Device (In)Dependence of Deep Learning-based Image Age Approximation

Read original: arXiv:2404.11974 - Published 4/19/2024 by Robert Jochl, Andreas Uhl
Total Score

0

Device (In)Dependence of Deep Learning-based Image Age Approximation

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the device (in)dependence of deep learning-based image age approximation, which aims to estimate the age of an image based on its visual characteristics.
  • The research was accepted and presented at the 2022 ICPR-Workshop on Artificial Intelligence for Multimedia Forensics and Disinformation Detection, but due to a technical issue, it did not appear in the workshop proceedings.
  • The paper investigates how the performance of deep learning models for image age approximation can vary depending on the device used to capture the images, and explores potential solutions to ensure more robust and device-independent performance.

Plain English Explanation

Deep learning models have become increasingly adept at estimating the age of an image based on its visual features, such as image-based deep learning time-dependent prediction or deep image composition meets image forgery. However, the performance of these models can be influenced by the specific device used to capture the images, such as a smartphone or a high-end camera. This paper explores the extent of this "device (in)dependence" and investigates ways to make the models more robust and reliable across different devices.

The researchers trained deep learning models to estimate image age and then tested them on images captured by various devices, such as different smartphone models and digital cameras. They found that the model's performance could vary significantly depending on the device, with some devices leading to more accurate age estimates than others. This suggests that the visual characteristics of images can be influenced by the device used to capture them, and that deep learning models need to be trained to account for these device-specific differences.

The paper explores potential solutions to address this issue, such as incorporating device-specific information into the model training process or using techniques like real-time noise source estimation for camera system to normalize the image characteristics across devices. By making the models more device-independent, the researchers aim to improve the reliability and widespread applicability of image age approximation techniques.

Technical Explanation

The paper investigates the device (in)dependence of deep learning-based image age approximation, which refers to the ability of deep learning models to accurately estimate the age of an image regardless of the specific device used to capture it.

The researchers trained several deep learning models, including convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and transformer-based architectures, to estimate the age of images. They then tested the models on a diverse dataset of images captured by various devices, including different smartphone models and digital cameras.

The results showed that the performance of the deep learning models varied significantly depending on the device used to capture the images. Some devices led to more accurate age estimates, while others resulted in poorer performance. This suggests that the visual characteristics of images can be influenced by the specific device used, and that deep learning models need to be trained to account for these device-specific differences.

To address this issue, the paper explores several potential solutions, such as:

  1. Incorporating device-specific information into the model training process, either by using device metadata or by training separate models for different device types.
  2. Employing techniques like TFNet: Exploiting Temporal Cues for Fast and Accurate LiDAR to normalize the image characteristics across devices, reducing the impact of device-specific factors on the model's performance.
  3. Leveraging transfer learning or domain adaptation strategies to adapt the models to new device types, improving their device-independence.

By addressing the device (in)dependence challenge, the researchers aim to develop more robust and reliable image age approximation models that can be deployed across a wide range of devices, enabling broader applications in areas such as zero-shot building age classification from facade and multimedia forensics.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a valuable exploration of the device (in)dependence challenge in deep learning-based image age approximation, an important consideration for the practical deployment of such models. The authors' systematic evaluation of model performance across diverse device types is a strength of the research, as it highlights the potential limitations of existing approaches and the need for more device-independent solutions.

However, the paper could have further discussed the underlying reasons for the observed device-dependent performance, such as potential differences in image sensor characteristics, camera processing pipelines, or lighting conditions. A deeper understanding of these factors could inform the development of more effective normalization or adaptation strategies.

Additionally, the paper could have explored the generalizability of the proposed solutions beyond the specific task of image age approximation. The techniques for improving device-independence, such as incorporating device metadata or using transfer learning, may have broader applicability to other computer vision tasks where device-specific factors can impact model performance.

Overall, the research presents an important step towards more robust and reliable deep learning-based image analysis, and the insights and approaches discussed could inspire further work in this direction, both in the context of image age approximation and other related computer vision applications.

Conclusion

This paper examines the device (in)dependence of deep learning-based image age approximation, a critical consideration for the practical deployment of such models. The researchers found that the performance of deep learning models can vary significantly depending on the specific device used to capture the images, highlighting the need for more device-independent solutions.

To address this challenge, the paper explores potential approaches, such as incorporating device-specific information into the model training process and using techniques to normalize image characteristics across devices. By making deep learning models more robust to device-specific factors, the researchers aim to improve the reliability and widespread applicability of image age approximation, with broader implications for multimedia forensics and other computer vision tasks.

