CoxSE: Exploring the Potential of Self-Explaining Neural Networks with Cox Proportional Hazards Model for Survival Analysis
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper explores the potential of self-explaining neural networks for survival analysis using the Cox Proportional Hazards model.
- Survival analysis is a statistical method for predicting the time until an event of interest, such as death or disease recurrence.
- The proposed CoxSE model aims to provide interpretable and accurate survival predictions by combining the power of neural networks with the explainability of the Cox model.
Plain English Explanation
The research paper you provided explores a new way to analyze and predict survival outcomes, which is the time until a significant event like death or the return of a disease. The researchers developed a model called CoxSE that combines the strengths of two different approaches:
-
Neural networks - These are a type of machine learning model that can learn complex patterns in data and make accurate predictions. However, neural networks can be "black boxes" that are difficult to understand.
-
Cox Proportional Hazards model - This is a well-established statistical model for survival analysis that provides clear explanations of how different factors influence the likelihood and timing of an event. But it may not be as accurate as neural networks.
By bringing these two approaches together, the CoxSE model aims to give you the best of both worlds - the predictive power of neural networks with the interpretability of the Cox model. This could help doctors, researchers, and patients better understand the factors that influence a person's survival chances and make more informed decisions.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes the CoxSE (Cox Self-Explaining) model, which combines the strengths of neural networks and the Cox Proportional Hazards model for survival analysis. The key elements of the CoxSE approach are:
-
Architecture: CoxSE consists of a neural network that learns a representation of the input features, followed by a Cox Proportional Hazards layer that models the survival outcomes. This allows the model to capture complex, nonlinear relationships in the data while providing interpretable insights through the Cox model.
-
Training: The CoxSE model is trained end-to-end using a combination of the neural network's representation learning and the Cox model's log-likelihood loss function. This allows the model to optimize both predictive accuracy and interpretability.
-
Interpretability: The Cox Proportional Hazards model provides explanations of how each input feature influences the predicted survival outcomes through its coefficients. These insights are preserved in the CoxSE model, making it self-explaining.
-
Experiments: The authors evaluate CoxSE on several publicly available survival analysis datasets and compare its performance to other state-of-the-art survival analysis models. The results demonstrate that CoxSE can achieve competitive predictive accuracy while providing valuable interpretable insights.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach to combining the strengths of neural networks and the Cox Proportional Hazards model for survival analysis. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:
-
Complexity: The CoxSE model adds an additional layer of complexity compared to a standalone Cox model. It's important to ensure that the benefits of improved predictive accuracy and interpretability outweigh the increased computational cost and potential for overfitting.
-
Generalization: The authors only evaluate CoxSE on a limited number of datasets. Further research is needed to assess its performance and generalization capabilities on a wider range of survival analysis problems, including those with more complex data structures or censoring patterns.
-
Interpretability Validation: While the paper claims that CoxSE provides interpretable insights, the authors could have included more extensive validation of the model's interpretability, such as conducting user studies or analyzing the sensitivity of the Cox model coefficients.
-
[object Object]: The paper could have compared CoxSE to other interpretable survival analysis models, such as those based on Bayesian networks or additive models, to better understand its relative strengths and weaknesses.
Overall, the CoxSE model is a promising contribution to the field of survival analysis, but further research and validation would be beneficial to fully assess its capabilities and limitations.
Conclusion
The CoxSE model presented in this paper represents a novel approach to survival analysis that combines the predictive power of neural networks with the interpretability of the Cox Proportional Hazards model. By preserving the explanatory capabilities of the Cox model within a neural network framework, CoxSE aims to provide accurate and self-explaining survival predictions, which could be valuable for medical decision-making, risk assessment, and other applications where both predictive accuracy and interpretability are important.
While the paper demonstrates promising results, further research is needed to fully understand the model's strengths, limitations, and potential areas for improvement. Nonetheless, the CoxSE approach is an important step towards developing more interpretable and reliable survival analysis tools, which could have significant implications for healthcare, policy, and beyond.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
CoxSE: Exploring the Potential of Self-Explaining Neural Networks with Cox Proportional Hazards Model for Survival Analysis
Abdallah Alabdallah, Omar Hamed, Mattias Ohlsson, Thorsteinn Rognvaldsson, Sepideh Pashami
The Cox Proportional Hazards (CPH) model has long been the preferred survival model for its explainability. However, to increase its predictive power beyond its linear log-risk, it was extended to utilize deep neural networks sacrificing its explainability. In this work, we explore the potential of self-explaining neural networks (SENN) for survival analysis. we propose a new locally explainable Cox proportional hazards model, named CoxSE, by estimating a locally-linear log-hazard function using the SENN. We also propose a modification to the Neural additive (NAM) models hybrid with SENN, named CoxSENAM, which enables the control of the stability and consistency of the generated explanations. Several experiments using synthetic and real datasets have been performed comparing with a NAM-based model, DeepSurv model explained with SHAP, and a linear CPH model. The results show that, unlike the NAM-based model, the SENN-based model can provide more stable and consistent explanations while maintaining the same expressiveness power of the black-box model. The results also show that, due to their structural design, NAM-based models demonstrated better robustness to non-informative features. Among these models, the hybrid model exhibited the best robustness.
