On Convex Optimization with Semi-Sensitive Features
2406.19040
0
0
🛠️
Abstract
We study the differentially private (DP) empirical risk minimization (ERM) problem under the semi-sensitive DP setting where only some features are sensitive. This generalizes the Label DP setting where only the label is sensitive. We give improved upper and lower bounds on the excess risk for DP-ERM. In particular, we show that the error only scales polylogarithmically in terms of the sensitive domain size, improving upon previous results that scale polynomially in the sensitive domain size (Ghazi et al., 2021).
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper studies differentially private (DP) empirical risk minimization (ERM) in a semi-sensitive setting where only some features are sensitive.
- It provides improved upper and lower bounds on the excess risk for DP-ERM.
- The key finding is that the error only scales polylogarithmically in terms of the sensitive domain size, an improvement over previous results that scaled polynomially.
Plain English Explanation
The research paper looks at a type of machine learning problem called empirical risk minimization (ERM) in a privacy-preserving context. Specifically, it considers a scenario where only some of the input features are sensitive, meaning they contain private information that needs to be protected.
This is an extension of the label-only differential privacy setting, where only the target variable (the "label") is sensitive. By allowing some features to be sensitive while others are not, the researchers are able to develop more nuanced privacy guarantees.
The main contribution of the paper is to provide better upper and lower bounds on the "excess risk" - the difference between the model's performance and the best possible performance - when using differentially private ERM in this semi-sensitive setting. Specifically, they show that the excess risk only needs to grow logarithmically with the size of the sensitive domain, rather than the polynomial growth seen in previous work.
This is an important result because it means that models can achieve strong privacy guarantees without sacrificing too much in terms of their overall accuracy. The logarithmic scaling means that as the size of the sensitive domain increases, the privacy-preserving model's performance degrades much more slowly than before.
Technical Explanation
The paper studies the differentially private (DP) empirical risk minimization (ERM) problem in a semi-sensitive setting. This means that only a subset of the input features are considered sensitive and require protection, generalizing the label-only DP setting where only the target variable is sensitive.
The researchers provide new upper and lower bounds on the excess risk for DP-ERM in this semi-sensitive setting. Specifically, they show that the error scales polylogarithmically in terms of the size of the sensitive domain, improving upon previous results that scaled polynomially.
This improvement is achieved through a novel analysis that carefully accounts for the different sensitivities of the sensitive and non-sensitive features. The key technical insight is to leverage the locally private estimation of public features to obtain tighter bounds.
The researchers also draw connections to other related problems, such as differentially private non-convex optimization, and discuss how their techniques can be applied in these settings as well.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling theoretical analysis of DP-ERM in the semi-sensitive setting, with the key contribution being the improved scaling of the excess risk with respect to the sensitive domain size. This is an important result that can enable more practical privacy-preserving machine learning systems.
However, the analysis is primarily theoretical, and the researchers do not provide any empirical validation of their bounds. It would be helpful to see how the theoretical improvements translate to real-world performance, especially in comparison to previous approaches.
Additionally, the semi-sensitive setting, while more general than label-only DP, still makes some simplifying assumptions about the data. In practice, the distribution of sensitive and non-sensitive features may be more complex, and it would be valuable to understand how the techniques can be extended to handle more realistic scenarios.
Finally, the paper does not discuss the computational or sample complexity of the DP-ERM algorithm it analyzes. These practical considerations would be important for assessing the feasibility of deploying such methods in real-world applications.
Conclusion
The research paper presents an important theoretical advance in the field of differentially private empirical risk minimization. By studying a semi-sensitive setting where only a subset of features are considered private, the researchers are able to derive improved bounds on the excess risk compared to previous work.
This result is significant because it suggests that privacy-preserving machine learning models can achieve strong privacy guarantees without sacrificing too much in terms of their overall accuracy. The logarithmic scaling of the excess risk with the sensitive domain size is a promising finding that could enable more practical applications of DP-ERM.
While the analysis is primarily theoretical, the insights and techniques introduced in this paper could pave the way for further advancements in differentially private optimization and machine learning. Researchers and practitioners interested in building privacy-preserving systems may find this work a valuable contribution to the field.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🧠
The Power of Sampling: Dimension-free Risk Bounds in Private ERM
Yin Tat Lee, Daogao Liu, Zhou Lu
0
0
Differentially private empirical risk minimization (DP-ERM) is a fundamental problem in private optimization. While the theory of DP-ERM is well-studied, as large-scale models become prevalent, traditional DP-ERM methods face new challenges, including (1) the prohibitive dependence on the ambient dimension, (2) the highly non-smooth objective functions, (3) costly first-order gradient oracles. Such challenges demand rethinking existing DP-ERM methodologies. In this work, we show that the regularized exponential mechanism combined with existing samplers can address these challenges altogether: under the standard unconstrained domain and low-rank gradients assumptions, our algorithm can achieve rank-dependent risk bounds for non-smooth convex objectives using only zeroth order oracles, which was not accomplished by prior methods. This highlights the power of sampling in differential privacy. We further construct lower bounds, demonstrating that when gradients are full-rank, there is no separation between the constrained and unconstrained settings. Our lower bound is derived from a general black-box reduction from unconstrained to the constrained domain and an improved lower bound in the constrained setting, which might be of independent interest.
