Deep Learning in Earthquake Engineering: A Comprehensive Review

2405.09021

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 5/16/2024 by Yazhou Xie

🤿

Abstract

This article surveys the growing interest in utilizing Deep Learning (DL) as a powerful tool to address challenging problems in earthquake engineering. Despite decades of advancement in domain knowledge, issues such as uncertainty in earthquake occurrence, unpredictable seismic loads, nonlinear structural responses, and community engagement remain difficult to tackle using domain-specific methods. DL offers promising solutions by leveraging its data-driven capacity for nonlinear mapping, sequential data modeling, automatic feature extraction, dimensionality reduction, optimal decision-making, etc. However, the literature lacks a comprehensive review that systematically covers a consistent scope intersecting DL and earthquake engineering. To bridge the gap, the article first discusses methodological advances to elucidate various applicable DL techniques, such as multi-layer perceptron (MLP), convolutional neural network (CNN), recurrent neural network (RNN), generative adversarial network (GAN), autoencoder (AE), transfer learning (TL), reinforcement learning (RL), and graph neural network (GNN). A thorough research landscape is then disclosed by exploring various DL applications across different research topics, including vision-based seismic damage assessment and structural characterization, seismic demand and damage state prediction, seismic response history prediction, regional seismic risk assessment and community resilience, ground motion (GM) for engineering use, seismic response control, and the inverse problem of system/damage identification. Suitable DL techniques for each research topic are identified, emphasizing the preeminence of CNN for vision-based tasks, RNN for sequential data, RL for community resilience, and unsupervised learning for GM analysis. The article also discusses opportunities and challenges for leveraging DL in earthquake engineering research and practice.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper surveys the growing use of Deep Learning (DL) to address challenging problems in earthquake engineering.
  • Existing domain-specific methods struggle with issues like uncertainty in earthquake occurrence, unpredictable seismic loads, nonlinear structural responses, and community engagement.
  • DL offers promising solutions by leveraging its data-driven capacity for nonlinear mapping, sequential data modeling, automatic feature extraction, dimensionality reduction, and optimal decision-making.
  • The paper systematically reviews the application of various DL techniques, including multi-layer perceptron (MLP), convolutional neural network (CNN), recurrent neural network (RNN), generative adversarial network (GAN), autoencoder (AE), transfer learning (TL), reinforcement learning (RL), and graph neural network (GNN) in earthquake engineering research.

Plain English Explanation

Earthquakes are incredibly complex and challenging phenomena to understand and predict. Traditional methods used by earthquake engineers have struggled to address issues like the unpredictable timing and strength of earthquakes, the complex ways buildings and structures respond to seismic forces, and the overall resilience of communities.

However, a new tool called deep learning is offering promising solutions. Deep learning is a type of artificial intelligence that can identify patterns and make predictions from large datasets. By leveraging deep learning's strengths in areas like nonlinear modeling, sequential data analysis, and automated feature extraction, researchers are finding ways to tackle long-standing problems in earthquake engineering.

This paper provides a comprehensive review of how deep learning is being applied across a range of earthquake engineering topics. For example, deep learning models can analyze images to assess earthquake damage, predict the demand and damage that structures will experience, and even forecast the response of entire communities to seismic events. The paper also discusses how deep learning can be used to generate realistic earthquake ground motion data and control the seismic response of structures.

Overall, this research highlights the significant potential of deep learning to transform the field of earthquake engineering, providing new tools to better understand, predict, and mitigate the devastating impacts of these natural disasters.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by discussing the methodological advances that have enabled the application of various deep learning techniques to earthquake engineering problems. These include:

  • Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP): A type of neural network well-suited for nonlinear mapping and prediction tasks.
  • Convolutional Neural Network (CNN): Powerful for vision-based tasks like image-based seismic damage assessment and structural characterization.
  • Recurrent Neural Network (RNN): Effective for modeling sequential data, such as seismic response history prediction.
  • Generative Adversarial Network (GAN): Can be used to generate realistic earthquake ground motion data.
  • Autoencoder (AE): Useful for dimensionality reduction and feature extraction, e.g., in regional seismic risk assessment.
  • Transfer Learning (TL): Allows leveraging knowledge from pre-trained models to improve performance on specific earthquake engineering tasks.
  • Reinforcement Learning (RL): Promising for community resilience and seismic response control problems.
  • Graph Neural Network (GNN): Applicable to structural and network-based problems in earthquake engineering.

