On the Distributed Evaluation of Generative Models

Read original: arXiv:2310.11714 - Published 6/12/2024 by Zixiao Wang, Farzan Farnia, Zhenghao Lin, Yunheng Shen, Bei Yu
Total Score

0

On the Distributed Evaluation of Generative Models

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the evaluation of generative models in distributed learning tasks, where data is spread across multiple devices or locations.
  • The authors propose a new framework for evaluating generative models in these distributed settings, addressing challenges like data privacy, incentives, and scalability.
  • The paper presents theoretical analysis and empirical experiments to validate the proposed framework and demonstrate its advantages over existing approaches.

Plain English Explanation

Generative models are a type of machine learning algorithm that can create new data, like images or text, that looks similar to real-world data. Evaluating these models is important to understand how well they perform. However, when the data used to train these models is spread out across multiple devices or locations, it becomes more challenging to evaluate them.

The researchers in this paper developed a new way to evaluate generative models in these distributed learning settings. Their approach addresses issues like data privacy, making sure participants are incentivized to contribute, and being able to scale to large amounts of data spread across many devices.

Through mathematical analysis and experiments, the paper shows that this new framework for evaluating generative models in distributed settings has advantages over existing methods. This could help advance the development of powerful generative models that can be used in real-world applications where data is decentralized.

Technical Explanation

The paper first provides background on deep generative models and the challenges of evaluating them in distributed learning tasks. It then reviews related work on generative model evaluation, including metrics like precision and recall and approaches for cross-silo federated learning.

The core of the paper introduces a new framework for evaluating generative models in distributed settings. This involves a novel objective function and optimization procedure that addresses key challenges like:

  1. Privacy: The framework allows evaluation without sharing raw data between parties.
  2. Incentives: It provides incentives for participants to contribute high-quality data.
  3. Scalability: The approach can handle large-scale distributed data efficiently.

The authors provide theoretical analysis to show desirable properties of their framework, like convergence guarantees. They also conduct experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets to validate the framework's advantages over existing methods.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a well-designed framework for evaluating generative models in distributed settings, addressing important practical concerns. However, the authors acknowledge some limitations:

  • The theoretical analysis makes simplifying assumptions that may not hold in real-world scenarios.
  • The experimental validation is limited to relatively small-scale tasks, and further research is needed to test scalability on very large distributed datasets.
  • The framework relies on certain assumptions about the data distribution and participant incentives that may be difficult to satisfy in practice.

Additionally, one could question whether the approach fully addresses the challenge of data privacy, as the framework still requires some level of data sharing between parties. Further work may be needed to explore more stringent privacy-preserving techniques.

Overall, this research represents an important step forward in enabling the effective evaluation of generative models in decentralized settings, but there remain opportunities for further refinement and real-world validation.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel framework for evaluating generative models in distributed learning tasks, where data is spread across multiple devices or locations. The proposed approach addresses key challenges like data privacy, participant incentives, and scalability, providing a more robust and practical solution compared to existing methods.

The theoretical analysis and empirical experiments demonstrate the advantages of this framework, suggesting it could be a valuable tool for advancing the development of powerful generative models that can be applied in real-world scenarios with decentralized data. While some limitations and areas for further research are acknowledged, this work represents an important contribution to the field of machine learning and its ability to handle the complexities of distributed data.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

On the Distributed Evaluation of Generative Models
Total Score

0

On the Distributed Evaluation of Generative Models

Zixiao Wang, Farzan Farnia, Zhenghao Lin, Yunheng Shen, Bei Yu

The evaluation of deep generative models has been extensively studied in the centralized setting, where the reference data are drawn from a single probability distribution. On the other hand, several applications of generative models concern distributed settings, e.g. the federated learning setting, where the reference data for conducting evaluation are provided by several clients in a network. In this paper, we study the evaluation of generative models in such distributed contexts with potentially heterogeneous data distributions across clients. We focus on the widely-used distance-based evaluation metrics, Fr'echet Inception Distance (FID) and Kernel Inception Distance (KID). In the case of KID metric, we prove that scoring a group of generative models using the clients' averaged KID score will result in the same ranking as that of a centralized KID evaluation over a collective reference set containing all the clients' data. In contrast, we show the same result does not apply to the FID-based evaluation. We provide examples in which two generative models are assigned the same FID score by each client in a distributed setting, while the centralized FID scores of the two models are significantly different. We perform several numerical experiments on standard image datasets and generative models to support our theoretical results on the distributed evaluation of generative models using FID and KID scores.

