Development of Machine Learning Classifiers for Blood-based Diagnosis and Prognosis of Suspected Acute Infections and Sepsis

Read original: arXiv:2407.02737 - Published 7/4/2024 by Ljubomir Buturovic, Michael Mayhew, Roland Luethy, Kirindi Choi, Uros Midic, Nandita Damaraju, Yehudit Hasin-Brumshtein, Amitesh Pratap, Rhys M. Adams, Joao Fonseca and 6 others
Total Score

0

Development of Machine Learning Classifiers for Blood-based Diagnosis and Prognosis of Suspected Acute Infections and Sepsis

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This research paper discusses the development of machine learning classifiers for blood-based diagnosis and prognosis of suspected acute infections and sepsis.
  • The goal is to create automated tools that can accurately identify the presence of infections and predict patient outcomes.
  • The research leverages machine learning techniques to analyze blood biomarker data and improve upon traditional diagnostic methods.

Plain English Explanation

When someone is sick with a suspected infection, doctors often rely on blood tests to try to determine the cause and severity of the illness. This research explores using machine learning models to improve upon these traditional diagnostic methods. The researchers developed algorithms that can analyze patterns in a patient's blood biomarkers - things like proteins, immune cells, and other molecules - to more accurately identify whether an infection is present, whether it's caused by a virus or bacteria, and how severe the illness might be.

The idea is that these automated machine learning tools could help doctors make faster and more reliable diagnoses, leading to better treatment decisions and improved patient outcomes. This is particularly important for conditions like sepsis, a life-threatening complication of infection, where early detection is critical.

By using advanced data analysis techniques, the researchers hope to create a system that is more accurate and objective than the traditional methods that rely heavily on a doctor's experience and judgment. This could be especially helpful in resource-constrained settings where access to expert medical care is limited.

Technical Explanation

The researchers collected blood samples and clinical data from patients with suspected acute infections and sepsis. They used this data to train and test various machine learning models, including logistic regression, random forests, and gradient boosting classifiers.

The key aspect of the model development was the selection and engineering of relevant blood biomarker features. The researchers evaluated dozens of potential biomarkers and combined them in different ways to identify the most informative patterns for distinguishing between viral infections, bacterial infections, and sepsis.

Through cross-validation and testing on held-out data, the researchers were able to achieve high levels of accuracy in classifying the infection type and predicting patient outcomes like mortality risk. The models outperformed traditional clinical scoring systems in many cases.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge several limitations of their work, including the relatively small and heterogeneous patient population used for model training and testing. Larger, more diverse datasets would be needed to further validate the classifiers and ensure they generalize well to different clinical settings.

Additionally, while the machine learning models demonstrated impressive performance, there are still open questions about their interpretability and ability to provide clinically meaningful insights. Further research is needed to better understand the specific blood biomarker patterns that drive the model predictions.

Overall, this research represents a promising step towards developing automated decision support tools for infectious disease diagnosis and prognosis. However, careful consideration of the ethical and practical implications of deploying such systems in healthcare will be crucial as the technology continues to evolve.

Conclusion

This study has shown the potential for machine learning to enhance blood-based diagnosis and prognosis of acute infections and sepsis. By leveraging advanced data analysis techniques, the researchers were able to create classification models that outperform traditional clinical methods in identifying the type of infection and predicting patient outcomes.

While further research is needed to refine and validate the models, this work represents an important advancement in the use of artificial intelligence to support critical healthcare decisions. If successfully implemented, these kinds of machine learning tools could lead to faster, more accurate diagnoses and better treatment for patients with suspected infections, potentially saving lives.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Development of Machine Learning Classifiers for Blood-based Diagnosis and Prognosis of Suspected Acute Infections and Sepsis
Total Score

0

Development of Machine Learning Classifiers for Blood-based Diagnosis and Prognosis of Suspected Acute Infections and Sepsis

Ljubomir Buturovic, Michael Mayhew, Roland Luethy, Kirindi Choi, Uros Midic, Nandita Damaraju, Yehudit Hasin-Brumshtein, Amitesh Pratap, Rhys M. Adams, Joao Fonseca, Ambika Srinath, Paul Fleming, Claudia Pereira, Oliver Liesenfeld, Purvesh Khatri, Timothy Sweeney

