Deep Graph Anomaly Detection: A Survey and New Perspectives
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Graph Anomaly Detection (GAD) is the task of identifying anomalous or unusual patterns in graph-structured data.
- Deep learning techniques, especially Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), have shown promising results for GAD.
- This paper provides a comprehensive survey of deep learning-based GAD methods and outlines new research perspectives.
Plain English Explanation
[object Object] is the process of finding unusual or abnormal patterns in data that is organized in a graph format. Graphs are a way of representing information where entities (nodes) are connected by relationships (edges).
Deep learning, a type of artificial intelligence that can automatically learn patterns from data, has been particularly effective at [object Object]. Specifically, [object Object] (GNNs) are a class of deep learning models designed to work with graph-structured data.
This paper provides a comprehensive review of the latest deep learning techniques for [object Object] and discusses new research directions in this area. The authors cover the key challenges, state-of-the-art methods, and future opportunities for improving [object Object] using deep learning.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by [object Object] and highlighting its importance in various domains, such as social networks, cybersecurity, and transportation networks.
It then [object Object], including graph complexity, class imbalance, and the need for interpretable and generalizable models.
The core of the paper focuses on [object Object]. The authors categorize the existing approaches into different groups, such as unsupervised, supervised, and semi-supervised methods, and provide a detailed discussion of the key techniques within each category.
Additionally, the paper [object Object], including fairness, robustness, and the integration of domain knowledge.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and well-structured survey of deep learning-based [object Object] methods. The authors have done a thorough job of covering the state-of-the-art techniques and identifying the key challenges and research directions in this field.
One potential limitation of the survey is that it does not delve deeply into the specifics of the various deep learning architectures and algorithms used for [object Object]. While the high-level categorization and discussion are valuable, a more detailed technical explanation of the inner workings of these methods could have provided additional insights.
Additionally, the paper could have discussed the performance and limitations of the surveyed methods in more depth, using concrete examples and comparisons. This would have helped readers better understand the strengths, weaknesses, and practical applicability of the different [object Object] approaches.
Conclusion
This paper provides a comprehensive and insightful survey of deep learning-based [object Object] methods. It highlights the key challenges, the state-of-the-art techniques, and emerging research directions in this important field.
The review can serve as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners interested in [object Object] and the application of deep learning to graph-structured data. By identifying the current limitations and future research opportunities, the paper can help drive the development of more effective and robust [object Object] solutions.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Deep Graph Anomaly Detection: A Survey and New Perspectives
Hezhe Qiao, Hanghang Tong, Bo An, Irwin King, Charu Aggarwal, Guansong Pang
Graph anomaly detection (GAD), which aims to identify unusual graph instances (nodes, edges, subgraphs, or graphs), has attracted increasing attention in recent years due to its significance in a wide range of applications. Deep learning approaches, graph neural networks (GNNs) in particular, have been emerging as a promising paradigm for GAD, owing to its strong capability in capturing complex structure and/or node attributes in graph data. Considering the large number of methods proposed for GNN-based GAD, it is of paramount importance to summarize the methodologies and findings in the existing GAD studies, so that we can pinpoint effective model designs for tackling open GAD problems. To this end, in this work we aim to present a comprehensive review of deep learning approaches for GAD. Existing GAD surveys are focused on task-specific discussions, making it difficult to understand the technical insights of existing methods and their limitations in addressing some unique challenges in GAD. To fill this gap, we first discuss the problem complexities and their resulting challenges in GAD, and then provide a systematic review of current deep GAD methods from three novel perspectives of methodology, including GNN backbone design, proxy task design for GAD, and graph anomaly measures. To deepen the discussions, we further propose a taxonomy of 13 fine-grained method categories under these three perspectives to provide more in-depth insights into the model designs and their capabilities. To facilitate the experiments and validation, we also summarize a collection of widely-used GAD datasets and empirical comparison. We further discuss multiple open problems to inspire more future high-quality research. A continuously updated repository for datasets, links to the codes of algorithms, and empirical comparison is available at https://github.com/mala-lab/Awesome-Deep-Graph-Anomaly-Detection.
