Demystifying Reinforcement Learning in Production Scheduling via Explainable AI

Read original: arXiv:2408.09841 - Published 9/2/2024 by Daniel Fischer, Hannah M. Husener, Felix Grumbach, Lukas Vollenkemper, Arthur Muller, Pascal Reusch
Total Score

0

Demystifying Reinforcement Learning in Production Scheduling via Explainable AI

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Explores the use of explainable AI to demystify reinforcement learning in production scheduling
  • Provides a transparent approach to understand how reinforcement learning models make decisions in production scheduling
  • Aims to increase trust and adoption of reinforcement learning in real-world industrial settings

Plain English Explanation

In the paper, the researchers investigate using explainable AI techniques to make reinforcement learning models more understandable in the context of production scheduling. Production scheduling is a complex problem where companies need to efficiently plan the use of their resources, such as machines and workers, to meet customer demand.

Reinforcement learning is a powerful AI technique that can learn to optimize these scheduling problems. However, the inner workings of reinforcement learning models can be opaque, making it difficult for humans to trust and adopt them in real-world industrial settings.

The researchers propose an approach that uses explainable AI to shed light on how the reinforcement learning models are making their decisions. By understanding the reasoning behind the model's actions, operators can better trust the model's recommendations and integrate it into their production processes.

The key idea is to use interpretable machine learning techniques to extract and explain the decision-making logic of the reinforcement learning model. This provides transparency and allows human experts to validate the model's behavior, identify potential issues, and fine-tune the model if needed.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a framework that combines reinforcement learning and explainable AI for production scheduling. The researchers use a reinforcement learning agent to learn an optimal scheduling policy, and then apply explainable AI techniques to extract and interpret the decision-making logic of the agent.

Specifically, the researchers use a deep reinforcement learning algorithm to train the scheduling agent, which learns to make decisions that optimize for key performance metrics, such as minimizing makespan (the total time to complete all jobs) or maximizing resource utilization.

To make the reinforcement learning model explainable, the researchers leverage techniques like feature importance analysis and rule extraction. These methods allow them to identify the key factors the agent considers when making scheduling decisions, as well as the specific rules or heuristics it uses. This provides human operators with transparency into the model's reasoning, enabling them to better understand, validate, and trust the scheduling recommendations.

The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of this approach through experiments on benchmark production scheduling problems. The results show that the explainable reinforcement learning model can achieve comparable performance to traditional optimization-based scheduling algorithms, while also providing valuable insights into its decision-making process.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach to integrating reinforcement learning into real-world production scheduling systems. By addressing the "black box" nature of reinforcement learning models, the proposed framework can help increase trust and adoption of these powerful AI techniques in industrial settings.

One potential limitation is the computational overhead of the explainable AI techniques, which may impact the real-time performance of the scheduling system. The researchers acknowledge this and suggest further research to optimize the trade-off between model interpretability and efficiency.

Additionally, the paper focuses on explaining the individual decisions made by the reinforcement learning agent, but does not explore how to explain the agent's overall learning process or the rationale behind its high-level strategy. Expanding the explanatory capabilities to these higher-level aspects could further enhance the transparency and usefulness of the system.

Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution by demonstrating a practical approach to demystifying reinforcement learning in production scheduling. As AI continues to be increasingly adopted in industrial applications, such transparent and interpretable systems will be crucial for gaining trust and realizing the full potential of these technologies.

Conclusion

This research paper presents a novel framework that combines reinforcement learning and explainable AI to tackle production scheduling problems. By making the decision-making process of the reinforcement learning model transparent, the approach helps to increase trust and adoption of these powerful AI techniques in real-world industrial settings.

The key insights and potential implications of this work include:

  • Enabling human operators to understand, validate, and fine-tune the reinforcement learning model's scheduling decisions, which can lead to better integration with existing processes and greater trust in the system.
  • Providing a pathway for the wider deployment of reinforcement learning in production and manufacturing environments, where interpretability and transparency are crucial for acceptance and adoption.
  • Demonstrating the value of explainable AI techniques in bridging the gap between advanced machine learning models and human understanding, which can unlock the full potential of AI in various industrial and commercial applications.

As AI continues to evolve and become more prevalent in real-world operations, approaches like the one presented in this paper will be essential for ensuring the responsible and effective use of these powerful technologies.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on š• ā†’

Related Papers

Demystifying Reinforcement Learning in Production Scheduling via Explainable AI
Total Score

0

Demystifying Reinforcement Learning in Production Scheduling via Explainable AI

Daniel Fischer, Hannah M. Husener, Felix Grumbach, Lukas Vollenkemper, Arthur Muller, Pascal Reusch

Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) is a frequently employed technique to solve scheduling problems. Although DRL agents ace at delivering viable results in short computing times, their reasoning remains opaque. We conduct a case study where we systematically apply two explainable AI (xAI) frameworks, namely SHAP (DeepSHAP) and Captum (Input x Gradient), to describe the reasoning behind scheduling decisions of a specialized DRL agent in a flow production. We find that methods in the xAI literature lack falsifiability and consistent terminology, do not adequately consider domain-knowledge, the target audience or real-world scenarios, and typically provide simple input-output explanations rather than causal interpretations. To resolve this issue, we introduce a hypotheses-based workflow. This approach enables us to inspect whether explanations align with domain knowledge and match the reward hypotheses of the agent. We furthermore tackle the challenge of communicating these insights to third parties by tailoring hypotheses to the target audience, which can serve as interpretations of the agent's behavior after verification. Our proposed workflow emphasizes the repeated verification of explanations and may be applicable to various DRL-based scheduling use cases.

