Differentiable Gaussianization Layers for Inverse Problems Regularized by Deep Generative Models

Overview

• Deep generative models like GANs, normalizing flows, and diffusion models can be powerful tools for inverse problems.
• They have the potential to help reduce the ill-posedness of inverse problems and produce high-quality results.
• However, the latent tensors of these models can deviate from the desired high-dimensional standard Gaussian distribution during inversion, especially when dealing with noisy data or inaccurate forward models.
• This can lead to low-fidelity solutions.

Plain English Explanation

Deep generative models are a type of machine learning technique that can create new, realistic-looking data (like images or text) by learning the underlying patterns in a dataset. Generative models have shown great promise for helping solve inverse problems - tasks where you're trying to infer the original cause from some observed effects.

The key idea is that these deep generative models can act as powerful "regularizers" for inverse problems. Regularization is a technique used to make ill-posed inverse problems more well-behaved and less sensitive to noise or errors in the data. By incorporating a deep generative model into the inverse problem, the solution is encouraged to stay within the distribution of realistic, high-quality examples that the model has learned.

However, the authors note that there's a problem: the latent tensors (the internal representations learned by the deep model) can end up outside the desired high-dimensional Gaussian distribution during the inversion process, particularly when dealing with noisy data or inaccurate forward models. This can cause the final solutions to have low fidelity - they may not match the true underlying reality very well.

Technical Explanation

To address this issue, the researchers propose a novel approach called "Gaussianizing" the latent tensors. They develop differentiable data-dependent layers that can reparameterize and constrain the latent tensors to stay within the desired Gaussian distribution, even in the face of challenging inverse problems.

These custom layers are defined by solving optimization problems, which ensures the inverse problems produce high-fidelity solutions that are "in-distribution" - i.e., stay within the range of realistic examples represented by the deep generative model.

The authors validate their technique on three different inverse problem tasks: compressive sensing MRI, image deblurring, and eikonal tomography (a nonlinear PDE-constrained inverse problem). They test it using two representative deep generative models: StyleGAN2 and Glow.

The results show that their approach achieves state-of-the-art performance in terms of accuracy and consistency compared to other methods.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a clever and principled approach to addressing an important issue with using deep generative models for inverse problems. By "Gaussianizing" the latent tensors, the authors are able to keep the solutions within the distribution of realistic examples the model has learned, even in the face of challenging conditions like noisy data or inaccurate forward models.

One potential limitation is that the proposed data-dependent layers add additional complexity to the overall model and optimization procedure. The authors acknowledge this but argue that the benefits of improved performance outweigh the added complexity.

Additionally, the paper focuses on three specific inverse problem domains. It would be interesting to see how well the approach generalizes to a broader range of inverse problems beyond the ones studied here.

Overall, this research makes a valuable contribution to the field of inverse problems, demonstrating how deep generative models can be better leveraged as powerful regularizers when their latent representations are properly constrained.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel technique for using deep generative models as effective regularizers for inverse problems. By reparameterizing and "Gaussianizing" the latent tensors of the generative models, the authors are able to obtain high-fidelity solutions that stay within the distribution of realistic examples, even in the presence of noisy data or inaccurate forward models.

The results on several challenging inverse problem tasks show state-of-the-art performance, suggesting this approach could have wide-ranging applications wherever inverse problems need to be solved reliably and robustly. As deep generative models continue to advance, techniques like this will be increasingly important for leveraging their power to tackle complex real-world problems.