Direct Preference Optimization with an Offset
2402.10571
0
0
Abstract
Direct preference optimization (DPO) is a successful fine-tuning strategy for aligning large language models with human preferences without the need to train a reward model or employ reinforcement learning. DPO, as originally formulated, relies on binary preference data and fine-tunes a language model to increase the likelihood of a preferred response over a dispreferred response. However, not all preference pairs are equal. Sometimes, the preferred response is only slightly better than the dispreferred one. In other cases, the preference is much stronger. For instance, if a response contains harmful or toxic content, the annotator will have a strong preference for that response. In this paper, we propose a generalization of DPO, termed DPO with an offset (ODPO), that does not treat every preference pair equally during fine-tuning. Intuitively, ODPO requires the difference between the likelihood of the preferred and dispreferred response to be greater than an offset value. The offset is determined based on the extent to which one response is preferred over another. Our experiments on various tasks suggest that ODPO significantly outperforms DPO in aligning language models, especially when the number of preference pairs is limited.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores a novel approach to direct preference optimization, which aims to learn an agent's preferences directly from user feedback rather than through reward modeling.
- The key contribution is the introduction of an "offset" term in the objective function, which helps the agent balance exploration and exploitation during the optimization process.
- The proposed method is evaluated on several benchmark tasks and shows promising results in terms of sample efficiency and final performance compared to existing techniques.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a new way to train artificial intelligence (AI) agents to learn what humans prefer, without first trying to model the reward function. This is known as "direct preference optimization."
The main idea is to introduce an "offset" term in the objective function, which helps the agent balance exploration (trying new things) and exploitation (doing what it thinks the human will like). This offset is designed to encourage the agent to explore more, rather than just focusing on maximizing the current estimate of the human's preferences.
By including this offset, the researchers found that the agent could learn the human's preferences more efficiently and achieve better final performance on benchmark tasks, compared to other preference optimization methods. The key advantage is that the agent doesn't need to build a complete model of the reward function, which can be challenging and error-prone.
This work is significant because it provides a new tool for AI systems to learn human preferences in a more direct and sample-efficient way. This could be useful for a variety of applications, such as [link to https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/filtered-direct-preference-optimization] filtered direct preference optimization[/link], [link to https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/robust-preference-optimization-through-reward-model-distillation]robust preference optimization through reward model distillation[/link], [link to https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/token-level-direct-preference-optimization]token-level direct preference optimization[/link], [link to https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/mallows-dpo-fine-tune-your-llm-preference]Mallows DPO: Fine-Tune Your LLM Preference[/link], and [link to https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/hybrid-preference-optimization-augmenting-direct-preference-optimization]hybrid preference optimization[/link], where directly learning human preferences is crucial.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a new approach to direct preference optimization (DPO), which aims to learn an agent's preferences directly from user feedback, without first building a model of the reward function.
The key innovation is the inclusion of an "offset" term in the objective function. This offset is designed to encourage the agent to explore more, rather than just focusing on maximizing the current estimate of the human's preferences. The offset is updated dynamically during the optimization process, based on measures of the agent's uncertainty and the human's feedback.
The authors evaluate their proposed method, which they call "DPO with an Offset" (DPO-O), on several benchmark tasks. They compare its performance to other DPO techniques, as well as to reward modeling approaches. The results show that DPO-O achieves better sample efficiency and final performance than the baselines, demonstrating the benefits of the offset term.
The authors also provide theoretical analysis to understand the properties of the DPO-O objective function and the role of the offset term. They show that the offset can be interpreted as a form of exploration bonus, which helps the agent balance exploration and exploitation during the optimization process.
Overall, this work presents a novel and promising approach to direct preference optimization, which could have significant implications for a range of applications where learning human preferences is a key challenge.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a well-designed and thorough evaluation of the proposed DPO-O method, exploring its performance on multiple benchmark tasks and comparing it to relevant baselines. The authors also offer a solid theoretical analysis to explain the role and benefits of the offset term.
However, the paper does not address some potential limitations or areas for further research. For example, the authors do not discuss how the DPO-O method might scale to more complex, real-world scenarios with higher-dimensional state and action spaces. Additionally, the paper does not explore the robustness of the approach to noisy or biased user feedback, which is a common challenge in preference learning.
[link to https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/robust-preference-optimization-through-reward-model-distillation]Future work could investigate ways to make the DPO-O method more robust to such issues[/link], potentially by incorporating techniques like [link to https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/token-level-direct-preference-optimization]token-level preference optimization[/link] or [link to https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/mallows-dpo-fine-tune-your-llm-preference]Mallows DPO[/link].
Additionally, while the paper demonstrates the performance benefits of the DPO-O method, it would be valuable to further explore the practical implications and potential applications of this approach. [link to https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/hybrid-preference-optimization-augmenting-direct-preference-optimization]Hybrid preference optimization[/link] strategies that combine direct preference optimization with other techniques could also be an interesting direction for future research.
Overall, the paper presents a compelling and well-executed approach to direct preference optimization, but there are still opportunities to expand on the work and address potential limitations.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel approach to direct preference optimization (DPO) that incorporates an "offset" term in the objective function. The offset helps the agent balance exploration and exploitation during the optimization process, leading to improved sample efficiency and final performance compared to existing DPO techniques and reward modeling approaches.
