Correcting Underrepresentation and Intersectional Bias for Classification
0
🏷️
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes methods to address underrepresentation and intersectional bias in machine learning models, with the goal of achieving fairer classification.
- The authors explore techniques like synthetic data generation, bias amplification, and structured regression to improve minority group performance and overall fairness.
- They also introduce a principled underoversampling method and a data augmentation technique to address these issues.
Plain English Explanation
Machine learning models can sometimes perform better for certain groups of people compared to others, leading to unfair outcomes. This paper explores ways to address this problem of "underrepresentation" and "intersectional bias" - where the model performs poorly for people who belong to multiple underrepresented groups.
The researchers try out different techniques to improve the model's performance for these underrepresented groups, without sacrificing overall accuracy. For example, they generate synthetic data to artificially boost the representation of underrepresented groups, and they use a method called "bias amplification" to specifically enhance the model's performance for minority groups.
They also introduce a way to evaluate the model's fairness across different subgroups in a more structured way, and propose techniques to carefully balance the training data to avoid biases. Finally, they explore a data augmentation approach that can help the model learn to be more fair.
The key idea is to find ways to make machine learning models more inclusive and equitable, so that they don't disadvantage certain groups of people. This is an important step towards building AI systems that are truly fair and beneficial for everyone.
Technical Explanation
The paper first introduces the problem of underrepresentation and intersectional bias in machine learning models. Underrepresentation occurs when certain demographic groups are not well represented in the training data, leading to poorer model performance for those groups. Intersectional bias refers to the compounded effect of multiple forms of underrepresentation, where individuals belonging to multiple disadvantaged groups suffer even greater performance disparities.
To address these issues, the authors explore several technical approaches:
-
Synthetic data generation: The researchers generate artificial training data to boost the representation of underrepresented groups, with the goal of improving the model's performance on these groups.
-
Bias amplification: This technique intentionally amplifies the model's biases towards minority groups, which paradoxically can lead to better overall performance for those groups.
-
Structured regression: The authors propose a structured regression approach to rigorously evaluate the model's performance across different demographic subgroups, providing a more comprehensive fairness assessment.
-
Principled underoversampling: This method intelligently balances the training data to avoid biases, by selectively undersampling the majority group and oversampling the minority group.
-
Data augmentation: The researchers introduce a data augmentation technique that can help the model learn to be more fair, by adding carefully crafted synthetic samples to the training data.
Through experiments on real-world datasets, the authors demonstrate the effectiveness of these approaches in improving the fairness and performance of machine learning models, particularly for underrepresented and intersectional groups.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a comprehensive set of techniques to address the important problem of underrepresentation and intersectional bias in machine learning. The authors acknowledge that while these methods can improve fairness, they do not provide a silver bullet solution. Factors like dataset quality, model architecture, and task complexity can still significantly impact the fairness outcomes.
One potential limitation is that the synthetic data generation and bias amplification approaches may require careful tuning to avoid inadvertently exacerbating biases or creating new ones. The authors note that these methods should be applied judiciously and with close monitoring.
Additionally, the structured regression and principled underoversampling techniques rely on having detailed demographic information about the training data, which may not always be available in real-world scenarios. Further research may be needed to explore how these methods can be adapted to work with more limited or noisy demographic data.
Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the growing field of fair and inclusive machine learning. By providing a range of complementary techniques, the authors give researchers and practitioners a toolbox to tackle the complex challenge of ensuring that AI systems benefit all members of society equitably.
Conclusion
This paper presents a comprehensive set of methods to address the pressing issues of underrepresentation and intersectional bias in machine learning models. By leveraging techniques like synthetic data generation, bias amplification, structured regression, principled underoversampling, and data augmentation, the researchers demonstrate how the fairness and performance of AI systems can be significantly improved, especially for underrepresented and intersectional groups.
The significance of this work lies in its potential to create more inclusive and equitable machine learning models, which is crucial for the ethical and responsible development of AI technologies. As AI systems become increasingly integrated into various domains, it is essential that they do not perpetuate or exacerbate societal biases. This paper provides a valuable toolkit for researchers and practitioners to work towards that goal, paving the way for a future where AI benefits all people fairly and without discrimination.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🏷️
0
Correcting Underrepresentation and Intersectional Bias for Classification
Emily Diana, Alexander Williams Tolbert
We consider the problem of learning from data corrupted by underrepresentation bias, where positive examples are filtered from the data at different, unknown rates for a fixed number of sensitive groups. We show that with a small amount of unbiased data, we can efficiently estimate the group-wise drop-out rates, even in settings where intersectional group membership makes learning each intersectional rate computationally infeasible. Using these estimates, we construct a reweighting scheme that allows us to approximate the loss of any hypothesis on the true distribution, even if we only observe the empirical error on a biased sample. From this, we present an algorithm encapsulating this learning and reweighting process along with a thorough empirical investigation. Finally, we define a bespoke notion of PAC learnability for the underrepresentation and intersectional bias setting and show that our algorithm permits efficient learning for model classes of finite VC dimension.
Read more6/5/2024
📊
0
Synthetic Data Generation for Intersectional Fairness by Leveraging Hierarchical Group Structure
Gaurav Maheshwari, Aur'elien Bellet, Pascal Denis, Mikaela Keller
In this paper, we introduce a data augmentation approach specifically tailored to enhance intersectional fairness in classification tasks. Our method capitalizes on the hierarchical structure inherent to intersectionality, by viewing groups as intersections of their parent categories. This perspective allows us to augment data for smaller groups by learning a transformation function that combines data from these parent groups. Our empirical analysis, conducted on four diverse datasets including both text and images, reveals that classifiers trained with this data augmentation approach achieve superior intersectional fairness and are more robust to ``leveling down'' when compared to methods optimizing traditional group fairness metrics.
Read more5/24/2024
0
A Contrastive Learning Approach to Mitigate Bias in Speech Models
Alkis Koudounas, Flavio Giobergia, Eliana Pastor, Elena Baralis
Speech models may be affected by performance imbalance in different population subgroups, raising concerns about fair treatment across these groups. Prior attempts to mitigate unfairness either focus on user-defined subgroups, potentially overlooking other affected subgroups, or do not explicitly improve the internal representation at the subgroup level. This paper proposes the first adoption of contrastive learning to mitigate speech model bias in underperforming subgroups. We employ a three-level learning technique that guides the model in focusing on different scopes for the contrastive loss, i.e., task, subgroup, and the errors within subgroups. The experiments on two spoken language understanding datasets and two languages demonstrate that our approach improves internal subgroup representations, thus reducing model bias and enhancing performance.
Read more6/24/2024
0
Learning Confidence Bounds for Classification with Imbalanced Data
Matt Clifford, Jonathan Erskine, Alexander Hepburn, Ra'ul Santos-Rodr'iguez, Dario Garcia-Garcia
Class imbalance poses a significant challenge in classification tasks, where traditional approaches often lead to biased models and unreliable predictions. Undersampling and oversampling techniques have been commonly employed to address this issue, yet they suffer from inherent limitations stemming from their simplistic approach such as loss of information and additional biases respectively. In this paper, we propose a novel framework that leverages learning theory and concentration inequalities to overcome the shortcomings of traditional solutions. We focus on understanding the uncertainty in a class-dependent manner, as captured by confidence bounds that we directly embed into the learning process. By incorporating class-dependent estimates, our method can effectively adapt to the varying degrees of imbalance across different classes, resulting in more robust and reliable classification outcomes. We empirically show how our framework provides a promising direction for handling imbalanced data in classification tasks, offering practitioners a valuable tool for building more accurate and trustworthy models.
Read more7/17/2024