6/5/2024
🛠️
Differentially Private Non-Convex Optimization under the KL Condition with Optimal Rates
Michael Menart, Enayat Ullah, Raman Arora, Raef Bassily, Crist'obal Guzm'an
0
0
We study private empirical risk minimization (ERM) problem for losses satisfying the $(gamma,kappa)$-Kurdyka-{L}ojasiewicz (KL) condition. The Polyak-{L}ojasiewicz (PL) condition is a special case of this condition when $kappa=2$. Specifically, we study this problem under the constraint of $rho$ zero-concentrated differential privacy (zCDP). When $kappain[1,2]$ and the loss function is Lipschitz and smooth over a sufficiently large region, we provide a new algorithm based on variance reduced gradient descent that achieves the rate $tilde{O}big(big(frac{sqrt{d}}{nsqrt{rho}}big)^kappabig)$ on the excess empirical risk, where $n$ is the dataset size and $d$ is the dimension. We further show that this rate is nearly optimal. When $kappa geq 2$ and the loss is instead Lipschitz and weakly convex, we show it is possible to achieve the rate $tilde{O}big(big(frac{sqrt{d}}{nsqrt{rho}}big)^kappabig)$ with a private implementation of the proximal point method. When the KL parameters are unknown, we provide a novel modification and analysis of the noisy gradient descent algorithm and show that this algorithm achieves a rate of $tilde{O}big(big(frac{sqrt{d}}{nsqrt{rho}}big)^{frac{2kappa}{4-kappa}}big)$ adaptively, which is nearly optimal when $kappa = 2$. We further show that, without assuming the KL condition, the same gradient descent algorithm can achieve fast convergence to a stationary point when the gradient stays sufficiently large during the run of the algorithm. Specifically, we show that this algorithm can approximate stationary points of Lipschitz, smooth (and possibly nonconvex) objectives with rate as fast as $tilde{O}big(frac{sqrt{d}}{nsqrt{rho}}big)$ and never worse than $tilde{O}big(big(frac{sqrt{d}}{nsqrt{rho}}big)^{1/2}big)$. The latter rate matches the best known rate for methods that do not rely on variance reduction.
4/4/2024
🌐
Empirical Risk Minimization with Relative Entropy Regularization
Samir M. Perlaza, Gaetan Bisson, I~naki Esnaola, Alain Jean-Marie, Stefano Rini
0
0
The empirical risk minimization (ERM) problem with relative entropy regularization (ERM-RER) is investigated under the assumption that the reference measure is a $sigma$-finite measure, and not necessarily a probability measure. Under this assumption, which leads to a generalization of the ERM-RER problem allowing a larger degree of flexibility for incorporating prior knowledge, numerous relevant properties are stated. Among these properties, the solution to this problem, if it exists, is shown to be a unique probability measure, mutually absolutely continuous with the reference measure. Such a solution exhibits a probably-approximately-correct guarantee for the ERM problem independently of whether the latter possesses a solution. For a fixed dataset and under a specific condition, the empirical risk is shown to be a sub-Gaussian random variable when the models are sampled from the solution to the ERM-RER problem. The generalization capabilities of the solution to the ERM-RER problem (the Gibbs algorithm) are studied via the sensitivity of the expected empirical risk to deviations from such a solution towards alternative probability measures. Finally, an interesting connection between sensitivity, generalization error, and lautum information is established.
4/9/2024
✅
Collaborative Learning with Different Labeling Functions
Yuyang Deng, Mingda Qiao
0
0
We study a variant of Collaborative PAC Learning, in which we aim to learn an accurate classifier for each of the $n$ data distributions, while minimizing the number of samples drawn from them in total. Unlike in the usual collaborative learning setup, it is not assumed that there exists a single classifier that is simultaneously accurate for all distributions. We show that, when the data distributions satisfy a weaker realizability assumption, which appeared in [Crammer and Mansour, 2012] in the context of multi-task learning, sample-efficient learning is still feasible. We give a learning algorithm based on Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) on a natural augmentation of the hypothesis class, and the analysis relies on an upper bound on the VC dimension of this augmented class. In terms of the computational efficiency, we show that ERM on the augmented hypothesis class is NP-hard, which gives evidence against the existence of computationally efficient learners in general. On the positive side, for two special cases, we give learners that are both sample- and computationally-efficient.
5/24/2024