Differentially Private Synthetic Data with Private Density Estimation

2405.04554

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 5/9/2024 by Nikolija Bojkovic, Po-Ling Loh
Differentially Private Synthetic Data with Private Density Estimation

Abstract

The need to analyze sensitive data, such as medical records or financial data, has created a critical research challenge in recent years. In this paper, we adopt the framework of differential privacy, and explore mechanisms for generating an entire dataset which accurately captures characteristics of the original data. We build upon the work of Boedihardjo et al, which laid the foundations for a new optimization-based algorithm for generating private synthetic data. Importantly, we adapt their algorithm by replacing a uniform sampling step with a private distribution estimator; this allows us to obtain better computational guarantees for discrete distributions, and develop a novel algorithm suitable for continuous distributions. We also explore applications of our work to several statistical tasks.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a method for generating differentially private synthetic data using private density estimation.
  • The researchers developed a technique to create realistic synthetic data that preserves the statistical properties of the original dataset while protecting individual privacy.
  • The approach involves estimating the data distribution in a differentially private manner and then sampling from the learned distribution to generate new synthetic data.
  • The authors evaluate their method on several real-world datasets and show that it can produce high-quality synthetic data that maintains utility for various machine learning tasks.

Plain English Explanation

The paper describes a way to create fake data that looks a lot like real data, but protects the privacy of the people whose information is in the original dataset. The key idea is to first figure out the overall shape or "distribution" of the real data in a private way, without revealing details about individuals. Then, the researchers can sample from this private distribution to generate new synthetic data that has similar statistical properties to the original, but doesn't contain any real people's information.

This is useful because sometimes you can't directly use real data, for example if it contains sensitive personal details. By creating synthetic data that mimics the real thing, researchers and analysts can still study trends and patterns without compromising anyone's privacy. The authors of this paper show that their method can produce high-quality fake data that retains the utility of the original for various machine learning tasks.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a framework for generating differentially private synthetic data using a private density estimation technique. Differential privacy is a formal guarantee of privacy protection that bounds the influence any individual can have on the output of an analysis.

The core of the approach is to first learn a differentially private estimate of the data distribution using a novel noise-infused kernel density estimation method. This private density model is then used to sample new synthetic data points that preserve the statistical properties of the original dataset while satisfying differential privacy.

The authors evaluate their differentially private synthesis method on several real-world datasets, including Census, Boston housing, and the ADULT dataset. They demonstrate that the synthetic data maintains high utility for a range of machine learning tasks, such as classification and regression, compared to baseline methods.

The paper also analyzes the theoretical privacy guarantees of the approach and shows that it can achieve strong privacy while retaining data utility. The authors discuss some limitations and suggest future research directions, such as extending the method to handle complex data types and improving its scalability.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and technically sound approach for generating differentially private synthetic data. The key strength of the method is its ability to preserve the statistical properties of the original dataset while providing strong privacy guarantees. This is an important problem, as the need for privacy-preserving data sharing and analysis is becoming increasingly crucial in many domains.

However, the paper does acknowledge some limitations of the approach. For example, the method may struggle with high-dimensional or complex data distributions, and the computational cost of the private density estimation step could be prohibitive for large datasets. The authors also note that the synthetic data may not perfectly capture all the nuances and dependencies present in the original data, which could limit its utility for certain applications.

Additionally, while the paper demonstrates the utility of the synthetic data for standard machine learning tasks, it would be valuable to explore the method's performance on more specialized analyses, such as causal inference or personalized recommendations. Further research is needed to fully understand the capabilities and limitations of this approach in real-world scenarios.

Overall, this paper makes an important contribution to the field of differentially private data synthesis and highlights the potential for this technology to enable privacy-preserving data sharing and analysis. However, as with any emerging technique, continued research and careful consideration of the practical implications will be necessary to ensure its responsible and effective deployment.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel method for generating differentially private synthetic data using private density estimation. The key innovation is the ability to learn a private model of the data distribution and then sample from it to create new synthetic data that preserves the statistical properties of the original dataset while providing strong privacy guarantees.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on several real-world datasets, showing that the synthetic data maintains high utility for various machine learning tasks. This work represents an important step forward in the field of privacy-preserving data synthesis, which has the potential to unlock new opportunities for data sharing and analysis while protecting individual privacy.

