Resilience of Deep Learning applications: a systematic literature review of analysis and hardening techniques

2309.16733

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 5/31/2024 by Cristiana Bolchini, Luca Cassano, Antonio Miele
Resilience of Deep Learning applications: a systematic literature review of analysis and hardening techniques

Abstract

Machine Learning (ML) is currently being exploited in numerous applications being one of the most effective Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies, used in diverse fields, such as vision, autonomous systems, and alike. The trend motivated a significant amount of contributions to the analysis and design of ML applications against faults affecting the underlying hardware. The authors investigate the existing body of knowledge on Deep Learning (among ML techniques) resilience against hardware faults systematically through a thoughtful review in which the strengths and weaknesses of this literature stream are presented clearly and then future avenues of research are set out. The review is based on 220 scientific articles published between January 2019 and March 2024. The authors adopt a classifying framework to interpret and highlight research similarities and peculiarities, based on several parameters, starting from the main scope of the work, the adopted fault and error models, to their reproducibility. This framework allows for a comparison of the different solutions and the identification of possible synergies. Furthermore, suggestions concerning the future direction of research are proposed in the form of open challenges to be addressed.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper provides a systematic survey of analysis and hardening techniques for improving the resilience of deep learning applications.
  • It explores various methods to make deep learning models more robust and resistant to common issues like adversarial attacks, dataset shift, and model drift.
  • The survey covers a wide range of techniques, from model hardening approaches to data augmentation and testing strategies.

Plain English Explanation

Deep learning, a powerful form of artificial intelligence, has seen tremendous success in a variety of applications, from image recognition to language processing. However, these deep learning models can be vulnerable to certain issues that can undermine their reliability and performance.

This paper aims to address these challenges by presenting a comprehensive review of techniques that can help improve the [object Object]. The authors explore a wide range of methods, from [object Object] that make the models more robust to adversarial attacks, to data augmentation strategies that help the models generalize better to new situations.

The paper also covers testing and analysis techniques that can be used to identify and mitigate potential weaknesses in deep learning models. This includes methods for [object Object] – when the distribution of the data used to train the model differs from the data it's applied to in the real world.

By understanding and applying these resilience-enhancing techniques, researchers and developers can build [object Object] that are better equipped to handle the challenges and uncertainties of real-world deployment.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a comprehensive survey of analysis and hardening techniques for improving the resilience of deep learning applications. The authors conducted a systematic review of the literature, covering a wide range of techniques that can be used to address common issues with deep learning models, such as adversarial attacks, dataset shift, and model drift.

The survey is structured around four main categories of resilience-enhancing techniques:

  1. Model Hardening: This includes approaches like adversarial training, input transformation, and model regularization, which aim to make deep learning models more robust to adversarial perturbations and other types of attacks.

  2. Data Augmentation and Representation Learning: The authors explore methods that can help deep learning models generalize better to new data, such as data augmentation, meta-learning, and self-supervised learning.

  3. Testing and Analysis: The paper covers a range of techniques for evaluating the reliability and performance of deep learning models, including methods for detecting dataset shift, model drift, and other issues.

  4. Robustness Evaluation: The survey also examines approaches for quantifying the robustness of deep learning models, such as robustness benchmarks and formal verification techniques.

Throughout the paper, the authors provide detailed descriptions of the various techniques, their underlying principles, and their effectiveness in improving the resilience of deep learning applications. The survey also includes a discussion of the limitations and challenges associated with these approaches, as well as potential areas for future research.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive and well-structured overview of techniques for enhancing the resilience of deep learning applications. The authors have done an excellent job of covering a wide range of approaches, from model hardening to testing and analysis, and their discussion of the underlying principles and practical implications is generally clear and insightful.

One potential limitation of the study is that it does not delve into the specific trade-offs and challenges associated with each resilience-enhancing technique. For example, the authors could have discussed the computational and performance overhead of some of the more complex hardening methods, or the challenges in effectively deploying certain testing and analysis approaches in real-world settings.

Additionally, while the paper acknowledges the limitations and areas for future research, it could have provided a more critical examination of the current state of the field and the outstanding challenges that need to be addressed. For instance, the authors could have discussed the potential biases and limitations of the existing robustness evaluation techniques, or the difficulty in generalizing resilience-enhancing methods across different deep learning domains and applications.

Overall, this paper serves as an excellent reference for researchers and practitioners interested in improving the [object Object]. By highlighting the various analysis and hardening techniques available, it can help guide the development of more robust and resilient deep learning applications.

Conclusion

This systematic survey provides a comprehensive overview of the analysis and hardening techniques that can be used to improve the resilience of deep learning applications. By exploring a wide range of approaches, from model hardening to data augmentation and testing strategies, the authors have offered valuable insights and guidance for researchers and developers working to build more reliable and trustworthy deep learning systems.

