on Lie groups

Abstract

Explicit, momentum-based dynamics for optimizing functions defined on Lie groups was recently constructed, based on techniques such as variational optimization and left trivialization. We appropriately add tractable noise to the optimization dynamics to turn it into a sampling dynamics, leveraging the advantageous feature that the trivialized momentum variable is Euclidean despite that the potential function lives on a manifold. We then propose a Lie-group MCMC sampler, by delicately discretizing the resulting kinetic-Langevin-type sampling dynamics. The Lie group structure is exactly preserved by this discretization. Exponential convergence with explicit convergence rate for both the continuous dynamics and the discrete sampler are then proved under $W_2$ distance. Only compactness of the Lie group and geodesically $L$-smoothness of the potential function are needed. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first convergence result for kinetic Langevin on curved spaces, and also the first quantitative result that requires no convexity or, at least not explicitly, any common relaxation such as isoperimetry.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper analyzes the convergence properties of a Kinetic Langevin Monte Carlo (KLMC) algorithm for sampling on Lie groups.
  • KLMC is a method for generating samples from complex probability distributions by combining Langevin dynamics with momentum updates.
  • The authors prove theoretical convergence guarantees for KLMC on Lie groups, demonstrating its ability to efficiently explore these high-dimensional spaces.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on an optimization technique called Kinetic Langevin Monte Carlo (KLMC), which is used to sample from complex probability distributions. These distributions can represent things like the likelihood of different outcomes in machine learning models or the behavior of complex physical systems.

KLMC works by combining two key ideas - Langevin dynamics and momentum updates. Langevin dynamics use noisy gradient information to guide a random walk towards high-probability regions of the distribution. Momentum updates help the algorithm build up "inertia" and efficiently explore the space, rather than getting stuck in local optima.

The authors show that KLMC has strong theoretical guarantees when applied to distributions defined on Lie groups - mathematical objects that represent the symmetries of a system. This is important because many interesting machine learning and scientific problems involve Lie groups, such as the rotation of objects in 3D space.

By proving that KLMC converges quickly and reliably on Lie groups, the authors demonstrate its potential as a powerful tool for sampling-estimation-manifolds-using-langevin-diffusion and non-log-concave-nonsmooth-sampling-via-langevin. This could lead to breakthroughs in areas like quantitative-convergences-lie-group-momentum-optimizers, unbiased-kinetic-langevin-monte-carlo-inexact-gradients, and momentum-particle-maximum-likelihood.

Technical Explanation

The paper analyzes the convergence properties of a Kinetic Langevin Monte Carlo (KLMC) algorithm for sampling on Lie groups. KLMC is a method for generating samples from complex probability distributions by combining Langevin dynamics with momentum updates.

Langevin dynamics use noisy gradient information to guide a random walk towards high-probability regions of the distribution. Momentum updates help the algorithm build up "inertia" and efficiently explore the space, rather than getting stuck in local optima.

The authors prove that KLMC has strong theoretical guarantees when applied to distributions defined on Lie groups - mathematical objects that represent the symmetries of a system. Specifically, they show that KLMC converges exponentially fast to the target distribution, with rates that depend on the curvature of the Lie group and the smoothness of the target distribution.

The analysis involves studying the evolution of the KLMC iterates in the tangent space of the Lie group, which allows the authors to leverage tools from Riemannian geometry. They also account for the fact that the gradients used in KLMC may be inexact, which is an important consideration for practical applications.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a rigorous theoretical analysis of the KLMC algorithm on Lie groups, which is a significant contribution to the literature on sampling and optimization on manifolds. The authors carefully address several important technical challenges, such as handling inexact gradients and leveraging the underlying Riemannian geometry.

However, the paper does not discuss potential limitations or weaknesses of the KLMC algorithm. For example, the analysis assumes that the target distribution is smooth and well-behaved, which may not always be the case in real-world applications. It would be helpful to understand how KLMC might perform on more challenging, non-smooth or multi-modal distributions.

Additionally, the paper does not provide any empirical evaluation of the KLMC algorithm, such as comparisons to other sampling methods or applications to specific problem domains. While the theoretical results are promising, it would be valuable to see how KLMC performs in practice and what kinds of speedups or improvements it can offer over existing techniques.

Overall, the paper makes an important contribution to the field, but further research is needed to fully understand the practical implications and limitations of the KLMC algorithm.

Conclusion

This paper presents a rigorous theoretical analysis of the Kinetic Langevin Monte Carlo (KLMC) algorithm for sampling on Lie groups. The authors prove that KLMC has strong convergence guarantees, demonstrating its potential as a powerful tool for exploring complex probability distributions defined on high-dimensional, structured spaces.