Read more7/22/2024
🔮
0
ResSurv: Cancer Survival Analysis Prediction Model Based on Residual Networks
Wankang Zhai
Survival prediction is an important branch of cancer prognosis analysis. The model that predicts survival risk through TCGA genomics data can discover genes related to cancer and provide diagnosis and treatment recommendations based on patient characteristics. We found that deep learning models based on Cox proportional hazards often suffer from overfitting when dealing with high-throughput data. Moreover, we found that as the number of network layers increases, the experimental results will not get better, and network degradation will occur. Based on this problem, we propose a new framework based on Deep Residual Learning. Combine the ideas of Cox proportional hazards and Residual. And name it ResSurv. First, ResSurv is a feed-forward deep learning network stacked by multiple basic ResNet Blocks. In each ResNet Block, we add a Normalization Layer to prevent gradient disappearance and gradient explosion. Secondly, for the loss function of the neural network, we inherited the Cox proportional hazards methods, applied the semi-parametric of the CPH model to the neural network, combined with the partial likelihood model, established the loss function, and performed backpropagation and gradient update. Finally, we compared ResSurv networks of different depths and found that we can effectively extract high-dimensional features. Ablation experiments and comparative experiments prove that our model has reached SOTA(state of the art) in the field of deep learning, and our network can effectively extract deep information.
Read more5/14/2024
0
Bayesian Survival Analysis by Approximate Inference of Neural Networks
Christian Marius Lillelund, Martin Magris, Christian Fischer Pedersen
Variational Inference (VI) is a commonly used technique for approximate Bayesian inference and uncertainty estimation in deep learning models, yet it comes at a computational cost, as it doubles the number of trainable parameters to represent uncertainty. This rapidly becomes challenging in high-dimensional settings and motivates the use of alternative techniques for inference, such as Monte Carlo Dropout (MCD) or Spectral-normalized Neural Gaussian Process (SNGP). However, such methods have seen little adoption in survival analysis, and VI remains the prevalent approach for training probabilistic neural networks. In this paper, we investigate how to train deep probabilistic survival models in large datasets without introducing additional overhead in model complexity. To achieve this, we adopt three probabilistic approaches, namely VI, MCD, and SNGP, and evaluate them in terms of their prediction performance, calibration performance, and model complexity. In the context of probabilistic survival analysis, we investigate whether non-VI techniques can offer comparable or possibly improved prediction performance and uncertainty calibration compared to VI. In the MIMIC-IV dataset, we find that MCD aligns with VI in terms of the concordance index (0.748 vs. 0.743) and mean absolute error (254.9 vs. 254.7) using hinge loss, while providing C-calibrated uncertainty estimates. Moreover, our SNGP implementation provides D-calibrated survival functions in all datasets compared to VI (4/4 vs. 2/4, respectively). Our work encourages the use of techniques alternative to VI for survival analysis in high-dimensional datasets, where computational efficiency and overhead are of concern.
Read more6/21/2024
0
CoxKAN: Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks for Interpretable, High-Performance Survival Analysis
William Knottenbelt, Zeyu Gao, Rebecca Wray, Woody Zhidong Zhang, Jiashuai Liu, Mireia Crispin-Ortuzar
Survival analysis is a branch of statistics used for modeling the time until a specific event occurs and is widely used in medicine, engineering, finance, and many other fields. When choosing survival models, there is typically a trade-off between performance and interpretability, where the highest performance is achieved by black-box models based on deep learning. This is a major problem in fields such as medicine where practitioners are reluctant to blindly trust black-box models to make important patient decisions. Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs) were recently proposed as an interpretable and accurate alternative to multi-layer perceptrons (MLPs). We introduce CoxKAN, a Cox proportional hazards Kolmogorov-Arnold Network for interpretable, high-performance survival analysis. We evaluate the proposed CoxKAN on 4 synthetic datasets and 9 real medical datasets. The synthetic experiments demonstrate that CoxKAN accurately recovers interpretable symbolic formulae for the hazard function, and effectively performs automatic feature selection. Evaluation on the 9 real datasets show that CoxKAN consistently outperforms the Cox proportional hazards model and achieves performance that is superior or comparable to that of tuned MLPs. Furthermore, we find that CoxKAN identifies complex interactions between predictor variables that would be extremely difficult to recognise using existing survival methods, and automatically finds symbolic formulae which uncover the precise effect of important biomarkers on patient risk.
Read more9/9/2024