Detecting and Deterring Manipulation in a Cognitive Hierarchy
2405.01870
0
0
🚀
Abstract
Social agents with finitely nested opponent models are vulnerable to manipulation by agents with deeper reasoning and more sophisticated opponent modelling. This imbalance, rooted in logic and the theory of recursive modelling frameworks, cannot be solved directly. We propose a computational framework, $aleph$-IPOMDP, augmenting model-based RL agents' Bayesian inference with an anomaly detection algorithm and an out-of-belief policy. Our mechanism allows agents to realize they are being deceived, even if they cannot understand how, and to deter opponents via a credible threat. We test this framework in both a mixed-motive and zero-sum game. Our results show the $aleph$ mechanism's effectiveness, leading to more equitable outcomes and less exploitation by more sophisticated agents. We discuss implications for AI safety, cybersecurity, cognitive science, and psychiatry.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the vulnerability of social agents with limited opponent modeling abilities to manipulation by more sophisticated agents.
- The authors propose a computational framework, called [aleph]-IPOMDP, to address this imbalance by allowing agents to detect when they are being deceived and deter such manipulation.
- The framework is tested in both mixed-motive and zero-sum game settings, demonstrating its effectiveness in promoting more equitable outcomes.
- The implications of this research extend to AI safety, cybersecurity, cognitive science, and psychiatry.
Plain English Explanation
In the world of artificial intelligence (AI) and game theory, agents (or players) often need to model their opponents' behavior to make optimal decisions. However, this paper argues that agents with limited opponent modeling capabilities are vulnerable to manipulation by more sophisticated agents.
Imagine a simple game where two players are competing. Player A has a basic understanding of how Player B might act, but Player B has a deeper understanding of Player A's reasoning. In this scenario, Player B can exploit Player A's limited model and gain an unfair advantage.
The authors propose a solution called [aleph]-IPOMDP, which augments model-based reinforcement learning (RL) agents with an anomaly detection algorithm and an "out-of-belief" policy. This mechanism allows agents to realize when they are being deceived, even if they can't fully understand how. It also enables them to deter opponents by threatening to take action if they continue to manipulate the situation.
By testing this framework in both mixed-motive and zero-sum game settings, the researchers demonstrate its effectiveness in leading to more equitable outcomes and reducing exploitation by more sophisticated agents. This has important implications for various fields, including AI safety, cybersecurity, cognitive science, and psychiatry, where understanding and addressing manipulation is crucial.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by acknowledging the inherent imbalance in recursive modeling frameworks, where agents with deeper reasoning and more sophisticated opponent modeling can exploit those with more limited capabilities. This issue is rooted in the logic and theory underlying these frameworks.
To address this challenge, the authors propose the [aleph]-IPOMDP computational framework. This approach augments model-based reinforcement learning (RL) agents' Bayesian inference with an anomaly detection algorithm and an "out-of-belief" policy.
The anomaly detection algorithm allows agents to identify when they are being deceived, even if they cannot fully comprehend the mechanism behind the deception. The out-of-belief policy, on the other hand, enables agents to deter opponents by threatening to take action if the manipulation continues.
The researchers test this framework in both a mixed-motive and a zero-sum game setting. Their results demonstrate the effectiveness of the [aleph] mechanism in promoting more equitable outcomes and reducing exploitation by more sophisticated agents.
This research has significant implications for various fields, as it provides insights into the dynamics of manipulation and deception in multi-agent systems. The findings are particularly relevant for AI safety, cybersecurity, cognitive science, and psychiatry, where understanding and mitigating manipulation is a critical challenge.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling and well-designed solution to the problem of vulnerability in social agents with limited opponent modeling capabilities. The [aleph]-IPOMDP framework is a creative and promising approach that addresses the logical and theoretical limitations of existing recursive modeling frameworks.
However, the authors acknowledge that the proposed solution does not directly solve the underlying imbalance. Instead, it provides a mechanism for agents to detect and deter manipulation, rather than eliminating the possibility altogether. This suggests that further research may be needed to address the root causes of this vulnerability.
Additionally, the authors note that the effectiveness of the [aleph] mechanism may depend on the specific game or scenario being considered. While the results from the mixed-motive and zero-sum game settings are encouraging, it would be valuable to explore the framework's performance in a wider range of contexts to better understand its broader applicability and limitations.
Another potential area of concern is the computational complexity and resource requirements of the [aleph]-IPOMDP approach. As the authors mention, the addition of the anomaly detection and out-of-belief policy components may increase the overall complexity of the system, which could impact its practical implementation and scalability.
Despite these caveats, the paper makes a valuable contribution to the field by highlighting an important challenge in multi-agent systems and proposing a promising solution. The [aleph] framework's ability to help agents detect and deter manipulation, even when they cannot fully understand the underlying mechanisms, is a significant step forward in addressing this critical issue.
Conclusion
This paper tackles the vulnerability of social agents with limited opponent modeling capabilities to manipulation by more sophisticated agents. The authors propose the [aleph]-IPOMDP computational framework as a solution, which enhances model-based RL agents' Bayesian inference with anomaly detection and an out-of-belief policy.
