Demarked: A Strategy for Enhanced Abusive Speech Moderation through Counterspeech, Detoxification, and Message Management
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a novel strategy called "Demarked" for enhancing abusive speech moderation on online platforms.
- The key components of Demarked are counterspeech, detoxification, and message management.
- The goal is to create a more nuanced and effective approach to addressing harmful online content.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a new method called "Demarked" for dealing with abusive language and behavior on the internet. Demarked: A Strategy for Enhanced Abusive Speech Moderation through Counterspeech, Detoxification, and Message Management outlines three main ways this could work:
- Counterspeech: Encouraging users to respond to harmful posts with messages that counter the abusive content, providing an alternative perspective.
- Detoxification: Modifying or "detoxifying" the original abusive message in a way that reduces its negative impact, without completely removing it.
- Message Management: Carefully curating how abusive messages are displayed or distributed on the platform, to limit their reach and influence.
The goal is to create a more nuanced and effective way of dealing with online abuse, going beyond just removing posts or banning users. The authors believe this could lead to better outcomes for both the targets of abuse and the overall online community.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a three-pronged strategy called "Demarked" for enhancing abusive speech moderation on online platforms. Discursive Objection Strategies in Online Comments: Developing a Classification Scheme and Exploring the Boundaries and Intensities of Offensive and Hate Speech: Unveiling the Shades of Griefing provide relevant background on the challenges of moderation.
The first component is counterspeech, where users are encouraged to respond to abusive content with messages that provide an alternative perspective. The Unappreciated Role of Intent in Algorithmic Moderation of Social Media discusses the importance of user intent in moderation.
The second component is detoxification, where the original abusive message is modified in a way that reduces its negative impact, without completely removing it. Bans vs. Warning Labels: Examining Support for Community Moderation explores different moderation approaches.
The third component is message management, where the platform carefully curates how abusive messages are displayed or distributed, to limit their reach and influence. Harmful Speech Detection by Language Models Exhibits Biases highlights the challenges of automated moderation.
Critical Analysis
The Demarked strategy presents a promising approach to abusive speech moderation, but it also raises some important questions and concerns. While the idea of using counterspeech, detoxification, and message management is intriguing, the authors acknowledge that implementing these techniques effectively could be quite challenging.
There are potential risks, such as the possibility of counterspeech further escalating conflicts, or detoxification being perceived as censorship. The authors also note that message management could be viewed as manipulative or heavy-handed by users. Careful design and testing would be crucial to ensure these techniques are applied in a fair and transparent manner.
Additionally, the paper does not provide much detail on how these components would be implemented in practice. More research would be needed to develop specific algorithms, user interfaces, and moderation policies to put the Demarked strategy into action.
Overall, the Demarked proposal is an interesting and thought-provoking contribution to the ongoing discussion around online abuse and moderation. While there are valid concerns that would need to be addressed, the core ideas have the potential to improve upon current approaches and lead to better outcomes for online communities.
Conclusion
The Demarked strategy offers a novel and multifaceted approach to enhancing abusive speech moderation on online platforms. By incorporating counterspeech, detoxification, and message management, the authors aim to create a more nuanced and effective way of addressing harmful content.
While there are important practical and ethical considerations that would need to be carefully navigated, the core concepts behind Demarked represent a promising direction for the field of online moderation. Further research and experimentation could help refine the implementation and unlock the potential benefits for fostering healthier and more inclusive online communities.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Demarked: A Strategy for Enhanced Abusive Speech Moderation through Counterspeech, Detoxification, and Message Management
Seid Muhie Yimam, Daryna Dementieva, Tim Fischer, Daniil Moskovskiy, Naquee Rizwan, Punyajoy Saha, Sarthak Roy, Martin Semmann, Alexander Panchenko, Chris Biemann, Animesh Mukherjee
Despite regulations imposed by nations and social media platforms, such as recent EU regulations targeting digital violence, abusive content persists as a significant challenge. Existing approaches primarily rely on binary solutions, such as outright blocking or banning, yet fail to address the complex nature of abusive speech. In this work, we propose a more comprehensive approach called Demarcation scoring abusive speech based on four aspect -- (i) severity scale; (ii) presence of a target; (iii) context scale; (iv) legal scale -- and suggesting more options of actions like detoxification, counter speech generation, blocking, or, as a final measure, human intervention. Through a thorough analysis of abusive speech regulations across diverse jurisdictions, platforms, and research papers we highlight the gap in preventing measures and advocate for tailored proactive steps to combat its multifaceted manifestations. Our work aims to inform future strategies for effectively addressing abusive speech online.
