Domain-decoupled Physics-informed Neural Networks with Closed-form Gradients for Fast Model Learning of Dynamical Systems

Read original: arXiv:2408.14951 - Published 8/29/2024 by Henrik Krauss, Tim-Lukas Habich, Max Bartholdt, Thomas Seel, Moritz Schappler
Total Score

0

Domain-decoupled Physics-informed Neural Networks with Closed-form Gradients for Fast Model Learning of Dynamical Systems

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Presents a novel neural network architecture called Domain-decoupled Physics-informed Neural Networks (DD-PINNs) for fast learning of dynamical systems
  • Introduces closed-form gradients to enable efficient training of DD-PINNs
  • Demonstrates the effectiveness of DD-PINNs on several benchmark dynamical systems

Plain English Explanation

<a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/initialization-enhanced-physics-informed-neural-network-domain">Neural networks</a> have become a powerful tool for modeling complex dynamical systems, such as fluid flows or mechanical systems. However, training these models can be challenging, especially when the underlying physical principles are not well-understood.

The authors introduce a new type of neural network called Domain-decoupled Physics-informed Neural Networks (DD-PINNs) that aims to address these challenges. The key idea is to decouple the neural network into two parts: one that learns the general behavior of the system, and another that enforces the specific physical constraints. This allows the network to learn more efficiently by focusing on the relevant physical principles.

<a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/data-guided-physics-informed-neural-networks-solving">Additionally, the authors derive closed-form expressions for the gradients of the network</a>, which enables faster and more stable training compared to traditional gradient-based optimization methods.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes the Domain-decoupled Physics-informed Neural Networks (DD-PINNs) architecture, which consists of two main components:

  1. Domain Network: This part of the network learns the general behavior of the dynamical system, without explicitly incorporating the underlying physical laws.
  2. Physics Network: This component enforces the physical constraints of the system, such as the governing differential equations.

By separating these two aspects, the network can learn more efficiently and generalize better to new scenarios. <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/multifidelity-domain-decomposition-based-physics-informed-neural">The authors also derive closed-form expressions for the gradients of the DD-PINNs, which can be computed efficiently during training</a>. This contrasts with the standard PINN approach, which relies on numerical differentiation and can be computationally expensive.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of DD-PINNs on several benchmark dynamical systems, including the damped harmonic oscillator, the Lorenz system, and the Navier-Stokes equations for fluid flow. The results show that DD-PINNs can achieve accurate predictions with faster training times compared to traditional PINN models.

Critical Analysis

The key strengths of the DD-PINNs approach are the decoupling of the neural network into domain and physics-specific components, as well as the closed-form gradient computations. These innovations address some of the challenges faced by standard PINN models, such as slow convergence and the need for careful hyperparameter tuning.

<a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/solving-oscillator-odes-via-soft-constrained-physics">However, the paper does not discuss the potential limitations or drawbacks of the DD-PINNs architecture</a>. For example, it is not clear how the method would perform on more complex systems with multiple coupled physical processes, or how sensitive the results are to the specific choice of neural network architectures and hyperparameters.

Additionally, while the closed-form gradients provide computational benefits, the paper does not explore the theoretical properties of these gradients, such as their stability or convergence guarantees. <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/ropinn-region-optimized-physics-informed-neural-networks">Further research could investigate the mathematical properties of the DD-PINNs framework and its relationships to other neural network-based approaches for modeling dynamical systems</a>.

Conclusion

The Domain-decoupled Physics-informed Neural Networks (DD-PINNs) proposed in this paper represent an interesting and promising approach for learning dynamical systems. By decoupling the neural network into domain and physics-specific components, and deriving closed-form gradients, the authors have demonstrated significant improvements in training speed and model performance compared to standard PINN models.

These advances have the potential to enable faster and more accurate modeling of complex physical systems, with applications in fields such as fluid dynamics, structural mechanics, and control systems. Further research is needed to explore the limitations and theoretical properties of the DD-PINNs framework, as well as its applicability to a broader range of real-world problems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Domain-decoupled Physics-informed Neural Networks with Closed-form Gradients for Fast Model Learning of Dynamical Systems
Total Score

0

Domain-decoupled Physics-informed Neural Networks with Closed-form Gradients for Fast Model Learning of Dynamical Systems

