Crossing the principle-practice gap in AI ethics with ethical problem-solving
0
🤖
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Rapid advancements in AI, driven by breakthroughs in deep learning and increased computing power, have transformed various domains in our daily lives.
- However, this progress raises concerns about balancing technological advancement, ethical considerations, safety measures, and financial interests.
- The paper proposes a framework called "Ethical Problem-Solving (EPS)" to help bridge the gap between ethical principles and practical AI development.
Plain English Explanation
The past few years have seen a rapid growth in artificial intelligence (AI) technology. This has been driven by major advancements in deep learning (a type of AI) and increased computing power, as well as significant investments in the field. As a result, AI systems have become much more capable at generating and creating content, affecting many areas of our lives.
While this progress is exciting, it also raises important concerns. We need to carefully consider the ethical implications, ensure proper safety measures are in place, and balance technological advancement with other important factors like human values. Using AI in sensitive areas, like healthcare or criminal justice, makes these ethical considerations even more crucial.
The challenge is that the discussions around the ethics of AI don't always connect well with the technical side of how these systems are actually developed. To help bridge this gap, the researchers propose a framework called "Ethical Problem-Solving (EPS)". EPS is a methodology for responsible, human-centric, and value-oriented AI development.
The core idea of EPS is to translate ethical principles into practical steps that can be implemented during AI development. This includes using surveys to assess the potential impacts of an AI system and a process to recommend ways to address any ethical concerns. The researchers have also released an "Ethics as a Service Platform" as a demonstration of how EPS can be applied.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces the "Ethical Problem-Solving (EPS)" framework as a methodology to help bridge the gap between ethical principles and the practical implementation of AI systems.
The key components of the EPS framework are:
-
Impact Assessment Surveys: These surveys are used to evaluate the potential impacts, both positive and negative, that an AI system may have. This helps identify ethical considerations that need to be addressed.
-
Differential Recommendation Methodology: This process takes the insights from the impact assessment and translates them into practical recommendations for how to implement the AI system in a more ethical and responsible manner.
The researchers demonstrate the EPS framework by proposing an "Ethics as a Service Platform", which provides a simple implementation of the key EPS components. The goal is to make this framework openly available so the broader community can build upon and extend it to other contexts.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thoughtful approach to addressing the ethical challenges posed by the rapid advancement of AI technology. By focusing on bridging the gap between ethical principles and practical implementation, the EPS framework has the potential to help organizations develop AI systems that are more responsible, human-centric, and aligned with important values.
One limitation mentioned in the paper is that the EPS framework and the demonstration "Ethics as a Service Platform" are still relatively simple and would require further development and refinement to be truly effective in real-world scenarios. Additional research may be needed to explore how the framework can be scaled and adapted to handle the complexity of ethical considerations in various domains.
Another potential area for further exploration is how to effectively engage and educate AI developers and other stakeholders on the importance of ethical AI development. [Integrating ethical training and awareness into the AI development process could be a crucial complement to the technical tools provided by the EPS framework.
Conclusion
The paper proposes the "Ethical Problem-Solving (EPS)" framework as a promising approach to addressing the ethical challenges posed by the rapid advancement of AI technology. By translating ethical principles into practical implementation steps, EPS aims to help organizations develop AI systems that are more responsible, human-centric, and aligned with important values.
