Decentralized Learning in General-sum Markov Games
0
🔄
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores decentralized learning in general-sum Markov games, a type of multi-agent reinforcement learning problem.
- The authors propose a new solution concept called a Markov near-potential function, which extends the idea of potential functions to general-sum games.
- They develop a decentralized learning algorithm that converges to a Markov near-potential equilibrium and demonstrate its performance on several benchmark tasks.
Plain English Explanation
In this paper, the researchers are looking at a type of problem called a "general-sum Markov game." This is a situation where multiple agents (like different computer programs or robots) are trying to achieve their own goals, but their goals might not completely align with each other.
The researchers introduce a new idea called a "Markov near-potential function" to help solve these kinds of problems. A potential function is a way to measure how well the agents are doing overall, even if their individual goals don't perfectly match up.
The researchers then develop a learning algorithm that allows the agents to figure out how to play the game in a decentralized way, without a central controller telling them what to do. This algorithm is designed to converge, or settle down, to a "Markov near-potential equilibrium," which means a set of strategies where the agents are doing about as well as they can given the constraints of the game.
The researchers test their algorithm on some benchmark tasks to see how well it performs. The key idea is to give the agents a way to cooperate and coordinate their actions, even when their individual goals don't perfectly align.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a new solution concept called a Markov near-potential function for general-sum Markov games. This extends the idea of potential functions, which are commonly used in potential games, to more general settings where the agents' rewards may not be perfectly aligned.
The authors develop a decentralized learning algorithm that converges to a Markov near-potential equilibrium. This involves each agent maintaining an estimate of the Markov near-potential function and using that to guide their actions. The algorithm is shown to have strong theoretical guarantees, including almost-sure convergence to an equilibrium.
The paper evaluates the algorithm on several benchmark tasks, including a multi-agent particle environment and a traffic control problem. The results demonstrate the algorithm's ability to find high-performing strategies in general-sum Markov games where the agents' individual objectives are not perfectly aligned.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes an important contribution by extending the concept of potential functions to the more general setting of general-sum Markov games. This provides a new solution concept and corresponding learning algorithm with strong theoretical guarantees.
However, the analysis is limited to the single-state case, and the authors note that extending the results to the multi-state case remains an open challenge. Additionally, the benchmark tasks considered are relatively simple, and it would be valuable to see how the algorithm performs on more complex or realistic multi-agent scenarios.
Another potential limitation is that the Markov near-potential function may not capture all the relevant information about the game, and there may be other solution concepts or learning approaches that could outperform this method in certain settings. Further research is needed to understand the relative strengths and weaknesses of this approach compared to other multi-agent learning techniques.
Conclusion
This paper presents an important theoretical advance in the field of multi-agent reinforcement learning, introducing the concept of a Markov near-potential function and a corresponding decentralized learning algorithm. The results demonstrate the algorithm's ability to find high-performing strategies in general-sum Markov games where the agents' individual objectives are not perfectly aligned.
While the analysis is limited in some respects, the paper opens up new avenues for research in this challenging domain. By providing a principled way to coordinate agent behavior in general-sum settings, the work has the potential to significantly impact the development of more effective and robust multi-agent systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔄
0
Decentralized Learning in General-sum Markov Games
Chinmay Maheshwari, Manxi Wu, Shankar Sastry
The Markov game framework is widely used to model interactions among agents with heterogeneous utilities in dynamic, uncertain, societal-scale systems. In these settings, agents typically operate in a decentralized manner due to privacy and scalability concerns, often without knowledge of others' strategies. Designing decentralized learning algorithms that provably converge to rational outcomes remains challenging, especially beyond Markov zero-sum and potential games, which do not fully capture the mixed cooperative-competitive nature of real-world interactions. Our paper focuses on designing decentralized learning algorithms for general-sum Markov games, aiming to provide guarantees of convergence to approximate Nash equilibria. We introduce a Markov Near-Potential Function (MNPF), and show that MNPF plays a central role in the analysis of convergence of an actor-critic-based decentralized learning dynamics to approximate Nash equilibria. Our analysis leverages the two-timescale nature of actor-critic algorithms, where Q-function updates occur faster than policy updates. This result is further strengthened under certain regularity conditions and when the set of Nash equilibria is finite. Our findings provide a new perspective on the analysis of decentralized learning in multi-agent systems, addressing the complexities of real-world interactions.
