Copying style, Extracting value: Illustrators' Perception of AI Style Transfer and its Impact on Creative Labor
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores illustrators' perceptions of AI-powered style transfer and its impact on their creative labor.
- The researchers conducted interviews with illustrators to understand how they view the use of AI for style transfer and its implications for their work.
- Key topics covered include the use of AI as a "boundary object", the extraction of value from illustrators' creative labor, and the potential for AI to disrupt the traditional creative economy.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines how illustrators feel about AI systems that can transfer the artistic style from one image to another. Illustrators are artists who create drawings, paintings, or other visual works. The researchers interviewed illustrators to understand their perspectives on these AI-powered style transfer tools and how they might impact the illustrators' creative work and livelihoods.
The key ideas explored in the paper include:
- Boundary Objects: The researchers view the AI style transfer tools as "boundary objects" - tools that allow different groups (illustrators and AI developers) to collaborate and communicate, even if they have different goals and understandings of the technology.
- Value Extraction: The paper examines how the AI systems may allow companies or others to extract value from the illustrators' creative work without fully compensating them.
- Disruption of the Creative Economy: The use of AI-powered style transfer could potentially disrupt the traditional creative economy in which illustrators earn a living, leading to concerns about job security and artistic integrity.
The paper provides insights into how illustrators, as creative professionals, perceive and grapple with the implications of this emerging AI technology.
Technical Explanation
The study used semi-structured interviews with 20 professional illustrators to explore their perceptions and experiences with AI-powered style transfer tools. The researchers analyzed the interview transcripts to identify key themes and insights.
The paper discusses how the AI style transfer tools function as "boundary objects" - artifacts that allow collaboration and communication between different social worlds (in this case, illustrators and AI developers) even when they have different goals and understandings of the technology. The illustrators saw the tools as both helpful and threatening to their creative process and livelihood.
The researchers found that the illustrators were concerned about the potential for these AI systems to extract value from their creative labor without adequate compensation. There were fears that clients or others could use the AI tools to cheaply produce illustrations in the style of a particular illustrator, undermining the value of the illustrator's work.
Additionally, the paper examines how the rise of AI-powered style transfer could disrupt the traditional creative economy that illustrators rely on for their livelihoods. The illustrators expressed concerns about job security and the potential devaluation of their unique artistic skills and styles.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides valuable insights into how illustrators, as creative professionals, perceive and respond to the emergence of AI-powered style transfer tools. By focusing on the illustrators' perspectives, the research highlights important considerations around the impact of this technology on creative labor and the creative economy.
However, the study is limited by its relatively small sample size of 20 illustrators. Further research with a larger and more diverse group of creative professionals could provide additional insights and perspectives on this issue.
The paper also does not delve deeply into the technical details of how the AI style transfer systems work or the specific capabilities and limitations of the technology. A more in-depth technical analysis could help readers better understand the potential implications and risks identified by the illustrators.
Additionally, the paper does not offer any potential solutions or strategies for how illustrators and other creative professionals could adapt to or mitigate the challenges posed by AI-powered style transfer. Exploring potential approaches to address the concerns raised would be a valuable addition to the research.
Conclusion
This paper offers valuable insights into how illustrators perceive the use of AI-powered style transfer tools and the potential impact on their creative labor and livelihoods. The researchers highlight important issues around the use of these tools as "boundary objects" and the concerns over the extraction of value from illustrators' work.
The findings suggest that the rise of AI-powered style transfer could disrupt the traditional creative economy and lead to challenges for illustrators in maintaining the uniqueness and value of their artistic styles. As AI technology continues to advance, it will be crucial for researchers, policymakers, and creative professionals to work together to address these concerns and ensure a fair and sustainable future for the creative industries.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Copying style, Extracting value: Illustrators' Perception of AI Style Transfer and its Impact on Creative Labor
Julien Porquet, Sitong Wang, Lydia B. Chilton
Generative text-to-image models are disrupting the lives of creative professionals. Specifically, illustrators are threatened by models that claim to extract and reproduce their style. Yet, research on style transfer has rarely focused on their perspectives. We provided four illustrators with a model fine-tuned to their style and conducted semi-structured interviews about the model's successes, limitations, and potential uses. Evaluating their output, artists reported that style transfer successfully copies aesthetic fragments but is limited by content-style disentanglement and lacks the crucial emergent quality of their style. They also deemed the others' copies more successful. Understanding the results of style transfer as boundary objects, we analyze how they can simultaneously be considered unsuccessful by artists and poised to replace their work by others. We connect our findings to critical HCI frameworks, demonstrating that style transfer, rather than merely a Creativity Support Tool, should also be understood as a supply chain optimization one.