The key insights from this research include the ability of agents to realize they are being deceived, even if they cannot comprehend the full deception, and the potential to deter opponents through credible threats. These findings have important implications for various fields, such as AI safety, cybersecurity, cognitive science, and psychiatry, where understanding and mitigating manipulation is a critical challenge.
While the proposed solution does not directly solve the underlying imbalance, the [aleph] framework represents a significant step forward in addressing this problem. Further research may be needed to explore the framework's performance in a wider range of contexts and to address potential limitations, such as computational complexity. Nonetheless, this paper provides valuable insights and a promising direction for enhancing the robustness and fairness of multi-agent systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Efficient Adaptation in Mixed-Motive Environments via Hierarchical Opponent Modeling and Planning
Yizhe Huang, Anji Liu, Fanqi Kong, Yaodong Yang, Song-Chun Zhu, Xue Feng
0
0
Despite the recent successes of multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) algorithms, efficiently adapting to co-players in mixed-motive environments remains a significant challenge. One feasible approach is to hierarchically model co-players' behavior based on inferring their characteristics. However, these methods often encounter difficulties in efficient reasoning and utilization of inferred information. To address these issues, we propose Hierarchical Opponent modeling and Planning (HOP), a novel multi-agent decision-making algorithm that enables few-shot adaptation to unseen policies in mixed-motive environments. HOP is hierarchically composed of two modules: an opponent modeling module that infers others' goals and learns corresponding goal-conditioned policies, and a planning module that employs Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to identify the best response. Our approach improves efficiency by updating beliefs about others' goals both across and within episodes and by using information from the opponent modeling module to guide planning. Experimental results demonstrate that in mixed-motive environments, HOP exhibits superior few-shot adaptation capabilities when interacting with various unseen agents, and excels in self-play scenarios. Furthermore, the emergence of social intelligence during our experiments underscores the potential of our approach in complex multi-agent environments.
6/13/2024
🏅
Bias Mitigation via Compensation: A Reinforcement Learning Perspective
Nandhini Swaminathan, David Danks
0
0
As AI increasingly integrates with human decision-making, we must carefully consider interactions between the two. In particular, current approaches focus on optimizing individual agent actions but often overlook the nuances of collective intelligence. Group dynamics might require that one agent (e.g., the AI system) compensate for biases and errors in another agent (e.g., the human), but this compensation should be carefully developed. We provide a theoretical framework for algorithmic compensation that synthesizes game theory and reinforcement learning principles to demonstrate the natural emergence of deceptive outcomes from the continuous learning dynamics of agents. We provide simulation results involving Markov Decision Processes (MDP) learning to interact. This work then underpins our ethical analysis of the conditions in which AI agents should adapt to biases and behaviors of other agents in dynamic and complex decision-making environments. Overall, our approach addresses the nuanced role of strategic deception of humans, challenging previous assumptions about its detrimental effects. We assert that compensation for others' biases can enhance coordination and ethical alignment: strategic deception, when ethically managed, can positively shape human-AI interactions.
5/1/2024
Learn to Disguise: Avoid Refusal Responses in LLM's Defense via a Multi-agent Attacker-Disguiser Game
Qianqiao Xu, Zhiliang Tian, Hongyan Wu, Zhen Huang, Yiping Song, Feng Liu, Dongsheng Li
0
0
With the enhanced performance of large models on natural language processing tasks, potential moral and ethical issues of large models arise. There exist malicious attackers who induce large models to jailbreak and generate information containing illegal, privacy-invasive information through techniques such as prompt engineering. As a result, large models counter malicious attackers' attacks using techniques such as safety alignment. However, the strong defense mechanism of the large model through rejection replies is easily identified by attackers and used to strengthen attackers' capabilities. In this paper, we propose a multi-agent attacker-disguiser game approach to achieve a weak defense mechanism that allows the large model to both safely reply to the attacker and hide the defense intent. First, we construct a multi-agent framework to simulate attack and defense scenarios, playing different roles to be responsible for attack, disguise, safety evaluation, and disguise evaluation tasks. After that, we design attack and disguise game algorithms to optimize the game strategies of the attacker and the disguiser and use the curriculum learning process to strengthen the capabilities of the agents. The experiments verify that the method in this paper is more effective in strengthening the model's ability to disguise the defense intent compared with other methods. Moreover, our approach can adapt any black-box large model to assist the model in defense and does not suffer from model version iterations.
4/4/2024
Detection of Malicious Agents in Social Learning
Valentina Shumovskaia, Mert Kayaalp, Ali H. Sayed
0
0
Non-Bayesian social learning is a framework for distributed hypothesis testing aimed at learning the true state of the environment. Traditionally, the agents are assumed to receive observations conditioned on the same true state, although it is also possible to examine the case of heterogeneous models across the graph. One important special case is when heterogeneity is caused by the presence of malicious agents whose goal is to move the agents toward a wrong hypothesis. In this work, we propose an algorithm that allows discovering the true state of every individual agent based on the sequence of their beliefs. In so doing, the methodology is also able to locate malicious behavior.
6/26/2024