As the need for privacy-preserving technologies continues to grow, research like this will play a vital role in developing practical solutions that balance data utility and individual privacy. While the current method has some limitations, the authors' insights and the broader principles behind their approach can serve as a foundation for further advancements in this critical area of study.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

Differentially Private Verification of Survey-Weighted Estimates

Differentially Private Verification of Survey-Weighted Estimates

Tong Lin, Jerome P. Reiter

YC

0

Reddit

0

Several official statistics agencies release synthetic data as public use microdata files. In practice, synthetic data do not admit accurate results for every analysis. Thus, it is beneficial for agencies to provide users with feedback on the quality of their analyses of the synthetic data. One approach is to couple synthetic data with a verification server that provides users with measures of the similarity of estimates computed with the synthetic and underlying confidential data. However, such measures leak information about the confidential records, so that agencies may wish to apply disclosure control methods to the released verification measures. We present a verification measure that satisfies differential privacy and can be used when the underlying confidential are collected with a complex survey design. We illustrate the verification measure using repeated sampling simulations where the confidential data are sampled with a probability proportional to size design, and the analyst estimates a population total or mean with the synthetic data. The simulations suggest that the verification measures can provide useful information about the quality of synthetic data inferences.

Read more

4/4/2024

Continual Release of Differentially Private Synthetic Data from Longitudinal Data Collections

Continual Release of Differentially Private Synthetic Data from Longitudinal Data Collections

Mark Bun, Marco Gaboardi, Marcel Neunhoeffer, Wanrong Zhang

YC

0

Reddit

0

Motivated by privacy concerns in long-term longitudinal studies in medical and social science research, we study the problem of continually releasing differentially private synthetic data from longitudinal data collections. We introduce a model where, in every time step, each individual reports a new data element, and the goal of the synthesizer is to incrementally update a synthetic dataset in a consistent way to capture a rich class of statistical properties. We give continual synthetic data generation algorithms that preserve two basic types of queries: fixed time window queries and cumulative time queries. We show nearly tight upper bounds on the error rates of these algorithms and demonstrate their empirical performance on realistically sized datasets from the U.S. Census Bureau's Survey of Income and Program Participation.

Read more

5/28/2024

📊

Differentially-Private Data Synthetisation for Efficient Re-Identification Risk Control

T^ania Carvalho, Nuno Moniz, Lu'is Antunes, Nitesh Chawla

YC

0

Reddit

0

Protecting user data privacy can be achieved via many methods, from statistical transformations to generative models. However, all of them have critical drawbacks. For example, creating a transformed data set using traditional techniques is highly time-consuming. Also, recent deep learning-based solutions require significant computational resources in addition to long training phases, and differentially private-based solutions may undermine data utility. In this paper, we propose $epsilon$-PrivateSMOTE, a technique designed for safeguarding against re-identification and linkage attacks, particularly addressing cases with a high sloppy re-identification risk. Our proposal combines synthetic data generation via noise-induced interpolation with differential privacy principles to obfuscate high-risk cases. We demonstrate how $epsilon$-PrivateSMOTE is capable of achieving competitive results in privacy risk and better predictive performance when compared to multiple traditional and state-of-the-art privacy-preservation methods, including generative adversarial networks, variational autoencoders, and differential privacy baselines. We also show how our method improves time requirements by at least a factor of 9 and is a resource-efficient solution that ensures high performance without specialised hardware.

Read more

4/24/2024

🤯

Causal Inference with Differentially Private (Clustered) Outcomes

Adel Javanmard, Vahab Mirrokni, Jean Pouget-Abadie

YC

0

Reddit

0

Estimating causal effects from randomized experiments is only feasible if participants agree to reveal their potentially sensitive responses. Of the many ways of ensuring privacy, label differential privacy is a widely used measure of an algorithm's privacy guarantee, which might encourage participants to share responses without running the risk of de-anonymization. Many differentially private mechanisms inject noise into the original data-set to achieve this privacy guarantee, which increases the variance of most statistical estimators and makes the precise measurement of causal effects difficult: there exists a fundamental privacy-variance trade-off to performing causal analyses from differentially private data. With the aim of achieving lower variance for stronger privacy guarantees, we suggest a new differential privacy mechanism, Cluster-DP, which leverages any given cluster structure of the data while still allowing for the estimation of causal effects. We show that, depending on an intuitive measure of cluster quality, we can improve the variance loss while maintaining our privacy guarantees. We compare its performance, theoretically and empirically, to that of its unclustered version and a more extreme uniform-prior version which does not use any of the original response distribution, both of which are special cases of the Cluster-DP algorithm.

Read more

5/1/2024