Read more9/17/2024
🔍
0
Learning Nash Equilibria in Zero-Sum Markov Games: A Single Time-scale Algorithm Under Weak Reachability
Reda Ouhamma, Maryam Kamgarpour
We consider decentralized learning for zero-sum games, where players only see their payoff information and are agnostic to actions and payoffs of the opponent. Previous works demonstrated convergence to a Nash equilibrium in this setting using double time-scale algorithms under strong reachability assumptions. We address the open problem of achieving an approximate Nash equilibrium efficiently with an uncoupled and single time-scale algorithm under weaker conditions. Our contribution is a rational and convergent algorithm, utilizing Tsallis-entropy regularization in a value-iteration-based approach. The algorithm learns an approximate Nash equilibrium in polynomial time, requiring only the existence of a policy pair that induces an irreducible and aperiodic Markov chain, thus considerably weakening past assumptions. Our analysis leverages negative drift inequalities and introduces novel properties of Tsallis entropy that are of independent interest.
Read more5/27/2024
🤿
0
Improving Sample Efficiency of Model-Free Algorithms for Zero-Sum Markov Games
Songtao Feng, Ming Yin, Yu-Xiang Wang, Jing Yang, Yingbin Liang
The problem of two-player zero-sum Markov games has recently attracted increasing interests in theoretical studies of multi-agent reinforcement learning (RL). In particular, for finite-horizon episodic Markov decision processes (MDPs), it has been shown that model-based algorithms can find an $epsilon$-optimal Nash Equilibrium (NE) with the sample complexity of $O(H^3SAB/epsilon^2)$, which is optimal in the dependence of the horizon $H$ and the number of states $S$ (where $A$ and $B$ denote the number of actions of the two players, respectively). However, none of the existing model-free algorithms can achieve such an optimality. In this work, we propose a model-free stage-based Q-learning algorithm and show that it achieves the same sample complexity as the best model-based algorithm, and hence for the first time demonstrate that model-free algorithms can enjoy the same optimality in the $H$ dependence as model-based algorithms. The main improvement of the dependency on $H$ arises by leveraging the popular variance reduction technique based on the reference-advantage decomposition previously used only for single-agent RL. However, such a technique relies on a critical monotonicity property of the value function, which does not hold in Markov games due to the update of the policy via the coarse correlated equilibrium (CCE) oracle. Thus, to extend such a technique to Markov games, our algorithm features a key novel design of updating the reference value functions as the pair of optimistic and pessimistic value functions whose value difference is the smallest in the history in order to achieve the desired improvement in the sample efficiency.
Read more6/7/2024
📉
0
Decentralized Online Learning in General-Sum Stackelberg Games
Yaolong Yu, Haipeng Chen
We study an online learning problem in general-sum Stackelberg games, where players act in a decentralized and strategic manner. We study two settings depending on the type of information for the follower: (1) the limited information setting where the follower only observes its own reward, and (2) the side information setting where the follower has extra side information about the leader's reward. We show that for the follower, myopically best responding to the leader's action is the best strategy for the limited information setting, but not necessarily so for the side information setting -- the follower can manipulate the leader's reward signals with strategic actions, and hence induce the leader's strategy to converge to an equilibrium that is better off for itself. Based on these insights, we study decentralized online learning for both players in the two settings. Our main contribution is to derive last-iterate convergence and sample complexity results in both settings. Notably, we design a new manipulation strategy for the follower in the latter setting, and show that it has an intrinsic advantage against the best response strategy. Our theories are also supported by empirical results.
Read more5/7/2024