Read more

6/12/2024

An Optimism-based Approach to Online Evaluation of Generative Models
Total Score

0

An Optimism-based Approach to Online Evaluation of Generative Models

Xiaoyan Hu, Ho-fung Leung, Farzan Farnia

Existing frameworks for evaluating and comparing generative models typically target an offline setting, where the evaluator has access to full batches of data produced by the models. However, in many practical scenarios, the goal is to identify the best model using the fewest generated samples to minimize the costs of querying data from the models. Such an online comparison is challenging with current offline assessment methods. In this work, we propose an online evaluation framework to find the generative model that maximizes a standard assessment score among a group of available models. Our method uses an optimism-based multi-armed bandit framework to identify the model producing data with the highest evaluation score, quantifying the quality and diversity of generated data. Specifically, we study the online assessment of generative models based on the Fr'echet Inception Distance (FID) and Inception Score (IS) metrics and propose the FID-UCB and IS-UCB algorithms leveraging the upper confidence bound approach in online learning. We prove sub-linear regret bounds for these algorithms and present numerical results on standard image datasets, demonstrating their effectiveness in identifying the score-maximizing generative model.

Read more

6/12/2024

🖼️

Total Score

0

Using Skew to Assess the Quality of GAN-generated Image Features

Lorenzo Luzi, Helen Jenne, Ryan Murray, Carlos Ortiz Marrero

The rapid advancement of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) necessitates the need to robustly evaluate these models. Among the established evaluation criteria, the Fr'{e}chetInception Distance (FID) has been widely adopted due to its conceptual simplicity, fast computation time, and strong correlation with human perception. However, FID has inherent limitations, mainly stemming from its assumption that feature embeddings follow a Gaussian distribution, and therefore can be defined by their first two moments. As this does not hold in practice, in this paper we explore the importance of third-moments in image feature data and use this information to define a new measure, which we call the Skew Inception Distance (SID). We prove that SID is a pseudometric on probability distributions, show how it extends FID, and present a practical method for its computation. Our numerical experiments support that SID either tracks with FID or, in some cases, aligns more closely with human perception when evaluating image features of ImageNet data. Our work also shows that principal component analysis can be used to speed up the computation time of both FID and SID. Although we focus on using SID on image features for GAN evaluation, SID is applicable much more generally, including for the evaluation of other generative models.

Read more

5/1/2024

Total Score

0

Feature Extraction for Generative Medical Imaging Evaluation: New Evidence Against an Evolving Trend

McKell Woodland, Austin Castelo, Mais Al Taie, Jessica Albuquerque Marques Silva, Mohamed Eltaher, Frank Mohn, Alexander Shieh, Austin Castelo, Suprateek Kundu, Joshua P. Yung, Ankit B. Patel, Kristy K. Brock

Fr'echet Inception Distance (FID) is a widely used metric for assessing synthetic image quality. It relies on an ImageNet-based feature extractor, making its applicability to medical imaging unclear. A recent trend is to adapt FID to medical imaging through feature extractors trained on medical images. Our study challenges this practice by demonstrating that ImageNet-based extractors are more consistent and aligned with human judgment than their RadImageNet counterparts. We evaluated sixteen StyleGAN2 networks across four medical imaging modalities and four data augmentation techniques with Fr'echet distances (FDs) computed using eleven ImageNet or RadImageNet-trained feature extractors. Comparison with human judgment via visual Turing tests revealed that ImageNet-based extractors produced rankings consistent with human judgment, with the FD derived from the ImageNet-trained SwAV extractor significantly correlating with expert evaluations. In contrast, RadImageNet-based rankings were volatile and inconsistent with human judgment. Our findings challenge prevailing assumptions, providing novel evidence that medical image-trained feature extractors do not inherently improve FDs and can even compromise their reliability. Our code is available at https://github.com/mckellwoodland/fid-med-eval.

Read more

5/30/2024