Eagle: Exploring The Design Space for Multimodal LLMs with Mixture of Encoders
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper, titled "Eagle: Exploring The Design Space for Multimodal LLMs with Mixture of Encoders," explores the design of multimodal large language models (LLMs) that can process both text and visual inputs.
- The researchers investigate different encoder configurations, including a novel "mixture of encoders" approach, to improve the model's performance on various multimodal tasks.
- The paper provides a thorough design space exploration and analysis of the trade-offs between different model architectures and their performance.
Plain English Explanation
The paper is about designing large language models that can understand both text and images. These models, called multimodal LLMs, are useful for tasks that involve processing both text and visuals, such as image captioning or visual question answering.
The researchers explored different ways to build these multimodal models, including a new approach called "mixture of encoders." This approach combines multiple encoder modules, each specialized for a different type of input (e.g., text or image), to capture the unique features of each modality.
The researchers tested various encoder configurations and analyzed how they affected the model's performance on different tasks. They found that the mixture of encoders approach often outperformed more traditional approaches, suggesting it's a promising direction for designing powerful multimodal LLMs.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a design space exploration of multimodal LLMs, focusing on different encoder configurations. The researchers investigate several approaches, including:
- Separate Encoders: Using separate encoder modules for text and image inputs, with no interaction between the modalities.
- Shared Encoder: Using a single encoder module that processes both text and image inputs.
- Mixture of Encoders: Using a mixture of specialized encoders, each focused on a particular input modality, with a gating mechanism to combine their outputs.
The researchers evaluate these approaches on various multimodal tasks, such as visual question answering and image captioning, and analyze the trade-offs in terms of performance, parameter efficiency, and interpretability.
Their results show that the mixture of encoders approach often outperforms the other configurations, particularly on tasks that require reasoning across modalities. This suggests that leveraging the unique strengths of specialized encoders can be beneficial for building powerful multimodal LLMs.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-designed exploration of the design space for multimodal LLMs. The researchers considered a range of encoder configurations and evaluated them on relevant tasks, offering valuable insights into the trade-offs and performance characteristics of each approach.
One potential limitation is the scope of the tasks and datasets used in the evaluation. While the researchers covered several common multimodal benchmarks, there may be other tasks or real-world applications where the performance and characteristics of these models could differ.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the interpretability or explainability of the mixture of encoders approach. Understanding the inner workings and decision-making processes of these complex models is an important area for future research, as it can help users better understand and trust the model's outputs.
Conclusion
This paper makes a significant contribution to the field of multimodal LLMs by systematically exploring different encoder configurations and demonstrating the potential benefits of a mixture of encoders approach. The insights gained from this research can inform the design of future multimodal language models, potentially leading to systems that can more effectively leverage and reason about combined text and visual information.
The findings in this paper also suggest that a modular, specialized approach to multimodal processing may be more effective than a single, generalized encoder. This aligns with a broader trend in AI towards more compositional and interpretable models, which could have important implications for the development of advanced artificial intelligence systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Eagle: Exploring The Design Space for Multimodal LLMs with Mixture of Encoders
Min Shi, Fuxiao Liu, Shihao Wang, Shijia Liao, Subhashree Radhakrishnan, De-An Huang, Hongxu Yin, Karan Sapra, Yaser Yacoob, Humphrey Shi, Bryan Catanzaro, Andrew Tao, Jan Kautz, Zhiding Yu, Guilin Liu
The ability to accurately interpret complex visual information is a crucial topic of multimodal large language models (MLLMs). Recent work indicates that enhanced visual perception significantly reduces hallucinations and improves performance on resolution-sensitive tasks, such as optical character recognition and document analysis. A number of recent MLLMs achieve this goal using a mixture of vision encoders. Despite their success, there is a lack of systematic comparisons and detailed ablation studies addressing critical aspects, such as expert selection and the integration of multiple vision experts. This study provides an extensive exploration of the design space for MLLMs using a mixture of vision encoders and resolutions. Our findings reveal several underlying principles common to various existing strategies, leading to a streamlined yet effective design approach. We discover that simply concatenating visual tokens from a set of complementary vision encoders is as effective as more complex mixing architectures or strategies. We additionally introduce Pre-Alignment to bridge the gap between vision-focused encoders and language tokens, enhancing model coherence. The resulting family of MLLMs, Eagle, surpasses other leading open-source models on major MLLM benchmarks. Models and code: https://github.com/NVlabs/Eagle