While the paper acknowledges some of the limitations and challenges associated with these techniques, it serves as an important resource for the broader [object Object] to understand the current state of the field and the ongoing efforts to address the vulnerabilities of deep learning models. As the adoption of deep learning continues to grow, the need for robust and resilient applications will only become more critical, underscoring the importance of this research.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

⛏️

Machine Learning Robustness: A Primer

Houssem Ben Braiek, Foutse Khomh

YC

0

Reddit

0

This chapter explores the foundational concept of robustness in Machine Learning (ML) and its integral role in establishing trustworthiness in Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems. The discussion begins with a detailed definition of robustness, portraying it as the ability of ML models to maintain stable performance across varied and unexpected environmental conditions. ML robustness is dissected through several lenses: its complementarity with generalizability; its status as a requirement for trustworthy AI; its adversarial vs non-adversarial aspects; its quantitative metrics; and its indicators such as reproducibility and explainability. The chapter delves into the factors that impede robustness, such as data bias, model complexity, and the pitfalls of underspecified ML pipelines. It surveys key techniques for robustness assessment from a broad perspective, including adversarial attacks, encompassing both digital and physical realms. It covers non-adversarial data shifts and nuances of Deep Learning (DL) software testing methodologies. The discussion progresses to explore amelioration strategies for bolstering robustness, starting with data-centric approaches like debiasing and augmentation. Further examination includes a variety of model-centric methods such as transfer learning, adversarial training, and randomized smoothing. Lastly, post-training methods are discussed, including ensemble techniques, pruning, and model repairs, emerging as cost-effective strategies to make models more resilient against the unpredictable. This chapter underscores the ongoing challenges and limitations in estimating and achieving ML robustness by existing approaches. It offers insights and directions for future research on this crucial concept, as a prerequisite for trustworthy AI systems.

Read more

5/7/2024

A Survey on Deep Learning and State-of-the-art Applications

A Survey on Deep Learning and State-of-the-art Applications

Mohd Halim Mohd Noor, Ayokunle Olalekan Ige

YC

0

Reddit

0

Deep learning, a branch of artificial intelligence, is a computational model that uses multiple layers of interconnected units (neurons) to learn intricate patterns and representations directly from raw input data. Empowered by this learning capability, it has become a powerful tool for solving complex problems and is the core driver of many groundbreaking technologies and innovations. Building a deep learning model is a challenging task due to the algorithm`s complexity and the dynamic nature of real-world problems. Several studies have reviewed deep learning concepts and applications. However, the studies mostly focused on the types of deep learning models and convolutional neural network architectures, offering limited coverage of the state-of-the-art of deep learning models and their applications in solving complex problems across different domains. Therefore, motivated by the limitations, this study aims to comprehensively review the state-of-the-art deep learning models in computer vision, natural language processing, time series analysis and pervasive computing. We highlight the key features of the models and their effectiveness in solving the problems within each domain. Furthermore, this study presents the fundamentals of deep learning, various deep learning model types and prominent convolutional neural network architectures. Finally, challenges and future directions in deep learning research are discussed to offer a broader perspective for future researchers.

Read more

5/17/2024

🤿

A Structured Review of Literature on Uncertainty in Machine Learning & Deep Learning

Fahimeh Fakour, Ali Mosleh, Ramin Ramezani

YC

0

Reddit

0

The adaptation and use of Machine Learning (ML) in our daily lives has led to concerns in lack of transparency, privacy, reliability, among others. As a result, we are seeing research in niche areas such as interpretability, causality, bias and fairness, and reliability. In this survey paper, we focus on a critical concern for adaptation of ML in risk-sensitive applications, namely understanding and quantifying uncertainty. Our paper approaches this topic in a structured way, providing a review of the literature in the various facets that uncertainty is enveloped in the ML process. We begin by defining uncertainty and its categories (e.g., aleatoric and epistemic), understanding sources of uncertainty (e.g., data and model), and how uncertainty can be assessed in terms of uncertainty quantification techniques (Ensembles, Bayesian Neural Networks, etc.). As part of our assessment and understanding of uncertainty in the ML realm, we cover metrics for uncertainty quantification for a single sample, dataset, and metrics for accuracy of the uncertainty estimation itself. This is followed by discussions on calibration (model and uncertainty), and decision making under uncertainty. Thus, we provide a more complete treatment of uncertainty: from the sources of uncertainty to the decision-making process. We have focused the review of uncertainty quantification methods on Deep Learning (DL), while providing the necessary background for uncertainty discussion within ML in general. Key contributions in this review are broadening the scope of uncertainty discussion, as well as an updated review of uncertainty quantification methods in DL.

Read more

6/4/2024

🤿

On Security Weaknesses and Vulnerabilities in Deep Learning Systems

Zhongzheng Lai, Huaming Chen, Ruoxi Sun, Yu Zhang, Minhui Xue, Dong Yuan

YC

0

Reddit

0

The security guarantee of AI-enabled software systems (particularly using deep learning techniques as a functional core) is pivotal against the adversarial attacks exploiting software vulnerabilities. However, little attention has been paid to a systematic investigation of vulnerabilities in such systems. A common situation learned from the open source software community is that deep learning engineers frequently integrate off-the-shelf or open-source learning frameworks into their ecosystems. In this work, we specifically look into deep learning (DL) framework and perform the first systematic study of vulnerabilities in DL systems through a comprehensive analysis of identified vulnerabilities from Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) and open-source DL tools, including TensorFlow, Caffe, OpenCV, Keras, and PyTorch. We propose a two-stream data analysis framework to explore vulnerability patterns from various databases. We investigate the unique DL frameworks and libraries development ecosystems that appear to be decentralized and fragmented. By revisiting the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) List, which provides the traditional software vulnerability related practices, we observed that it is more challenging to detect and fix the vulnerabilities throughout the DL systems lifecycle. Moreover, we conducted a large-scale empirical study of 3,049 DL vulnerabilities to better understand the patterns of vulnerability and the challenges in fixing them. We have released the full replication package at https://github.com/codelzz/Vulnerabilities4DLSystem. We anticipate that our study can advance the development of secure DL systems.

Read more

6/14/2024