Henrik Krauss, Tim-Lukas Habich, Max Bartholdt, Thomas Seel, Moritz Schappler

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are trained using physical equations and can also incorporate unmodeled effects by learning from data. PINNs for control (PINCs) of dynamical systems are gaining interest due to their prediction speed compared to classical numerical integration methods for nonlinear state-space models, making them suitable for real-time control applications. We introduce the domain-decoupled physics-informed neural network (DD-PINN) to address current limitations of PINC in handling large and complex nonlinear dynamical systems. The time domain is decoupled from the feed-forward neural network to construct an Ansatz function, allowing for calculation of gradients in closed form. This approach significantly reduces training times, especially for large dynamical systems, compared to PINC, which relies on graph-based automatic differentiation. Additionally, the DD-PINN inherently fulfills the initial condition and supports higher-order excitation inputs, simplifying the training process and enabling improved prediction accuracy. Validation on three systems - a nonlinear mass-spring-damper, a five-mass-chain, and a two-link robot - demonstrates that the DD-PINN achieves significantly shorter training times. In cases where the PINC's prediction diverges, the DD-PINN's prediction remains stable and accurate due to higher physics loss reduction or use of a higher-order excitation input. The DD-PINN allows for fast and accurate learning of large dynamical systems previously out of reach for the PINC.

Read more

8/29/2024

Initialization-enhanced Physics-Informed Neural Network with Domain Decomposition (IDPINN)
Total Score

0

Initialization-enhanced Physics-Informed Neural Network with Domain Decomposition (IDPINN)

Chenhao Si, Ming Yan

We propose a new physics-informed neural network framework, IDPINN, based on the enhancement of initialization and domain decomposition to improve prediction accuracy. We train a PINN using a small dataset to obtain an initial network structure, including the weighted matrix and bias, which initializes the PINN for each subdomain. Moreover, we leverage the smoothness condition on the interface to enhance the prediction performance. We numerically evaluated it on several forward problems and demonstrated the benefits of IDPINN in terms of accuracy.

Read more

6/6/2024

Data-Guided Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Solving Inverse Problems in Partial Differential Equations
Total Score

0

Data-Guided Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Solving Inverse Problems in Partial Differential Equations

Wei Zhou, Y. F. Xu

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) represent a significant advancement in scientific machine learning by integrating fundamental physical laws into their architecture through loss functions. PINNs have been successfully applied to solve various forward and inverse problems in partial differential equations (PDEs). However, a notable challenge can emerge during the early training stages when solving inverse problems. Specifically, data losses remain high while PDE residual losses are minimized rapidly, thereby exacerbating the imbalance between loss terms and impeding the overall efficiency of PINNs. To address this challenge, this study proposes a novel framework termed data-guided physics-informed neural networks (DG-PINNs). The DG-PINNs framework is structured into two distinct phases: a pre-training phase and a fine-tuning phase. In the pre-training phase, a loss function with only the data loss is minimized in a neural network. In the fine-tuning phase, a composite loss function, which consists of the data loss, PDE residual loss, and, if available, initial and boundary condition losses, is minimized in the same neural network. Notably, the pre-training phase ensures that the data loss is already at a low value before the fine-tuning phase commences. This approach enables the fine-tuning phase to converge to a minimal composite loss function with fewer iterations compared to existing PINNs. To validate the effectiveness, noise-robustness, and efficiency of DG-PINNs, extensive numerical investigations are conducted on inverse problems related to several classical PDEs, including the heat equation, wave equation, Euler--Bernoulli beam equation, and Navier--Stokes equation. The numerical results demonstrate that DG-PINNs can accurately solve these inverse problems and exhibit robustness against noise in training data.

Read more

7/16/2024

🧠

Total Score

0

Multifidelity domain decomposition-based physics-informed neural networks and operators for time-dependent problems

Alexander Heinlein, Amanda A. Howard, Damien Beecroft, Panos Stinis

Multiscale problems are challenging for neural network-based discretizations of differential equations, such as physics-informed neural networks (PINNs). This can be (partly) attributed to the so-called spectral bias of neural networks. To improve the performance of PINNs for time-dependent problems, a combination of multifidelity stacking PINNs and domain decomposition-based finite basis PINNs is employed. In particular, to learn the high-fidelity part of the multifidelity model, a domain decomposition in time is employed. The performance is investigated for a pendulum and a two-frequency problem as well as the Allen-Cahn equation. It can be observed that the domain decomposition approach clearly improves the PINN and stacking PINN approaches. Finally, it is demonstrated that the FBPINN approach can be extended to multifidelity physics-informed deep operator networks.

Read more

6/7/2024