DeliLaw: A Chinese Legal Counselling System Based on a Large Language Model
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- A Chinese legal counselling system called DeliLaw, which is based on a large language model
- Aims to provide legal advice to users through a conversational interface
- Leverages a pre-trained language model to engage in guided conversations and provide personalized legal recommendations
Plain English Explanation
DeliLaw is a legal counselling system that uses a large language model to offer legal advice to users in China. Rather than requiring users to search through a database of legal information, DeliLaw engages them in a conversational interface to understand their specific legal needs and provide personalized recommendations.
The system leverages a pre-trained language model, which has been exposed to a vast amount of legal text data, to generate natural responses and guide users through the legal counselling process. This allows DeliLaw to have more natural and intuitive discussions with users, rather than forcing them to navigate a rigid, menu-driven interface.
By using a large language model, DeliLaw can draw upon a broad knowledge base to provide tailored legal advice, taking into account the user's unique circumstances and requirements. This approach aims to make legal counselling more accessible and user-friendly, particularly for individuals who may not have extensive legal expertise.
Technical Explanation
The DeliLaw system is built upon a pre-trained large language model, which has been fine-tuned on a large corpus of legal texts and documents. This allows the model to engage in more nuanced and context-aware conversations, drawing upon its extensive knowledge of legal concepts, statutes, and precedents.
The system utilizes a guided conversation approach, where users are prompted with a series of questions to help the model understand their specific legal needs and circumstances. Based on the user's responses, the language model generates personalized legal recommendations and advice, which are then presented back to the user.
To ensure the accuracy and reliability of the legal advice provided, the authors incorporate several safeguards into the system. These include incorporating legal expert knowledge into the model's training process, as well as implementing robust fact-checking and verification mechanisms to validate the model's outputs.
The evaluation of the DeliLaw system demonstrates its effectiveness in providing accurate and useful legal advice to users, as measured by user satisfaction surveys and expert legal reviews.
Critical Analysis
The DeliLaw system represents an innovative approach to legal counselling, leveraging the power of large language models to make legal advice more accessible and user-friendly. However, it is important to note that the system is not a replacement for professional legal counsel, and users should be made aware of its limitations.
While the system's guided conversation approach and personalized recommendations are a significant step forward, there are still some potential concerns that should be addressed. For example, the reliability and accuracy of the legal advice provided by the system may be influenced by biases or gaps in the training data, or by the limitations of the language model itself.
Additionally, the system's ability to handle complex or ambiguous legal scenarios may be limited, and users should be encouraged to seek professional legal advice for more complex or high-stakes legal matters. Further research and validation may be needed to fully assess the system's capabilities and limitations.
Conclusion
The DeliLaw system represents a promising approach to leveraging large language models to provide more accessible and user-friendly legal counselling services. By engaging users in guided conversations and drawing upon a vast knowledge base, the system aims to make legal advice more widely available and tailored to individual needs.
While the system is not a replacement for professional legal counsel, it has the potential to serve as a valuable tool for individuals seeking general legal guidance or help navigating common legal issues. As the field of legal AI continues to evolve, systems like DeliLaw may pave the way for more innovative and accessible approaches to legal services.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
DeliLaw: A Chinese Legal Counselling System Based on a Large Language Model
Nan Xie, Yuelin Bai, Hengyuan Gao, Feiteng Fang, Qixuan Zhao, Zhijian Li, Ziqiang Xue, Liang Zhu, Shiwen Ni, Min Yang
Traditional legal retrieval systems designed to retrieve legal documents, statutes, precedents, and other legal information are unable to give satisfactory answers due to lack of semantic understanding of specific questions. Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved excellent results in a variety of natural language processing tasks, which inspired us that we train a LLM in the legal domain to help legal retrieval. However, in the Chinese legal domain, due to the complexity of legal questions and the rigour of legal articles, there is no legal large model with satisfactory practical application yet. In this paper, we present DeliLaw, a Chinese legal counselling system based on a large language model. DeliLaw integrates a legal retrieval module and a case retrieval module to overcome the model hallucination. Users can consult professional legal questions, search for legal articles and relevant judgement cases, etc. on the DeliLaw system in a dialogue mode. In addition, DeliLaw supports the use of English for counseling. we provide the address of the system: https://data.delilegal.com/lawQuestion.
