Deep Clustering Survival Machines with Interpretable Expert Distributions
2301.11826
0
0
🤿
Abstract
Conventional survival analysis methods are typically ineffective to characterize heterogeneity in the population while such information can be used to assist predictive modeling. In this study, we propose a hybrid survival analysis method, referred to as deep clustering survival machines, that combines the discriminative and generative mechanisms. Similar to the mixture models, we assume that the timing information of survival data is generatively described by a mixture of certain numbers of parametric distributions, i.e., expert distributions. We learn weights of the expert distributions for individual instances according to their features discriminatively such that each instance's survival information can be characterized by a weighted combination of the learned constant expert distributions. This method also facilitates interpretable subgrouping/clustering of all instances according to their associated expert distributions. Extensive experiments on both real and synthetic datasets have demonstrated that the method is capable of obtaining promising clustering results and competitive time-to-event predicting performance.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Conventional survival analysis methods often fail to capture the diversity within a population
- The proposed "deep clustering survival machines" method combines discriminative and generative mechanisms to address this issue
- It learns a mixture of parametric distributions that can characterize individual survival patterns based on features
- This allows for interpretable subgrouping/clustering of instances based on their survival patterns
Plain English Explanation
Survival analysis is the study of how long it takes for certain events to occur, like a disease progressing or a patient passing away. Conventional survival analysis methods often struggle to capture the differences between individuals within a population. However, understanding this heterogeneity can be very useful for predicting outcomes.
The researchers propose a new hybrid method called "deep clustering survival machines" that tries to address this limitation. It works by assuming the survival times follow a mixture of certain parametric distributions, like normal or exponential distributions. The method then learns weights for each of these "expert" distributions based on the individuals' features.
This allows the survival of each person to be characterized by a weighted combination of the expert distributions, rather than a single distribution. It also enables interpretable clustering of individuals into subgroups based on their associated expert distributions.
The researchers demonstrate through experiments on real and synthetic data that this method can produce promising clustering results and competitive predictive performance for time-to-event outcomes compared to other approaches.
Technical Explanation
The key idea of the "deep clustering survival machines" method is to combine discriminative and generative mechanisms to model survival data. Similar to mixture models, the method assumes the survival times follow a mixture of parametric "expert" distributions. However, unlike traditional mixture models, it learns the weights of these expert distributions for each individual based on their features in a discriminative manner.
This allows the model to flexibly characterize the survival pattern of each instance as a weighted combination of the learned expert distributions. The method also facilitates interpretable clustering of instances into subgroups based on their associated expert distributions.
The researchers evaluate their approach on both real-world and synthetic datasets, demonstrating that it can achieve competitive time-to-event prediction performance compared to other survival analysis techniques. It also produces meaningful clustering results that provide insights into the heterogeneity within the population.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a novel hybrid approach that combines discriminative and generative elements to address limitations of conventional survival analysis methods. The ability to learn flexible, interpretable survival patterns for individuals is a promising advancement that could have significant implications for applications like medical prognosis.
However, the complexity of the model and the need to specify the number of expert distributions a priori may limit its practicality in some real-world scenarios. Additionally, the evaluation is relatively narrow, focusing mainly on predictive performance and clustering quality, while other explanatory capabilities of the model are not thoroughly examined.
Further research could explore techniques to automatically determine the optimal number of expert distributions, as well as investigate the model's ability to provide interpretable insights into the underlying survival dynamics beyond just clustering. Incorporating semi-supervised learning or sparse, interpretable representations may also be fruitful avenues to explore.
Conclusion
The proposed "deep clustering survival machines" method represents a promising step forward in addressing the limitations of conventional survival analysis techniques. By combining discriminative and generative elements, the model can flexibly characterize individual survival patterns and enable interpretable subgrouping of the population.