Read more8/29/2024
0
EAGLE: Elevating Geometric Reasoning through LLM-empowered Visual Instruction Tuning
Zhihao Li, Yao Du, Yang Liu, Yan Zhang, Yufang Liu, Mengdi Zhang, Xunliang Cai
Multi-modal Large Language Models have recently experienced rapid developments and excel in various multi-modal tasks. However, they still struggle with mathematical geometric problem solving, which requires exceptional visual perception proficiency. Existing MLLMs mostly optimize the LLM backbone to acquire geometric reasoning capabilities, while rarely emphasizing improvements in visual comprehension. In this paper, we first investigate the visual perception performance of MLLMs when facing geometric diagrams. Our findings reveal that current MLLMs severely suffer from inaccurate geometric perception and hallucinations. To address these limitations, we propose EAGLE, a novel two-stage end-to-end visual enhancement MLLM framework designed to ElevAte Geometric reasoning through LLM-Empowered visual instruction tuning. Specifically, in the preliminary stage, we feed geometric image-caption pairs into our MLLM that contains a fully fine-tuning CLIP ViT and a frozen LLM, aiming to endow our model with basic geometric knowledge. In the subsequent advanced stage, we incorporate LoRA modules into the vision encoder and unfreeze the LLM backbone. This enables the model to leverage the inherent CoT rationales within question-answer pairs, guiding the MLLM to focus on nuanced visual cues and enhancing its overall perceptual capacity. Moreover, we optimize the cross-modal projector in both stages to foster adaptive visual-linguistic alignments. After the two-stage visual enhancement, we develop the geometry expert model EAGLE-7B. Extensive experiments on popular benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our model. For example, on the GeoQA benchmark, EAGLE-7B not only surpasses the exemplary G-LLaVA 7B model by 2.9%, but also marginally outperforms the larger G-LLaVA 13B model. On the MathVista benchmark, EAGLE-7B achieves remarkable 3.8% improvements compared with the proprietary model GPT-4V.
Read more8/22/2024
💬
0
Explaining Multi-modal Large Language Models by Analyzing their Vision Perception
Loris Giulivi, Giacomo Boracchi
Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in understanding and generating content across various modalities, such as images and text. However, their interpretability remains a challenge, hindering their adoption in critical applications. This research proposes a novel approach to enhance the interpretability of MLLMs by focusing on the image embedding component. We combine an open-world localization model with a MLLM, thus creating a new architecture able to simultaneously produce text and object localization outputs from the same vision embedding. The proposed architecture greatly promotes interpretability, enabling us to design a novel saliency map to explain any output token, to identify model hallucinations, and to assess model biases through semantic adversarial perturbations.
Read more5/29/2024
🗣️
0
Dense Connector for MLLMs
Huanjin Yao, Wenhao Wu, Taojiannan Yang, YuXin Song, Mengxi Zhang, Haocheng Feng, Yifan Sun, Zhiheng Li, Wanli Ouyang, Jingdong Wang
Do we fully leverage the potential of visual encoder in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs)? The recent outstanding performance of MLLMs in multimodal understanding has garnered broad attention from both academia and industry. In the current MLLM rat race, the focus seems to be predominantly on the linguistic side. We witness the rise of larger and higher-quality instruction datasets, as well as the involvement of larger-sized LLMs. Yet, scant attention has been directed towards the visual signals utilized by MLLMs, often assumed to be the final high-level features extracted by a frozen visual encoder. In this paper, we introduce the Dense Connector - a simple, effective, and plug-and-play vision-language connector that significantly enhances existing MLLMs by leveraging multi-layer visual features, with minimal additional computational overhead. Furthermore, our model, trained solely on images, showcases remarkable zero-shot capabilities in video understanding as well. Experimental results across various vision encoders, image resolutions, training dataset scales, varying sizes of LLMs (2.7B->70B), and diverse architectures of MLLMs (e.g., LLaVA and Mini-Gemini) validate the versatility and scalability of our approach, achieving state-of-the-art performance on across 19 image and video benchmarks. We hope that this work will provide valuable experience and serve as a basic module for future MLLM development.
Read more5/24/2024