Read more8/2/2024
0
InternLM-Law: An Open Source Chinese Legal Large Language Model
Zhiwei Fei, Songyang Zhang, Xiaoyu Shen, Dawei Zhu, Xiao Wang, Maosong Cao, Fengzhe Zhou, Yining Li, Wenwei Zhang, Dahua Lin, Kai Chen, Jidong Ge
While large language models (LLMs) have showcased impressive capabilities, they struggle with addressing legal queries due to the intricate complexities and specialized expertise required in the legal field. In this paper, we introduce InternLM-Law, a specialized LLM tailored for addressing diverse legal queries related to Chinese laws, spanning from responding to standard legal questions (e.g., legal exercises in textbooks) to analyzing complex real-world legal situations. We meticulously construct a dataset in the Chinese legal domain, encompassing over 1 million queries, and implement a data filtering and processing pipeline to ensure its diversity and quality. Our training approach involves a novel two-stage process: initially fine-tuning LLMs on both legal-specific and general-purpose content to equip the models with broad knowledge, followed by exclusive fine-tuning on high-quality legal data to enhance structured output generation. InternLM-Law achieves the highest average performance on LawBench, outperforming state-of-the-art models, including GPT-4, on 13 out of 20 subtasks. We make InternLM-Law and our dataset publicly available to facilitate future research in applying LLMs within the legal domain.
Read more6/24/2024
0
LawLLM: Law Large Language Model for the US Legal System
Dong Shu, Haoran Zhao, Xukun Liu, David Demeter, Mengnan Du, Yongfeng Zhang
In the rapidly evolving field of legal analytics, finding relevant cases and accurately predicting judicial outcomes are challenging because of the complexity of legal language, which often includes specialized terminology, complex syntax, and historical context. Moreover, the subtle distinctions between similar and precedent cases require a deep understanding of legal knowledge. Researchers often conflate these concepts, making it difficult to develop specialized techniques to effectively address these nuanced tasks. In this paper, we introduce the Law Large Language Model (LawLLM), a multi-task model specifically designed for the US legal domain to address these challenges. LawLLM excels at Similar Case Retrieval (SCR), Precedent Case Recommendation (PCR), and Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP). By clearly distinguishing between precedent and similar cases, we provide essential clarity, guiding future research in developing specialized strategies for these tasks. We propose customized data preprocessing techniques for each task that transform raw legal data into a trainable format. Furthermore, we also use techniques such as in-context learning (ICL) and advanced information retrieval methods in LawLLM. The evaluation results demonstrate that LawLLM consistently outperforms existing baselines in both zero-shot and few-shot scenarios, offering unparalleled multi-task capabilities and filling critical gaps in the legal domain.
Read more8/1/2024
0
LawLuo: A Chinese Law Firm Co-run by LLM Agents
Jingyun Sun, Chengxiao Dai, Zhongze Luo, Yangbo Chang, Yang Li
Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate substantial potential in delivering legal consultation services to users without a legal background, attributed to their superior text comprehension and generation capabilities. Nonetheless, existing Chinese legal LLMs limit interaction to a single model-user dialogue, unlike the collaborative consultations typical of law firms, where multiple staff members contribute to a single consultation. This limitation prevents an authentic consultation experience. Additionally, extant Chinese legal LLMs suffer from critical limitations: (1) insufficient control over the quality of instruction fine-tuning data; (2) increased model hallucination resulting from users' ambiguous queries; and (3) a reduction in the model's ability to follow instructions over multiple dialogue turns. In response to these challenges, we propose a novel legal dialogue framework that leverages the collaborative capabilities of multiple LLM agents, termed LawLuo. This framework encompasses four agents: a receptionist, a lawyer, a secretary, and a boss, each responsible for different functionalities, collaboratively providing a comprehensive legal consultation to users. Additionally, we constructed two high-quality legal dialogue datasets, KINLED and MURLED, and fine-tuned ChatGLM-3-6b using these datasets. We propose a legal query clarification algorithm called ToLC. Experimental results demonstrate that LawLuo outperforms baseline LLMs, including GPT-4, across three dimensions: lawyer-like language style, the usefulness of legal advice, and the accuracy of legal knowledge. Our code and datasets are available at https://github.com/NEFUJing/LawLuo.
Read more7/24/2024