The paper then explores a wide range of deep learning applications across different research topics in earthquake engineering, such as:

  • Vision-based seismic damage assessment and structural characterization: Leveraging CNNs to analyze images and classify damage states.
  • Seismic demand and damage state prediction: Using MLPs, RNNs, and other techniques to forecast structural responses.
  • Seismic response history prediction: Employing RNNs to model the time-series behavior of structures under seismic loading.
  • Regional seismic risk assessment and community resilience: Combining unsupervised learning (e.g., AEs) and RL to evaluate and improve community-level resilience.
  • Ground motion (GM) for engineering use: Utilizing GANs to generate realistic synthetic ground motion data.
  • Seismic response control: Applying RL to optimize control strategies for mitigating structural responses.
  • Inverse problem of system/damage identification: Using deep learning techniques to infer structural properties and damage states from sensor data.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive and insightful review of the growing application of deep learning in earthquake engineering research. The authors have done an excellent job of covering a wide range of deep learning techniques and their suitability for different problem domains within the field.

One potential limitation of the review is that it does not delve deeply into the specific architectural choices, hyperparameter tuning, and other implementation details of the deep learning models described. While this is understandable given the broad scope of the paper, it may limit the ability of readers to directly apply the techniques in their own research or practical applications.

Additionally, the paper does not address the potential challenges and limitations of deploying deep learning models in real-world earthquake engineering scenarios. Issues such as the challenges of deploying machine learning models in practice, the need for physics-informed machine learning to ensure model reliability, and the considerations for using deep learning in educational data science could have been discussed to provide a more holistic view of the field.

Overall, this paper serves as an excellent starting point for researchers and practitioners interested in leveraging deep learning to advance earthquake engineering. By highlighting the diverse applications and the suitability of different deep learning techniques, it lays the groundwork for further exploration and innovation in this rapidly evolving field.

Conclusion

This paper provides a comprehensive survey of the growing application of deep learning to address challenging problems in earthquake engineering. By leveraging the unique capabilities of deep learning, such as nonlinear modeling, sequential data analysis, and automated feature extraction, researchers are finding new ways to tackle long-standing issues in areas like seismic damage assessment, structural response prediction, community resilience, and ground motion simulation.

The review covers a wide range of deep learning techniques, including MLPs, CNNs, RNNs, GANs, and others, and explores their suitability for different earthquake engineering research topics. This systematic overview highlights the significant potential of deep learning to transform the field, providing new tools and insights that can lead to improved understanding, prediction, and mitigation of the devastating impacts of earthquakes.

As the field continues to evolve, the paper also identifies opportunities for further research, such as addressing the practical challenges of deploying deep learning models in real-world earthquake engineering scenarios. By encouraging critical analysis and continued innovation, this review serves as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners seeking to harness the power of deep learning to advance the state of the art in earthquake engineering.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

🔮

Physics-Informed Machine Learning for Seismic Response Prediction OF Nonlinear Steel Moment Resisting Frame Structures