While the framework and its demonstration are still relatively simple, the researchers have made the components openly available, encouraging the broader community to build upon and extend the work. Continued refinement, scalability, and integration with educational efforts could further strengthen the impact of the EPS approach as the field of AI continues to evolve and become increasingly influential in our daily lives.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤖
0
Crossing the principle-practice gap in AI ethics with ethical problem-solving
Nicholas Kluge Corr^ea, James William Santos, Camila Galv~ao, Marcelo Pasetti, Dieine Schiavon, Faizah Naqvi, Robayet Hossain, Nythamar De Oliveira
The past years have presented a surge in (AI) development, fueled by breakthroughs in deep learning, increased computational power, and substantial investments in the field. Given the generative capabilities of more recent AI systems, the era of large-scale AI models has transformed various domains that intersect our daily lives. However, this progress raises concerns about the balance between technological advancement, ethical considerations, safety measures, and financial interests. Moreover, using such systems in sensitive areas amplifies our general ethical awareness, prompting a reemergence of debates on governance, regulation, and human values. However, amidst this landscape, how to bridge the principle-practice gap separating ethical discourse from the technical side of AI development remains an open problem. In response to this challenge, the present work proposes a framework to help shorten this gap: ethical problem-solving (EPS). EPS is a methodology promoting responsible, human-centric, and value-oriented AI development. The framework's core resides in translating principles into practical implementations using impact assessment surveys and a differential recommendation methodology. We utilize EPS as a blueprint to propose the implementation of Ethics as a Service Platform, which is currently available as a simple demonstration. We released all framework components openly and with a permissive license, hoping the community would adopt and extend our efforts into other contexts. Available in https://github.com/Nkluge-correa/ethical-problem-solving
Read more6/26/2024
🤖
0
New!Beyond principlism: Practical strategies for ethical AI use in research practices
Zhicheng Lin
The rapid adoption of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in scientific research, particularly large language models (LLMs), has outpaced the development of ethical guidelines, leading to a Triple-Too problem: too many high-level ethical initiatives, too abstract principles lacking contextual and practical relevance, and too much focus on restrictions and risks over benefits and utilities. Existing approaches, including principlism (reliance on abstract ethical principles), formalism (rigid application of rules), and technical solutionism (overemphasis on technological fixes), offer little practical guidance for addressing ethical challenges of AI in scientific research practices. To bridge the gap between abstract principles and day-to-day research practices, a user-centered, realism-inspired approach is proposed here. It outlines five specific goals for ethical AI use: 1) understanding model training and output, including bias mitigation strategies; 2) respecting privacy, confidentiality, and copyright; 3) avoiding plagiarism and policy violations; 4) applying AI beneficially compared to alternatives; and 5) using AI transparently and reproducibly. Each goal is accompanied by actionable strategies and realistic cases of misuse and corrective measures. I argue that ethical AI application requires evaluating its utility against existing alternatives rather than isolated performance metrics. Additionally, I propose documentation guidelines to enhance transparency and reproducibility in AI-assisted research. Moving forward, we need targeted professional development, training programs, and balanced enforcement mechanisms to promote responsible AI use while fostering innovation. By refining these ethical guidelines and adapting them to emerging AI capabilities, we can accelerate scientific progress without compromising research integrity.
Read more9/19/2024
🤖
0
Resolving Ethics Trade-offs in Implementing Responsible AI
Conrad Sanderson, Emma Schleiger, David Douglas, Petra Kuhnert, Qinghua Lu
While the operationalisation of high-level AI ethics principles into practical AI/ML systems has made progress, there is still a theory-practice gap in managing tensions between the underlying AI ethics aspects. We cover five approaches for addressing the tensions via trade-offs, ranging from rudimentary to complex. The approaches differ in the types of considered context, scope, methods for measuring contexts, and degree of justification. None of the approaches is likely to be appropriate for all organisations, systems, or applications. To address this, we propose a framework which consists of: (i) proactive identification of tensions, (ii) prioritisation and weighting of ethics aspects, (iii) justification and documentation of trade-off decisions. The proposed framework aims to facilitate the implementation of well-rounded AI/ML systems that are appropriate for potential regulatory requirements.
Read more9/10/2024
🤖
0
A Conceptual Framework for Ethical Evaluation of Machine Learning Systems
Neha R. Gupta, Jessica Hullman, Hari Subramonyam
Research in Responsible AI has developed a range of principles and practices to ensure that machine learning systems are used in a manner that is ethical and aligned with human values. However, a critical yet often neglected aspect of ethical ML is the ethical implications that appear when designing evaluations of ML systems. For instance, teams may have to balance a trade-off between highly informative tests to ensure downstream product safety, with potential fairness harms inherent to the implemented testing procedures. We conceptualize ethics-related concerns in standard ML evaluation techniques. Specifically, we present a utility framework, characterizing the key trade-off in ethical evaluation as balancing information gain against potential ethical harms. The framework is then a tool for characterizing challenges teams face, and systematically disentangling competing considerations that teams seek to balance. Differentiating between different types of issues encountered in evaluation allows us to highlight best practices from analogous domains, such as clinical trials and automotive crash testing, which navigate these issues in ways that can offer inspiration to improve evaluation processes in ML. Our analysis underscores the critical need for development teams to deliberately assess and manage ethical complexities that arise during the evaluation of ML systems, and for the industry to move towards designing institutional policies to support ethical evaluations.
Read more8/21/2024