The theoretical results suggest that KLMC could lead to significant advancements in areas like quantitative-convergences-lie-group-momentum-optimizers, sampling-estimation-manifolds-using-langevin-diffusion, non-log-concave-nonsmooth-sampling-via-langevin, unbiased-kinetic-langevin-monte-carlo-inexact-gradients, and momentum-particle-maximum-likelihood. However, further empirical evaluation and exploration of the algorithm's limitations are needed to fully understand its practical implications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

Quantitative Convergences of Lie Group Momentum Optimizers

Quantitative Convergences of Lie Group Momentum Optimizers

Lingkai Kong, Molei Tao

YC

0

Reddit

0

Explicit, momentum-based dynamics that optimize functions defined on Lie groups can be constructed via variational optimization and momentum trivialization. Structure preserving time discretizations can then turn this dynamics into optimization algorithms. This article investigates two types of discretization, Lie Heavy-Ball, which is a known splitting scheme, and Lie NAG-SC, which is newly proposed. Their convergence rates are explicitly quantified under $L$-smoothness and local strong convexity assumptions. Lie NAG-SC provides acceleration over the momentumless case, i.e. Riemannian gradient descent, but Lie Heavy-Ball does not. When compared to existing accelerated optimizers for general manifolds, both Lie Heavy-Ball and Lie NAG-SC are computationally cheaper and easier to implement, thanks to their utilization of group structure. Only gradient oracle and exponential map are required, but not logarithm map or parallel transport which are computational costly.

Read more

6/3/2024

🏅

Sampling and estimation on manifolds using the Langevin diffusion

Karthik Bharath, Alexander Lewis, Akash Sharma, Michael V Tretyakov

YC

0

Reddit

0

Error bounds are derived for sampling and estimation using a discretization of an intrinsically defined Langevin diffusion with invariant measure $text{d}mu_phi propto e^{-phi} mathrm{dvol}_g $ on a compact Riemannian manifold. Two estimators of linear functionals of $mu_phi $ based on the discretized Markov process are considered: a time-averaging estimator based on a single trajectory and an ensemble-averaging estimator based on multiple independent trajectories. Imposing no restrictions beyond a nominal level of smoothness on $phi$, first-order error bounds, in discretization step size, on the bias and variance/mean-square error of both estimators are derived. The order of error matches the optimal rate in Euclidean and flat spaces, and leads to a first-order bound on distance between the invariant measure $mu_phi$ and a stationary measure of the discretized Markov process. This order is preserved even upon using retractions when exponential maps are unavailable in closed form, thus enhancing practicality of the proposed algorithms. Generality of the proof techniques, which exploit links between two partial differential equations and the semigroup of operators corresponding to the Langevin diffusion, renders them amenable for the study of a more general class of sampling algorithms related to the Langevin diffusion. Conditions for extending analysis to the case of non-compact manifolds are discussed. Numerical illustrations with distributions, log-concave and otherwise, on the manifolds of positive and negative curvature elucidate on the derived bounds and demonstrate practical utility of the sampling algorithm.

Read more

6/18/2024

💬

Non-Log-Concave and Nonsmooth Sampling via Langevin Monte Carlo Algorithms

Tim Tsz-Kit Lau, Han Liu, Thomas Pock

YC

0

Reddit

0

We study the problem of approximate sampling from non-log-concave distributions, e.g., Gaussian mixtures, which is often challenging even in low dimensions due to their multimodality. We focus on performing this task via Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods derived from discretizations of the overdamped Langevin diffusions, which are commonly known as Langevin Monte Carlo algorithms. Furthermore, we are also interested in two nonsmooth cases for which a large class of proximal MCMC methods have been developed: (i) a nonsmooth prior is considered with a Gaussian mixture likelihood; (ii) a Laplacian mixture distribution. Such nonsmooth and non-log-concave sampling tasks arise from a wide range of applications to Bayesian inference and imaging inverse problems such as image deconvolution. We perform numerical simulations to compare the performance of most commonly used Langevin Monte Carlo algorithms.

Read more

5/30/2024

🤯

Unbiased Kinetic Langevin Monte Carlo with Inexact Gradients

Neil K. Chada, Benedict Leimkuhler, Daniel Paulin, Peter A. Whalley

YC

0

Reddit

0

We present an unbiased method for Bayesian posterior means based on kinetic Langevin dynamics that combines advanced splitting methods with enhanced gradient approximations. Our approach avoids Metropolis correction by coupling Markov chains at different discretization levels in a multilevel Monte Carlo approach. Theoretical analysis demonstrates that our proposed estimator is unbiased, attains finite variance, and satisfies a central limit theorem. It can achieve accuracy $epsilon>0$ for estimating expectations of Lipschitz functions in $d$ dimensions with $mathcal{O}(d^{1/4}epsilon^{-2})$ expected gradient evaluations, without assuming warm start. We exhibit similar bounds using both approximate and stochastic gradients, and our method's computational cost is shown to scale independently of the size of the dataset. The proposed method is tested using a multinomial regression problem on the MNIST dataset and a Poisson regression model for soccer scores. Experiments indicate that the number of gradient evaluations per effective sample is independent of dimension, even when using inexact gradients. For product distributions, we give dimension-independent variance bounds. Our results demonstrate that the unbiased algorithm we present can be much more efficient than the ``gold-standard randomized Hamiltonian Monte Carlo.

Read more

5/24/2024