Read more9/17/2024
0
Anomaly Detection in Dynamic Graphs: A Comprehensive Survey
Ocheme Anthony Ekle, William Eberle
This survey paper presents a comprehensive and conceptual overview of anomaly detection using dynamic graphs. We focus on existing graph-based anomaly detection (AD) techniques and their applications to dynamic networks. The contributions of this survey paper include the following: i) a comparative study of existing surveys on anomaly detection; ii) a Dynamic Graph-based Anomaly Detection (DGAD) review framework in which approaches for detecting anomalies in dynamic graphs are grouped based on traditional machine-learning models, matrix transformations, probabilistic approaches, and deep-learning approaches; iii) a discussion of graphically representing both discrete and dynamic networks; and iv) a discussion of the advantages of graph-based techniques for capturing the relational structure and complex interactions in dynamic graph data. Finally, this work identifies the potential challenges and future directions for detecting anomalies in dynamic networks. This DGAD survey approach aims to provide a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners by summarizing the strengths and limitations of each approach, highlighting current research trends, and identifying open challenges. In doing so, it can guide future research efforts and promote advancements in anomaly detection in dynamic graphs. Keywords: Graphs, Anomaly Detection, dynamic networks,Graph Neural Networks (GNN), Node anomaly, Graph mining.
Read more6/4/2024
🧠
0
Guarding Graph Neural Networks for Unsupervised Graph Anomaly Detection
Yuanchen Bei, Sheng Zhou, Jinke Shi, Yao Ma, Haishuai Wang, Jiajun Bu
Unsupervised graph anomaly detection aims at identifying rare patterns that deviate from the majority in a graph without the aid of labels, which is important for a variety of real-world applications. Recent advances have utilized Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to learn effective node representations by aggregating information from neighborhoods. This is motivated by the hypothesis that nodes in the graph tend to exhibit consistent behaviors with their neighborhoods. However, such consistency can be disrupted by graph anomalies in multiple ways. Most existing methods directly employ GNNs to learn representations, disregarding the negative impact of graph anomalies on GNNs, resulting in sub-optimal node representations and anomaly detection performance. While a few recent approaches have redesigned GNNs for graph anomaly detection under semi-supervised label guidance, how to address the adverse effects of graph anomalies on GNNs in unsupervised scenarios and learn effective representations for anomaly detection are still under-explored. To bridge this gap, in this paper, we propose a simple yet effective framework for Guarding Graph Neural Networks for Unsupervised Graph Anomaly Detection (G3AD). Specifically, G3AD introduces two auxiliary networks along with correlation constraints to guard the GNNs from inconsistent information encoding. Furthermore, G3AD introduces an adaptive caching module to guard the GNNs from solely reconstructing the observed data that contains anomalies. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our proposed G3AD can outperform seventeen state-of-the-art methods on both synthetic and real-world datasets.
Read more4/26/2024
❗
0
Towards Fair Graph Anomaly Detection: Problem, Benchmark Datasets, and Evaluation
Neng Kai Nigel Neo, Yeon-Chang Lee, Yiqiao Jin, Sang-Wook Kim, Srijan Kumar
The Fair Graph Anomaly Detection (FairGAD) problem aims to accurately detect anomalous nodes in an input graph while avoiding biased predictions against individuals from sensitive subgroups. However, the current literature does not comprehensively discuss this problem, nor does it provide realistic datasets that encompass actual graph structures, anomaly labels, and sensitive attributes. To bridge this gap, we introduce a formal definition of the FairGAD problem and present two novel datasets constructed from the social media platforms Reddit and Twitter. These datasets comprise 1.2 million and 400,000 edges associated with 9,000 and 47,000 nodes, respectively, and leverage political leanings as sensitive attributes and misinformation spreaders as anomaly labels. We demonstrate that our FairGAD datasets significantly differ from the synthetic datasets used by the research community. Using our datasets, we investigate the performance-fairness trade-off in nine existing GAD and non-graph AD methods on five state-of-the-art fairness methods. Our code and datasets are available at https://github.com/nigelnnk/FairGAD
Read more7/30/2024