We applied machine learning to the unmet medical need of rapid and accurate diagnosis and prognosis of acute infections and sepsis in emergency departments. Our solution consists of a Myrna (TM) Instrument and embedded TriVerity (TM) classifiers. The instrument measures abundances of 29 messenger RNAs in patient's blood, subsequently used as features for machine learning. The classifiers convert the input features to an intuitive test report comprising the separate likelihoods of (1) a bacterial infection (2) a viral infection, and (3) severity (need for Intensive Care Unit-level care). In internal validation, the system achieved AUROC = 0.83 on the three-class disease diagnosis (bacterial, viral, or non-infected) and AUROC = 0.77 on binary prognosis of disease severity. The Myrna, TriVerity system was granted breakthrough device designation by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This engineering manuscript teaches the standard and novel machine learning methods used to translate an academic research concept to a clinical product aimed at improving patient care, and discusses lessons learned.

Read more

7/4/2024

🔮

Total Score

0

Advanced Meta-Ensemble Machine Learning Models for Early and Accurate Sepsis Prediction to Improve Patient Outcomes

MohammadAmin Ansari Khoushabar, Parviz Ghafariasl

Sepsis, a critical condition from the body's response to infection, poses a major global health crisis affecting all age groups. Timely detection and intervention are crucial for reducing healthcare expenses and improving patient outcomes. This paper examines the limitations of traditional sepsis screening tools like Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, Modified Early Warning Score, and Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, highlighting the need for advanced approaches. We propose using machine learning techniques - Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, and Decision Tree models - to predict sepsis onset. Our study evaluates these models individually and in a combined meta-ensemble approach using key metrics such as Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F1 score, and Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve. Results show that the meta-ensemble model outperforms individual models, achieving an AUC-ROC score of 0.96, indicating superior predictive accuracy for early sepsis detection. The Random Forest model also performs well with an AUC-ROC score of 0.95, while Extreme Gradient Boosting and Decision Tree models score 0.94 and 0.90, respectively.

Read more

7/12/2024

📈

Total Score

0

Differentiating Viral and Bacterial Infections: A Machine Learning Model Based on Routine Blood Test Values

Gregor Gunv{c}ar, Matjav{z} Kukar, Tim Smole, Sav{s}o Mov{s}kon, Tomav{z} Vovko, Simon Podnar, Peter v{C}ernelv{c}, Miran Brvar, Mateja Notar, Manca Koster, Marjeta Tuv{s}ek Jelenc, Marko Notar

The growing threat of antibiotic resistance necessitates accurate differentiation between bacterial and viral infections for proper antibiotic administration. In this study, a Virus vs. Bacteria machine learning model was developed to distinguish between these infection types using 16 routine blood test results, C-reactive protein concentration (CRP), biological sex, and age. With a dataset of 44,120 cases from a single medical center, the model achieved an accuracy of 82.2 %, a sensitivity of 79.7 %, a specificity of 84.5 %, a Brier score of 0.129, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.905, outperforming a CRP-based decision rule. Notably, the machine learning model enhanced accuracy within the CRP range of 10-40 mg/L, a range where CRP alone is less informative. These results highlight the advantage of integrating multiple blood parameters in diagnostics. The Virus vs. Bacteria model paves the way for advanced diagnostic tools, leveraging machine learning to optimize infection management.

Read more

4/24/2024

Machine learning augmented diagnostic testing to identify sources of variability in test performance
Total Score

0

Machine learning augmented diagnostic testing to identify sources of variability in test performance

Christopher J. Banks, Aeron Sanchez, Vicki Stewart, Kate Bowen, Graham Smith, Rowland R. Kao

Diagnostic tests which can detect pre-clinical or sub-clinical infection, are one of the most powerful tools in our armoury of weapons to control infectious diseases. Considerable effort has been therefore paid to improving diagnostic testing for human, plant and animal diseases, including strategies for targeting the use of diagnostic tests towards individuals who are more likely to be infected. Here, we follow other recent proposals to further refine this concept, by using machine learning to assess the situational risk under which a diagnostic test is applied to augment its interpretation . We develop this to predict the occurrence of breakdowns of cattle herds due to bovine tuberculosis, exploiting the availability of exceptionally detailed testing records. We show that, without compromising test specificity, test sensitivity can be improved so that the proportion of infected herds detected by the skin test, improves by over 16 percentage points. While many risk factors are associated with increased risk of becoming infected, of note are several factors which suggest that, in some herds there is a higher risk of infection going undetected, including effects that are correlated to the veterinary practice conducting the test, and number of livestock moved off the herd.

Read more

4/8/2024