Read more7/1/2024
🏷️
0
Discursive objection strategies in online comments: Developing a classification schema and validating its training
Ashley L. Shea, Aspen K. B. Omapang, Ji Yong Cho, Miryam Y. Ginsparg, Natalie Bazarova, Winice Hui, Ren'e F. Kizilcec, Chau Tong, Drew Margolin
Most Americans agree that misinformation, hate speech and harassment are harmful and inadequately curbed on social media through current moderation practices. In this paper, we aim to understand the discursive strategies employed by people in response to harmful speech in news comments. We conducted a content analysis of more than 6500 comment replies to trending news videos on YouTube and Twitter and identified seven distinct discursive objection strategies (Study 1). We examined the frequency of each strategy's occurrence from the 6500 comment replies, as well as from a second sample of 2004 replies (Study 2). Together, these studies show that people deploy a diversity of discursive strategies when objecting to speech, and reputational attacks are the most common. The resulting classification scheme accounts for different theoretical approaches for expressing objections and offers a comprehensive perspective on grassroots efforts aimed at stopping offensive or problematic speech on campus.
Read more5/15/2024
0
Exploring Boundaries and Intensities in Offensive and Hate Speech: Unveiling the Complex Spectrum of Social Media Discourse
Abinew Ali Ayele, Esubalew Alemneh Jalew, Adem Chanie Ali, Seid Muhie Yimam, Chris Biemann
The prevalence of digital media and evolving sociopolitical dynamics have significantly amplified the dissemination of hateful content. Existing studies mainly focus on classifying texts into binary categories, often overlooking the continuous spectrum of offensiveness and hatefulness inherent in the text. In this research, we present an extensive benchmark dataset for Amharic, comprising 8,258 tweets annotated for three distinct tasks: category classification, identification of hate targets, and rating offensiveness and hatefulness intensities. Our study highlights that a considerable majority of tweets belong to the less offensive and less hate intensity levels, underscoring the need for early interventions by stakeholders. The prevalence of ethnic and political hatred targets, with significant overlaps in our dataset, emphasizes the complex relationships within Ethiopia's sociopolitical landscape. We build classification and regression models and investigate the efficacy of models in handling these tasks. Our results reveal that hate and offensive speech can not be addressed by a simplistic binary classification, instead manifesting as variables across a continuous range of values. The Afro-XLMR-large model exhibits the best performances achieving F1-scores of 75.30%, 70.59%, and 29.42% for the category, target, and regression tasks, respectively. The 80.22% correlation coefficient of the Afro-XLMR-large model indicates strong alignments.
Read more4/19/2024
0
The Unappreciated Role of Intent in Algorithmic Moderation of Social Media Content
Xinyu Wang, Sai Koneru, Pranav Narayanan Venkit, Brett Frischmann, Sarah Rajtmajer
As social media has become a predominant mode of communication globally, the rise of abusive content threatens to undermine civil discourse. Recognizing the critical nature of this issue, a significant body of research has been dedicated to developing language models that can detect various types of online abuse, e.g., hate speech, cyberbullying. However, there exists a notable disconnect between platform policies, which often consider the author's intention as a criterion for content moderation, and the current capabilities of detection models, which typically lack efforts to capture intent. This paper examines the role of intent in content moderation systems. We review state of the art detection models and benchmark training datasets for online abuse to assess their awareness and ability to capture intent. We propose strategic changes to the design and development of automated detection and moderation systems to improve alignment with ethical and policy conceptualizations of abuse.
Read more5/21/2024