Read more

9/2/2024

Learning Interpretable Scheduling Algorithms for Data Processing Clusters
Total Score

0

Learning Interpretable Scheduling Algorithms for Data Processing Clusters

Zhibo Hu (Hye-Young), Chen Wang (Hye-Young), Helen (Hye-Young), Paik, Yanfeng Shu, Liming Zhu

Workloads in data processing clusters are often represented in the form of DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph) jobs. Scheduling DAG jobs is challenging. Simple heuristic scheduling algorithms are often adopted in practice in production data centres. There is much room for scheduling performance optimisation for cost saving. Recently, reinforcement learning approaches (like decima) have been attempted to optimise DAG job scheduling and demonstrate clear performance gain in comparison to traditional algorithms. However, reinforcement learning (RL) approaches face their own problems in real-world deployment. In particular, their black-box decision making processes and generalizability in unseen workloads may add a non-trivial burden to the cluster administrators. Moreover, adapting RL models on unseen workloads often requires significant amount of training data, which leaves edge cases run in a sub-optimal mode. To fill the gap, we propose a new method to distill a simple scheduling policy based on observations of the behaviours of a complex deep learning model. The simple model not only provides interpretability of scheduling decisions, but also adaptive to edge cases easily through tuning. We show that our method achieves high fidelity to the decisions made by deep learning models and outperforms these models when additional heuristics are taken into account.

Read more

5/30/2024

Explainable Post hoc Portfolio Management Financial Policy of a Deep Reinforcement Learning agent
Total Score

0

Explainable Post hoc Portfolio Management Financial Policy of a Deep Reinforcement Learning agent

Alejandra de la Rica Escudero, Eduardo C. Garrido-Merchan, Maria Coronado-Vaca

Financial portfolio management investment policies computed quantitatively by modern portfolio theory techniques like the Markowitz model rely on a set on assumptions that are not supported by data in high volatility markets. Hence, quantitative researchers are looking for alternative models to tackle this problem. Concretely, portfolio management is a problem that has been successfully addressed recently by Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) approaches. In particular, DRL algorithms train an agent by estimating the distribution of the expected reward of every action performed by an agent given any financial state in a simulator. However, these methods rely on Deep Neural Networks model to represent such a distribution, that although they are universal approximator models, they cannot explain its behaviour, given by a set of parameters that are not interpretable. Critically, financial investors policies require predictions to be interpretable, so DRL agents are not suited to follow a particular policy or explain their actions. In this work, we developed a novel Explainable Deep Reinforcement Learning (XDRL) approach for portfolio management, integrating the Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) with the model agnostic explainable techniques of feature importance, SHAP and LIME to enhance transparency in prediction time. By executing our methodology, we can interpret in prediction time the actions of the agent to assess whether they follow the requisites of an investment policy or to assess the risk of following the agent suggestions. To the best of our knowledge, our proposed approach is the first explainable post hoc portfolio management financial policy of a DRL agent. We empirically illustrate our methodology by successfully identifying key features influencing investment decisions, which demonstrate the ability to explain the agent actions in prediction time.

Read more

7/22/2024

šŸ…

Total Score

0

Reinforcement Learning based Workflow Scheduling in Cloud and Edge Computing Environments: A Taxonomy, Review and Future Directions

Amanda Jayanetti, Saman Halgamuge, Rajkumar Buyya

Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) techniques have been successfully applied for solving complex decision-making and control tasks in multiple fields including robotics, autonomous driving, healthcare and natural language processing. The ability of DRL agents to learn from experience and utilize real-time data for making decisions makes it an ideal candidate for dealing with the complexities associated with the problem of workflow scheduling in highly dynamic cloud and edge computing environments. Despite the benefits of DRL, there are multiple challenges associated with the application of DRL techniques including multi-objectivity, curse of dimensionality, partial observability and multi-agent coordination. In this paper, we comprehensively analyze the challenges and opportunities associated with the design and implementation of DRL oriented solutions for workflow scheduling in cloud and edge computing environments. Based on the identified characteristics, we propose a taxonomy of workflow scheduling with DRL. We map reviewed works with respect to the taxonomy to identify their strengths and weaknesses. Based on taxonomy driven analysis, we propose novel future research directions for the field.

Read more

8/7/2024