R. Bailey Bond, Pu Ren, Jerome F. Hajjar, Hao Sun

YC

0

Reddit

0

There is growing interest in using machine learning (ML) methods for structural metamodeling due to the substantial computational cost of traditional simulations. Purely data-driven strategies often face limitations in model robustness, interpretability, and dependency on extensive data. To address these challenges, this paper introduces a novel physics-informed machine learning (PiML) method that integrates scientific principles and physical laws into deep neural networks to model seismic responses of nonlinear structures. The approach constrains the ML model's solution space within known physical bounds through three main features: dimensionality reduction via combined model order reduction and wavelet analysis, long short-term memory (LSTM) networks, and Newton's second law. Dimensionality reduction addresses structural systems' redundancy and boosts efficiency while extracting essential features through wavelet analysis. LSTM networks capture temporal dependencies for accurate time-series predictions. Manipulating the equation of motion helps learn system nonlinearities and confines solutions within physically interpretable results. These attributes allow for model training with sparse data, enhancing accuracy, interpretability, and robustness. Furthermore, a dataset of archetype steel moment resistant frames under seismic loading, available in the DesignSafe-CI Database [1], is considered for evaluation. The resulting metamodel handles complex data better than existing physics-guided LSTM models and outperforms other non-physics data-driven networks.

Read more

4/30/2024

Resilience of Deep Learning applications: a systematic literature review of analysis and hardening techniques

Resilience of Deep Learning applications: a systematic literature review of analysis and hardening techniques

Cristiana Bolchini, Luca Cassano, Antonio Miele

YC

0

Reddit

0

Machine Learning (ML) is currently being exploited in numerous applications being one of the most effective Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies, used in diverse fields, such as vision, autonomous systems, and alike. The trend motivated a significant amount of contributions to the analysis and design of ML applications against faults affecting the underlying hardware. The authors investigate the existing body of knowledge on Deep Learning (among ML techniques) resilience against hardware faults systematically through a thoughtful review in which the strengths and weaknesses of this literature stream are presented clearly and then future avenues of research are set out. The review is based on 220 scientific articles published between January 2019 and March 2024. The authors adopt a classifying framework to interpret and highlight research similarities and peculiarities, based on several parameters, starting from the main scope of the work, the adopted fault and error models, to their reproducibility. This framework allows for a comparison of the different solutions and the identification of possible synergies. Furthermore, suggestions concerning the future direction of research are proposed in the form of open challenges to be addressed.

Read more

5/31/2024

🏷️

Beyond development: Challenges in deploying machine learning models for structural engineering applications

Mohsen Zaker Esteghamati, Brennan Bean, Henry V. Burton, M. Z. Naser

YC

0

Reddit

0

Machine learning (ML)-based solutions are rapidly changing the landscape of many fields, including structural engineering. Despite their promising performance, these approaches are usually only demonstrated as proof-of-concept in structural engineering, and are rarely deployed for real-world applications. This paper aims to illustrate the challenges of developing ML models suitable for deployment through two illustrative examples. Among various pitfalls, the presented discussion focuses on model overfitting and underspecification, training data representativeness, variable omission bias, and cross-validation. The results highlight the importance of implementing rigorous model validation techniques through adaptive sampling, careful physics-informed feature selection, and considerations of both model complexity and generalizability.

Read more

4/22/2024

🤿

Automated Deep Learning for Load Forecasting

Julie Keisler (CRIStAL, EDF R&D OSIRIS, EDF R&D), Sandra Claudel, Gilles Cabriel, Margaux Br'eg`ere

YC

0

Reddit

0

Accurate forecasting of electricity consumption is essential to ensure the performance and stability of the grid, especially as the use of renewable energy increases. Forecasting electricity is challenging because it depends on many external factors, such as weather and calendar variables. While regression-based models are currently effective, the emergence of new explanatory variables and the need to refine the temporality of the signals to be forecasted is encouraging the exploration of novel methodologies, in particular deep learning models. However, Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) struggle with this task due to the lack of data points and the different types of explanatory variables (e.g. integer, float, or categorical). In this paper, we explain why and how we used Automated Deep Learning (AutoDL) to find performing DNNs for load forecasting. We ended up creating an AutoDL framework called EnergyDragon by extending the DRAGON package and applying it to load forecasting. EnergyDragon automatically selects the features embedded in the DNN training in an innovative way and optimizes the architecture and the hyperparameters of the networks. We demonstrate on the French load signal that EnergyDragon can find original DNNs that outperform state-of-the-art load forecasting methods as well as other AutoDL approaches.

Read more

5/16/2024