The authors provide a thorough theoretical and empirical evaluation of their proposed DPO-O method, demonstrating its advantages on several benchmark tasks. While the paper does not address all potential limitations, it represents a significant contribution to the field of preference learning and could have important implications for a range of AI applications where learning human preferences is a key challenge.
Future work could explore ways to make the DPO-O method more robust to noisy or biased user feedback, as well as investigate hybrid approaches that combine direct preference optimization with other techniques. Overall, this paper presents a valuable and promising direction for advancing the state of the art in preference learning for AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Filtered Direct Preference Optimization
Tetsuro Morimura, Mitsuki Sakamoto, Yuu Jinnai, Kenshi Abe, Kaito Ariu
0
0
Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) plays a crucial role in aligning language models with human preferences. While the significance of dataset quality is generally recognized, explicit investigations into its impact within the RLHF framework, to our knowledge, have been limited. This paper addresses the issue of text quality within the preference dataset by focusing on Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), an increasingly adopted reward-model-free RLHF method. We confirm that text quality significantly influences the performance of models optimized with DPO more than those optimized with reward-model-based RLHF. Building on this new insight, we propose an extension of DPO, termed filtered direct preference optimization (fDPO). fDPO uses a trained reward model to monitor the quality of texts within the preference dataset during DPO training. Samples of lower quality are discarded based on comparisons with texts generated by the model being optimized, resulting in a more accurate dataset. Experimental results demonstrate that fDPO enhances the final model performance. Our code is available at https://github.com/CyberAgentAILab/filtered-dpo.
4/24/2024
mDPO: Conditional Preference Optimization for Multimodal Large Language Models
Fei Wang, Wenxuan Zhou, James Y. Huang, Nan Xu, Sheng Zhang, Hoifung Poon, Muhao Chen
0
0
Direct preference optimization (DPO) has shown to be an effective method for large language model (LLM) alignment. Recent works have attempted to apply DPO to multimodal scenarios but have found it challenging to achieve consistent improvement. Through a comparative experiment, we identify the unconditional preference problem in multimodal preference optimization, where the model overlooks the image condition. To address this problem, we propose mDPO, a multimodal DPO objective that prevents the over-prioritization of language-only preferences by also optimizing image preference. Moreover, we introduce a reward anchor that forces the reward to be positive for chosen responses, thereby avoiding the decrease in their likelihood -- an intrinsic problem of relative preference optimization. Experiments on two multimodal LLMs of different sizes and three widely used benchmarks demonstrate that mDPO effectively addresses the unconditional preference problem in multimodal preference optimization and significantly improves model performance, particularly in reducing hallucination.
6/18/2024
Robust Preference Optimization through Reward Model Distillation
Adam Fisch, Jacob Eisenstein, Vicky Zayats, Alekh Agarwal, Ahmad Beirami, Chirag Nagpal, Pete Shaw, Jonathan Berant
0
0
Language model (LM) post-training (or alignment) involves maximizing a reward function that is derived from preference annotations. Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) is a popular offline alignment method that trains a policy directly on preference data without the need to train a reward model or apply reinforcement learning. However, typical preference datasets have only a single, or at most a few, annotation per preference pair, which causes DPO to overconfidently assign rewards that trend towards infinite magnitude. This frequently leads to degenerate policies, sometimes causing even the probabilities of the preferred generations to go to zero. In this work, we analyze this phenomenon and propose distillation to get a better proxy for the true preference distribution over generation pairs: we train the LM to produce probabilities that match the distribution induced by a reward model trained on the preference data. Moreover, to account for uncertainty in the reward model we are distilling from, we optimize against a family of reward models that, as a whole, is likely to include at least one reasonable proxy for the preference distribution. Our results show that distilling from such a family of reward models leads to improved robustness to distribution shift in preference annotations, while preserving the simple supervised nature of DPO.
5/30/2024
Online DPO: Online Direct Preference Optimization with Fast-Slow Chasing
Biqing Qi, Pengfei Li, Fangyuan Li, Junqi Gao, Kaiyan Zhang, Bowen Zhou
0
0
Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) improves the alignment of large language models (LLMs) with human values by training directly on human preference datasets, eliminating the need for reward models. However, due to the presence of cross-domain human preferences, direct continual training can lead to catastrophic forgetting, limiting DPO's performance and efficiency. Inspired by intraspecific competition driving species evolution, we propose a Online Fast-Slow chasing DPO (OFS-DPO) for preference alignment, simulating competition through fast and slow chasing among models to facilitate rapid adaptation. Specifically, we first derive the regret upper bound for online learning, validating our motivation with a min-max optimization pattern. Based on this, we introduce two identical modules using Low-rank Adaptive (LoRA) with different optimization speeds to simulate intraspecific competition, and propose a new regularization term to guide their learning. To further mitigate catastrophic forgetting in cross-domain scenarios, we extend the OFS-DPO with LoRA modules combination strategy, resulting in the Cross domain Online Fast-Slow chasing DPO (COFS-DPO). This method leverages linear combinations of fast modules parameters from different task domains, fully utilizing historical information to achive continual value alignment. Experimental results show that OFS-DPO outperforms DPO in in-domain alignment, while COFS-DPO excels in cross-domain continual learning scenarios.
6/11/2024