A dual basis approach to multidimensional scaling

Read original: arXiv:2303.05682 - Published 8/1/2024 by Samuel Lichtenberg, Abiy Tasissa
Total Score

0

📉

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Classical multidimensional scaling (CMDS) is a technique that embeds a set of objects in a Euclidean space given their pairwise Euclidean distances.
  • The main part of CMDS involves double centering a squared distance matrix and using a truncated eigendecomposition to recover the point coordinates.
  • This paper explores a dual basis approach to CMDS, motivated by a study in Euclidean distance geometry.

Plain English Explanation

Classical multidimensional scaling (CMDS) is a way to take a set of objects and represent them in a 2D or 3D space, based on how far apart they are from each other. The key steps are:

  1. Start with a table of the distances between every pair of objects.
  2. Adjust this distance matrix to be "double-centered" - this removes any overall shift or scale.
  3. Use a mathematical technique called eigendecomposition to extract the coordinates of the objects in the new 2D/3D space.

In this paper, the researchers explore an alternative approach called the "dual basis" method. This means they use a different way of representing the relationships between the objects, which has some interesting mathematical properties. The goal is to better understand the underlying structure of the CMDS problem and make connections to related problems in metric nearness.

Technical Explanation

The key steps of the dual basis approach to CMDS are:

  1. Derive an explicit formula for the "dual basis vectors" - these represent the relationships between objects in an alternative way.
  2. Characterize the spectrum (the set of eigenvalues) of an important matrix in this dual basis framework.
  3. Make connections between this dual basis CMDS approach and the problem of metric nearness - finding the closest matrix with a particular metric structure.

This alternative perspective provides additional mathematical insights into the CMDS problem and its underlying geometry, beyond what is possible with the standard CMDS approach.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a rigorous mathematical analysis of the dual basis approach to CMDS, deriving new results about the spectrum and connections to metric nearness. However, the technical nature of the analysis may limit its accessibility to a general audience.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the practical implications or performance of the dual basis CMDS method compared to the standard approach. Further research would be needed to evaluate the benefits and limitations of this new technique in real-world applications.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel dual basis perspective on the classical multidimensional scaling (CMDS) problem, motivated by studies in Euclidean distance geometry. The researchers derive explicit formulas and characterize the spectrum of key matrices in this alternative framework, providing additional mathematical insights into the underlying structure of CMDS. While the technical analysis may be challenging for a general audience, this work opens up new directions for further research into efficient and robust methods for embedding high-dimensional data in lower-dimensional spaces.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

📉

Total Score

0

A dual basis approach to multidimensional scaling

Samuel Lichtenberg, Abiy Tasissa

Classical multidimensional scaling (CMDS) is a technique that embeds a set of objects in a Euclidean space given their pairwise Euclidean distances. The main part of CMDS involves double centering a squared distance matrix and using a truncated eigendecomposition to recover the point coordinates. In this paper, motivated by a study in Euclidean distance geometry, we explore a dual basis approach to CMDS. We give an explicit formula for the dual basis vectors and fully characterize the spectrum of an essential matrix in the dual basis framework. We make connections to a related problem in metric nearness.

Read more

8/1/2024

A quasi-polynomial time algorithm for Multi-Dimensional Scaling via LP hierarchies
Total Score

0

A quasi-polynomial time algorithm for Multi-Dimensional Scaling via LP hierarchies

Ainesh Bakshi, Vincent Cohen-Addad, Samuel B. Hopkins, Rajesh Jayaram, Silvio Lattanzi

Multi-dimensional Scaling (MDS) is a family of methods for embedding an $n$-point metric into low-dimensional Euclidean space. We study the Kamada-Kawai formulation of MDS: given a set of non-negative dissimilarities ${d_{i,j}}_{i , j in [n]}$ over $n$ points, the goal is to find an embedding ${x_1,dots,x_n} in mathbb{R}^k$ that minimizes [text{OPT} = min_{x} mathbb{E}_{i,j in [n]} left[ left(1-frac{|x_i - x_j|}{d_{i,j}}right)^2 right] ] Kamada-Kawai provides a more relaxed measure of the quality of a low-dimensional metric embedding than the traditional bi-Lipschitz-ness measure studied in theoretical computer science; this is advantageous because strong hardness-of-approximation results are known for the latter, Kamada-Kawai admits nontrivial approximation algorithms. Despite its popularity, our theoretical understanding of MDS is limited. Recently, Demaine, Hesterberg, Koehler, Lynch, and Urschel (arXiv:2109.11505) gave the first approximation algorithm with provable guarantees for Kamada-Kawai in the constant-$k$ regime, with cost $text{OPT} +epsilon$ in $n^2 2^{text{poly}(Delta/epsilon)}$ time, where $Delta$ is the aspect ratio of the input. In this work, we give the first approximation algorithm for MDS with quasi-polynomial dependency on $Delta$: we achieve a solution with cost $tilde{O}(log Delta)text{OPT}^{Omega(1)}+epsilon$ in time $n^{O(1)}2^{text{poly}(log(Delta)/epsilon)}$. Our approach is based on a novel analysis of a conditioning-based rounding scheme for the Sherali-Adams LP Hierarchy. Crucially, our analysis exploits the geometry of low-dimensional Euclidean space, allowing us to avoid an exponential dependence on the aspect ratio. We believe our geometry-aware treatment of the Sherali-Adams Hierarchy is an important step towards developing general-purpose techniques for efficient metric optimization algorithms.

Read more

4/12/2024

Total Score

0

A Surprisingly Simple Method for Distributed Euclidean-Minimum Spanning Tree / Single Linkage Dendrogram Construction from High Dimensional Embeddings via Distance Decomposition

Richard Lettich

We introduce a decomposition method for the distributed calculation of exact Euclidean Minimum Spanning Trees in high dimensions (where sub-quadratic algorithms are not effective), or more generalized geometric-minimum spanning trees of complete graphs, where for each vertex $vin V$ in the graph $G=(V,E)$ is represented by a vector in $vec{v}in mathbb{R}^n$, and each for any edge, the the weight of the edge in the graph is given by a symmetric binary `distance' function between the representative vectors $w({x,y}) = d(vec{x},vec{y})$. This is motivated by the task of clustering high dimensional embeddings produced by neural networks, where low-dimensional algorithms are ineffective; such geometric-minimum spanning trees find applications as a subroutine in the construction of single linkage dendrograms, as the two structures can be converted between each other efficiently.

Read more

6/5/2024

🏷️

Total Score

0

Differential Similarity in Higher Dimensional Spaces: Theory and Applications

L. Thorne McCarty

This paper presents an extension and an elaboration of the theory of differential similarity, which was originally proposed in arXiv:1401.2411 [cs.LG]. The goal is to develop an algorithm for clustering and coding that combines a geometric model with a probabilistic model in a principled way. For simplicity, the geometric model in the earlier paper was restricted to the three-dimensional case. The present paper removes this restriction, and considers the full $n$-dimensional case. Although the mathematical model is the same, the strategies for computing solutions in the $n$-dimensional case are different, and one of the main purposes of this paper is to develop and analyze these strategies. Another main purpose is to devise techniques for estimating the parameters of the model from sample data, again in $n$ dimensions. We evaluate the solution strategies and the estimation techniques by applying them to two familiar real-world examples: the classical MNIST dataset and the CIFAR-10 dataset.

Read more

5/14/2024