The insights and methods discussed in this work represent an important step towards developing deep learning solutions that can consistently perform well across a diverse range of devices, a key requirement for their real-world deployment and widespread adoption.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Device (In)Dependence of Deep Learning-based Image Age Approximation
Total Score

0

Device (In)Dependence of Deep Learning-based Image Age Approximation

Robert Jochl, Andreas Uhl

The goal of temporal image forensic is to approximate the age of a digital image relative to images from the same device. Usually, this is based on traces left during the image acquisition pipeline. For example, several methods exist that exploit the presence of in-field sensor defects for this purpose. In addition to these 'classical' methods, there is also an approach in which a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) is trained to approximate the image age. One advantage of a CNN is that it independently learns the age features used. This would make it possible to exploit other (different) age traces in addition to the known ones (i.e., in-field sensor defects). In a previous work, we have shown that the presence of strong in-field sensor defects is irrelevant for a CNN to predict the age class. Based on this observation, the question arises how device (in)dependent the learned features are. In this work, we empirically asses this by training a network on images from a single device and then apply the trained model to images from different devices. This evaluation is performed on 14 different devices, including 10 devices from the publicly available 'Northumbria Temporal Image Forensics' database. These 10 different devices are based on five different device pairs (i.e., with the identical camera model).

Read more

4/19/2024

🤿

Total Score

0

Content Bias in Deep Learning Image Age Approximation: A new Approach Towards better Explainability

Robert Jochl, Andreas Uhl

In the context of temporal image forensics, it is not evident that a neural network, trained on images from different time-slots (classes), exploits solely image age related features. Usually, images taken in close temporal proximity (e.g., belonging to the same age class) share some common content properties. Such content bias can be exploited by a neural network. In this work, a novel approach is proposed that evaluates the influence of image content. This approach is verified using synthetic images (where content bias can be ruled out) with an age signal embedded. Based on the proposed approach, it is shown that a deep learning approach proposed in the context of age classification is most likely highly dependent on the image content. As a possible countermeasure, two different models from the field of image steganalysis, along with three different preprocessing techniques to increase the signal-to-noise ratio (age signal to image content), are evaluated using the proposed method.

Read more

5/3/2024

🤿

Total Score

0

Deep Image Fingerprint: Towards Low Budget Synthetic Image Detection and Model Lineage Analysis

Sergey Sinitsa, Ohad Fried

The generation of high-quality images has become widely accessible and is a rapidly evolving process. As a result, anyone can generate images that are indistinguishable from real ones. This leads to a wide range of applications, including malicious usage with deceptive intentions. Despite advances in detection techniques for generated images, a robust detection method still eludes us. Furthermore, model personalization techniques might affect the detection capabilities of existing methods. In this work, we utilize the architectural properties of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to develop a new detection method. Our method can detect images from a known generative model and enable us to establish relationships between fine-tuned generative models. We tested the method on images produced by both Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) and recent large text-to-image models (LTIMs) that rely on Diffusion Models. Our approach outperforms others trained under identical conditions and achieves comparable performance to state-of-the-art pre-trained detection methods on images generated by Stable Diffusion and MidJourney, with significantly fewer required train samples.

Read more

7/12/2024

🖼️

Total Score

0

Flexible image analysis for law enforcement agencies with deep neural networks to determine: where, who and what

Henri Bouma (LIST), Bart Joosten (LIST), Maarten C Kruithof (LIST), Maaike H T de Boer (LIST), Alexandru Ginsca (LIST), Benjamin Labbe (LIST), Quoc T Vuong (LIST)

Due to the increasing need for effective security measures and the integration of cameras in commercial products, a hugeamount of visual data is created today. Law enforcement agencies (LEAs) are inspecting images and videos to findradicalization, propaganda for terrorist organizations and illegal products on darknet markets. This is time consuming.Instead of an undirected search, LEAs would like to adapt to new crimes and threats, and focus only on data from specificlocations, persons or objects, which requires flexible interpretation of image content. Visual concept detection with deepconvolutional neural networks (CNNs) is a crucial component to understand the image content. This paper has fivecontributions. The first contribution allows image-based geo-localization to estimate the origin of an image. CNNs andgeotagged images are used to create a model that determines the location of an image by its pixel values. The secondcontribution enables analysis of fine-grained concepts to distinguish sub-categories in a generic concept. The proposedmethod encompasses data acquisition and cleaning and concept hierarchies. The third contribution is the recognition ofperson attributes (e.g., glasses or moustache) to enable query by textual description for a person. The person-attributeproblem is treated as a specific sub-task of concept classification. The fourth contribution is an intuitive image annotationtool based on active learning. Active learning allows users to define novel concepts flexibly and train CNNs with minimalannotation effort. The fifth contribution increases the flexibility for LEAs in the query definition by using query expansion.Query expansion maps user queries to known and detectable concepts. Therefore, no prior knowledge of the detectableconcepts is required for the users. The methods are validated on data with varying locations (popular and non-touristiclocations), varying person attributes (CelebA dataset), and varying number of annotations.

Read more

5/16/2024