While the model's complexity and narrow evaluation present some challenges, the potential implications for applications like medical prognosis are significant. Continued research to address these limitations and further explore the model's explanatory capabilities could lead to impactful advancements in the field of survival analysis.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Clustering Survival Data using a Mixture of Non-parametric Experts
Gabriel Buginga, Edmundo de Souza e Silva
0
0
Survival analysis aims to predict the timing of future events across various fields, from medical outcomes to customer churn. However, the integration of clustering into survival analysis, particularly for precision medicine, remains underexplored. This study introduces SurvMixClust, a novel algorithm for survival analysis that integrates clustering with survival function prediction within a unified framework. SurvMixClust learns latent representations for clustering while also predicting individual survival functions using a mixture of non-parametric experts. Our evaluations on five public datasets show that SurvMixClust creates balanced clusters with distinct survival curves, outperforms clustering baselines, and competes with non-clustering survival models in predictive accuracy, as measured by the time-dependent c-index and log-rank metrics.
5/28/2024
🔮
Interpretable Prediction and Feature Selection for Survival Analysis
Mike Van Ness, Madeleine Udell
0
0
Survival analysis is widely used as a technique to model time-to-event data when some data is censored, particularly in healthcare for predicting future patient risk. In such settings, survival models must be both accurate and interpretable so that users (such as doctors) can trust the model and understand model predictions. While most literature focuses on discrimination, interpretability is equally as important. A successful interpretable model should be able to describe how changing each feature impacts the outcome, and should only use a small number of features. In this paper, we present DyS (pronounced ``dice''), a new survival analysis model that achieves both strong discrimination and interpretability. DyS is a feature-sparse Generalized Additive Model, combining feature selection and interpretable prediction into one model. While DyS works well for all survival analysis problems, it is particularly useful for large (in $n$ and $p$) survival datasets such as those commonly found in observational healthcare studies. Empirical studies show that DyS competes with other state-of-the-art machine learning models for survival analysis, while being highly interpretable.
4/24/2024
Bayesian Survival Analysis by Approximate Inference of Neural Networks
Christian Marius Lillelund, Martin Magris, Christian Fischer Pedersen
0
0
Variational Inference (VI) is a commonly used technique for approximate Bayesian inference and uncertainty estimation in deep learning models, yet it comes at a computational cost, as it doubles the number of trainable parameters to represent uncertainty. This rapidly becomes challenging in high-dimensional settings and motivates the use of alternative techniques for inference, such as Monte Carlo Dropout (MCD) or Spectral-normalized Neural Gaussian Process (SNGP). However, such methods have seen little adoption in survival analysis, and VI remains the prevalent approach for training probabilistic neural networks. In this paper, we investigate how to train deep probabilistic survival models in large datasets without introducing additional overhead in model complexity. To achieve this, we adopt three probabilistic approaches, namely VI, MCD, and SNGP, and evaluate them in terms of their prediction performance, calibration performance, and model complexity. In the context of probabilistic survival analysis, we investigate whether non-VI techniques can offer comparable or possibly improved prediction performance and uncertainty calibration compared to VI. In the MIMIC-IV dataset, we find that MCD aligns with VI in terms of the concordance index (0.748 vs. 0.743) and mean absolute error (254.9 vs. 254.7) using hinge loss, while providing C-calibrated uncertainty estimates. Moreover, our SNGP implementation provides D-calibrated survival functions in all datasets compared to VI (4/4 vs. 2/4, respectively). Our work encourages the use of techniques alternative to VI for survival analysis in high-dimensional datasets, where computational efficiency and overhead are of concern.
6/21/2024
Optimal Sparse Survival Trees
Rui Zhang, Rui Xin, Margo Seltzer, Cynthia Rudin
0
0
Interpretability is crucial for doctors, hospitals, pharmaceutical companies and biotechnology corporations to analyze and make decisions for high stakes problems that involve human health. Tree-based methods have been widely adopted for survival analysis due to their appealing interpretablility and their ability to capture complex relationships. However, most existing methods to produce survival trees rely on heuristic (or greedy) algorithms, which risk producing sub-optimal models. We present a dynamic-programming-with-bounds approach that finds provably-optimal sparse survival tree models, frequently in only a few seconds.
5/24/2024