Read more9/27/2024
0
Rethinking Artistic Copyright Infringements in the Era of Text-to-Image Generative Models
Mazda Moayeri, Samyadeep Basu, Sriram Balasubramanian, Priyatham Kattakinda, Atoosa Chengini, Robert Brauneis, Soheil Feizi
Recent text-to-image generative models such as Stable Diffusion are extremely adept at mimicking and generating copyrighted content, raising concerns amongst artists that their unique styles may be improperly copied. Understanding how generative models copy artistic style is more complex than duplicating a single image, as style is comprised by a set of elements (or signature) that frequently co-occurs across a body of work, where each individual work may vary significantly. In our paper, we first reformulate the problem of artistic copyright infringement to a classification problem over image sets, instead of probing image-wise similarities. We then introduce ArtSavant, a practical (i.e., efficient and easy to understand) tool to (i) determine the unique style of an artist by comparing it to a reference dataset of works from 372 artists curated from WikiArt, and (ii) recognize if the identified style reappears in generated images. We leverage two complementary methods to perform artistic style classification over image sets, includingTagMatch, which is a novel inherently interpretable and attributable method, making it more suitable for broader use by non-technical stake holders (artists, lawyers, judges, etc). Leveraging ArtSavant, we then perform a large-scale empirical study to provide quantitative insight on the prevalence of artistic style copying across 3 popular text-to-image generative models. Namely, amongst a dataset of prolific artists (including many famous ones), only 20% of them appear to have their styles be at a risk of copying via simple prompting of today's popular text-to-image generative models.
Read more4/15/2024
0
InstantStyle-Plus: Style Transfer with Content-Preserving in Text-to-Image Generation
Haofan Wang, Peng Xing, Renyuan Huang, Hao Ai, Qixun Wang, Xu Bai
Style transfer is an inventive process designed to create an image that maintains the essence of the original while embracing the visual style of another. Although diffusion models have demonstrated impressive generative power in personalized subject-driven or style-driven applications, existing state-of-the-art methods still encounter difficulties in achieving a seamless balance between content preservation and style enhancement. For example, amplifying the style's influence can often undermine the structural integrity of the content. To address these challenges, we deconstruct the style transfer task into three core elements: 1) Style, focusing on the image's aesthetic characteristics; 2) Spatial Structure, concerning the geometric arrangement and composition of visual elements; and 3) Semantic Content, which captures the conceptual meaning of the image. Guided by these principles, we introduce InstantStyle-Plus, an approach that prioritizes the integrity of the original content while seamlessly integrating the target style. Specifically, our method accomplishes style injection through an efficient, lightweight process, utilizing the cutting-edge InstantStyle framework. To reinforce the content preservation, we initiate the process with an inverted content latent noise and a versatile plug-and-play tile ControlNet for preserving the original image's intrinsic layout. We also incorporate a global semantic adapter to enhance the semantic content's fidelity. To safeguard against the dilution of style information, a style extractor is employed as discriminator for providing supplementary style guidance. Codes will be available at https://github.com/instantX-research/InstantStyle-Plus.
Read more7/2/2024
0
An Analysis for Image-to-Image Translation and Style Transfer
Xiaoming Yu, Jie Tian, Zhenhua Hu
With the development of generative technologies in deep learning, a large number of image-to-image translation and style transfer models have emerged at an explosive rate in recent years. These two technologies have made significant progress and can generate realistic images. However, many communities tend to confuse the two, because both generate the desired image based on the input image and both cover the two definitions of content and style. In fact, there are indeed significant differences between the two, and there is currently a lack of clear explanations to distinguish the two technologies, which is not conducive to the advancement of technology. We hope to serve the entire community by introducing the differences and connections between image-to-image translation and style transfer. The entire discussion process involves the concepts, forms, training modes, evaluation processes, and visualization results of the two technologies. Finally, we conclude that image-to-image translation divides images by domain, and the types of images in the domain are limited, and the scope involved is small, but the conversion ability is strong and can achieve strong semantic changes. Style transfer divides image types by single image, and the scope involved is large, but the transfer ability is limited, and it transfers more texture and color of the image.
Read more8/13/2024